Talk:2351: Standard Model Changes - Revision history

172.70.162.229 at 19:44, 29 March 2023

2023-03-29T19:44:23Z

Unreliable Connection at 08:05, 29 March 2023

2023-03-29T08:05:12Z

Jkshapiro: Fix typo

2021-08-09T01:55:35Z

Fix typo

These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For: Forgot to sign my comment.

2020-10-05T09:18:43Z

Forgot to sign my comment.

162.158.187.239 at 01:36, 5 October 2020

2020-10-05T01:36:46Z

These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For at 04:06, 1 September 2020

2020-09-01T04:06:23Z

These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For: Just joshing.

2020-09-01T04:04:48Z

Just joshing.

162.158.186.196: reword

2020-08-30T17:42:19Z

reword

108.162.237.226 at 17:37, 30 August 2020

2020-08-30T17:37:25Z

172.69.34.38 at 01:59, 29 August 2020

2020-08-29T01:59:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 29 March 2023
Line 44:		Line 44:

	"Higgs" loosely rhymes with "Pigs". I guess that's the reason why [[Randall]] doesn't want to use the name "Higgs". [[User:Unreliable Connection\|2659: Unreliable Connection]] ([[User talk:Unreliable Connection\|talk]]) 08:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)		"Higgs" loosely rhymes with "Pigs". I guess that's the reason why [[Randall]] doesn't want to use the name "Higgs". [[User:Unreliable Connection\|2659: Unreliable Connection]] ([[User talk:Unreliable Connection\|talk]]) 08:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
		+	:Higgs ''exactly'' rhymes with Pigs, but there's absolutely no reason to believe that hS anything to do with anything. Stupid comment, made for stupid reason, and I think this needs highlighting more than it deserves to be swept under the carpet. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.229\|172.70.162.229]] 19:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:05, 29 March 2023
Line 42:		Line 42:

	Neutrinos naturally undergo flavor-changing oscillations, so the idea of getting rid of the extra generations is more reasonable than it seems at first. Electron neutrinos change to mu and tau neutrinos in flight and vice versa. Mentioning this simply because I didn't see anyone else mention it. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino_oscillation		Neutrinos naturally undergo flavor-changing oscillations, so the idea of getting rid of the extra generations is more reasonable than it seems at first. Electron neutrinos change to mu and tau neutrinos in flight and vice versa. Mentioning this simply because I didn't see anyone else mention it. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino_oscillation
		+
		+	"Higgs" loosely rhymes with "Pigs". I guess that's the reason why [[Randall]] doesn't want to use the name "Higgs". [[User:Unreliable Connection\|2659: Unreliable Connection]] ([[User talk:Unreliable Connection\|talk]]) 08:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 This is the first time I have seen an explainxkcd that blatantly and intentionally lies in the explanation. Jokes are common, especially the 'citation needed' meme. But your supposed to do that ''without'' any lies. Someone please fix it (especially the bug section) to be a funny, but accurate explanation as per the norm. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.226|108.162.237.226]] 17:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-I misread the right-most vertical caption [in the explanation's chart] as "secular bosons" and didn't understand what the religious beliefs of seaman have to do with the rest. [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|talk]]) 09:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
+I misread the right-most vertical caption [in the explanation's chart] as "secular bosuns" and didn't understand what the religious beliefs of seaman have to do with the rest. [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|talk]]) 09:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 Neutrinos naturally undergo flavor-changing oscillations, so the idea of getting rid of the extra generations is more reasonable than it seems at first. Electron neutrinos change to mu and tau neutrinos in flight and vice versa. Mentioning this simply because I didn't see anyone else mention it. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino_oscillation

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 This is the first time I have seen an explainxkcd that blatantly and intentionally lies in the explanation. Jokes are common, especially the 'citation needed' meme. But your supposed to do that ''without'' any lies. Someone please fix it (especially the bug section) to be a funny, but accurate explanation as per the norm. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.226|108.162.237.226]] 17:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
-I misread the right-most vertical caption as "secular bosons" and didn't understand what the religious beliefs of seaman have to do with the rest.
+I misread the right-most vertical caption [in the explanation's chart] as "secular bosons" and didn't understand what the religious beliefs of seaman have to do with the rest. [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|talk]]) 09:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 Neutrinos naturally undergo flavor-changing oscillations, so the idea of getting rid of the extra generations is more reasonable than it seems at first. Electron neutrinos change to mu and tau neutrinos in flight and vice versa. Mentioning this simply because I didn't see anyone else mention it. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino_oscillation

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:36, 5 October 2020
Line 40:		Line 40:

	I misread the right-most vertical caption as "secular bosons" and didn't understand what the religious beliefs of seaman have to do with the rest.		I misread the right-most vertical caption as "secular bosons" and didn't understand what the religious beliefs of seaman have to do with the rest.
		+
		+	Neutrinos naturally undergo flavor-changing oscillations, so the idea of getting rid of the extra generations is more reasonable than it seems at first. Electron neutrinos change to mu and tau neutrinos in flight and vice versa. Mentioning this simply because I didn't see anyone else mention it. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino_oscillation

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:06, 1 September 2020
Line 39:		Line 39:
	This is the first time I have seen an explainxkcd that blatantly and intentionally lies in the explanation. Jokes are common, especially the 'citation needed' meme. But your supposed to do that ''without'' any lies. Someone please fix it (especially the bug section) to be a funny, but accurate explanation as per the norm. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.226\|108.162.237.226]] 17:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)		This is the first time I have seen an explainxkcd that blatantly and intentionally lies in the explanation. Jokes are common, especially the 'citation needed' meme. But your supposed to do that ''without'' any lies. Someone please fix it (especially the bug section) to be a funny, but accurate explanation as per the norm. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.226\|108.162.237.226]] 17:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

−	I misread the right-most vertical caption as "secular ~~boson~~" and didn't understand what the religious beliefs of a seaman ~~had~~ to do with the rest.	+	I misread the right-most vertical caption as "secular bosons" and didn't understand what the religious beliefs of seaman have to do with the rest.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:04, 1 September 2020
Line 38:		Line 38:

	This is the first time I have seen an explainxkcd that blatantly and intentionally lies in the explanation. Jokes are common, especially the 'citation needed' meme. But your supposed to do that ''without'' any lies. Someone please fix it (especially the bug section) to be a funny, but accurate explanation as per the norm. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.226\|108.162.237.226]] 17:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)		This is the first time I have seen an explainxkcd that blatantly and intentionally lies in the explanation. Jokes are common, especially the 'citation needed' meme. But your supposed to do that ''without'' any lies. Someone please fix it (especially the bug section) to be a funny, but accurate explanation as per the norm. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.226\|108.162.237.226]] 17:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	I misread the right-most vertical caption as "secular boson" and didn't understand what the religious beliefs of a seaman had to do with the rest.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 30 August 2020
Line 37:		Line 37:
	"Randall apparently considers magic to exist and be a particle, both of which are blatantly false." - but both the text of the comic and the sentence immediately after this one clearly state that it is ''intentionally'' inaccurate, so this seems like a strange claim to make. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.156\|172.69.34.156]] 01:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)		"Randall apparently considers magic to exist and be a particle, both of which are blatantly false." - but both the text of the comic and the sentence immediately after this one clearly state that it is ''intentionally'' inaccurate, so this seems like a strange claim to make. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.156\|172.69.34.156]] 01:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

−	This is the first time I have seen an explainxkcd that blatantly and intentionally lies in the explanation. Jokes are common, especially the 'citation needed' meme. But your supposed to do that ''without'' any lies. Someone please fix it (especially the bug section) to be a funny, but ~~serious~~ explanation as per the norm. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.226\|108.162.237.226]] 17:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)	+	This is the first time I have seen an explainxkcd that blatantly and intentionally lies in the explanation. Jokes are common, especially the 'citation needed' meme. But your supposed to do that ''without'' any lies. Someone please fix it (especially the bug section) to be a funny, but accurate explanation as per the norm. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.226\|108.162.237.226]] 17:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:37, 30 August 2020
Line 36:		Line 36:

	"Randall apparently considers magic to exist and be a particle, both of which are blatantly false." - but both the text of the comic and the sentence immediately after this one clearly state that it is ''intentionally'' inaccurate, so this seems like a strange claim to make. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.156\|172.69.34.156]] 01:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)		"Randall apparently considers magic to exist and be a particle, both of which are blatantly false." - but both the text of the comic and the sentence immediately after this one clearly state that it is ''intentionally'' inaccurate, so this seems like a strange claim to make. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.156\|172.69.34.156]] 01:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	This is the first time I have seen an explainxkcd that blatantly and intentionally lies in the explanation. Jokes are common, especially the 'citation needed' meme. But your supposed to do that ''without'' any lies. Someone please fix it (especially the bug section) to be a funny, but serious explanation as per the norm. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.226\|108.162.237.226]] 17:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:59, 29 August 2020
Line 35:		Line 35:
	Most recent revision "(→‎Leptons: neutrons are universally lower-case n, ..." isn't strictly true in its reversion of a prior statement. {{w\|Neutron\|Wikipedia}} (amongst other places) states possible symbols of "n, n⁰, N⁰". The replacement information is probably not wrong, though. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.158.185\|162.158.158.185]] 11:38, 28 August 2020 (UTC)		Most recent revision "(→‎Leptons: neutrons are universally lower-case n, ..." isn't strictly true in its reversion of a prior statement. {{w\|Neutron\|Wikipedia}} (amongst other places) states possible symbols of "n, n⁰, N⁰". The replacement information is probably not wrong, though. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.158.185\|162.158.158.185]] 11:38, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

−	"Randall apparently considers magic to exist and be a particle, both of which are blatantly false." - but both the text of the comic and the sentence immediately after this one clearly state that it is ''intentionally'' inaccurate, so this seems like a strange claim to make. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.156\|172.69.34.156]] 01:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)~~Somdudewillson~~	+	"Randall apparently considers magic to exist and be a particle, both of which are blatantly false." - but both the text of the comic and the sentence immediately after this one clearly state that it is ''intentionally'' inaccurate, so this seems like a strange claim to make. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.156\|172.69.34.156]] 01:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)