Talk:2719: Hydrogen Isotopes - Revision history

Psychoticpotato at 18:07, 2 October 2024

2024-10-02T18:07:24Z

PDesbeginner at 01:41, 21 June 2024

2024-06-21T01:41:34Z

Psychoticpotato at 18:42, 3 May 2024

2024-05-03T18:42:52Z

Psychoticpotato: fixing a mistake with a comment I just made

2024-04-04T21:30:13Z

fixing a mistake with a comment I just made

Psychoticpotato: commenting

2024-04-04T21:29:42Z

commenting

42.book.addict at 03:41, 3 February 2024

2024-02-03T03:41:21Z

172.71.242.87 at 17:28, 2 February 2023

2023-02-02T17:28:36Z

Adeblanc: added description of bulk nuclear matter; suggested dark matter as central force

2023-02-02T14:57:15Z

added description of bulk nuclear matter; suggested dark matter as central force

162.158.86.50 at 22:09, 4 January 2023

2023-01-04T22:09:17Z

162.158.87.28: Trivia material

2023-01-04T22:07:48Z

Trivia material

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 2 October 2024
Line 49:		Line 49:
	What if we made a Rubiks Cube out of "Oops, All Neutrons"? That would be fun. (We would probably all die) [[User:Psychoticpotato\|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato\|talk]]) 21:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)		What if we made a Rubiks Cube out of "Oops, All Neutrons"? That would be fun. (We would probably all die) [[User:Psychoticpotato\|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato\|talk]]) 21:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
	:I don't understand. Can you explain? [[User:PDesbeginner\|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner\|talk]]) 01:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)		:I don't understand. Can you explain? [[User:PDesbeginner\|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner\|talk]]) 01:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
		+	::Neutrons are mean when there are a lot of them and not much else. [[User:Psychoticpotato\|P?sych??otic?pot??at???o ]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato\|talk]]) 18:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 21 June 2024
Line 48:		Line 48:

	What if we made a Rubiks Cube out of "Oops, All Neutrons"? That would be fun. (We would probably all die) [[User:Psychoticpotato\|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato\|talk]]) 21:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)		What if we made a Rubiks Cube out of "Oops, All Neutrons"? That would be fun. (We would probably all die) [[User:Psychoticpotato\|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato\|talk]]) 21:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
		+	:I don't understand. Can you explain? [[User:PDesbeginner\|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner\|talk]]) 01:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 3 May 2024
Line 47:		Line 47:
	:But dark matter is invisible… [[User:42.book.addict\|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict\|talk]]) 03:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)		:But dark matter is invisible… [[User:42.book.addict\|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict\|talk]]) 03:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

−	What if we made a Rubiks Cube out of "Oops, All Neutrons"? That would be fun. (We would all die) [[User:Psychoticpotato\|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato\|talk]]) 21:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)	+	What if we made a Rubiks Cube out of "Oops, All Neutrons"? That would be fun. (We would probably all die) [[User:Psychoticpotato\|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato\|talk]]) 21:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 4 April 2024
Line 47:		Line 47:
	:But dark matter is invisible… [[User:42.book.addict\|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict\|talk]]) 03:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)		:But dark matter is invisible… [[User:42.book.addict\|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict\|talk]]) 03:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

−	What if we made a Rubiks Cube out of "Oops, All Neutrons"? That would be fun. (We would all die)	+	What if we made a Rubiks Cube out of "Oops, All Neutrons"? That would be fun. (We would all die) [[User:Psychoticpotato\|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato\|talk]]) 21:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 4 April 2024
Line 46:		Line 46:
	A second point, if I may. An electron can orbit an empty place quite easily if you put it in a magnetic field - but there is another possibility. Dark matter exerts gravitational attraction on electrons. Given enough room, an electron will orbit dark matter. Perhaps "ium" should be called "darkium". {{unsigned\|Adeblanc\|14:57, 2 February 2023}}		A second point, if I may. An electron can orbit an empty place quite easily if you put it in a magnetic field - but there is another possibility. Dark matter exerts gravitational attraction on electrons. Given enough room, an electron will orbit dark matter. Perhaps "ium" should be called "darkium". {{unsigned\|Adeblanc\|14:57, 2 February 2023}}
	:But dark matter is invisible… [[User:42.book.addict\|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict\|talk]]) 03:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)		:But dark matter is invisible… [[User:42.book.addict\|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict\|talk]]) 03:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	What if we made a Rubiks Cube out of "Oops, All Neutrons"? That would be fun. (We would all die)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:41, 3 February 2024
Line 45:		Line 45:

	A second point, if I may. An electron can orbit an empty place quite easily if you put it in a magnetic field - but there is another possibility. Dark matter exerts gravitational attraction on electrons. Given enough room, an electron will orbit dark matter. Perhaps "ium" should be called "darkium". {{unsigned\|Adeblanc\|14:57, 2 February 2023}}		A second point, if I may. An electron can orbit an empty place quite easily if you put it in a magnetic field - but there is another possibility. Dark matter exerts gravitational attraction on electrons. Given enough room, an electron will orbit dark matter. Perhaps "ium" should be called "darkium". {{unsigned\|Adeblanc\|14:57, 2 February 2023}}
		+	:But dark matter is invisible… [[User:42.book.addict\|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict\|talk]]) 03:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 2 February 2023
Line 44:		Line 44:
	One thing about this cartoon strikes me as impressive. "Hydrogen, maximum strength" is about 5-10 % protons. Bulk nuclear matter, which is what makes up most of the body of a neutron star, has a neutron/proton ratio between 10 and 20 (probably close to the higher value). Hydrogen (maximum strength) is what holds up a neutron star, and that qualifies as pretty strong in anybody's book. And, while on the topic, there is no such thing as "neutronium". The cores of neutron stars are covered by a "nilium ocean" of free neutrons - but that term applies to bulk properties of the ocean. Go to the microscopic picture, and its just free neutrons; it is not a substance in its own right.		One thing about this cartoon strikes me as impressive. "Hydrogen, maximum strength" is about 5-10 % protons. Bulk nuclear matter, which is what makes up most of the body of a neutron star, has a neutron/proton ratio between 10 and 20 (probably close to the higher value). Hydrogen (maximum strength) is what holds up a neutron star, and that qualifies as pretty strong in anybody's book. And, while on the topic, there is no such thing as "neutronium". The cores of neutron stars are covered by a "nilium ocean" of free neutrons - but that term applies to bulk properties of the ocean. Go to the microscopic picture, and its just free neutrons; it is not a substance in its own right.

−	A second point, if I may. An electron can orbit an empty place quite easily if you put it in a magnetic field - but there is another possibility. Dark matter exerts gravitational attraction on electrons. Given enough room, an electron will orbit dark matter. Perhaps "ium" should be called "darkium".	+	A second point, if I may. An electron can orbit an empty place quite easily if you put it in a magnetic field - but there is another possibility. Dark matter exerts gravitational attraction on electrons. Given enough room, an electron will orbit dark matter. Perhaps "ium" should be called "darkium". {{unsigned\|Adeblanc\|14:57, 2 February 2023}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 2 February 2023
Line 41:		Line 41:
	I love the administratium joke, but adding more jokes in the description seems antithetical to the purpose of this website :) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.100.107\|172.70.100.107]] 21:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)		I love the administratium joke, but adding more jokes in the description seems antithetical to the purpose of this website :) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.100.107\|172.70.100.107]] 21:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
	:+1, same here. But if the joke's too good to delete, it might be moved to the [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ#What_belongs_to_the_trivia_section.3F trivia section]. Also, a proper reference would be in order, as the joke's been around the web since [http://web.mit.edu/amgreene/athena/Humour/Science/administrium 1989] at least --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.87.28\|162.158.87.28]] 22:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)		:+1, same here. But if the joke's too good to delete, it might be moved to the [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ#What_belongs_to_the_trivia_section.3F trivia section]. Also, a proper reference would be in order, as the joke's been around the web since [http://web.mit.edu/amgreene/athena/Humour/Science/administrium 1989] at least --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.87.28\|162.158.87.28]] 22:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
		+
		+	One thing about this cartoon strikes me as impressive. "Hydrogen, maximum strength" is about 5-10 % protons. Bulk nuclear matter, which is what makes up most of the body of a neutron star, has a neutron/proton ratio between 10 and 20 (probably close to the higher value). Hydrogen (maximum strength) is what holds up a neutron star, and that qualifies as pretty strong in anybody's book. And, while on the topic, there is no such thing as "neutronium". The cores of neutron stars are covered by a "nilium ocean" of free neutrons - but that term applies to bulk properties of the ocean. Go to the microscopic picture, and its just free neutrons; it is not a substance in its own right.
		+
		+	A second point, if I may. An electron can orbit an empty place quite easily if you put it in a magnetic field - but there is another possibility. Dark matter exerts gravitational attraction on electrons. Given enough room, an electron will orbit dark matter. Perhaps "ium" should be called "darkium".

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:09, 4 January 2023
Line 40:		Line 40:

	I love the administratium joke, but adding more jokes in the description seems antithetical to the purpose of this website :) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.100.107\|172.70.100.107]] 21:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)		I love the administratium joke, but adding more jokes in the description seems antithetical to the purpose of this website :) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.100.107\|172.70.100.107]] 21:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
−	:+1, same here. But if the joke's too good to delete, it ~~could~~ be moved to the [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ#What_belongs_to_the_trivia_section.3F trivia section]. Also, a proper reference would be in order, as the joke's been around the web since [http://web.mit.edu/amgreene/athena/Humour/Science/administrium 1989] at least) --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.87.28\|162.158.87.28]] 22:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)	+	:+1, same here. But if the joke's too good to delete, it might be moved to the [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ#What_belongs_to_the_trivia_section.3F trivia section]. Also, a proper reference would be in order, as the joke's been around the web since [http://web.mit.edu/amgreene/athena/Humour/Science/administrium 1989] at least --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.87.28\|162.158.87.28]] 22:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 4 January 2023
Line 40:		Line 40:

	I love the administratium joke, but adding more jokes in the description seems antithetical to the purpose of this website :) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.100.107\|172.70.100.107]] 21:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)		I love the administratium joke, but adding more jokes in the description seems antithetical to the purpose of this website :) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.100.107\|172.70.100.107]] 21:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
		+	:+1, same here. But if the joke's too good to delete, it could be moved to the [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ#What_belongs_to_the_trivia_section.3F trivia section]. Also, a proper reference would be in order, as the joke's been around the web since [http://web.mit.edu/amgreene/athena/Humour/Science/administrium 1989] at least) --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.87.28\|162.158.87.28]] 22:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)