Talk:2041: Frontiers - Revision history

EebstertheGreat: /* "Around 95% of the oceans haven't been explored and mapped by humans." */ new section

2024-03-07T06:15:25Z

‎"Around 95% of the oceans haven't been explored and mapped by humans.": new section

Schoenarts at 05:13, 12 October 2021

2021-10-12T05:13:14Z

Dr. Beret: Removed spam comment

2021-08-23T02:00:06Z

Removed spam comment

Tom0099: Replaced content with "How to get free robux 2021 no human verification https://free-robuxnoverification.com just one a single click here and get more about basic info."

2021-08-05T08:42:24Z

Replaced content with "How to get free robux 2021 no human verification https://free-robuxnoverification.com just one a single click here and get more about basic info."

Brenda at 09:28, 25 January 2020

2020-01-25T09:28:59Z

Brenda at 09:28, 25 January 2020

2020-01-25T09:28:30Z

162.158.78.10 at 00:36, 13 November 2018

2018-11-13T00:36:13Z

162.158.167.174 at 04:39, 5 September 2018

2018-09-05T04:39:17Z

172.69.70.143 at 18:02, 4 September 2018

2018-09-04T18:02:33Z

Dgbrt: Please sign your comments.

2018-09-04T17:59:09Z

Please sign your comments.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:15, 7 March 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What about Missouri though?		What about Missouri though?
		+
		+	== "Around 95% of the oceans haven't been explored and mapped by humans." ==
		+
		+	Is there a source for this fact? It isn't even clear what the sentence is saying. Is this a fraction of the surface of the ocean? The ocean floor? The water column? What counts as "exploring" a part? Do you just have to see it from a distance, or go there yourself, and if so, how close do you have to get? Will a ship that's twice as wide explore twice as much ocean per mile? That doesn't seem reasonable. How will we know when we are done exploring the ocean?
		+
		+	Also, if that does refer to some actual figure, it's probably out of date by now anyway. [[User:EebstertheGreat\|EebstertheGreat]] ([[User talk:EebstertheGreat\|talk]]) 06:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:13, 12 October 2021
Line 1:	Line 1:
−	+	What about Missouri though?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 23 August 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~How to get free robux 2021 no human verification https://free-robuxnoverification.com just one a single click here and get more about basic info.~~	+

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:42, 5 August 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->~~	+	How to get free robux 2021 no human verification https://free-robuxnoverification.com just one a single click here and get more about basic info.
−	~~Most likely though of course not guaranteed reference for the title text is the recent stories out (about 2 days ago) saying that William Shatner regrets directing Star Trek V: The Final Frontier.~~
−	~~Quick example of one story here [~~https://~~www.cinemablend.com/news/2456761/william-shatner-regrets-directing-star-trek-v]~~
−	~~--[[User:Wjbodin3\|WJBodin3]] ([[User talk:Wjbodin3\|talk]]) 21:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)~~
−	~~:I would find the timing very suspicious at the very least. I think it's highly likely the news inspired this comic, especially in light of Star Trek being outright named~~ - ~~and specifically that instalment. [[User:NiceGuy1\|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1\|talk]]) 13:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)~~
−
−	It is interesting that all the current frontiers seem somewhat equidistant from the "center" of the squarish figure, as if we have achieved the same level of knowledge/exploration in each category... [[User:Daiemos\|Daiemos]] ([[User talk:Daiemos\|talk]]) 15:18, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
−	~~:Each is on its own (unlabeled) axis, scaled to imply parity among the topics. See [https://www.explainxkcd~~.com~~/wiki/index.php/2023:_Y-Axis] [[Special:Contributions/172.68.58.89\|172.68.58.89]] 16:53, 4 September 2018 (UTC)~~
−
−	~~;...finished exploring it by now (Title text)~~
−	~~If Randall means space and not the movie alone this would contradict the comic itself where space is still~~ a ~~big challenge. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 16:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)~~
−
−	:I was thinking that myself, he could be saying that star trek has been fully explored, which the could be a slight reference to the relatively hot topic about star trek discovery. Some trekkies lamenting the fact that they didn't want another prequel... If on the other hand it is a reference to space itself, randall could have left the contradiction in on purpose, as part of the joke. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.143\|172.69.70.143]] 18:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC) Sam
−
−	~~: Actually the title text states that the movie is only a small part of the space frontier~~ and ~~also probably fully explored by now. So the diagram is~~ about ~~Space, not the movie.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.167.174\|162.158.167~~.~~174]] 04:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)~~
−	~~I, embarrassingly, thought it referred to "Looking for Alaska." I am not worthy of XKCDhood~~
−	~~[[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.10\|162.158.78.10]] 00:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)~~
−
−	~~I always assumed that the final frontier to which the title was referring was "Death". [[User:Brenda\|Brenda]] ([[User talk:Brenda\|talk]]) 09:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 25 January 2020
Line 17:		Line 17:
	[[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.10\|162.158.78.10]] 00:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.10\|162.158.78.10]] 00:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

−	: I always assumed that the final frontier to which the title was referring was "Death". [[User:Brenda\|Brenda]] ([[User talk:Brenda\|talk]]) 09:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)	+	I always assumed that the final frontier to which the title was referring was "Death". [[User:Brenda\|Brenda]] ([[User talk:Brenda\|talk]]) 09:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 25 January 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:
	I, embarrassingly, thought it referred to "Looking for Alaska." I am not worthy of XKCDhood		I, embarrassingly, thought it referred to "Looking for Alaska." I am not worthy of XKCDhood
	[[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.10\|162.158.78.10]] 00:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.10\|162.158.78.10]] 00:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
		+
		+	: I always assumed that the final frontier to which the title was referring was "Death". [[User:Brenda\|Brenda]] ([[User talk:Brenda\|talk]]) 09:28, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:36, 13 November 2018
Line 14:		Line 14:

	: Actually the title text states that the movie is only a small part of the space frontier and also probably fully explored by now. So the diagram is about Space, not the movie.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.167.174\|162.158.167.174]] 04:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)		: Actually the title text states that the movie is only a small part of the space frontier and also probably fully explored by now. So the diagram is about Space, not the movie.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.167.174\|162.158.167.174]] 04:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
		+	I, embarrassingly, thought it referred to "Looking for Alaska." I am not worthy of XKCDhood
		+	[[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.10\|162.158.78.10]] 00:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:39, 5 September 2018
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:I was thinking that myself, he could be saying that star trek has been fully explored, which the could be a slight reference to the relatively hot topic about star trek discovery. Some trekkies lamenting the fact that they didn't want another prequel... If on the other hand it is a reference to space itself, randall could have left the contradiction in on purpose, as part of the joke. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.143\|172.69.70.143]] 18:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC) Sam		:I was thinking that myself, he could be saying that star trek has been fully explored, which the could be a slight reference to the relatively hot topic about star trek discovery. Some trekkies lamenting the fact that they didn't want another prequel... If on the other hand it is a reference to space itself, randall could have left the contradiction in on purpose, as part of the joke. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.143\|172.69.70.143]] 18:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC) Sam
		+
		+	: Actually the title text states that the movie is only a small part of the space frontier and also probably fully explored by now. So the diagram is about Space, not the movie.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.167.174\|162.158.167.174]] 04:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:02, 4 September 2018
Line 11:		Line 11:
	If Randall means space and not the movie alone this would contradict the comic itself where space is still a big challenge. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 16:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)		If Randall means space and not the movie alone this would contradict the comic itself where space is still a big challenge. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 16:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

−	:I was thinking that myself, he could be saying that star trek has been fully explored, which the could be a slight reference to the relatively hot topic about star trek discovery. Some trekkies lamenting the fact that they didn't want another prequel. If on the other hand it is a reference to space itself, randall could have left the contradiction in on purpose, as part of the joke. ~~{{unsigned ip~~\|172.69.71.~~6}}~~	+	:I was thinking that myself, he could be saying that star trek has been fully explored, which the could be a slight reference to the relatively hot topic about star trek discovery. Some trekkies lamenting the fact that they didn't want another prequel... If on the other hand it is a reference to space itself, randall could have left the contradiction in on purpose, as part of the joke. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.143\|172.69.70.143]] 18:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC) Sam

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:59, 4 September 2018
Line 11:		Line 11:
	If Randall means space and not the movie alone this would contradict the comic itself where space is still a big challenge. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 16:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)		If Randall means space and not the movie alone this would contradict the comic itself where space is still a big challenge. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 16:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

−	:I was thinking that myself, he could be saying that star trek has been fully explored, which the could be a slight reference to the relatively hot topic about star trek discovery. Some trekkies lamenting the fact that they didn't want another prequel.	+	:I was thinking that myself, he could be saying that star trek has been fully explored, which the could be a slight reference to the relatively hot topic about star trek discovery. Some trekkies lamenting the fact that they didn't want another prequel. If on the other hand it is a reference to space itself, randall could have left the contradiction in on purpose, as part of the joke. {{unsigned ip\|172.69.71.6}}
−	If on the other hand it is a reference to space itself, randall could have left the contradiction in on purpose, as part of the joke.