Talk:2151: A/B - Revision history

An user who has no account yet at 10:28, 3 September 2023

2023-09-03T10:28:15Z

172.68.134.117 at 10:27, 3 September 2023

2023-09-03T10:27:12Z

162.158.182.214 at 16:35, 30 June 2019

2019-06-30T16:35:46Z

162.158.182.214 at 16:34, 30 June 2019

2019-06-30T16:34:37Z

Stellaathena at 13:51, 15 June 2019

2019-06-15T13:51:09Z

Stellaathena: Disagree with the need for more elaboration

2019-06-15T13:50:19Z

Disagree with the need for more elaboration

NiceGuy1 at 04:26, 24 May 2019

2019-05-24T04:26:29Z

NiceGuy1 at 04:21, 24 May 2019

2019-05-24T04:21:50Z

Comet at 20:15, 23 May 2019

2019-05-23T20:15:38Z

Lupo: Undo revision 174375 by IGenics8 (talk) Spam

2019-05-22T07:39:07Z

Undo revision 174375 by IGenics8 (talk) Spam

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:28, 3 September 2023
Line 32:		Line 32:
	So funny, just yesterday this book Solving Linear B (John Chadwick) caught my eye on a shelf of free books. It was Saturday and I was out with friends music blaring, and they would pick on me for reading this book. Brought it home, completely new topic to me - and today I actually understood this one! It warms my heart, I really am a confirmed nerd.		So funny, just yesterday this book Solving Linear B (John Chadwick) caught my eye on a shelf of free books. It was Saturday and I was out with friends music blaring, and they would pick on me for reading this book. Brought it home, completely new topic to me - and today I actually understood this one! It warms my heart, I really am a confirmed nerd.

−	i once made a similar pun regarding the fact "script" also refers to the dialogs of a movie: how do you call a javanese film's dialogs? java script	+	i once made a similar pun regarding the fact "script" also refers to the dialogs of a movie: how do you call a javanese film's dialogs? java script [[User:An user who has no account yet\|An user who has no account yet]] ([[User talk:An user who has no account yet\|talk]]) 10:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
−
−	~~oh crap i'm not logged in~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:27, 3 September 2023
Line 31:		Line 31:

	So funny, just yesterday this book Solving Linear B (John Chadwick) caught my eye on a shelf of free books. It was Saturday and I was out with friends music blaring, and they would pick on me for reading this book. Brought it home, completely new topic to me - and today I actually understood this one! It warms my heart, I really am a confirmed nerd.		So funny, just yesterday this book Solving Linear B (John Chadwick) caught my eye on a shelf of free books. It was Saturday and I was out with friends music blaring, and they would pick on me for reading this book. Brought it home, completely new topic to me - and today I actually understood this one! It warms my heart, I really am a confirmed nerd.
		+
		+	i once made a similar pun regarding the fact "script" also refers to the dialogs of a movie: how do you call a javanese film's dialogs? java script
		+
		+	oh crap i'm not logged in

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:35, 30 June 2019
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Can someone please make a re-mix of [https://xkcd.com/435/ xkcd #435] with this #2151 embedded inside it, ''two'' spaces over on the left (like math is one space over on the right of the scale) with the caption "Linguistics" under it? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.197\|172.68.142.197]] 18:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)		Can someone please make a re-mix of [https://xkcd.com/435/ xkcd #435] with this #2151 embedded inside it, ''two'' spaces over on the left (like math is one space over on the right of the scale) with the caption "Linguistics" under it? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.197\|172.68.142.197]] 18:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

		+	== Nice nerd affirming coincidence ==

	So funny, just yesterday this book Solving Linear B (John Chadwick) caught my eye on a shelf of free books. It was Saturday and I was out with friends music blaring, and they would pick on me for reading this book. Brought it home, completely new topic to me - and today I actually understood this one! It warms my heart, I really am a confirmed nerd.		So funny, just yesterday this book Solving Linear B (John Chadwick) caught my eye on a shelf of free books. It was Saturday and I was out with friends music blaring, and they would pick on me for reading this book. Brought it home, completely new topic to me - and today I actually understood this one! It warms my heart, I really am a confirmed nerd.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 30 June 2019
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Can someone please make a re-mix of [https://xkcd.com/435/ xkcd #435] with this #2151 embedded inside it, ''two'' spaces over on the left (like math is one space over on the right of the scale) with the caption "Linguistics" under it? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.197\|172.68.142.197]] 18:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)		Can someone please make a re-mix of [https://xkcd.com/435/ xkcd #435] with this #2151 embedded inside it, ''two'' spaces over on the left (like math is one space over on the right of the scale) with the caption "Linguistics" under it? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.197\|172.68.142.197]] 18:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	So funny, just yesterday this book Solving Linear B (John Chadwick) caught my eye on a shelf of free books. It was Saturday and I was out with friends music blaring, and they would pick on me for reading this book. Brought it home, completely new topic to me - and today I actually understood this one! It warms my heart, I really am a confirmed nerd.

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 https://web.archive.org/web/20190516074849/https:/phys.org/news/2019-05-bristol-academic-voynich-code-century-old.html [[http://www.linkedin.com/in/Comet Comet]] 20:15, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
-I don’t see any meaningful connection to the Voynich manuscript. It is not true that they used “a stochastic methodology,” they [[claimed|https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/09/the-mysterious-voynich-manuscript-has-finally-been-decoded/]] to have realized it was abbreviations. Furthermore the claim that they decided it at all is widely dismissed as untrue. Finally, I don’t see any obvious reason to believe that these Linear A / Linear B testers are using a stochastic technique. I would recommend removing the tag for further elaboration on this connection unless the claim of similarity can be substantiated.
+I don’t see any meaningful connection to the Voynich manuscript. It is not true that they used “a stochastic methodology,” they [[https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/09/the-mysterious-voynich-manuscript-has-finally-been-decoded/claimed]] to have realized it was abbreviations. Furthermore the claim that they decided it at all is widely dismissed as untrue. Finally, I don’t see any obvious reason to believe that these Linear A / Linear B testers are using a stochastic technique. I would recommend removing the tag for further elaboration on this connection unless the claim of similarity can be substantiated. [[User:Stellaathena|Stellaathena]] ([[User talk:Stellaathena|talk]]) 13:51, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 == Request ==
 Can someone please make a re-mix of [https://xkcd.com/435/ xkcd #435] with this #2151 embedded inside it, ''two'' spaces over on the left (like math is one space over on the right of the scale) with the caption "Linguistics" under it? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.197|172.68.142.197]] 18:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 : Yeah, no kidding! Usually I get the majority of the comic and I come here for the finer points and title text (I browse these sites on my iPad, no mouse with which to see the "MouseOver text"). But this one, *whiff!*, right over my head! LOL! [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 04:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 :: @NiceGuy: You can touch and hold on the image to see the mouseOver text. --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.182.136|172.68.182.136]] 06:47, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
-::: Years now of reading XKCD (including a couple of years before I joined this site), over two different iPads, and I never knew that! Thanks! I only know holding pictures for if I want to save them, and if I want to do that (which I often do to share on Facebook, if I share the link Facebook insists on picking the wrong picture for the preview), I open the Full Size link lists on the comic first (which obviously doesn't have the text). [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 04:21, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
+::: Years now of reading XKCD (including a couple of years before I joined this site), over two different iPads, and I never knew that! Thanks! I only know holding pictures for if I want to save them, and if I want to do that (which I often do to share on Facebook, if I share the link Facebook insists on picking the wrong picture for the preview), I open the Full Size link listed on the comic first (which obviously doesn't have the text). [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 04:21, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 The title text refers to "Java script", which probably is meant to reference both the programming language Java and the completely different programming language JavaScript. While the former is almost never referenced with the word script afterwards, the latter is also never referenced with a space in the middle of the word. Hence, it seems meant to further confuse which language is actually being referenced. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.77|172.68.132.77]] 16:39, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:39, 22 May 2019
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Can someone please make a re-mix of [https://xkcd.com/435/ xkcd #435] with this #2151 embedded inside it, ''two'' spaces over on the left (like math is one space over on the right of the scale) with the caption "Linguistics" under it? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.197\|172.68.142.197]] 18:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)		Can someone please make a re-mix of [https://xkcd.com/435/ xkcd #435] with this #2151 embedded inside it, ''two'' spaces over on the left (like math is one space over on the right of the scale) with the caption "Linguistics" under it? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.197\|172.68.142.197]] 18:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
−
−	Another way to improve your vision without glasses or contact [https://supplementdevotee.com/igenics-review/ iGenics ] lenses is to try some few exercises. Just like the rest of the body, regular exercises will help relax your eyes, and prevent any future or immediate problems that may lead to wearing contact lenses or opting for a corrective surgery. Some of these exercises include; palming, the dot exercise, the word exercise, and the double vision exercise among others. The dot exercise involves focusing on a period or a coma on a book page to improve sight. The word exercise is not too different from the dot vision, but this time around you need to focus on a set of letters. The double vision is aimed at helping your eyes see together as a team. All these are aimed at helping you improve your eyesight naturally.
−
−	You can get a lot more from the Bates method to improve your vision without glasses or contact lenses. The truth is, it is possible to achieve a better vision without spending a dime.In the world of optometry, a lot has changed over the last decade. While a majority of these changes will have little affect on the average person, there are some obvious benefits to newly created technology. Contact lenses have been around of a long time, but their utility was limited to only helping people with basic problems like being near sighted or far sighted. However, over the last decade, there have been a number of improvements that have expanded the applications of specific types of lenses. Multifocal contact lenses are an excellent example of this.
−
−	Unfortunately, like many areas that undergo intense research and development by multiple educational institutions and corporations, people are now seeing a variety of different types of contact lenses which are all designed to solve the same problem. Currently, there are three different primary designs for multifocal contact lenses. They are the concentric bifocal design, alternative image design, and simultaneous image design. The concentric bifocal design has become the most common. The reason for this is simple, they seem to be the most effective. They are designed so that the center of lens help you see up close, while the outside of lens help you see things in the distance. This works well with how we naturally focus. When we look at something close to us, we tend to get tunnel vision, however when we look into the distance, we tend to take in the full picture.
−
−
−
−	~~[https://supplementdevotee.com/igenics-review/ https://supplementdevotee.com/igenics-review/]~~