Talk:191: Lojban - Revision history

172.68.73.32 at 22:32, 14 May 2023

2023-05-14T22:32:40Z

Tbodt at 03:22, 6 February 2022

2022-02-06T03:22:41Z

Beanie at 12:03, 18 March 2021

2021-03-18T12:03:48Z

162.158.79.245: qaaqaqaqaq

2019-08-24T01:42:04Z

qaaqaqaqaq

Dgbrt: Please sign your comments.

2018-10-30T19:20:44Z

Please sign your comments.

172.68.174.82 at 23:38, 29 October 2018

2018-10-29T23:38:42Z

162.158.83.210 at 18:56, 12 October 2016

2016-10-12T18:56:53Z

173.245.54.40 at 01:25, 17 March 2016

2016-03-17T01:25:52Z

Dgbrt at 20:58, 5 November 2013

2013-11-05T20:58:21Z

Dgbrt at 20:56, 5 November 2013

2013-11-05T20:56:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, 14 May 2023
Line 22:		Line 22:

	They should call a problem like this the Lojban Effect [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.245\|162.158.79.245]] 01:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)		They should call a problem like this the Lojban Effect [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.245\|162.158.79.245]] 01:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	somehow it seems like {xekce} should be mentioned somewhere on this page [[Special:Contributions/172.68.73.32\|172.68.73.32]] 22:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ::This also could mean changing the transcript again, but then it has to be explained.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 20:58, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 ::It also was not correct, as .xekrimapku. is not a legal cmene. Maybe "xekrimapuk."? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.40|173.245.54.40]] 01:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 I would really like to know which of the two alternative interpretations given in the entry text is actually supported by the Lojban translation, though... being a proclaimed unambiguous language and all [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.210|162.158.83.210]] 18:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:03, 18 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRsPheErBj8 --[[Special:Contributions/79.67.240.72\|79.67.240.72]] 16:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC)		https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRsPheErBj8 --[[Special:Contributions/79.67.240.72\|79.67.240.72]] 16:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
		+	:Go away. [[User:Beanie\|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie\|talk]]) 12:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

	- What can we learn from this? - I've learned that unless you share your knowledge with others, the rest of your life will be very lonely and no one will understand you. - [[User:E-inspired\|E-inspired]] ([[User talk:E-inspired\|talk]]) 16:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC)		- What can we learn from this? - I've learned that unless you share your knowledge with others, the rest of your life will be very lonely and no one will understand you. - [[User:E-inspired\|E-inspired]] ([[User talk:E-inspired\|talk]]) 16:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:42, 24 August 2019
Line 18:		Line 18:

	162.158.83.210, Lojban is syntactically unambiguous. It is not, and does not claim to be, semantically unambiguous. I don't think that's even possible. Even if Lojban was semantically unambiguous, there would still be multiple ways to translate it into English, another semantically ambiguous language. {{unsigned ip\|172.68.174.82}}		162.158.83.210, Lojban is syntactically unambiguous. It is not, and does not claim to be, semantically unambiguous. I don't think that's even possible. Even if Lojban was semantically unambiguous, there would still be multiple ways to translate it into English, another semantically ambiguous language. {{unsigned ip\|172.68.174.82}}
		+
		+	They should call a problem like this the Lojban Effect [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.245\|162.158.79.245]] 01:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, 30 October 2018
Line 17:		Line 17:
	I would really like to know which of the two alternative interpretations given in the entry text is actually supported by the Lojban translation, though... being a proclaimed unambiguous language and all [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.210\|162.158.83.210]] 18:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)		I would really like to know which of the two alternative interpretations given in the entry text is actually supported by the Lojban translation, though... being a proclaimed unambiguous language and all [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.210\|162.158.83.210]] 18:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

−	162.158.83.210, Lojban is syntactically unambiguous. It is not, and does not claim to be, semantically unambiguous. I don't think that's even possible. Even if Lojban was semantically unambiguous, there would still be multiple ways to translate it into English, another semantically ambiguous language.	+	162.158.83.210, Lojban is syntactically unambiguous. It is not, and does not claim to be, semantically unambiguous. I don't think that's even possible. Even if Lojban was semantically unambiguous, there would still be multiple ways to translate it into English, another semantically ambiguous language. {{unsigned ip\|172.68.174.82}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 29 October 2018
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I would really like to know which of the two alternative interpretations given in the entry text is actually supported by the Lojban translation, though... being a proclaimed unambiguous language and all [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.210\|162.158.83.210]] 18:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)		I would really like to know which of the two alternative interpretations given in the entry text is actually supported by the Lojban translation, though... being a proclaimed unambiguous language and all [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.210\|162.158.83.210]] 18:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	162.158.83.210, Lojban is syntactically unambiguous. It is not, and does not claim to be, semantically unambiguous. I don't think that's even possible. Even if Lojban was semantically unambiguous, there would still be multiple ways to translate it into English, another semantically ambiguous language.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:56, 12 October 2016
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::This also could mean changing the transcript again, but then it has to be explained.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:58, 5 November 2013 (UTC)		::This also could mean changing the transcript again, but then it has to be explained.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:58, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
	::It also was not correct, as .xekrimapku. is not a legal cmene. Maybe "xekrimapuk."? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.40\|173.245.54.40]] 01:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)		::It also was not correct, as .xekrimapku. is not a legal cmene. Maybe "xekrimapuk."? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.40\|173.245.54.40]] 01:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	I would really like to know which of the two alternative interpretations given in the entry text is actually supported by the Lojban translation, though... being a proclaimed unambiguous language and all [[Special:Contributions/162.158.83.210\|162.158.83.210]] 18:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:25, 17 March 2016
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:I would be happy if you could do an explain on this. I just did check the transcript, and I am not native Lojban ;). So, if there are any important differences, it has to be explained here. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:56, 5 November 2013 (UTC)		:I would be happy if you could do an explain on this. I just did check the transcript, and I am not native Lojban ;). So, if there are any important differences, it has to be explained here. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:56, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
	::This also could mean changing the transcript again, but then it has to be explained.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:58, 5 November 2013 (UTC)		::This also could mean changing the transcript again, but then it has to be explained.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:58, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
		+	::It also was not correct, as .xekrimapku. is not a legal cmene. Maybe "xekrimapuk."? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.40\|173.245.54.40]] 01:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 5 November 2013
Line 12:		Line 12:
	- That's how a transcript would be written in a Lojban text; {.kiubal.}, for instance, is a Lojbanisation of "cueball", and {lu} and {li'u} are open/close quotation marks. It would have been right if this wiki was in Lojban, but since it's in English, it's debatable. I guess the current version is easier for the readership to read. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.225\|141.101.98.225]] 13:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)		- That's how a transcript would be written in a Lojban text; {.kiubal.}, for instance, is a Lojbanisation of "cueball", and {lu} and {li'u} are open/close quotation marks. It would have been right if this wiki was in Lojban, but since it's in English, it's debatable. I guess the current version is easier for the readership to read. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.225\|141.101.98.225]] 13:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
	:I would be happy if you could do an explain on this. I just did check the transcript, and I am not native Lojban ;). So, if there are any important differences, it has to be explained here. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:56, 5 November 2013 (UTC)		:I would be happy if you could do an explain on this. I just did check the transcript, and I am not native Lojban ;). So, if there are any important differences, it has to be explained here. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:56, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
		+	::This also could mean changing the transcript again, but then it has to be explained.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:58, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:56, 5 November 2013
Line 11:		Line 11:

	- That's how a transcript would be written in a Lojban text; {.kiubal.}, for instance, is a Lojbanisation of "cueball", and {lu} and {li'u} are open/close quotation marks. It would have been right if this wiki was in Lojban, but since it's in English, it's debatable. I guess the current version is easier for the readership to read. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.225\|141.101.98.225]] 13:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)		- That's how a transcript would be written in a Lojban text; {.kiubal.}, for instance, is a Lojbanisation of "cueball", and {lu} and {li'u} are open/close quotation marks. It would have been right if this wiki was in Lojban, but since it's in English, it's debatable. I guess the current version is easier for the readership to read. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.225\|141.101.98.225]] 13:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
		+	:I would be happy if you could do an explain on this. I just did check the transcript, and I am not native Lojban ;). So, if there are any important differences, it has to be explained here. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:56, 5 November 2013 (UTC)