Talk:2466: In Your Classroom - Revision history

82.132.244.89 at 14:27, 5 November 2025

2025-11-05T14:27:49Z

Explainyourself: Theology

2025-11-05T04:41:14Z

Theology

172.69.195.230: /* hey, uh, i think a joke in here needs an explain-explain-xkcd page. */

2024-02-13T02:08:02Z

‎hey, uh, i think a joke in here needs an explain-explain-xkcd page.

Willlbrwillbr: /* hey, uh, i think a joke in here needs an explain-explain-xkcd page. */ new section

2024-02-13T01:31:37Z

‎hey, uh, i think a joke in here needs an explain-explain-xkcd page.: new section

Moderator: Comment

2024-02-05T01:50:13Z

Comment

141.101.99.80 at 14:19, 4 February 2024

2024-02-04T14:19:52Z

172.69.194.80: Fix info reply.

2024-02-04T13:57:02Z

Fix info reply.

Cal3000000 at 12:12, 4 February 2024

2024-02-04T12:12:41Z

172.69.35.102 at 22:25, 1 June 2021

2021-06-01T22:25:49Z

108.162.249.50: Comment on over-use (in my opinion) of "citation needed" tags

2021-05-29T02:11:06Z

Comment on over-use (in my opinion) of "citation needed" tags

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 5 November 2025
Line 40:		Line 40:

	He should've added theology. [[User:Explainyourself\|Explainyourself]] ([[User talk:Explainyourself\|talk]]) 04:41, 5 November 2025 (UTC)		He should've added theology. [[User:Explainyourself\|Explainyourself]] ([[User talk:Explainyourself\|talk]]) 04:41, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
		+	:Though, for those that believe in it, it's ''always'' there. Whilst for others it should ''never'' be. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.89\|82.132.244.89]] 14:27, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:41, 5 November 2025
Line 38:		Line 38:
	the thing in robotics' row about sarah connor from terminator. self-explanatory. {{unsigned\|Willlbrwillbr\|01:31, 13 February 2024}}		the thing in robotics' row about sarah connor from terminator. self-explanatory. {{unsigned\|Willlbrwillbr\|01:31, 13 February 2024}}
	:I'll put a wikilink in, then. Perhaps her Character Page, if she has one and it relates to her (justified) robophobia. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.230\|172.69.195.230]] 02:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)		:I'll put a wikilink in, then. Perhaps her Character Page, if she has one and it relates to her (justified) robophobia. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.230\|172.69.195.230]] 02:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	He should've added theology. [[User:Explainyourself\|Explainyourself]] ([[User talk:Explainyourself\|talk]]) 04:41, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 Thanks to whoever added to my clarification on top of the table [[User:Moderator|Moderator]] ([[User talk:Moderator|talk]]) 01:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
-== hey, uh, i think a joke in here needs an explain-explain-xkcd page. ==
+;hey, uh, i think a joke in here needs an explain-explain-xkcd page.
-the thing in robotics' row about sarah connor from terminator. self-explanatory.
+the thing in robotics' row about sarah connor from terminator. self-explanatory. {{unsigned|Willlbrwillbr|01:31, 13 February 2024}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 13 February 2024
Line 33:		Line 33:

	Thanks to whoever added to my clarification on top of the table [[User:Moderator\|Moderator]] ([[User talk:Moderator\|talk]]) 01:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)		Thanks to whoever added to my clarification on top of the table [[User:Moderator\|Moderator]] ([[User talk:Moderator\|talk]]) 01:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	== hey, uh, i think a joke in here needs an explain-explain-xkcd page. ==
		+
		+	the thing in robotics' row about sarah connor from terminator. self-explanatory.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:50, 5 February 2024
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:(I had to squash the reason down, to fit, however. Table-data lines get the "\|-" symbol at the start of a line (text after that doesn't appear as regular cell data). Table cell-data starts as "\|" on a line-start (or "\|\|" where adding more cells on a single line of markup) and when the cell ("\|") starts with a "-" (e.g. "-5") then it clearly looks like a row-break ("\|-[...]") unless you do something about it. In this case, I put a space between the cell-pipe and the value-negative (and also could have added one, or two, before the unsigned values ...just for markup neatness). Other solutions might have been to use a different dash (”–” instead of "-", visually not too different, but might have annoyed other people doing text-searches [edit: and caused more fuss in supporting table-sorting functionality, of course!<!-- for the interested: if the column is "sortable", then data-sort-value="" would probably be needed, causing so much unnecessary additional fuss... -->]), moved the new-line cells into being "\|\|" followups to the respective prior line or used something like a <code><nowiki><nowiki/></nowiki></code> "breaking-nonspace" interjection (i.e. technically the opposite of an <code>&nbsp;</code>, though that would have worked also for several reasons). I'm sure there are other ways of doing it, as well, but I only tried the first, with the others in mind in case I'd got the right sort of diagnosis in mind but hadn't immediately identified a working cure.)		:(I had to squash the reason down, to fit, however. Table-data lines get the "\|-" symbol at the start of a line (text after that doesn't appear as regular cell data). Table cell-data starts as "\|" on a line-start (or "\|\|" where adding more cells on a single line of markup) and when the cell ("\|") starts with a "-" (e.g. "-5") then it clearly looks like a row-break ("\|-[...]") unless you do something about it. In this case, I put a space between the cell-pipe and the value-negative (and also could have added one, or two, before the unsigned values ...just for markup neatness). Other solutions might have been to use a different dash (”–” instead of "-", visually not too different, but might have annoyed other people doing text-searches [edit: and caused more fuss in supporting table-sorting functionality, of course!<!-- for the interested: if the column is "sortable", then data-sort-value="" would probably be needed, causing so much unnecessary additional fuss... -->]), moved the new-line cells into being "\|\|" followups to the respective prior line or used something like a <code><nowiki><nowiki/></nowiki></code> "breaking-nonspace" interjection (i.e. technically the opposite of an <code>&nbsp;</code>, though that would have worked also for several reasons). I'm sure there are other ways of doing it, as well, but I only tried the first, with the others in mind in case I'd got the right sort of diagnosis in mind but hadn't immediately identified a working cure.)
	:The only suggestion I have, for future, is to use the Preview button more. As I ought to, sometimes. But it lets you play around to see if you can identify (and solve!) any problems, especially with notoriously miseditable table markup. You can also entirely back out of changes easier, while you try to learn what went wrong or seek help from others. It's always good to learn, of course! And I also learnt from this, and it's probably only circumstantial that I had never made the same inadvertent error in the past... ;) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.80\|172.69.194.80]] 13:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)		:The only suggestion I have, for future, is to use the Preview button more. As I ought to, sometimes. But it lets you play around to see if you can identify (and solve!) any problems, especially with notoriously miseditable table markup. You can also entirely back out of changes easier, while you try to learn what went wrong or seek help from others. It's always good to learn, of course! And I also learnt from this, and it's probably only circumstantial that I had never made the same inadvertent error in the past... ;) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.80\|172.69.194.80]] 13:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	Thanks to whoever added to my clarification on top of the table [[User:Moderator\|Moderator]] ([[User talk:Moderator\|talk]]) 01:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 I tried to edit the table to have the weirdness and badness from -10 to 10, but the table broke. Can someone fix it please? [[User:Cal3000000|Cal3000000]] ([[User talk:Cal3000000|talk]]) 12:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 :Fixed it [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2466:_In_Your_Classroom&diff=334172&oldid=334170 here] (before I read your call for help). I mention in the summary the ''reason'' it broke, and was just about to let you know anyway (you don't have a Talk page yet, so came here to give the link and then find the above plea).
-:(I had to squash the reason down, to fit, however. Table-data lines get the "|-" symbol at the start of a line (text after that doesn't appear as regular cell data). Table cell-data starts as "|" on a line-start (or "||" where adding more cells on a single line of markup) and when the cell ("|") starts with a "-" (e.g. "-5") then it clearly looks like a row-break ("|-[...]") unless you do something about it. In this case, I put a space between the cell-pipe and the value-negative (and also could have added one, or two, before the unsigned values ...just for markup neatness). Other solutions might have been to use a different dash (”–” instead of "-", visually not too different, but might have annoyed other people doing text-sesrches), moved the new-line cells into being "||" followups to the respective prior line or used something like a <code><nowiki><nowiki/></nowiki></code> "breaking-nonspace" interjection (i.e. technically the opposite of an <code>&amp;nbsp;</code>, though that would have worked also for several reasons). I'm sure there are other ways of doing it, as well, but I only tried the first, with the others in mind in case I'd got the right sort of diagnosis in mind but hadn't immediately identified a working cure.)
+:(I had to squash the reason down, to fit, however. Table-data lines get the "|-" symbol at the start of a line (text after that doesn't appear as regular cell data). Table cell-data starts as "|" on a line-start (or "||" where adding more cells on a single line of markup) and when the cell ("|") starts with a "-" (e.g. "-5") then it clearly looks like a row-break ("|-[...]") unless you do something about it. In this case, I put a space between the cell-pipe and the value-negative (and also could have added one, or two, before the unsigned values ...just for markup neatness). Other solutions might have been to use a different dash (”–” instead of "-", visually not too different, but might have annoyed other people doing text-searches [edit: and caused more fuss in supporting table-sorting functionality, of course!<!-- for the interested: if the column is "sortable", then data-sort-value="" would probably be needed, causing so much unnecessary additional fuss... -->]), moved the new-line cells into being "||" followups to the respective prior line or used something like a <code><nowiki><nowiki/></nowiki></code> "breaking-nonspace" interjection (i.e. technically the opposite of an <code>&amp;nbsp;</code>, though that would have worked also for several reasons). I'm sure there are other ways of doing it, as well, but I only tried the first, with the others in mind in case I'd got the right sort of diagnosis in mind but hadn't immediately identified a working cure.)
 :The only suggestion I have, for future, is to use the Preview button more. As I ought to, sometimes. But it lets you play around to see if you can identify (and solve!) any problems, especially with notoriously miseditable table markup. You can also entirely back out of changes easier, while you try to learn what went wrong or seek help from others. It's always good to learn, of course! And I also learnt from this, and it's probably only circumstantial that I had never made the same inadvertent error in the past... ;) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.80|172.69.194.80]] 13:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 4 February 2024
Line 28:		Line 28:

	I tried to edit the table to have the weirdness and badness from -10 to 10, but the table broke. Can someone fix it please? [[User:Cal3000000\|Cal3000000]] ([[User talk:Cal3000000\|talk]]) 12:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)		I tried to edit the table to have the weirdness and badness from -10 to 10, but the table broke. Can someone fix it please? [[User:Cal3000000\|Cal3000000]] ([[User talk:Cal3000000\|talk]]) 12:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
		+	:Fixed it [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2466:_In_Your_Classroom&diff=334172&oldid=334170 here] (before I read your call for help). I mention in the summary the ''reason'' it broke, and was just about to let you know anyway (you don't have a Talk page yet, so came here to give the link and then find the above plea).
		+	:(I had to squash the reason down, to fit, however. Table-data lines get the "\|-" symbol at the start of a line (text after that doesn't appear as regular cell data). Table cell-data starts as "\|" on a line-start (or "\|\|" where adding more cells on a single line of markup) and when the cell ("\|") starts with a "-" (e.g. "-5") then it clearly looks like a row-break ("\|-[...]") unless you do something about it. In this case, I put a space between the cell-pipe and the value-negative (and also could have added one, or two, before the unsigned values ...just for markup neatness). Other solutions might have been to use a different dash (”–” instead of "-", visually not too different, but might have annoyed other people doing text-sesrches), moved the new-line cells into being "\|\|" followups to the respective prior line or used something like a <code><nowiki><nowiki/></nowiki></code> "breaking-nonspace" interjection (i.e. technically the opposite of an <code>&nbsp;</code>, though that would have worked also for several reasons). I'm sure there are other ways of doing it, as well, but I only tried the first, with the others in mind in case I'd got the right sort of diagnosis in mind but hadn't immediately identified a working cure.)
		+	:The only suggestion I have, for future, is to use the Preview button more. As I ought to, sometimes. But it lets you play around to see if you can identify (and solve!) any problems, especially with notoriously miseditable table markup. You can also entirely back out of changes easier, while you try to learn what went wrong or seek help from others. It's always good to learn, of course! And I also learnt from this, and it's probably only circumstantial that I had never made the same inadvertent error in the past... ;) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.80\|172.69.194.80]] 13:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:12, 4 February 2024
Line 26:		Line 26:

	Missed opportunity: "...and Quantum Mechanics is both way off to the left and way off to the right." --[[Special:Contributions/172.69.35.102\|172.69.35.102]] 22:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)		Missed opportunity: "...and Quantum Mechanics is both way off to the left and way off to the right." --[[Special:Contributions/172.69.35.102\|172.69.35.102]] 22:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	I tried to edit the table to have the weirdness and badness from -10 to 10, but the table broke. Can someone fix it please? [[User:Cal3000000\|Cal3000000]] ([[User talk:Cal3000000\|talk]]) 12:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 1 June 2021
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Several parts of this explanation seem to have been written in such a way as to include statements against which nobody in their right mind would argue and, in any other context at least, would not require any supporting citation, and are hence appropriate places for the humourous use of "citation needed" often seen on this site.{{citation needed}} I very much appreciate the hitherto typical Explain-XKCD-style sparse (about once per article) use of "citation needed" but I feel that it loses much of it's comedic effect when used frequently (six times in this article as I write!) in text that appears to be composed with the purpose of including the tag several times. I appreciate that some of us enjoy reading explanations peppered with the tags, so I haven't removed any of them, but my feeling is that the 'too much of a good thing' concept applies here. In future articles I personally hope to see normally written explanations (or as normally written as we can reasonably expect given the subject matter) with "citation needed" tags used only sparingly.		Several parts of this explanation seem to have been written in such a way as to include statements against which nobody in their right mind would argue and, in any other context at least, would not require any supporting citation, and are hence appropriate places for the humourous use of "citation needed" often seen on this site.{{citation needed}} I very much appreciate the hitherto typical Explain-XKCD-style sparse (about once per article) use of "citation needed" but I feel that it loses much of it's comedic effect when used frequently (six times in this article as I write!) in text that appears to be composed with the purpose of including the tag several times. I appreciate that some of us enjoy reading explanations peppered with the tags, so I haven't removed any of them, but my feeling is that the 'too much of a good thing' concept applies here. In future articles I personally hope to see normally written explanations (or as normally written as we can reasonably expect given the subject matter) with "citation needed" tags used only sparingly.
		+
		+	Missed opportunity: "...and Quantum Mechanics is both way off to the left and way off to the right." --[[Special:Contributions/172.69.35.102\|172.69.35.102]] 22:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 Shouldn't it be vulcanology?[[User:Joem5636|Joem5636]] ([[User talk:Joem5636|talk]]) 12:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-:I thought that, but it appears that vulcanology/volcanology are both possibly equally valid (though the 'vulc' definitions point to 'volc' ones almost always in online dictionaries, with the reverse mostly only as 'alternative', and 'vulcanologist' seems less acknowledged than 'volcanogist' in related-words linking). In many ways, that annoys me, but that might be the classicist in me rather than the geographer/geologist who appreciates that "vulcanology" might be a rather more limited field that would require no more travel to extensively study than can be afforded by a handy Sicilian fishing boat or light aircraft. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.19|141.101.99.19]] 14:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
+:I thought that, but it appears that vulcanology/volcanology are both possibly equally valid (though the 'vulc' definitions point to 'volc' ones almost always in online dictionaries, with the reverse mostly only as 'alternative', and 'vulcanologist' seems less acknowledged than 'volcanologist' in related-words linking). In many ways, that annoys me, but that might be the classicist in me rather than the geographer/geologist who appreciates that "vulcanology" might be a rather more limited field that would require no more travel to extensively study than can be afforded by a handy Sicilian fishing boat or light aircraft. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.19|141.101.99.19]] 14:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 Would an alternate Geography = weird be due to an invading nation-state? We already have volcanology and other similar "The earth came into the classroom" things in the graph. [[User:OhFFS|OhFFS]] ([[User talk:OhFFS|talk]]) 21:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 :That would be bad, but still less weird than the actual Earth. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.114.48|172.70.114.48]] 18:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)