Talk:2438: Siri - Revision history

Quillathe Siannodel: /* Does anyone know why this is incomplete? */

2021-04-16T15:07:51Z

‎Does anyone know why this is incomplete?

Quillathe Siannodel at 14:57, 25 March 2021

2021-03-25T14:57:54Z

Quillathe Siannodel at 14:56, 25 March 2021

2021-03-25T14:56:41Z

172.69.34.52 at 20:18, 22 March 2021

2021-03-22T20:18:59Z

162.158.212.224 at 17:14, 18 March 2021

2021-03-18T17:14:23Z

Hkmaly at 03:20, 18 March 2021

2021-03-18T03:20:52Z

172.69.22.252: Not to go all sentence fragment on you.

2021-03-18T02:44:21Z

Not to go all sentence fragment on you.

Ncxezlyz at 22:21, 17 March 2021

2021-03-17T22:21:02Z

162.158.159.108 at 22:17, 17 March 2021

2021-03-17T22:17:33Z

162.158.212.225 at 20:41, 17 March 2021

2021-03-17T20:41:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:07, 16 April 2021
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:Defeating Siri in that way is dishonorable. Face her! Look her in the eye!--[[User:Quillathe Siannodel\|Quillathe Siannodel]] ([[User talk:Quillathe Siannodel\|talk]]) 14:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)		:Defeating Siri in that way is dishonorable. Face her! Look her in the eye!--[[User:Quillathe Siannodel\|Quillathe Siannodel]] ([[User talk:Quillathe Siannodel\|talk]]) 14:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

−	~~== Does anyone know why this is incomplete? ==~~	+	EDIT: Comment was deleted due to spamming-ish-ness.
−
−	Without information, nobody knows which part needs fixing. If anyone knows why this is incomplete, please post the reason here. If nobody can provide a satisfactory answer, maybe we should consider removing the incomplete tag. '''Note that I am posting this exact same text on other comics of questionable incompleteness. It's not spamming~~, it's a conscious attempt to clean this category up.'''~~--~~[[User:Quillathe Siannodel\|Quillathe Siannodel]] ([[User talk:Quillathe Siannodel\|talk]]) 14:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)~~

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 If you expose your iPhone to helium, will that will defeat Siri?
 [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.52|172.69.34.52]] 20:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 == Does anyone know why this is incomplete? ==
 Without information, nobody knows which part needs fixing. If anyone knows why this is incomplete, please post the reason here. If nobody can provide a satisfactory answer, maybe we should consider removing the incomplete tag. '''Note that I am posting this exact same text on other comics of questionable incompleteness. It's not spamming, it's a conscious attempt to clean this category up.'''--[[User:Quillathe Siannodel|Quillathe Siannodel]] ([[User talk:Quillathe Siannodel|talk]]) 14:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 25 March 2021
Line 15:		Line 15:
	If you expose your iPhone to helium, will that will defeat Siri?		If you expose your iPhone to helium, will that will defeat Siri?
	[[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.52\|172.69.34.52]] 20:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.52\|172.69.34.52]] 20:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Does anyone know why this is incomplete? ==
		+
		+	Without information, nobody knows which part needs fixing. If anyone knows why this is incomplete, please post the reason here. If nobody can provide a satisfactory answer, maybe we should consider removing the incomplete tag. '''Note that I am posting this exact same text on other comics of questionable incompleteness. It's not spamming, it's a conscious attempt to clean this category up.'''--[[User:Quillathe Siannodel\|Quillathe Siannodel]] ([[User talk:Quillathe Siannodel\|talk]]) 14:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 22 March 2021
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:Maybe she thinks Siri is ghost haunting her phone? -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 03:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)		:Maybe she thinks Siri is ghost haunting her phone? -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 03:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	If you expose your iPhone to helium, will that will defeat Siri?
		+	[[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.52\|172.69.34.52]] 20:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 :It happened just now? I really want to say something like dispassionate non-empathy (it reads as if she has a fact-obsessed but emotion-sparse mentality). No idea why she thought to enquire of Siri's (latest) life-status without reason. Perhaps the app closed (unseen to us) and she arrived at the 'logical' question to try to determine why (from a Cueball who we can see has clearly not seen the event itsrlf). It all seems to point towards SG 'failing' various aspects of the Sally-Anne Test/Social Cognition/Theory Of Mind, with sufficiently advanced reasoning that is nonetheless grossly misapplied.
 :(It's funny, for those who perpetually ask, for the Cognitive Dissonance and Non-Sequiturs of the situation. In a RL example, we probably should be worried that either there's something very wrong with SG or else we're missing a lot of background facts ourselves. But I think we can still enjoy this sketch without the unease we might experience otherwise.) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.108|162.158.159.108]] 22:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 :Siri had to have been alive while recording her dialog, no? /s [[User:Ncxezlyz|Ncxezlyz]] ([[User talk:Ncxezlyz|talk]]) 22:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 Given the verb tense “is Siri alive?” it is clear that science girl was not referring to a past state.  This to me suggests that SG literally wasn’t sure if a live person (or sentient AI) actually had the ability to do things to her phone on command.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.22.252|172.69.22.252]]
 :Maybe she thinks Siri is ghost haunting her phone? -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 03:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:20, 18 March 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Given the verb tense “is Siri alive?” it is clear that science girl was not referring to a past state. This to me suggests that SG literally wasn’t sure if a live person (or sentient AI) actually had the ability to do things to her phone on command.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.22.252\|172.69.22.252]]		Given the verb tense “is Siri alive?” it is clear that science girl was not referring to a past state. This to me suggests that SG literally wasn’t sure if a live person (or sentient AI) actually had the ability to do things to her phone on command.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.22.252\|172.69.22.252]]
		+
		+	:Maybe she thinks Siri is ghost haunting her phone? -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 03:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 18 March 2021
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:Siri had to have been alive while recording her dialog, no? /s [[User:Ncxezlyz\|Ncxezlyz]] ([[User talk:Ncxezlyz\|talk]]) 22:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)		:Siri had to have been alive while recording her dialog, no? /s [[User:Ncxezlyz\|Ncxezlyz]] ([[User talk:Ncxezlyz\|talk]]) 22:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	Given the verb tense “is Siri alive?” it is clear that science girl was not referring to a past state. This to me suggests that SG literally wasn’t sure if a live person (or sentient AI) actually had the ability to do things to her phone on command.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.22.252\|172.69.22.252]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 17 March 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:It happened just now? I really want to say something like dispassionate non-empathy (it reads as if she has a fact-obsessed but emotion-sparse mentality). No idea why she thought to enquire of Siri's (latest) life-status without reason. Perhaps the app closed (unseen to us) and she arrived at the 'logical' question to try to determine why (from a Cueball who we can see has clearly not seen the event itsrlf). It all seems to point towards SG 'failing' various aspects of the Sally-Anne Test/Social Cognition/Theory Of Mind, with sufficiently advanced reasoning that is nonetheless grossly misapplied.		:It happened just now? I really want to say something like dispassionate non-empathy (it reads as if she has a fact-obsessed but emotion-sparse mentality). No idea why she thought to enquire of Siri's (latest) life-status without reason. Perhaps the app closed (unseen to us) and she arrived at the 'logical' question to try to determine why (from a Cueball who we can see has clearly not seen the event itsrlf). It all seems to point towards SG 'failing' various aspects of the Sally-Anne Test/Social Cognition/Theory Of Mind, with sufficiently advanced reasoning that is nonetheless grossly misapplied.
	:(It's funny, for those who perpetually ask, for the Cognitive Dissonance and Non-Sequiturs of the situation. In a RL example, we probably should be worried that either there's something very wrong with SG or else we're missing a lot of background facts ourselves. But I think we can still enjoy this sketch without the unease we might experience otherwise.) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.108\|162.158.159.108]] 22:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)		:(It's funny, for those who perpetually ask, for the Cognitive Dissonance and Non-Sequiturs of the situation. In a RL example, we probably should be worried that either there's something very wrong with SG or else we're missing a lot of background facts ourselves. But I think we can still enjoy this sketch without the unease we might experience otherwise.) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.108\|162.158.159.108]] 22:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Siri had to have been alive while recording her dialog, no? /s [[User:Ncxezlyz\|Ncxezlyz]] ([[User talk:Ncxezlyz\|talk]]) 22:21, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 17 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->		<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->
−	Why does she immediately accept that Siri did indeed die if Siri was talking to her just a moment ago?	+	Why does she immediately accept that Siri did indeed die if Siri was talking to her just a moment ago? (Unsigned!)
		+	:It happened just now? I really want to say something like dispassionate non-empathy (it reads as if she has a fact-obsessed but emotion-sparse mentality). No idea why she thought to enquire of Siri's (latest) life-status without reason. Perhaps the app closed (unseen to us) and she arrived at the 'logical' question to try to determine why (from a Cueball who we can see has clearly not seen the event itsrlf). It all seems to point towards SG 'failing' various aspects of the Sally-Anne Test/Social Cognition/Theory Of Mind, with sufficiently advanced reasoning that is nonetheless grossly misapplied.
		+	:(It's funny, for those who perpetually ask, for the Cognitive Dissonance and Non-Sequiturs of the situation. In a RL example, we probably should be worried that either there's something very wrong with SG or else we're missing a lot of background facts ourselves. But I think we can still enjoy this sketch without the unease we might experience otherwise.) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.108\|162.158.159.108]] 22:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 17 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->		<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->
		+	Why does she immediately accept that Siri did indeed die if Siri was talking to her just a moment ago?