Talk:1929: Argument Timing - Revision history

162.158.155.26 at 13:11, 8 February 2018

2018-02-08T13:11:19Z

173.245.48.153 at 04:13, 21 December 2017

2017-12-21T04:13:34Z

WingedCat at 23:10, 20 December 2017

2017-12-20T23:10:17Z

172.68.54.4: Either fecal-proclamation or point-of-information, depending on your view of the importance of the overlooked, obvious for-instance.

2017-12-20T05:01:48Z

Either fecal-proclamation or point-of-information, depending on your view of the importance of the overlooked, obvious for-instance.

172.68.54.76 at 04:14, 19 December 2017

2017-12-19T04:14:06Z

172.69.54.147 at 17:09, 18 December 2017

2017-12-18T17:09:50Z

141.101.76.16 at 08:44, 18 December 2017

2017-12-18T08:44:46Z

172.68.65.210 at 10:03, 17 December 2017

2017-12-17T10:03:29Z

162.158.126.64 at 00:30, 17 December 2017

2017-12-17T00:30:50Z

141.101.104.161: Probability has several measures

2017-12-15T22:12:38Z

Probability has several measures

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Hopefully someone more talented in maths can calculate if the integrals are identical 🤔 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.21|162.158.93.21]] 16:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
-The graph doesn't say if the probability is per unit time (eg per day), per friendship or per failed friendship. Only in the last case would the integral be 1. For the others you might expect the total probability to be higher now than it was, because it's so much easier.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.161|141.101.104.161]] 22:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
+: The graph doesn't say if the probability is per unit time (eg per day), per friendship or per failed friendship. Only in the last case would the integral be 1. For the others you might expect the total probability to be higher now than it was, because it's so much easier.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.161|141.101.104.161]] 22:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 Gonna be honest, expected a Net Neutrality comic. [[User:DPS2004|DPS2004&#39;); DROP TABLE users;--]] ([[User talk:DPS2004|talk]]) 17:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 And this is why I don't use Facebook. ----
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 A non-zero value after going to sleep doesn't necessarily imply sleep-typing. It could be that he's sending messages just before going to sleep, which then aren't being received by the other party until later.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.76.16|141.101.76.16]] 08:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
-To react on the "sleep typing" part, and the "receive during the night"/"read while the other is asleep" argument. I think the comic rather highlights the fact a lot of people keep typing on their phones while in bed, or start the day by typing a bit before getting up, while in both cases being "perfectly" awake. This might even be a moment of very strong activity as there is nothing else to do - unlike during lunch breaks or work. Additionally, since more and more people start typing during their pauses, they diminish the chances of having an argument in direct conversation. likewise they don't type so much strong stuff while having others around, in order to remain sort of social. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.54.147|172.69.54.147]] 17:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
+:To react on the "sleep typing" part, and the "receive during the night"/"read while the other is asleep" argument. I think the comic rather highlights the fact a lot of people keep typing on their phones while in bed, or start the day by typing a bit before getting up, while in both cases being "perfectly" awake. This might even be a moment of very strong activity as there is nothing else to do - unlike during lunch breaks or work. Additionally, since more and more people start typing during their pauses, they diminish the chances of having an argument in direct conversation. likewise they don't type so much strong stuff while having others around, in order to remain sort of social. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.54.147|172.69.54.147]] 17:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 I like that the timeline ends after he goes to bed, as it should be (and not at midnight, like so many stupid calendar apps do). --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.76|172.68.54.76]] 04:14, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 Outside of the waking-up and falling-asleep periods, does this mean that arguments have gone down since the rise of social media, or are the red and black lines adjusted to the total number of arguments per day? [[User:WingedCat|WingedCat]] ([[User talk:WingedCat|talk]]) 23:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 Considering that Randall seems to have the most offline arguments at dinner, should we recommend a marriage counselor?[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.153|173.245.48.153]] 04:13, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:13, 21 December 2017
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Outside of the waking-up and falling-asleep periods, does this mean that arguments have gone down since the rise of social media, or are the red and black lines adjusted to the total number of arguments per day? [[User:WingedCat\|WingedCat]] ([[User talk:WingedCat\|talk]]) 23:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)		Outside of the waking-up and falling-asleep periods, does this mean that arguments have gone down since the rise of social media, or are the red and black lines adjusted to the total number of arguments per day? [[User:WingedCat\|WingedCat]] ([[User talk:WingedCat\|talk]]) 23:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	Considering that Randall seems to have the most offline arguments at dinner, should we recommend a marriage counselor?[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.153\|173.245.48.153]] 04:13, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, 20 December 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:

	::It's not just 'sleep typing' or delays in receiving messages (note, that due to snail mail, etc., this should have always been a non-zero rate-of-occurrence) modern social media allows us to get into friendship ending arguments even when neither party is conscious simultaneously much more easily than was ever possible before, as seen by the many, many arguments that occur through short utterances, issued at a rate between that of face-to-face verbal communication and postal missive. For example, Party A can discover an old remark that Party 1 made, quite sometime previously, on one of their 'walls,' and respond to it, prompting a response from Part 1...in this manner, the two Parties could have quite the heated argument, with a facility and fevor difficult to match with olde fashion pen-and-ink-and-Pony-Express methods, and easily destroy a friendship with far greater efficiency than our less advantaged forebears. -[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.4\|172.68.54.4]] 05:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)		::It's not just 'sleep typing' or delays in receiving messages (note, that due to snail mail, etc., this should have always been a non-zero rate-of-occurrence) modern social media allows us to get into friendship ending arguments even when neither party is conscious simultaneously much more easily than was ever possible before, as seen by the many, many arguments that occur through short utterances, issued at a rate between that of face-to-face verbal communication and postal missive. For example, Party A can discover an old remark that Party 1 made, quite sometime previously, on one of their 'walls,' and respond to it, prompting a response from Part 1...in this manner, the two Parties could have quite the heated argument, with a facility and fevor difficult to match with olde fashion pen-and-ink-and-Pony-Express methods, and easily destroy a friendship with far greater efficiency than our less advantaged forebears. -[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.4\|172.68.54.4]] 05:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	Outside of the waking-up and falling-asleep periods, does this mean that arguments have gone down since the rise of social media, or are the red and black lines adjusted to the total number of arguments per day? [[User:WingedCat\|WingedCat]] ([[User talk:WingedCat\|talk]]) 23:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:01, 20 December 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:

	I like that the timeline ends after he goes to bed, as it should be (and not at midnight, like so many stupid calendar apps do). --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.76\|172.68.54.76]] 04:14, 19 December 2017 (UTC)		I like that the timeline ends after he goes to bed, as it should be (and not at midnight, like so many stupid calendar apps do). --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.76\|172.68.54.76]] 04:14, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	::It's not just 'sleep typing' or delays in receiving messages (note, that due to snail mail, etc., this should have always been a non-zero rate-of-occurrence) modern social media allows us to get into friendship ending arguments even when neither party is conscious simultaneously much more easily than was ever possible before, as seen by the many, many arguments that occur through short utterances, issued at a rate between that of face-to-face verbal communication and postal missive. For example, Party A can discover an old remark that Party 1 made, quite sometime previously, on one of their 'walls,' and respond to it, prompting a response from Part 1...in this manner, the two Parties could have quite the heated argument, with a facility and fevor difficult to match with olde fashion pen-and-ink-and-Pony-Express methods, and easily destroy a friendship with far greater efficiency than our less advantaged forebears. -[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.4\|172.68.54.4]] 05:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:14, 19 December 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:

	To react on the "sleep typing" part, and the "receive during the night"/"read while the other is asleep" argument. I think the comic rather highlights the fact a lot of people keep typing on their phones while in bed, or start the day by typing a bit before getting up, while in both cases being "perfectly" awake. This might even be a moment of very strong activity as there is nothing else to do - unlike during lunch breaks or work. Additionally, since more and more people start typing during their pauses, they diminish the chances of having an argument in direct conversation. likewise they don't type so much strong stuff while having others around, in order to remain sort of social. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.54.147\|172.69.54.147]] 17:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)		To react on the "sleep typing" part, and the "receive during the night"/"read while the other is asleep" argument. I think the comic rather highlights the fact a lot of people keep typing on their phones while in bed, or start the day by typing a bit before getting up, while in both cases being "perfectly" awake. This might even be a moment of very strong activity as there is nothing else to do - unlike during lunch breaks or work. Additionally, since more and more people start typing during their pauses, they diminish the chances of having an argument in direct conversation. likewise they don't type so much strong stuff while having others around, in order to remain sort of social. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.54.147\|172.69.54.147]] 17:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	I like that the timeline ends after he goes to bed, as it should be (and not at midnight, like so many stupid calendar apps do). --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.76\|172.68.54.76]] 04:14, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 18 December 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:

	A non-zero value after going to sleep doesn't necessarily imply sleep-typing. It could be that he's sending messages just before going to sleep, which then aren't being received by the other party until later.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.76.16\|141.101.76.16]] 08:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)		A non-zero value after going to sleep doesn't necessarily imply sleep-typing. It could be that he's sending messages just before going to sleep, which then aren't being received by the other party until later.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.76.16\|141.101.76.16]] 08:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	To react on the "sleep typing" part, and the "receive during the night"/"read while the other is asleep" argument. I think the comic rather highlights the fact a lot of people keep typing on their phones while in bed, or start the day by typing a bit before getting up, while in both cases being "perfectly" awake. This might even be a moment of very strong activity as there is nothing else to do - unlike during lunch breaks or work. Additionally, since more and more people start typing during their pauses, they diminish the chances of having an argument in direct conversation. likewise they don't type so much strong stuff while having others around, in order to remain sort of social. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.54.147\|172.69.54.147]] 17:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:44, 18 December 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:

	And this is why I don't use Facebook. ----		And this is why I don't use Facebook. ----
		+
		+	A non-zero value after going to sleep doesn't necessarily imply sleep-typing. It could be that he's sending messages just before going to sleep, which then aren't being received by the other party until later.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.76.16\|141.101.76.16]] 08:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:03, 17 December 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I would expect the integral under the red line to be much higher - Facebook and like have cheapened the meaning of friendship to the point I don't even KNOW a lot of my so called friends[[Special:Contributions/162.158.126.64\|162.158.126.64]] 00:30, 17 December 2017 (UTC)		I would expect the integral under the red line to be much higher - Facebook and like have cheapened the meaning of friendship to the point I don't even KNOW a lot of my so called friends[[Special:Contributions/162.158.126.64\|162.158.126.64]] 00:30, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	And this is why I don't use Facebook. ----

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:30, 17 December 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Gonna be honest, expected a Net Neutrality comic. [[User:DPS2004\|DPS2004'); DROP TABLE users;--]] ([[User talk:DPS2004\|talk]]) 17:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)		Gonna be honest, expected a Net Neutrality comic. [[User:DPS2004\|DPS2004'); DROP TABLE users;--]] ([[User talk:DPS2004\|talk]]) 17:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	I would expect the integral under the red line to be much higher - Facebook and like have cheapened the meaning of friendship to the point I don't even KNOW a lot of my so called friends[[Special:Contributions/162.158.126.64\|162.158.126.64]] 00:30, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 15 December 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Hopefully someone more talented in maths can calculate if the integrals are identical 🤔 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.21\|162.158.93.21]] 16:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)		Hopefully someone more talented in maths can calculate if the integrals are identical 🤔 [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.21\|162.158.93.21]] 16:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	The graph doesn't say if the probability is per unit time (eg per day), per friendship or per failed friendship. Only in the last case would the integral be 1. For the others you might expect the total probability to be higher now than it was, because it's so much easier.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.161\|141.101.104.161]] 22:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

	Gonna be honest, expected a Net Neutrality comic. [[User:DPS2004\|DPS2004'); DROP TABLE users;--]] ([[User talk:DPS2004\|talk]]) 17:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)		Gonna be honest, expected a Net Neutrality comic. [[User:DPS2004\|DPS2004'); DROP TABLE users;--]] ([[User talk:DPS2004\|talk]]) 17:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)