Talk:2120: Brain Hemispheres - Revision history

Netherin5 at 12:29, 13 March 2019

2019-03-13T12:29:47Z

I prefer qwerty: coincidence?

2019-03-13T11:38:43Z

coincidence?

I prefer qwerty: coincidence?

2019-03-13T11:36:20Z

coincidence?

PotatoGod: /* Conjoined twins analogous to "Disputed/Dual control" */

2019-03-11T22:15:23Z

‎Conjoined twins analogous to "Disputed/Dual control"

PotatoGod: /* Conjoined twins analogous to "Disputed/Dual control" */ new section

2019-03-11T22:14:47Z

‎Conjoined twins analogous to "Disputed/Dual control": new section

Keybounce at 00:18, 9 March 2019

2019-03-09T00:18:32Z

Dgbrt: Please sign your comments.

2019-03-08T16:39:11Z

Please sign your comments.

Evilbob0 at 03:13, 8 March 2019

2019-03-08T03:13:28Z

Evilbob0 at 03:12, 8 March 2019

2019-03-08T03:12:34Z

Evilbob0 at 03:11, 8 March 2019

2019-03-08T03:11:16Z

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 Is it possible that the title text is a reference to the whole "magnetic north is actually south" thing? {{unsigned ip|162.158.78.208}}
@@ Line 41: / Line 38: @@
+https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/212:_Brain coincidence? [[User:I prefer qwerty|I prefer qwerty]] ([[User talk:I prefer qwerty|talk]]) 11:38, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 == Conjoined twins analogous to "Disputed/Dual control" ==
 I don't have time to properly research now, but could some conjoined twins be a real world example of disputed/dual control on some parts of their bodies? I think I read that in some cases they have to cooperate to control a shared (3rd) leg or similar things? [[User:PotatoGod|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod|talk]]) 22:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 Is it possible that the title text is a reference to the whole "magnetic north is actually south" thing? {{unsigned ip|162.158.78.208}}
@@ Line 37: / Line 40: @@
 [[User:Keybounce|Keybounce]] ([[User talk:Keybounce|talk]]) 00:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
-https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/212:_Brain coincidence? [[User:I prefer qwerty|I prefer qwerty]] ([[User talk:I prefer qwerty|talk]]) 11:36, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 == Conjoined twins analogous to "Disputed/Dual control" ==
 I don't have time to properly research now, but could some conjoined twins be a real world example of disputed/dual control on some parts of their bodies? I think I read that in some cases they have to cooperate to control a shared (3rd) leg or similar things? [[User:PotatoGod|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod|talk]]) 22:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 The concern about the left leg being independent of the brain can be confirmed. Just scratch your left side, and watch your left leg kick.
 [[User:Keybounce|Keybounce]] ([[User talk:Keybounce|talk]]) 00:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
 == Conjoined twins analogous to "Disputed/Dual control" ==
 I don't have time to properly research now, but could some conjoined twins be a real world example of disputed/dual control on some parts of their bodies? I think I read that in some cases they have to cooperate to control a shared (3rd) leg or similar things? [[User:PotatoGod|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod|talk]]) 22:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 11 March 2019
Line 39:		Line 39:
	== Conjoined twins analogous to "Disputed/Dual control" ==		== Conjoined twins analogous to "Disputed/Dual control" ==

−	I don't have time to properly research now, but could some conjoined twins be an example of disputed/dual control on some parts of their bodies? I think I read that in some cases they have to cooperate to control a shared (3rd) leg or similar things? [[User:PotatoGod\|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod\|talk]]) 22:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)	+	I don't have time to properly research now, but could some conjoined twins be a real world example of disputed/dual control on some parts of their bodies? I think I read that in some cases they have to cooperate to control a shared (3rd) leg or similar things? [[User:PotatoGod\|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod\|talk]]) 22:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 11 March 2019
Line 36:		Line 36:
	The concern about the left leg being independent of the brain can be confirmed. Just scratch your left side, and watch your left leg kick.		The concern about the left leg being independent of the brain can be confirmed. Just scratch your left side, and watch your left leg kick.
	[[User:Keybounce\|Keybounce]] ([[User talk:Keybounce\|talk]]) 00:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)		[[User:Keybounce\|Keybounce]] ([[User talk:Keybounce\|talk]]) 00:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Conjoined twins analogous to "Disputed/Dual control" ==
		+
		+	I don't have time to properly research now, but could some conjoined twins be an example of disputed/dual control on some parts of their bodies? I think I read that in some cases they have to cooperate to control a shared (3rd) leg or similar things? [[User:PotatoGod\|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod\|talk]]) 22:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:18, 9 March 2019
Line 33:		Line 33:

	--[[User:Evilbob0\|Evilbob0]] ([[User talk:Evilbob0\|talk]]) 03:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)		--[[User:Evilbob0\|Evilbob0]] ([[User talk:Evilbob0\|talk]]) 03:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	The concern about the left leg being independent of the brain can be confirmed. Just scratch your left side, and watch your left leg kick.
		+	[[User:Keybounce\|Keybounce]] ([[User talk:Keybounce\|talk]]) 00:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, 8 March 2019
Line 16:		Line 16:


−	Is it possible that the title text is a reference to the whole "magnetic north is actually south" thing?	+	Is it possible that the title text is a reference to the whole "magnetic north is actually south" thing? {{unsigned ip\|162.158.78.208}}
−	~~----You forgot to sign, dude ^^^---~~

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 '''
 Removed and replaced it with a better explanation. Not technically "incorrectly argue". There is basis for which the arguments are founded.
 --[[User:Evilbob0|Evilbob0]] ([[User talk:Evilbob0|talk]]) 03:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 8 March 2019
Line 32:		Line 32:
	'''		'''
	Removed and replaced it with a better explanation. Not technically "incorrectly argue". There is basis for which the arguments are founded.		Removed and replaced it with a better explanation. Not technically "incorrectly argue". There is basis for which the arguments are founded.
		+	--[[User:Evilbob0\|Evilbob0]] ([[User talk:Evilbob0\|talk]]) 03:12, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:11, 8 March 2019
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Is it possible that the title text is a reference to the whole "magnetic north is actually south" thing?		Is it possible that the title text is a reference to the whole "magnetic north is actually south" thing?
		+	----You forgot to sign, dude ^^^---
		+
		+
		+	Completely rewrote the explanation. There are two key phrases that were removed with the following justifications:
		+
		+	'''"left arm and left leg, and vice versa for the left half of the brain, and competing theories such as [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1003.1872.pdf these] [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02972358 two] attempt to explain why this is the case."
		+	'''
		+	Those are not competing theories. It is the abandonment of one old theory in favor of a one that is better supported with evidence! It's like saying "There are competing theories of what an atom is actually made out of. One says that they are the smallest indivisible part of all matter. Another says that they are like plum-puddings with with a positive charge particle studded with negative charge corpsucles. And the last theory of what an atom is is a core particle with positive charge, made of many many smaller parts, surrounded by an probability/statistical cloud of negative particles which can act as both particles and waves and cannot have their speed and location determined at the same time.
		+
		+	... And if you think these are all "competing" and equally valid theories of what an atom is... I can not help you. Please... I don't know. Take a class or read a textbook or something. Good luck. May God have mercy on you.
		+
		+
		+	'''Similarly, many people incorrectly argue that different parts of the brain control logic and emotion, due to the importance of the [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393211000285?via%3Dihub left] brain for language processing.
		+	'''
		+	Removed and replaced it with a better explanation. Not technically "incorrectly argue". There is basis for which the arguments are founded.