Talk:2318: Dynamic Entropy - Revision history

These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For at 20:18, 15 June 2020

2020-06-15T20:18:35Z

Kev at 10:26, 13 June 2020

2020-06-13T10:26:01Z

172.69.62.148 at 15:28, 12 June 2020

2020-06-12T15:28:33Z

Kynde at 11:47, 12 June 2020

2020-06-12T11:47:52Z

Kynde at 11:42, 12 June 2020

2020-06-12T11:42:31Z

141.101.107.164 at 05:28, 12 June 2020

2020-06-12T05:28:21Z

108.162.216.60 at 22:19, 11 June 2020

2020-06-11T22:19:33Z

141.101.104.183 at 19:39, 11 June 2020

2020-06-11T19:39:15Z

141.101.76.204 at 19:35, 11 June 2020

2020-06-11T19:35:08Z

162.158.75.104: Forgot to sign my post

2020-06-11T13:53:48Z

Forgot to sign my post

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 15 June 2020
Line 30:		Line 30:

	The 'Use “-ic” with nouns ending in “-ics” (usually)' section of that Free Dictionary article is relevant here, since dynamics is a thing. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.62.148\|172.69.62.148]] 15:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)		The 'Use “-ic” with nouns ending in “-ics” (usually)' section of that Free Dictionary article is relevant here, since dynamics is a thing. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.62.148\|172.69.62.148]] 15:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	Dynamic gravity, dynamic oxygen level, dynamic surgical compentency, dynamic astronomical unit ... none of these are desireable. [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For\|talk]]) 20:18, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Can confirm, have never lost an argument. [[User:Dynamic Entropy|Dynamic Entropy]] ([[User talk:Dynamic Entropy|talk]]) 00:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
+: You came here for an argument?  No, this here is abuse.  Argument's next door. [[User:Kev|Kev]] ([[User talk:Kev|talk]]) 10:26, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 : Allegrini, P., Douglas, J. F., & Glotzer, S. C. (1999). Dynamic entropy as a measure of caging and persistent particle motion in supercooled liquids. Physical Review E, 60(5), 5714, doi: 10.1103/physreve.60.5714.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 12 June 2020
Line 28:		Line 28:

	(Looks like people aren't <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>ing. My contribution starts here.) I can just see a reporter, at the scene of some breaking news, saying "It's very much a dynamic situation here", while dodging various rioter/police missiles, hurricane debris, moving away from a wildfire front or in the middle of a rescue situation in post-earthquake aftermath yet still amidst aftershocks. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.164\|141.101.107.164]] 05:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)		(Looks like people aren't <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>ing. My contribution starts here.) I can just see a reporter, at the scene of some breaking news, saying "It's very much a dynamic situation here", while dodging various rioter/police missiles, hurricane debris, moving away from a wildfire front or in the middle of a rescue situation in post-earthquake aftermath yet still amidst aftershocks. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.164\|141.101.107.164]] 05:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	The 'Use “-ic” with nouns ending in “-ics” (usually)' section of that Free Dictionary article is relevant here, since dynamics is a thing. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.62.148\|172.69.62.148]] 15:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 I can think of a number of cases where "dynamic" would be a bad thing, but not necessarily pejorative. The structure of a building had better not be dynamic (think "sudden energetic disassembly"), and when my (salaried, should be steady) paycheck becomes dynamic, I have to talk to HR. Can someone come up with a pejorative? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.212|162.158.78.212]] 11:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
-:2050 retro slang: Dynamic, variant of Dienamic, portmanteau of Die and (Viet) Nam + adjectival suffix // Dienam (n): a long, brutal slog with an unsatisfying ending, possibly with unintended consequences arising some time after the conclusion (cv Agent Orange) "Just like the soldiers a century ago, they knew the project was a dienam -- resources would be wasted, careers ended, and goals unmet -- but they couldn't convince the executives to abandon the project." // Some[thing] that is a failure, many years in the making, from which no success can be extricated. "[The development team] was working on a dynamic project for the studio when [the studio] finally was forced to declare bankruptcy and shutter due to literally years of overcomitting and underdelivering."
+:2050 retro slang: Dynamic, variant of Dienamic, portmanteau of Die and (Viet) Nam + adjectival suffix // Dienam (n): a long, brutal slog with an unsatisfying ending, possibly with unintended consequences arising some time after the conclusion (cv Agent Orange) "Just like the soldiers a century ago, they knew the project was a dienam -- resources would be wasted, careers ended, and goals unmet -- but they couldn't convince the executives to abandon the project." // Some[thing] that is a failure, many years in the making, from which no success can be extricated. "[The development team] was working on a dynamic project for the studio when [the studio] finally was forced to declare bankruptcy and shutter due to literally years of overcomitting and underdelivering." {{unsigned ip|162.158.75.104}}
-As there exists such a thing as resilience by explicitness, when it comes to type system discussions in computer programming language design the term 'dynamic' can be pretty condemning.
+As there exists such a thing as resilience by explicitness, when it comes to type system discussions in computer programming language design the term 'dynamic' can be pretty condemning. {{unsigned ip|141.101.76.204}}
 (Looks like people aren't <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>ing. My contribution starts here.) I can just see a reporter, at the scene of some breaking news, saying "It's very much a dynamic situation here", while dodging various rioter/police missiles, hurricane debris, moving away from a wildfire front or in the middle of a rescue situation in post-earthquake aftermath yet still amidst aftershocks. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.164|141.101.107.164]] 05:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ::Can someone with knowledge of the reference system in a wiki make the reference appear above the discussion, maybe in a section named References?--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 07:06, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 :::Done [[User:Bugstomper|Bugstomper]] ([[User talk:Bugstomper|talk]]) 09:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 Well bugger me (METAPHOR! METAPHOR!) but my current Master thesis in Computer Science could use that term without much shoehorning. (tl;dr: Binary search trees that adapt, =dynamic, can serve a query series faster than static, and the gain depends on the structure of the query series, =entropy. I prefer the good old "instance optimality", though...) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.122|162.158.159.122]] 08:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:28, 12 June 2020
Line 25:		Line 25:

	As there exists such a thing as resilience by explicitness, when it comes to type system discussions in computer programming language design the term 'dynamic' can be pretty condemning.		As there exists such a thing as resilience by explicitness, when it comes to type system discussions in computer programming language design the term 'dynamic' can be pretty condemning.
		+
		+	(Looks like people aren't <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>ing. My contribution starts here.) I can just see a reporter, at the scene of some breaking news, saying "It's very much a dynamic situation here", while dodging various rioter/police missiles, hurricane debris, moving away from a wildfire front or in the middle of a rescue situation in post-earthquake aftermath yet still amidst aftershocks. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.164\|141.101.107.164]] 05:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 11 June 2020
Line 22:		Line 22:

	I can think of a number of cases where "dynamic" would be a bad thing, but not necessarily pejorative. The structure of a building had better not be dynamic (think "sudden energetic disassembly"), and when my (salaried, should be steady) paycheck becomes dynamic, I have to talk to HR. Can someone come up with a pejorative? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.212\|162.158.78.212]] 11:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)		I can think of a number of cases where "dynamic" would be a bad thing, but not necessarily pejorative. The structure of a building had better not be dynamic (think "sudden energetic disassembly"), and when my (salaried, should be steady) paycheck becomes dynamic, I have to talk to HR. Can someone come up with a pejorative? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.212\|162.158.78.212]] 11:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
		+	:2050 retro slang: Dynamic, variant of Dienamic, portmanteau of Die and (Viet) Nam + adjectival suffix // Dienam (n): a long, brutal slog with an unsatisfying ending, possibly with unintended consequences arising some time after the conclusion (cv Agent Orange) "Just like the soldiers a century ago, they knew the project was a dienam -- resources would be wasted, careers ended, and goals unmet -- but they couldn't convince the executives to abandon the project." // Some[thing] that is a failure, many years in the making, from which no success can be extricated. "[The development team] was working on a dynamic project for the studio when [the studio] finally was forced to declare bankruptcy and shutter due to literally years of overcomitting and underdelivering."

	As there exists such a thing as resilience by explicitness, when it comes to type system discussions in computer programming language design the term 'dynamic' can be pretty condemning.		As there exists such a thing as resilience by explicitness, when it comes to type system discussions in computer programming language design the term 'dynamic' can be pretty condemning.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 11 June 2020
Line 23:		Line 23:
	I can think of a number of cases where "dynamic" would be a bad thing, but not necessarily pejorative. The structure of a building had better not be dynamic (think "sudden energetic disassembly"), and when my (salaried, should be steady) paycheck becomes dynamic, I have to talk to HR. Can someone come up with a pejorative? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.212\|162.158.78.212]] 11:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)		I can think of a number of cases where "dynamic" would be a bad thing, but not necessarily pejorative. The structure of a building had better not be dynamic (think "sudden energetic disassembly"), and when my (salaried, should be steady) paycheck becomes dynamic, I have to talk to HR. Can someone come up with a pejorative? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.212\|162.158.78.212]] 11:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

−	As there exists such a thing as resilience by explicitness, when it comes to type system discussions in computer programming design the term 'dynamic' can be pretty condemning.	+	As there exists such a thing as resilience by explicitness, when it comes to type system discussions in computer programming language design the term 'dynamic' can be pretty condemning.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 11 June 2020
Line 22:		Line 22:

	I can think of a number of cases where "dynamic" would be a bad thing, but not necessarily pejorative. The structure of a building had better not be dynamic (think "sudden energetic disassembly"), and when my (salaried, should be steady) paycheck becomes dynamic, I have to talk to HR. Can someone come up with a pejorative? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.212\|162.158.78.212]] 11:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)		I can think of a number of cases where "dynamic" would be a bad thing, but not necessarily pejorative. The structure of a building had better not be dynamic (think "sudden energetic disassembly"), and when my (salaried, should be steady) paycheck becomes dynamic, I have to talk to HR. Can someone come up with a pejorative? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.212\|162.158.78.212]] 11:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	As there exists such a thing as resilience by explicitness, when it comes to type system discussions in computer programming design the term 'dynamic' can be pretty condemning.

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 This seems to tie in with the recent comic [[2315]]: ''Eventual Consistency'', which is also about entropy (in a thermodynamic(al) sense), but I guess that like the rest of the world I don't know what entropy really is, because if [[wikipedia:Entropy (information theory)|entropy]] is a measure of how "surprising" a variable is, why is everything being flat and spread out evenly called a state of maximum entropy? Everything being the same doesn't sound very surprising to me... --[[User:IByte|IByte]] ([[User talk:IByte|talk]]) 09:08, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 ::Because entropy is the ''inverse'' of how "surprising" or organized or full of information a system is. [[User:Bugstomper|Bugstomper]] ([[User talk:Bugstomper|talk]]) 09:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
-::It's not about "surprising" but about an even spread of probability, so for matter a complex molecule has less entropy than a smaller molecule because the atoms are held in place, and if the quarks in the atoms aren't even held together in subatomic particles then that is ultimate entropy. For information having more possible choices for the message or password spreads the probability of any one occurrence around more possibilities. If it is narrowly defined it has low entropy because the probability is concentrated in a few items.
+::It's not about "surprising" but about an even spread of probability, so for matter a complex molecule has less entropy than a smaller molecule because the atoms are held in place, and if the quarks in the atoms aren't even held together in subatomic particles then that is ultimate entropy. For information having more possible choices for the message or password spreads the probability of any one occurrence around more possibilities. If it is narrowly defined it has low entropy because the probability is concentrated in a few items.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.104|162.158.75.104]] 13:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 I can think of a number of cases where "dynamic" would be a bad thing, but not necessarily pejorative. The structure of a building had better not be dynamic (think "sudden energetic disassembly"), and when my (salaried, should be steady) paycheck becomes dynamic, I have to talk to HR. Can someone come up with a pejorative? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.212|162.158.78.212]] 11:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)