Talk:2604: Frankenstein Captcha - Revision history

172.71.242.21: All panels containe frankenstein?

2023-08-08T11:01:19Z

All panels containe frankenstein?

172.69.135.43 at 00:53, 25 April 2023

2023-04-25T00:53:23Z

172.70.85.211 at 06:03, 6 May 2022

2022-05-06T06:03:57Z

172.70.178.33 at 23:29, 2 May 2022

2022-05-02T23:29:38Z

141.101.98.145: Don't know if this comment might better fit in-between other sections, but definitely shouldn't be top-posted (with excess linefeeds beneath it).

2022-04-15T22:54:03Z

Don't know if this comment might better fit in-between other sections, but definitely shouldn't be top-posted (with excess linefeeds beneath it).

108.162.237.9 at 21:54, 15 April 2022

2022-04-15T21:54:39Z

172.70.91.36 at 20:02, 12 April 2022

2022-04-12T20:02:40Z

108.162.242.58 at 15:58, 12 April 2022

2022-04-12T15:58:03Z

172.68.132.206: /* GPT-3's opinion */ 1263: Reassuring

2022-04-12T04:39:39Z

‎GPT-3's opinion: 1263: Reassuring

172.69.68.202 at 15:23, 11 April 2022

2022-04-11T15:23:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:01, 8 August 2023
Line 117:		Line 117:

	Captcha looks like the reverse of 4 pics 1 word. Sorry, I can't create talk pages, so could you help move this line to the Category:CAPTCHA talk page? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.135.43\|172.69.135.43]] 00:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)		Captcha looks like the reverse of 4 pics 1 word. Sorry, I can't create talk pages, so could you help move this line to the Category:CAPTCHA talk page? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.135.43\|172.69.135.43]] 00:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
		+
		+	-----
		+
		+	I'm beginning to think all of the cells could be considered to be Frankensteins (and/or creations of Frankenstein): e.g. the Turtle/Tortoise was (one) of the first creatures brought back to life by Victor; The boat/ship in 'Frankenstein' is never named, it could be called Frankenstein's ship/boat, or HE could be on it; The monster could be considered as Frankenstein (to some); OK so I'm struggling to find a Frankenstein in the picure of Link, though there is a link between Frankenstein's Monster and Link (Zelda/Link confusion); Viktor makes a puddle of blood (by killing the bride), whom he also dumps in the lake; M3GAN can be seen as a morden day retelling of Frankenstein, there also appears to be a Megan Frankenstein at Boulder University; Magma/Lava - Magma comix publishes(d) a comic called The Modern Frankenstein, William Lava wrote the score to Dracula vs Frankenstein (a real frankenstein of a film, imho); Pumpkin's are often carved (sculpted) into Frankenstein's Monster - thus (following the concept that you carve away everything that isn't what you want when sculpting) every Pumkin contains a Frankenstein's monster (also there is such thing as a Frankenstein Pumpkin - moulded into shape while growing...); Viktor (or Henry) Frankenstein; there is a book called Frankenstein makes a sandwich, maybe Viktor (Henry) made a sandwich for lunch? (I'm sure he would have at some point), McDonald's have a Frankenstein (land, sea and air sandwich, which may have come our AFTER the comic); Stop sign.. the idea that the whole book is an ethical stop sign; Monster - needs nothing further; Planet - (this is where I started actually) Frankenstein Planets - forming from the remains of other 'dead' planets - indeed every planet can be said to be a Frankenstein planet, formed from the components of dead stars (as can everything else?); Cueball and Ponytail.. reference to XKCD 1589?; Traffic light - Frankenstein (the book) is a warning, so is a traffic light (but how does it contain Frankenstein?); and the last panel obviously doesn't have Frankenstein in it...

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:53, 25 April 2023
Line 113:		Line 113:

	Hmm... "(That's not a thing even though the surrounding text written by same author is accurate. I don't doubt the person who wrote it thinks this about normal captchas, but even sophisticated users do not, and likely won't fail a single captcha by not doing this.)", to explain one particular [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2604:_Frankenstein_Captcha&curid=25132&diff=264841&oldid=264431 (de-)edit]. I didn't write that bit, but I ''did'' write the "Also, in my experience, CAPTCHAs that ask for..." further up this Talk page, and as such I found it a reasonable interpretation of my experience. Not going to reinstate it, but just want to register my resemblence to the remark. Carry on, though... As you were... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.211\|172.70.85.211]] 06:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)		Hmm... "(That's not a thing even though the surrounding text written by same author is accurate. I don't doubt the person who wrote it thinks this about normal captchas, but even sophisticated users do not, and likely won't fail a single captcha by not doing this.)", to explain one particular [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2604:_Frankenstein_Captcha&curid=25132&diff=264841&oldid=264431 (de-)edit]. I didn't write that bit, but I ''did'' write the "Also, in my experience, CAPTCHAs that ask for..." further up this Talk page, and as such I found it a reasonable interpretation of my experience. Not going to reinstate it, but just want to register my resemblence to the remark. Carry on, though... As you were... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.211\|172.70.85.211]] 06:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	Captcha looks like the reverse of 4 pics 1 word. Sorry, I can't create talk pages, so could you help move this line to the Category:CAPTCHA talk page? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.135.43\|172.69.135.43]] 00:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:03, 6 May 2022
Line 111:		Line 111:
	isn't it referencing things that have been named after or called Frankenstein (a turtle, an heirloom tomato variety, a sandwich, a hairstyle, etc.)?		isn't it referencing things that have been named after or called Frankenstein (a turtle, an heirloom tomato variety, a sandwich, a hairstyle, etc.)?
	[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.9\|108.162.237.9]] 21:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.9\|108.162.237.9]] 21:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	Hmm... "(That's not a thing even though the surrounding text written by same author is accurate. I don't doubt the person who wrote it thinks this about normal captchas, but even sophisticated users do not, and likely won't fail a single captcha by not doing this.)", to explain one particular [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2604:_Frankenstein_Captcha&curid=25132&diff=264841&oldid=264431 (de-)edit]. I didn't write that bit, but I ''did'' write the "Also, in my experience, CAPTCHAs that ask for..." further up this Talk page, and as such I found it a reasonable interpretation of my experience. Not going to reinstate it, but just want to register my resemblence to the remark. Carry on, though... As you were... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.211\|172.70.85.211]] 06:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
 :I've seen plenty of this type of CAPTCHA with fewer than 3 correct tiles. Unless I'm not human enough to recognize all the matches.... [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 22:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 :I think you both just proved you are robots. Humans are too dumb to do this level of analysis. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.9|108.162.241.9]] 03:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
+:My (limited) experience with CAPTCHA is it doesn't matter what tiles you click, as long as you don't take too long to finish.(which can happen if you spend a lot of time squinting at the images or pondering semantical variations)[[Special:Contributions/172.70.178.33|172.70.178.33]] 23:29, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 "Knowledge is Knowing Frankenstein isn’t the Monster, Wisdom is Knowing Frankenstein is the Monster" - https://commons.emich.edu/ac/vol3/iss1/4/ [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.9|108.162.241.9]] 02:56, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
@@ Line 83: / Line 83: @@
 I have to suggest an alternate interpretation: CAPTCHAs are used as a way to provide sample data for machine learning AI. A situation like in the comic implies that there is a reason that an AI would need to be trained to recognise Frankenstein (presumably the monster), perhaps because he's real and on the loose, hence the dread. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.84|172.69.34.84]] 06:47, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
+:I am amused by this possibility. It also plays on the term CAPTCHA by suggesting that the monster is on the loose and needs to be CAPTURED.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.178.33|172.70.178.33]] 23:29, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 Really dark take: the people are all part of Frankenstein, it's just that their pictures were taken before their deaths. --[[User:Vdizz|Vdizz]] ([[User talk:Vdizz|talk]]) 05:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->
@@ Line 114: / Line 108: @@
 I am so amazingly disappointed that one of the captcha images is not a treacherous depiction of a pipe. {{unsigned}}
 :"Ceci n'est pas un canal de communication FIFO simplex"? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.36|172.70.91.36]] 20:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 15 April 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	isn't it referencing things that have been named after or called Frankenstein (a turtle, an heirloom tomato variety, a sandwich, a hairstyle, etc.)?
		+	[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.9\|108.162.237.9]] 21:54, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+
		+
	<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->		<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 12 April 2022
Line 106:		Line 106:
	[[1263: Reassuring]]. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.206\|172.68.132.206]] 04:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)		[[1263: Reassuring]]. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.206\|172.68.132.206]] 04:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

−	I am so amazingly disappointed that one of the captcha images is not a treacherous depiction of a pipe.	+	I am so amazingly disappointed that one of the captcha images is not a treacherous depiction of a pipe. {{unsigned}}
		+	:"Ceci n'est pas un canal de communication FIFO simplex"? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.36\|172.70.91.36]] 20:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:58, 12 April 2022
Line 105:		Line 105:

	[[1263: Reassuring]]. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.206\|172.68.132.206]] 04:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)		[[1263: Reassuring]]. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.206\|172.68.132.206]] 04:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	I am so amazingly disappointed that one of the captcha images is not a treacherous depiction of a pipe.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:39, 12 April 2022
Line 103:		Line 103:

	Don't forget that in certain regions (well, maybe just South Africa) a stoplight is called a robot. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.68.202\|172.69.68.202]] 15:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)		Don't forget that in certain regions (well, maybe just South Africa) a stoplight is called a robot. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.68.202\|172.69.68.202]] 15:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	[[1263: Reassuring]]. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.206\|172.68.132.206]] 04:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 11 April 2022
Line 102:		Line 102:
	Note you can't really do this kind of instant inquiry with Google Trends or Google Books Ngrams. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.145\|172.69.33.145]] 03:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC)		Note you can't really do this kind of instant inquiry with Google Trends or Google Books Ngrams. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.145\|172.69.33.145]] 03:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

−	Don't forget that in certain regions (well, maybe just South Africa) a stoplight is called a robot.	+	Don't forget that in certain regions (well, maybe just South Africa) a stoplight is called a robot. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.68.202\|172.69.68.202]] 15:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)