Talk:1926: Bad Code - Revision history

FaviFake: /* someone should make this */

2025-07-31T07:30:22Z

‎someone should make this

162.158.74.69: /* someone should make this */ new section

2024-09-16T11:38:55Z

‎someone should make this: new section

172.70.55.112: ~~~~

2023-01-13T04:23:47Z

~~~~

162.158.106.4: Page may be using some disfunctional code to display the comic, which, when it fails, displays "Bad Code".

2021-07-21T04:52:31Z

Page may be using some disfunctional code to display the comic, which, when it fails, displays "Bad Code".

Donthaveusername at 18:14, 16 October 2020

2020-10-16T18:14:40Z

Donthaveusername at 18:14, 16 October 2020

2020-10-16T18:14:04Z

NiceGuy1 at 04:49, 12 December 2017

2017-12-12T04:49:01Z

Kshksh: CQ comment

2017-12-11T20:45:30Z

CQ comment

108.162.216.40 at 20:35, 11 December 2017

2017-12-11T20:35:20Z

141.101.76.16 at 14:13, 11 December 2017

2017-12-11T14:13:56Z

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 Haskell, incidentally, has powerful parser combinators, one of the crown jewels of the language, that make it easy to parse HTML, or for that matter, anything. So, Cueball is just likely bad at Haskell. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.55.112|172.70.55.112]] 04:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
-== someone should make this ==
+; someone should make this
 it would be funny
 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.69|162.158.74.69]] 11:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:38, 16 September 2024
Line 30:		Line 30:

	Haskell, incidentally, has powerful parser combinators, one of the crown jewels of the language, that make it easy to parse HTML, or for that matter, anything. So, Cueball is just likely bad at Haskell. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.55.112\|172.70.55.112]] 04:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)		Haskell, incidentally, has powerful parser combinators, one of the crown jewels of the language, that make it easy to parse HTML, or for that matter, anything. So, Cueball is just likely bad at Haskell. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.55.112\|172.70.55.112]] 04:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
		+
		+	== someone should make this ==
		+
		+	it would be funny
		+
		+	[[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.69\|162.158.74.69]] 11:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:23, 13 January 2023
Line 27:		Line 27:

	I just loaded this xkcd comic (7/20/2021, 21:45 Pacific Daylight Time), and the page took time loading, then just shows "Bad Code" UNDER the title, in a different font. Page may be using some disfunctional code to display the comic, which, when it fails, displays "Bad Code".		I just loaded this xkcd comic (7/20/2021, 21:45 Pacific Daylight Time), and the page took time loading, then just shows "Bad Code" UNDER the title, in a different font. Page may be using some disfunctional code to display the comic, which, when it fails, displays "Bad Code".
		+
		+
		+	Haskell, incidentally, has powerful parser combinators, one of the crown jewels of the language, that make it easy to parse HTML, or for that matter, anything. So, Cueball is just likely bad at Haskell. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.55.112\|172.70.55.112]] 04:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 I'm almost certain that "parsing html" is a reference to this: https://stackoverflow.com/a/1732454
 [[User:Waterlubber|Waterlubber]] ([[User talk:Waterlubber|talk]]) 20:16, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 Isn't it ponytail who tries to destroy the wall, since by Cueball's logic it doesn't matter if she does it?
 Without the title text, I'd believe the wall is actually (already) bearing some kind of dependency into Cueball's spreadsheet, hence the reaction from Ponytail. Rather than giving him ideas to destroy it. It still makes sense because he's the kind of person to do messy things like that. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.46|162.158.92.46]] 00:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 I'm almost certain that "parsing html" is a reference to this: https://stackoverflow.com/a/1732454
 [[User:Waterlubber|Waterlubber]] ([[User talk:Waterlubber|talk]]) 20:16, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
-:You can't parse [X]HTML with regex. Because HTML can't be parsed by regex. Regex is not a tool that can be used to correctly parse HTML. As I have answered in HTML-and-regex questions here so many times before, the use of regex will not allow you to consume HTML. Regular expressions are a tool that is insufficiently sophisticated to understand the constructs employed by HTML. HTML is not a regular language and hence cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Regex queries are not equipped to break down HTML into its meaningful parts. so many times but it is not getting to me. Even enhanced irregular regular expressions as used by Perl are not up to the task of parsing HTML. You will never make me crack. HTML is a language of sufficient complexity that it cannot be parsed by regular expressions. Even Jon Skeet cannot parse HTML using regular expressions. Every time you attempt to parse HTML with regular expressions, the unholy child weeps the blood of virgins, and Russian hackers pwn your webapp. Parsing HTML with regex summons tainted souls into the realm of the living. HTML and regex go together like love, marriage, and ritual infanticide. The <center> cannot hold it is too late. The force of regex and HTML together in the same conceptual space will destroy your mind like so much watery putty. If you parse HTML with regex you are giving in to Them and their blasphemous ways which doom us all to inhuman toil for the One whose Name cannot be expressed in the Basic Multilingual Plane, he comes. HTML-plus-regexp will liquify the nerves of the sentient whilst you observe, your psyche withering in the onslaught of horror. Rege̿̔̉x-based HTML parsers are the cancer that is killing StackOverflow it is too late it is too late we cannot be saved the trangession of a chi͡ld ensures regex will consume all living tissue (except for HTML which it cannot, as previously prophesied) dear lord help us how can anyone survive this scourge using regex to parse HTML has doomed humanity to an eternity of dread torture and security holes using regex as a tool to process HTML establishes a breach between this world and the dread realm of c͒ͪo͛ͫrrupt entities (like SGML entities, but more corrupt) a mere glimpse of the world of regex parsers for HTML will instantly transport a programmer's consciousness into a world of ceaseless screaming, he comes, the pestilent slithy regex-infection will devour your HTML parser, application and existence for all time like Visual Basic only worse he comes he comes do not fight he com̡e̶s, ̕h̵is un̨ho͞ly radiańcé destro҉ying all enli̍̈́̂̈́ghtenment, HTML tags lea͠ki̧n͘g fr̶ǫm ̡yo͟ur eye͢s̸ ̛l̕ik͏e liquid pain, the song of re̸gular expression parsing will extinguish the voices of mortal man from the sphere I can see it can you see ̲͚̖͔̙î̩́t̲͎̩̱͔́̋̀ it is beautiful the final snuffing of the lies of Man ALL IS LOŚ͖̩͇̗̪̏̈́T ALL IS LOST the pon̷y he comes he c̶̮omes he comes the ichor permeates all MY FACE MY FACE ᵒh god no NO NOO̼OO NΘ stop the an*̶͑̾̾̅ͫ͏̙̤g͇̫͛͆̾ͫ̑͆l͖͉̗̩̳̟̍ͫͥͨe̠̅s ͎a̧͈͖r̽̾̈́͒͑e not rè̑ͧ̌aͨl̘̝̙̃ͤ͂̾̆ ZA̡͊͠͝LGΌ ISͮ̂҉̯͈͕̹̘̱ TO͇̹̺ͅƝ̴ȳ̳ TH̘Ë͖́̉ ͠P̯͍̭O̚N̐Y̡ H̸̡̪̯ͨ͊̽̅̾̎Ȩ̬̩̾͛ͪ̈́̀́͘ ̶̧̨̱̹̭̯ͧ̾ͬC̷̙̲̝͖ͭ̏ͥͮ͟Oͮ͏̮̪̝͍M̲̖͊̒ͪͩͬ̚̚͜Ȇ̴̟̟͙̞ͩ͌͝S̨̥̫͎̭ͯ̿̔̀ͅ

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:49, 12 December 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:::I know that people get better over time, but I'm picking more on indirect clues here. Cueball comments that "it's nothing wierd ''THIS TIME''", which means he's written many wierd projects. This means that he likes programming, and possibly have written some non-wierd projects. He also says "nothing depends on it", which means that he has written something that ''could'' depend on it. And while we have no direct indication of how much time passed in between comics, all of the Code Quality seems to happen in one sitting, while this is obviousely different situation.[[User:Kshksh\|kshksh]] ([[User talk:Kshksh\|talk]]) 20:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)		:::I know that people get better over time, but I'm picking more on indirect clues here. Cueball comments that "it's nothing wierd ''THIS TIME''", which means he's written many wierd projects. This means that he likes programming, and possibly have written some non-wierd projects. He also says "nothing depends on it", which means that he has written something that ''could'' depend on it. And while we have no direct indication of how much time passed in between comics, all of the Code Quality seems to happen in one sitting, while this is obviousely different situation.[[User:Kshksh\|kshksh]] ([[User talk:Kshksh\|talk]]) 20:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::: I've usually understood that Cueball isn't so much a beginner (in other Code Quality strips), but that he never bothered learning GOOD programming (format, syntax, efficiency, etc). He slaps together code and tries to nudge it and twist it into working, ending up needing assistance to get it done. Brute force programming, no finesse... Instead of using a loop, copies a command sequence 10 times over. That kind of thing. Besides, if he's always just a beginner, why is he always programming? Seems to me he has a passion for it and as such he keeps trying, but never bothers trying to improve (and, honestly, I feel like it takes a large, robust program to inspire such colourful comments from Ponytail. A simple beginner Hello, World progam couldn't have much to say other than "Put a semicolon here" and "You should indent these lines", stuff like that). And part of why his code is usually bad is because he writes programs to do weird things, hence his describing this one as not so bad. Actually, in this respect I wonder if this is ALSO related to the "Cueball has the weirdest computer problems" series, essentially tying those two series together: Cueball gets weird problems because he writes bad code to do weird things which has unexpected results. [[User:NiceGuy1\|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1\|talk]]) 04:49, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

	The hammer-throwing may also be a call-back to xkcd 905, "Homeownership", where Cueball accidentally destroys his home by getting carried away drilling holes in the walls?		The hammer-throwing may also be a call-back to xkcd 905, "Homeownership", where Cueball accidentally destroys his home by getting carried away drilling holes in the walls?

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 "MAY be the same Cueball and Ponytail as the Code Quality series"???!?! As far as I'm concerned, this is the latest entry in the Code Quality series! Oh, and my interpretation of her "Wait, crap." was her saying she realized he's actually done that before, thrown hammers at that wall. I feel like the giving-him-bad-ideas explanation makes more sense, though. [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 17:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
-:I don't see this that way. Cueball from Code Quality series was a beginner, self-taught coder. This one seems much more mature with programming skills.
+:I don't see this that way. Cueball from Code Quality series was a beginner, self-taught coder. This one seems much more mature with programming skills.[[User:Kshksh|kshksh]] ([[User talk:Kshksh|talk]]) 20:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 :: That happens sometimes.  I.e. people get better over time.  But in this case I'd agree with Ponytail that Cueball is not showing "programming skills and is not showing maturity.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.40|108.162.216.40]] 20:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 The hammer-throwing may also be a call-back to xkcd 905, "Homeownership", where Cueball accidentally destroys his home by getting carried away drilling holes in the walls?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 11 December 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:I don't see this that way. Cueball from Code Quality series was a beginner, self-taught coder. This one seems much more mature with programming skills.		:I don't see this that way. Cueball from Code Quality series was a beginner, self-taught coder. This one seems much more mature with programming skills.
		+
		+	:: That happens sometimes. I.e. people get better over time. But in this case I'd agree with Ponytail that Cueball is not showing "programming skills and is not showing maturity.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.40\|108.162.216.40]] 20:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

	The hammer-throwing may also be a call-back to xkcd 905, "Homeownership", where Cueball accidentally destroys his home by getting carried away drilling holes in the walls?		The hammer-throwing may also be a call-back to xkcd 905, "Homeownership", where Cueball accidentally destroys his home by getting carried away drilling holes in the walls?