Talk:2543: Never Told Anyone - Revision history

Troy0: Corrected an "unsigned" template

2021-11-27T03:41:44Z

Corrected an "unsigned" template

Divad27182: reply to unsigned reply

2021-11-19T14:39:44Z

reply to unsigned reply

172.70.85.227 at 10:48, 19 November 2021

2021-11-19T10:48:35Z

Ghostelephant at 01:30, 19 November 2021

2021-11-19T01:30:07Z

Angel at 01:26, 19 November 2021

2021-11-19T01:26:32Z

172.70.82.111 at 20:20, 18 November 2021

2021-11-18T20:20:54Z

GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e at 19:42, 18 November 2021

2021-11-18T19:42:20Z

162.158.203.36 at 18:46, 18 November 2021

2021-11-18T18:46:29Z

162.158.203.36 at 18:45, 18 November 2021

2021-11-18T18:45:31Z

Divad27182: Marriage?

2021-11-18T13:49:01Z

Marriage?

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 :Some Services offer a form of 2FA where they give you a list of 10 one time passwords / back-up codes that are valid indefinitely and are supposed to be printed out, in case access to the phone is lost. The generally romantic atmosphere of the comic makes me feel the number is more like that, especially since she also offers him her password in the alt-text. [[User:Ruffy314|Ruffy314]] ([[User talk:Ruffy314|talk]]) 10:39, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
-is prime, is that worthy of a mention? {{unsigned}}
+is prime, is that worthy of a mention? {{unsigned ip|108.162.249.63|21:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)}}
 :If you think it is a factor! (...of a semiprime, maybe.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.141|172.70.90.141]] 03:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 Aren't one time codes also used for Bluetooth pairing?  If so, couldn't this be considered a marriage proposal?  --[[User:Divad27182|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182|talk]]) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
-:If that's what you consider a proposal, I fear you will have plenty trouble finding a spouse----
+:If that's what you consider a proposal, I fear you will have plenty trouble finding a spouse----{{unsigned ip|162.158.203.36|13:45, 18 November 2021}}
 :I was thinking of something along those lines. They don't say what service the code is for, so it gave me a kind of weird train of thought like "this is a code that will give you access to ''me'', but only if you use it right away". Was wondering if anyone else was thinking along those lines [[User:Angel|Angel]] ([[User talk:Angel|talk]]) 01:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 Can some tell me why this comic is *still* in List of all comics even though it's number 2543, and so should be in the next page (2501-3000) --[[User:GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e|GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e]] ([[User talk:GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e|talk]]) 19:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 Joke's on you: I've already used that code before. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.227|172.70.85.227]] 10:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 19 November 2021
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:I was thinking of something along those lines. They don't say what service the code is for, so it gave me a kind of weird train of thought like "this is a code that will give you access to ''me'', but only if you use it right away". Was wondering if anyone else was thinking along those lines [[User:Angel\|Angel]] ([[User talk:Angel\|talk]]) 01:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)		:I was thinking of something along those lines. They don't say what service the code is for, so it gave me a kind of weird train of thought like "this is a code that will give you access to ''me'', but only if you use it right away". Was wondering if anyone else was thinking along those lines [[User:Angel\|Angel]] ([[User talk:Angel\|talk]]) 01:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
	Can some tell me why this comic is still in List of all comics even though it's number 2543, and so should be in the next page (2501-3000) --[[User:GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e\|GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e]] ([[User talk:GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e\|talk]]) 19:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)		Can some tell me why this comic is still in List of all comics even though it's number 2543, and so should be in the next page (2501-3000) --[[User:GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e\|GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e]] ([[User talk:GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e\|talk]]) 19:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	Joke's on you: I've already used that code before. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.227\|172.70.85.227]] 10:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 ::Though I'm not as obsessive with Star Wars to know this particular number, I know that the THX 1138 4EB meme pops up again throughout Lucas's later oevre, and (like just the other day) gets co-opted referentially by the Randalls of this world. Forty-odd years of obsession by generations of fans would not leave a single remastered pixel/unremastered grain of footage unanalysed of every last detail. I've personally used "6EQUJ5" as an obscure reference, at times, and had others have known/worked out what I was echoing (even before Google) and that's from a far more transient source... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.211|172.70.90.211]] 11:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 ::: 6EQUJ5 is no longer considered a one time code. In the 70s, it was inexplicable, but since then it has been found again. In fact, it is not considered to have a unique source. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.82.111|172.70.82.111]] 20:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 Aren't one time codes also used for Bluetooth pairing?  If so, couldn't this be considered a marriage proposal?  --[[User:Divad27182|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182|talk]]) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 Aren't one time codes also used for Bluetooth pairing?  If so, couldn't this be considered a marriage proposal?  --[[User:Divad27182|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182|talk]]) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 :If that's what you consider a proposal, I fear you will have plenty trouble finding a spouse----
 Can some tell me why this comic is *still* in List of all comics even though it's number 2543, and so should be in the next page (2501-3000) --[[User:GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e|GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e]] ([[User talk:GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e|talk]]) 19:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 18 November 2021
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Aren't one time codes also used for Bluetooth pairing? If so, couldn't this be considered a marriage proposal? --[[User:Divad27182\|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182\|talk]]) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)		Aren't one time codes also used for Bluetooth pairing? If so, couldn't this be considered a marriage proposal? --[[User:Divad27182\|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182\|talk]]) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
	:If that's what you consider a proposal, I fear you will have plenty trouble finding a spouse----		:If that's what you consider a proposal, I fear you will have plenty trouble finding a spouse----
		+	Can some tell me why this comic is still in List of all comics even though it's number 2543, and so should be in the next page (2501-3000) --[[User:GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e\|GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e]] ([[User talk:GcGYSF(asterisk)P(vertical line)e\|talk]]) 19:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 18 November 2021
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Aren't one time codes also used for Bluetooth pairing? If so, couldn't this be considered a marriage proposal? --[[User:Divad27182\|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182\|talk]]) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)		Aren't one time codes also used for Bluetooth pairing? If so, couldn't this be considered a marriage proposal? --[[User:Divad27182\|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182\|talk]]) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
−	:If that's what you consider a proposal, I fear you will have plenty trouble finding a spouse	+	:If that's what you consider a proposal, I fear you will have plenty trouble finding a spouse----
−	----

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:45, 18 November 2021
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Aren't one time codes also used for Bluetooth pairing? If so, couldn't this be considered a marriage proposal? --[[User:Divad27182\|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182\|talk]]) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)		Aren't one time codes also used for Bluetooth pairing? If so, couldn't this be considered a marriage proposal? --[[User:Divad27182\|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182\|talk]]) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
		+	:If that's what you consider a proposal, I fear you will have plenty trouble finding a spouse
		+	----

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:49, 18 November 2021
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:How on earth did you figure this out? Do you just happen to know the number of that trash compactor? And if so, how? And why? For me this comment raises way more questions than the comic did. [[User:Bischoff\|Bischoff]] ([[User talk:Bischoff\|talk]]) 10:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)		:How on earth did you figure this out? Do you just happen to know the number of that trash compactor? And if so, how? And why? For me this comment raises way more questions than the comic did. [[User:Bischoff\|Bischoff]] ([[User talk:Bischoff\|talk]]) 10:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
	::Though I'm not as obsessive with Star Wars to know this particular number, I know that the THX 1138 4EB meme pops up again throughout Lucas's later oevre, and (like just the other day) gets co-opted referentially by the Randalls of this world. Forty-odd years of obsession by generations of fans would not leave a single remastered pixel/unremastered grain of footage unanalysed of every last detail. I've personally used "6EQUJ5" as an obscure reference, at times, and had others have known/worked out what I was echoing (even before Google) and that's from a far more transient source... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.211\|172.70.90.211]] 11:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)		::Though I'm not as obsessive with Star Wars to know this particular number, I know that the THX 1138 4EB meme pops up again throughout Lucas's later oevre, and (like just the other day) gets co-opted referentially by the Randalls of this world. Forty-odd years of obsession by generations of fans would not leave a single remastered pixel/unremastered grain of footage unanalysed of every last detail. I've personally used "6EQUJ5" as an obscure reference, at times, and had others have known/worked out what I was echoing (even before Google) and that's from a far more transient source... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.211\|172.70.90.211]] 11:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	Aren't one time codes also used for Bluetooth pairing? If so, couldn't this be considered a marriage proposal? --[[User:Divad27182\|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182\|talk]]) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC)