Talk:2099: Missal of Silos - Revision history

172.71.241.50 at 16:05, 5 April 2025

2025-04-05T16:05:43Z

172.71.160.3 at 13:18, 5 April 2025

2025-04-05T13:18:53Z

108.162.245.220: fucking niggers

2019-02-02T02:20:32Z

fucking niggers

162.158.79.47: Replaced content with "Soon the world will go boom, like this wiki."

2019-02-02T02:16:02Z

Replaced content with "Soon the world will go boom, like this wiki."

NiceGuy1 at 04:54, 26 January 2019

2019-01-26T04:54:20Z

Lupo at 08:50, 21 January 2019

2019-01-21T08:50:58Z

Lupo at 08:33, 21 January 2019

2019-01-21T08:33:10Z

These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For: New ideas, slight reordering of comments to improve grandfathering.

2019-01-20T07:55:04Z

New ideas, slight reordering of comments to improve grandfathering.

162.158.62.51 at 18:15, 18 January 2019

2019-01-18T18:15:34Z

162.158.63.94 at 18:13, 18 January 2019

2019-01-18T18:13:44Z

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 ::My understanding is that most military sites are only capable of withstanding near misses from nuclear weapons.  This was adequate with early ICBMs because of accuracy problems, modern missiles however are supposed to be accurate enough to destroy hardened facilities.  [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.22|162.158.255.22]] 01:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
-Nuking cities will also REALLY tick off the UN,{{Citation needed}} which is a plus.
+Nuking cities will also REALLY tick off the UN,{{Citation needed}} which is a plus. {{unsigned ip|162.158.63.94|18:13-15, 18 January 2019}}
 "This is how the world ends, not with a bang, but a spellcheck." (Followed by a lot of bangs). [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|talk]]) 07:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 Wouldn't it make more sense to create a seperate page to collect all the "xkcd-Wikipedia effect" cases? I'm kinda surprised there isn't one already. Model Rail isn't even the only time that happened. One other example being https://xkcd.com/1485/. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.58.177|162.158.58.177]] 11:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
-There is also "the Wiki page for 'physics major redirects to engineer" in https://xkcd.com/1052/ -- Human Physics Padawan
+There is also "the Wiki page for 'physics major redirects to engineer" in https://xkcd.com/1052/ -- Human Physics Padawan {{unsigned ip|172.71.160.3|13:18, 5 April 2025}}
 ;Trivia
@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 There have been several comics referencing nuclear weapons in one way of another. Have added link to [[1655: Doomsday Clock]] in the description because there is already a collection of comics about this there. But do we need a category, so that kind of explanation could go there? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:15, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
-Why has it been cremated by a bob?
+Why has it been cremated by a bob? {{unsigned ip|162.158.63.196|18:10, 18 January 2019}}
 Damn it! I see comments raving about the Citation Needed, and there's none! Did some idiot remove it AGAIN? I'm getting sick and tired of the people who have grown tired of the gag. Just because YOU'VE become jaded and don't find it funny anymore doesn't mean there aren't still people who enjoy them! Case in point, just read the comments here. Be considerate of others and embrace the fact that we're all different. If you don't like the gag, move on to the next comic. [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 04:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:18, 5 April 2025
Line 19:		Line 19:

	Wouldn't it make more sense to create a seperate page to collect all the "xkcd-Wikipedia effect" cases? I'm kinda surprised there isn't one already. Model Rail isn't even the only time that happened. One other example being https://xkcd.com/1485/. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.58.177\|162.158.58.177]] 11:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)		Wouldn't it make more sense to create a seperate page to collect all the "xkcd-Wikipedia effect" cases? I'm kinda surprised there isn't one already. Model Rail isn't even the only time that happened. One other example being https://xkcd.com/1485/. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.58.177\|162.158.58.177]] 11:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	There is also "the Wiki page for 'physics major redirects to engineer" in https://xkcd.com/1052/ -- Human Physics Padawan

	;Trivia		;Trivia

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:20, 2 February 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~Soon~~ the world ~~will~~ go ~~boom~~, like ~~this wiki~~.	+	<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->
		+
		+	We need a citation to prove that residents of Cheyenne, Wyoming would rather not be targeted with nuclear weapons?
		+	[[Special:Contributions/172.68.58.59\|172.68.58.59]] 19:06, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
		+	:As no residents have already requested otherwise, let's go ahead and nuke them now. [[User:SDSpivey\|SDSpivey]] ([[User talk:SDSpivey\|talk]]) 19:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Seriously, though, a sufficiently patriotic American living in Cheyenne, WY may potentially prefer that the relatively unimportant city of his or her residence be nuked instead of the more militarily important{{Citation needed}} Cheyenne Mountain Complex. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.220\|162.158.78.220]] 20:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
		+	::Is the citation needed for the military importance or for the crazy patriotic guy? [[User:Linker\|Linker]] ([[User talk:Linker\|talk]]) 20:40, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
		+	::I'm wondering, why would anyone want to target a site that is expressly built to withstand a nuklear strike? That's like fighting a barbarian princess and try to hit her on the bikini armor instead of the midriff [[User:Ruffy314\|Ruffy314]] ([[User talk:Ruffy314\|talk]]) 00:12, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
		+	:::Enough nuclear weapons will eventually crack it, or at least that's the idea. Also, military command bases are far more important targets than cities: All nuking cities does is kill millions of people and disrupt your enemy's economy and morale, while destroying command bunkers actually reduces your enemy's ability to fight you.
		+
		+	::My understanding is that most military sites are only capable of withstanding near misses from nuclear weapons. This was adequate with early ICBMs because of accuracy problems, modern missiles however are supposed to be accurate enough to destroy hardened facilities. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.22\|162.158.255.22]] 01:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	Nuking cities will also REALLY tick off the UN,{{Citation needed}} which is a plus.
		+
		+	"This is how the world ends, not with a bang, but a spellcheck." (Followed by a lot of bangs). [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 07:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	I did not laugh at the comic today. However, I startled people around me laughing at the placement of this [citation needed] in the description. Kudo's to whomever placed it. [[User:DanB\|DanB]] ([[User talk:DanB\|talk]]) 21:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	Wouldn't it make more sense to create a seperate page to collect all the "xkcd-Wikipedia effect" cases? I'm kinda surprised there isn't one already. Model Rail isn't even the only time that happened. One other example being https://xkcd.com/1485/. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.58.177\|162.158.58.177]] 11:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	;Trivia
		+	Does the date of the underlying Wiki revision lend a clue as to the lead time Randall takes to create non-topical strips? [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 07:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
		+	:Checking the revision history, the revision mentioned in trivia (currently) did not influence the displayed part when viewed on a mobile, since it did only remove a picture (which I think usually is below the text on mobile). Actually the last change to the text displayed happened on 30th June 2014. So all we know is that the comic was created during the past 5 years. --[[User:Lupo\|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo\|talk]]) 08:33, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
		+	::Checking again, I notice, that the text given in the comic does not reflect any revision, since it misses the whole "The quarto missal has 157 original folios [...]" part. Therefore the trivia stated is just wrong. The article never looked like this. --[[User:Lupo\|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo\|talk]]) 08:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	;Similar comics
		+	The format of this comic is highly similar to the recent comic [[2042: Rolle's Theorem]], with a title and ''From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia'' header, and the first few paragraphs in the article.
		+	The fact that the reference of this comic to fuzzy string matching matches [[1031: s/keyboard/leopard/]]'s reference to regex (comic 1031 also has a Wikipedia page format)
		+	Can we have kind of a 'Meme format' explanation and Randall's fascination with this format? {{unsigned ip\|172.69.186.22}}
		+
		+
		+	There have been several comics referencing nuclear weapons in one way of another. Have added link to [[1655: Doomsday Clock]] in the description because there is already a collection of comics about this there. But do we need a category, so that kind of explanation could go there? --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 14:15, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	Why has it been cremated by a bob?
		+
		+	Damn it! I see comments raving about the Citation Needed, and there's none! Did some idiot remove it AGAIN? I'm getting sick and tired of the people who have grown tired of the gag. Just because YOU'VE become jaded and don't find it funny anymore doesn't mean there aren't still people who enjoy them! Case in point, just read the comments here. Be considerate of others and embrace the fact that we're all different. If you don't like the gag, move on to the next comic. [[User:NiceGuy1\|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1\|talk]]) 04:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:16, 2 February 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at~~ the ~~bottom.-->~~	+	Soon the world will go boom, like this wiki.
−
−	~~We need a citation to prove that residents of Cheyenne, Wyoming would rather not be targeted with nuclear weapons?~~
−	~~[[Special:Contributions/172.68.58.59\|172.68.58.59]] 19:06, 16 January 2019 (UTC)~~
−	~~:As no residents have already requested otherwise, let's~~ go ~~ahead and nuke them now. [[User:SDSpivey\|SDSpivey]] ([[User talk:SDSpivey\|talk]]) 19:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)~~
−
−	:Seriously, though, a sufficiently patriotic American living in Cheyenne, WY may potentially prefer that the relatively unimportant city of his or her residence be nuked instead of the more militarily important{{Citation needed}} Cheyenne Mountain Complex. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.220\|162.158.78.220]] 20:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
−	~~::Is the citation needed for the military importance or for the crazy patriotic guy? [[User:Linker\|Linker]] ([[User talk:Linker\|talk]]) 20:40, 16 January 2019 (UTC)~~
−	::I'm wondering, why would anyone want to target a site that is expressly built to withstand a nuklear strike? That's like fighting a barbarian princess and try to hit her on the bikini armor instead of the midriff [[User:Ruffy314\|Ruffy314]] ([[User talk:Ruffy314\|talk]]) 00:12, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
−	:::Enough nuclear weapons will eventually crack it, or at least that's the idea. Also, military command bases are far more important targets than cities: All nuking cities does is kill millions of people and disrupt your enemy's economy and morale, while destroying command bunkers actually reduces your enemy's ability to fight you.
−
−	::My understanding is that most military sites are only capable of withstanding near misses from nuclear weapons. This was adequate with early ICBMs because of accuracy problems, modern missiles however are supposed to be accurate enough to destroy hardened facilities. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.22\|162.158.255.22]] 01:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
−
−	~~Nuking cities will also REALLY tick off the UN,{{Citation needed}} which is a plus.~~
−
−	"This is how the world ends, not with a bang, but a spellcheck." (Followed by a lot of bangs). [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 07:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
−
−	I did not laugh at the comic today. However, I startled people around me laughing at the placement of this [citation needed] in the description. Kudo's to whomever placed it. [[User:DanB\|DanB]] ([[User talk:DanB\|talk]]) 21:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
−
−	Wouldn't it make more sense to create a seperate page to collect all the "xkcd-Wikipedia effect" cases? I'm kinda surprised there isn't one already. Model Rail isn't even the only time that happened. One other example being https://xkcd.com/1485/. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.58.177\|162.158.58.177]] 11:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
−
−	~~;Trivia~~
−	Does the date of the underlying Wiki revision lend a clue as to the lead time Randall takes to create non-topical strips? [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 07:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
−	~~:Checking the revision history~~, the revision mentioned in trivia (currently) did not influence the displayed part when viewed on a mobile, since it did only remove a picture (which I think usually is below the text on mobile). Actually the last change to the text displayed happened on 30th June 2014. So all we know is that the comic was created during the past 5 years. --[[User:Lupo\|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo\|talk]]) 08:33, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
−	::Checking again, I notice, that the text given in the comic does not reflect any revision, since it misses the whole "The quarto missal has 157 original folios [...]" part. Therefore the trivia stated is just wrong. The article never looked like this. ~~--[[User:Lupo\|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo\|talk]]) 08:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC)~~
−
−	~~;Similar comics~~
−	The format of this comic is highly similar to the recent comic [[2042: Rolle's Theorem]], with a title and ''From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia'' header, and the first few paragraphs in the article.
−	~~The fact that the reference of this comic to fuzzy string matching matches [[1031: s/keyboard/leopard/]]'s reference to regex (comic 1031 also has a Wikipedia page format)~~
−	~~Can we have kind of a 'Meme format' explanation and Randall's fascination with this format? {{unsigned ip\|172.69.186.22}}~~
−
−
−	There have been several comics referencing nuclear weapons in one way of another. Have added link to [[1655: Doomsday Clock]] in the description because there is already a collection of comics about this there. But do we need a category, so that kind of explanation could go there? --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 14:15, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
−
−	~~Why has it been cremated by a bob?~~
−
−	Damn it! I see comments raving about the Citation Needed, and there's none! Did some idiot remove it AGAIN? I'm getting sick and tired of the people who have grown tired of the gag. Just because YOU'VE become jaded and don't find it funny anymore doesn't mean there aren't still people who enjoy them! Case in point, just read the comments here. Be considerate of others and embrace the fact that we're all different. If you don't like the gag, move on to the next comic. [[User:NiceGuy1\|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1\|talk]]) 04:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:54, 26 January 2019
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Why has it been cremated by a bob?		Why has it been cremated by a bob?
		+
		+	Damn it! I see comments raving about the Citation Needed, and there's none! Did some idiot remove it AGAIN? I'm getting sick and tired of the people who have grown tired of the gag. Just because YOU'VE become jaded and don't find it funny anymore doesn't mean there aren't still people who enjoy them! Case in point, just read the comments here. Be considerate of others and embrace the fact that we're all different. If you don't like the gag, move on to the next comic. [[User:NiceGuy1\|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1\|talk]]) 04:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 Does the date of the underlying Wiki revision lend a clue as to the lead time Randall takes to create non-topical strips? [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|talk]]) 07:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 :Checking the revision history, the revision mentioned in trivia (currently) did not influence the displayed part when viewed on a mobile, since it did only remove a picture (which I think usually is below the text on mobile). Actually the last change to the text displayed happened on 30th June 2014. So all we know is that the comic was created during the past 5 years. --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 08:33, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 ;Similar comics

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :::Enough nuclear weapons will eventually crack it, or at least that's the idea. Also, military command bases are far more important targets than cities: All nuking cities does is kill millions of people and disrupt your enemy's economy and morale, while destroying command bunkers actually reduces your enemy's ability to fight you.
-Nuking cities will also REALLY tick off the UN, which is a plus.
+Nuking cities will also REALLY tick off the UN,{{Citation needed}} which is a plus.
 ::My understanding is that most military sites are only capable of withstanding near misses from nuclear weapons.  This was adequate with early ICBMs because of accuracy problems, modern missiles however are supposed to be accurate enough to destroy hardened facilities.  [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.22|162.158.255.22]] 01:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC)