Talk:2538: Snack - Revision history

MeZimm at 17:08, 7 March 2025

2025-03-07T17:08:03Z

Esogalt: Please don't actually, though.

2021-11-09T22:55:03Z

Please don't actually, though.

162.158.107.4: WANT COOKIES? good grief

2021-11-09T21:51:02Z

WANT COOKIES? good grief

Esogalt: Undo revision 220497 by 172.70.126.149 (talk). No thanks.

2021-11-08T15:53:04Z

Undo revision 220497 by 172.70.126.149 (talk). No thanks.

172.70.126.149: /* Pbpbpbpbpbpb */ new section

2021-11-08T15:07:00Z

‎Pbpbpbpbpbpb: new section

172.70.127.6 at 09:01, 8 November 2021

2021-11-08T09:01:05Z

GreatWyrmGold: Just a silly little joke.

2021-11-06T05:32:27Z

Just a silly little joke.

Esogalt at 01:09, 6 November 2021

2021-11-06T01:09:23Z

Hkmaly at 00:17, 6 November 2021

2021-11-06T00:17:46Z

Esogalt at 00:15, 6 November 2021

2021-11-06T00:15:47Z

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 I was wondering what the International Rugby Board had to do with the price of fish. [[User:Arachrah|Arachrah]] ([[User talk:Arachrah|talk]]) 22:26, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-I don't know who changed the bot's name to "Apple Cookie," but now I really want to know what that would taste like... -mezimm [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.115|108.162.221.115]] 20:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
+I don't know who changed the bot's name to "Apple Cookie," but now I really want to know what that would taste like... [[User:MeZimm|MeZimm]] ([[User talk:MeZimm|talk]]) 20:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 : Simply Google it (or possibly your favourite alternate of Bing, DuckDuckGo, AskJeeves, AltaVista, Yahoo, whatever else is actually around and hasn't been fatally out-Googled). One of the first things I got just now suggests a 20 mins bake using Brown sugar, apple, egg, baking soda, all purpose flour... but there are several others.
 :(I wasn't the Bot-changer, I must add, but I too now want some sort of apple biscuity-snack. And I only have some of the above ingredients at hand.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.185|172.70.85.185]] 21:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 9 November 2021
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Being asked whether I consent to cookies is literally the most common question I get this entire decade so far. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.4\|162.158.107.4]] 21:51, 9 November 2021 (UTC)		Being asked whether I consent to cookies is literally the most common question I get this entire decade so far. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.4\|162.158.107.4]] 21:51, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	: With enough time and drive I'm sure we could come up with a beautifully compelling subtext for this comic involving cookies, Facebook, ambiguously ethical experimentation, Apple Inc., and the relationship therebetween. [[User:Esogalt\|Esogalt]] ([[User talk:Esogalt\|talk]]) 22:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 9 November 2021
Line 26:		Line 26:

	What if the real lesson here is that all psychologists are just over-trained to be super cautious about considering EVERYTHING to be a psych experiment that requires ethics review? Maybe if the person offering snacks were ALSO a psychologist, they ACTUALLY WOULD BE REQUIRED to undergo IRB review and experiment documentation procedures and consent requirements.... JUST TO FIND OUT, as a matter of mild personal curiosity, which snack a specific person actually happened to prefer.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.127.6\|172.70.127.6]] 09:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)		What if the real lesson here is that all psychologists are just over-trained to be super cautious about considering EVERYTHING to be a psych experiment that requires ethics review? Maybe if the person offering snacks were ALSO a psychologist, they ACTUALLY WOULD BE REQUIRED to undergo IRB review and experiment documentation procedures and consent requirements.... JUST TO FIND OUT, as a matter of mild personal curiosity, which snack a specific person actually happened to prefer.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.127.6\|172.70.127.6]] 09:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	Being asked whether I consent to cookies is literally the most common question I get this entire decade so far. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.4\|162.158.107.4]] 21:51, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 8 November 2021
Line 26:		Line 26:

	What if the real lesson here is that all psychologists are just over-trained to be super cautious about considering EVERYTHING to be a psych experiment that requires ethics review? Maybe if the person offering snacks were ALSO a psychologist, they ACTUALLY WOULD BE REQUIRED to undergo IRB review and experiment documentation procedures and consent requirements.... JUST TO FIND OUT, as a matter of mild personal curiosity, which snack a specific person actually happened to prefer.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.127.6\|172.70.127.6]] 09:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)		What if the real lesson here is that all psychologists are just over-trained to be super cautious about considering EVERYTHING to be a psych experiment that requires ethics review? Maybe if the person offering snacks were ALSO a psychologist, they ACTUALLY WOULD BE REQUIRED to undergo IRB review and experiment documentation procedures and consent requirements.... JUST TO FIND OUT, as a matter of mild personal curiosity, which snack a specific person actually happened to prefer.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.127.6\|172.70.127.6]] 09:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
−
−	~~== Pbpbpbpbpbpb ==~~
−
−	~~faaaaaaaaart~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:07, 8 November 2021
Line 26:		Line 26:

	What if the real lesson here is that all psychologists are just over-trained to be super cautious about considering EVERYTHING to be a psych experiment that requires ethics review? Maybe if the person offering snacks were ALSO a psychologist, they ACTUALLY WOULD BE REQUIRED to undergo IRB review and experiment documentation procedures and consent requirements.... JUST TO FIND OUT, as a matter of mild personal curiosity, which snack a specific person actually happened to prefer.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.127.6\|172.70.127.6]] 09:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)		What if the real lesson here is that all psychologists are just over-trained to be super cautious about considering EVERYTHING to be a psych experiment that requires ethics review? Maybe if the person offering snacks were ALSO a psychologist, they ACTUALLY WOULD BE REQUIRED to undergo IRB review and experiment documentation procedures and consent requirements.... JUST TO FIND OUT, as a matter of mild personal curiosity, which snack a specific person actually happened to prefer.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.127.6\|172.70.127.6]] 09:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Pbpbpbpbpbpb ==
		+
		+	faaaaaaaaart

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:01, 8 November 2021
Line 24:		Line 24:

	This seems like it would be more effective on an Ayn Rand fanboy than a psych major. [[User:GreatWyrmGold\|GreatWyrmGold]] ([[User talk:GreatWyrmGold\|talk]]) 05:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)		This seems like it would be more effective on an Ayn Rand fanboy than a psych major. [[User:GreatWyrmGold\|GreatWyrmGold]] ([[User talk:GreatWyrmGold\|talk]]) 05:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	What if the real lesson here is that all psychologists are just over-trained to be super cautious about considering EVERYTHING to be a psych experiment that requires ethics review? Maybe if the person offering snacks were ALSO a psychologist, they ACTUALLY WOULD BE REQUIRED to undergo IRB review and experiment documentation procedures and consent requirements.... JUST TO FIND OUT, as a matter of mild personal curiosity, which snack a specific person actually happened to prefer.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.127.6\|172.70.127.6]] 09:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:32, 6 November 2021
Line 21:		Line 21:
	I don't think this really has anything to do with altruism. The cookie vs apple thing is reminiscent of studies on self-control, and in general I think the idea is that a lot of psychological studies require participants to make choices, and the participants are also often not made aware of the true nature of the experiment to avoid skewing results. [[User:Esogalt\|Esogalt]] ([[User talk:Esogalt\|talk]]) 00:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)		I don't think this really has anything to do with altruism. The cookie vs apple thing is reminiscent of studies on self-control, and in general I think the idea is that a lot of psychological studies require participants to make choices, and the participants are also often not made aware of the true nature of the experiment to avoid skewing results. [[User:Esogalt\|Esogalt]] ([[User talk:Esogalt\|talk]]) 00:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
	: Given a few people seem to generally agree with me, I've been bold™ and changed the explanation to relegate "altruism" to a secondary interpretation. Some examples of specific studies would be great; I'm blanking right now. [[User:Esogalt\|Esogalt]] ([[User talk:Esogalt\|talk]]) 01:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)		: Given a few people seem to generally agree with me, I've been bold™ and changed the explanation to relegate "altruism" to a secondary interpretation. Some examples of specific studies would be great; I'm blanking right now. [[User:Esogalt\|Esogalt]] ([[User talk:Esogalt\|talk]]) 01:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	This seems like it would be more effective on an Ayn Rand fanboy than a psych major. [[User:GreatWyrmGold\|GreatWyrmGold]] ([[User talk:GreatWyrmGold\|talk]]) 05:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:09, 6 November 2021
Line 20:		Line 20:

	I don't think this really has anything to do with altruism. The cookie vs apple thing is reminiscent of studies on self-control, and in general I think the idea is that a lot of psychological studies require participants to make choices, and the participants are also often not made aware of the true nature of the experiment to avoid skewing results. [[User:Esogalt\|Esogalt]] ([[User talk:Esogalt\|talk]]) 00:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)		I don't think this really has anything to do with altruism. The cookie vs apple thing is reminiscent of studies on self-control, and in general I think the idea is that a lot of psychological studies require participants to make choices, and the participants are also often not made aware of the true nature of the experiment to avoid skewing results. [[User:Esogalt\|Esogalt]] ([[User talk:Esogalt\|talk]]) 00:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
		+	: Given a few people seem to generally agree with me, I've been bold™ and changed the explanation to relegate "altruism" to a secondary interpretation. Some examples of specific studies would be great; I'm blanking right now. [[User:Esogalt\|Esogalt]] ([[User talk:Esogalt\|talk]]) 01:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 : Simply Google it (or possibly your favourite alternate of Bing, DuckDuckGo, AskJeeves, AltaVista, Yahoo, whatever else is actually around and hasn't been fatally out-Googled). One of the first things I got just now suggests a 20 mins bake using Brown sugar, apple, egg, baking soda, all purpose flour... but there are several others.
 :(I wasn't the Bot-changer, I must add, but I too now want some sort of apple biscuity-snack. And I only have some of the above ingredients at hand.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.185|172.70.85.185]] 21:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 Is altruism the only thing that psychologists study? It seems like psych students should be suspicious of just about any interactions. For instance, if they're invited to play in a game of chance, it could be a study of how they assess risk. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 21:11, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 I understood the comic as if he was given a choice that will reveal something about his personality instead of the altruism interpretation. The two very different options led me to this idea, that he doesn't want to choose the cookie because it seems unhealthy or whatever. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.167|108.162.237.167]] 23:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 I was given a choice of snack in one study that I participated in. But I don't know WHY. This might be too niche for me to understand.
 I don't think this really has anything to do with altruism. The cookie vs apple thing is reminiscent of studies on self-control, and in general I think the idea is that a lot of psychological studies require participants to make choices, and the participants are also often not made aware of the true nature of the experiment to avoid skewing results. [[User:Esogalt|Esogalt]] ([[User talk:Esogalt|talk]]) 00:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 6 November 2021
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I was given a choice of snack in one study that I participated in. But I don't know WHY. This might be too niche for me to understand.		I was given a choice of snack in one study that I participated in. But I don't know WHY. This might be too niche for me to understand.
		+
		+	I don't think this really has anything to do with altruism. The cookie vs apple thing is reminiscent of studies on self-control, and in general I think the idea is that a lot of psychological studies require participants to make choices, and the participants are also often not made aware of the true nature of the experiment to avoid skewing results. [[User:Esogalt\|Esogalt]] ([[User talk:Esogalt\|talk]]) 00:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)