Talk:220: Philosophy - Revision history

42.book.addict at 19:25, 12 December 2024

2024-12-12T19:25:06Z

DownGoer at 17:22, 26 June 2023

2023-06-26T17:22:53Z

162.158.62.179 at 16:58, 28 May 2020

2020-05-28T16:58:15Z

162.158.62.179: /* Just realized this */ new section

2020-05-28T16:57:14Z

‎Just realized this: new section

Kynde at 12:43, 16 March 2015

2015-03-16T12:43:54Z

St.nerol at 20:32, 7 August 2013

2013-08-07T20:32:10Z

Dgbrt at 19:16, 7 August 2013

2013-08-07T19:16:07Z

St.nerol at 18:37, 7 August 2013

2013-08-07T18:37:21Z

Dgbrt at 16:45, 7 August 2013

2013-08-07T16:45:26Z

St.nerol at 13:48, 7 August 2013

2013-08-07T13:48:52Z

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 :::Sorry, but look at your own edit comments in the history. I did refer to this.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 ::::I know. Now I clarified what I meant. Do you understand? –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 20:32, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 There is a [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Merge_Cueball_.26_Rob|community portal discussion]] of what to call Cueball and what to do in case with more than one Cueball. I have added this comic to the new Category:Multiple Cueballs.  In this case there is no reason to call one Cueball and the other friend. It could easily be the other way. So I have changed to remove Cueball.--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:43, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
@@ Line 12: / Line 11: @@
 Are we sure about the "''every'' religion" bit? It makes me a little nervous to use such definite language, but maybe it's ok. [[User:DownGoer|DownGoer]] ([[User talk:DownGoer|talk]]) 17:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
-== Just realized this ==
+;Just realized this
 It's titled "Philosophy," and Megan apparently keeps coming back to it. This could be a reference to Wikipedia (also referenced frequently), as if you keep clicking on the first link in a Wikipedia article in the main body text not in parentheses or italics (referenced in the title text of 903), you get back to the article on Philosophy. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.179|162.158.62.179]] 16:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 There is a [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Merge_Cueball_.26_Rob|community portal discussion]] of what to call Cueball and what to do in case with more than one Cueball. I have added this comic to the new Category:Multiple Cueballs.  In this case there is no reason to call one Cueball and the other friend. It could easily be the other way. So I have changed to remove Cueball.--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:43, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 == Just realized this ==
 It's titled "Philosophy," and Megan apparently keeps coming back to it. This could be a reference to Wikipedia (also referenced frequently), as if you keep clicking on the first link in a Wikipedia article in the main body text not in parentheses or italics (referenced in the title text of 903), you get back to the article on Philosophy. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.179|162.158.62.179]] 16:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 28 May 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:
	== Just realized this ==		== Just realized this ==

−	It's titled "Philosophy," and Megan apparently keeps coming back to it. This could be a reference to Wikipedia (also referenced frequently), as if you keep clicking on the first link in a Wikipedia article in the main body text not in parentheses or italics (referenced in the title text of 903), you get back to the article on Philosophy.	+	It's titled "Philosophy," and Megan apparently keeps coming back to it. This could be a reference to Wikipedia (also referenced frequently), as if you keep clicking on the first link in a Wikipedia article in the main body text not in parentheses or italics (referenced in the title text of 903), you get back to the article on Philosophy. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.179\|162.158.62.179]] 16:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 28 May 2020
Line 9:		Line 9:

	There is a [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Merge_Cueball_.26_Rob\|community portal discussion]] of what to call Cueball and what to do in case with more than one Cueball. I have added this comic to the new Category:Multiple Cueballs. In this case there is no reason to call one Cueball and the other friend. It could easily be the other way. So I have changed to remove Cueball.--[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 12:43, 16 March 2015 (UTC)		There is a [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Merge_Cueball_.26_Rob\|community portal discussion]] of what to call Cueball and what to do in case with more than one Cueball. I have added this comic to the new Category:Multiple Cueballs. In this case there is no reason to call one Cueball and the other friend. It could easily be the other way. So I have changed to remove Cueball.--[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 12:43, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Just realized this ==
		+
		+	It's titled "Philosophy," and Megan apparently keeps coming back to it. This could be a reference to Wikipedia (also referenced frequently), as if you keep clicking on the first link in a Wikipedia article in the main body text not in parentheses or italics (referenced in the title text of 903), you get back to the article on Philosophy.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 16 March 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::Sorry, but look at your own edit comments in the history. I did refer to this.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 19:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)		:::Sorry, but look at your own edit comments in the history. I did refer to this.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 19:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
	::::I know. Now I clarified what I meant. Do you understand? –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 20:32, 7 August 2013 (UTC)		::::I know. Now I clarified what I meant. Do you understand? –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 20:32, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	There is a [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Merge_Cueball_.26_Rob\|community portal discussion]] of what to call Cueball and what to do in case with more than one Cueball. I have added this comic to the new Category:Multiple Cueballs. In this case there is no reason to call one Cueball and the other friend. It could easily be the other way. So I have changed to remove Cueball.--[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 12:43, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 7 August 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Ah, so maybe you meant that the title text is the key to the last panel (and not the other way around)? I think it's very obvious that they are shooting Megan, and yes, I thought that from the start. You stated in the edit summary "Megan doesn't plan to use that super soaker against cats.", and I meant to ask: Why would anyone think that in the first place? –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 18:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)		::Ah, so maybe you meant that the title text is the key to the last panel (and not the other way around)? I think it's very obvious that they are shooting Megan, and yes, I thought that from the start. You stated in the edit summary "Megan doesn't plan to use that super soaker against cats.", and I meant to ask: Why would anyone think that in the first place? –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 18:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
	:::Sorry, but look at your own edit comments in the history. I did refer to this.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 19:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)		:::Sorry, but look at your own edit comments in the history. I did refer to this.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 19:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
		+	::::I know. Now I clarified what I meant. Do you understand? –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 20:32, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:16, 7 August 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:This is only obvious after reading the title text and the main joke here. Why this should be banned from the explain? And it was even not obvious to you, your statement a few hours ago did mention that Megan would use the super soaker...--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 16:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)		:This is only obvious after reading the title text and the main joke here. Why this should be banned from the explain? And it was even not obvious to you, your statement a few hours ago did mention that Megan would use the super soaker...--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 16:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
	::Ah, so maybe you meant that the title text is the key to the last panel (and not the other way around)? I think it's very obvious that they are shooting Megan, and yes, I thought that from the start. You stated in the edit summary "Megan doesn't plan to use that super soaker against cats.", and I meant to ask: Why would anyone think that in the first place? –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 18:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)		::Ah, so maybe you meant that the title text is the key to the last panel (and not the other way around)? I think it's very obvious that they are shooting Megan, and yes, I thought that from the start. You stated in the edit summary "Megan doesn't plan to use that super soaker against cats.", and I meant to ask: Why would anyone think that in the first place? –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 18:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
		+	:::Sorry, but look at your own edit comments in the history. I did refer to this.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 19:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:37, 7 August 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	That Megan's friends intend to shoot Megan with the soaker is obvious. The explanation is not incomplete because we don't spell that out. Please do not add the incomplete-template without a better reason. –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 13:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)		That Megan's friends intend to shoot Megan with the soaker is obvious. The explanation is not incomplete because we don't spell that out. Please do not add the incomplete-template without a better reason. –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 13:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
	:This is only obvious after reading the title text and the main joke here. Why this should be banned from the explain? And it was even not obvious to you, your statement a few hours ago did mention that Megan would use the super soaker...--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 16:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)		:This is only obvious after reading the title text and the main joke here. Why this should be banned from the explain? And it was even not obvious to you, your statement a few hours ago did mention that Megan would use the super soaker...--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 16:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
		+	::Ah, so maybe you meant that the title text is the key to the last panel (and not the other way around)? I think it's very obvious that they are shooting Megan, and yes, I thought that from the start. You stated in the edit summary "Megan doesn't plan to use that super soaker against cats.", and I meant to ask: Why would anyone think that in the first place? –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 18:37, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 7 August 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	That Megan's friends intend to shoot Megan with the soaker is obvious. The explanation is not incomplete because we don't spell that out. Please do not add the incomplete-template without a better reason. –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 13:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)		That Megan's friends intend to shoot Megan with the soaker is obvious. The explanation is not incomplete because we don't spell that out. Please do not add the incomplete-template without a better reason. –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 13:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
		+	:This is only obvious after reading the title text and the main joke here. Why this should be banned from the explain? And it was even not obvious to you, your statement a few hours ago did mention that Megan would use the super soaker...--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 16:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 7 August 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I've learned that if you are coming back to the same question over and over again, perhaps there is a lesson to learn there that you've missed. And when I ask myself "What it all means?", I realize that the lessons I've learned in life have shown me that I simply need to be the best human being I can and enjoy my personal adventure through this thing we call life. {{unsigned\|‎E-inspired}}		I've learned that if you are coming back to the same question over and over again, perhaps there is a lesson to learn there that you've missed. And when I ask myself "What it all means?", I realize that the lessons I've learned in life have shown me that I simply need to be the best human being I can and enjoy my personal adventure through this thing we call life. {{unsigned\|‎E-inspired}}
		+
		+	That Megan's friends intend to shoot Megan with the soaker is obvious. The explanation is not incomplete because we don't spell that out. Please do not add the incomplete-template without a better reason. –[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 13:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)