Talk:2806: Anti-Vaxxers - Revision history

MeZimm at 17:18, 7 March 2025

2025-03-07T17:18:23Z

172.70.90.118: Undo revision 357808 by Scienceizkool (talk) Was just going to {{unsigned}}-sign, but combination of bad prose, bad grammar, bad placement and ranting makes it more worthy of forgetting.

2024-11-25T13:27:50Z

Undo revision 357808 by Scienceizkool (talk) Was just going to {{unsigned}}-sign, but combination of bad prose, bad grammar, bad placement and ranting makes it more worthy of forgetting.

Scienceizkool: /* Digital Equipment Corporation */

2024-11-25T05:30:56Z

‎Digital Equipment Corporation

Jkshapiro: /* Digital Equipment Corporation */ new section

2024-06-24T00:17:27Z

‎Digital Equipment Corporation: new section

Scienceizkool at 20:05, 12 April 2024

2024-04-12T20:05:17Z

172.70.162.20 at 10:53, 9 April 2024

2024-04-09T10:53:51Z

Scienceizkool: conclusion to this very simple problem

2024-04-09T03:32:38Z

conclusion to this very simple problem

172.69.43.138 at 15:32, 6 November 2023

2023-11-06T15:32:57Z

172.69.43.139 at 15:29, 6 November 2023

2023-11-06T15:29:15Z

141.101.99.100: Removed link from discussion top (was this a mistake? looks like a test link)

2023-08-22T00:30:34Z

Removed link from discussion top (was this a mistake? looks like a test link)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:27, 25 November 2024
Line 253:		Line 253:

	Am I the only one disappointed this wasn't actually about the {{w\|VAX}} line of computers? [[User:Jkshapiro\|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro\|talk]]) 00:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)		Am I the only one disappointed this wasn't actually about the {{w\|VAX}} line of computers? [[User:Jkshapiro\|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro\|talk]]) 00:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
−
−	~~I'm disappointed in the "science enthusiasts". Realize yet that this sht wasn't simple?~~
−	What gave it away? The young cardiac patients? The sudden heart attacks? The stage 4 cancers? Guillan Barre syndrome? Autoimmune disorders? Diabetes got kicked into overdrive? Did you lose someone and get told that it was "a statistical anomaly"? That it's just a small sacrifice for the good of mankind?
−	~~You idiots got duped, and would rather forget about it instead of learning to get the f off your overdosing horse?~~
−	~~When the next culling comes, would you rather have learned from your mistakes? Or go singing into the meat grinder? Me I don't care, people have a right to crash into the same wall until they die.~~
−	~

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 25 November 2024
Line 253:		Line 253:

	Am I the only one disappointed this wasn't actually about the {{w\|VAX}} line of computers? [[User:Jkshapiro\|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro\|talk]]) 00:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)		Am I the only one disappointed this wasn't actually about the {{w\|VAX}} line of computers? [[User:Jkshapiro\|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro\|talk]]) 00:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	I'm disappointed in the "science enthusiasts". Realize yet that this sht wasn't simple?
		+	What gave it away? The young cardiac patients? The sudden heart attacks? The stage 4 cancers? Guillan Barre syndrome? Autoimmune disorders? Diabetes got kicked into overdrive? Did you lose someone and get told that it was "a statistical anomaly"? That it's just a small sacrifice for the good of mankind?
		+	You idiots got duped, and would rather forget about it instead of learning to get the f off your overdosing horse?
		+	When the next culling comes, would you rather have learned from your mistakes? Or go singing into the meat grinder? Me I don't care, people have a right to crash into the same wall until they die.
		+	~

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 24 June 2024
Line 249:		Line 249:
	:...so, yes, science can explain things. The fine detail can be argued about, but you can always check how much good data you have in order to give confidence to the minutiae, but population-wide statistics across stretches of time tend to be fairly reliable as far as such conclusions. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.20\|172.70.162.20]] 10:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)		:...so, yes, science can explain things. The fine detail can be argued about, but you can always check how much good data you have in order to give confidence to the minutiae, but population-wide statistics across stretches of time tend to be fairly reliable as far as such conclusions. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.20\|172.70.162.20]] 10:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
	:Get boosted [[User:Scienceizkool\|Scienceizkool]] ([[User talk:Scienceizkool\|talk]]) 20:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)		:Get boosted [[User:Scienceizkool\|Scienceizkool]] ([[User talk:Scienceizkool\|talk]]) 20:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Digital Equipment Corporation ==
		+
		+	Am I the only one disappointed this wasn't actually about the {{w\|VAX}} line of computers? [[User:Jkshapiro\|Jkshapiro]] ([[User talk:Jkshapiro\|talk]]) 00:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 12 April 2024
Line 248:		Line 248:
	:*Dementia and strokes are the kinds of thing you die of when you "haven't died of anything else", so if you're saving people from dying of cholera, car-crashes, rampaging cattle stampedes or suicide (through healthcare, seatbelts, farm safety and treating depression) then people will get old and succumb to more geriatric condictions.		:*Dementia and strokes are the kinds of thing you die of when you "haven't died of anything else", so if you're saving people from dying of cholera, car-crashes, rampaging cattle stampedes or suicide (through healthcare, seatbelts, farm safety and treating depression) then people will get old and succumb to more geriatric condictions.
	:...so, yes, science can explain things. The fine detail can be argued about, but you can always check how much good data you have in order to give confidence to the minutiae, but population-wide statistics across stretches of time tend to be fairly reliable as far as such conclusions. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.20\|172.70.162.20]] 10:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)		:...so, yes, science can explain things. The fine detail can be argued about, but you can always check how much good data you have in order to give confidence to the minutiae, but population-wide statistics across stretches of time tend to be fairly reliable as far as such conclusions. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.20\|172.70.162.20]] 10:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
		+	:Get boosted [[User:Scienceizkool\|Scienceizkool]] ([[User talk:Scienceizkool\|talk]]) 20:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:53, 9 April 2024
Line 244:		Line 244:
	Oh well. Guess science can't explain everything after all. I used to get mad at fanatics, but now I just feel sad, because the denial is rock solid.		Oh well. Guess science can't explain everything after all. I used to get mad at fanatics, but now I just feel sad, because the denial is rock solid.
	[[User:Scienceizkool\|Scienceizkool]] ([[User talk:Scienceizkool\|talk]]) 03:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)		[[User:Scienceizkool\|Scienceizkool]] ([[User talk:Scienceizkool\|talk]]) 03:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
		+	:Your point is ambiguous. Despite your username, hard to tell if you're using sarcasm or not. Poe's law seems to apply. But, to extend/counter your point (whichever), we can say:
		+	:*Excess deaths are a comparison of the expected trend, from thenimmediate lead-up of historic data, against what is then seen. Higher excess deaths could mean reversion to the mean after doing well on death-prevention before. Give or take whether you account for all those that previously didn't die who are now older and thus closer to dying from ''something else'', which a good Excess Deaths estimation might need to account for (slice it up be age demographics, obviously a 20yo who fortunately didn't die at 18 isn't likely to die of old age by 22).
		+	:*Dementia and strokes are the kinds of thing you die of when you "haven't died of anything else", so if you're saving people from dying of cholera, car-crashes, rampaging cattle stampedes or suicide (through healthcare, seatbelts, farm safety and treating depression) then people will get old and succumb to more geriatric condictions.
		+	:...so, yes, science can explain things. The fine detail can be argued about, but you can always check how much good data you have in order to give confidence to the minutiae, but population-wide statistics across stretches of time tend to be fairly reliable as far as such conclusions. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.20\|172.70.162.20]] 10:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:32, 9 April 2024
Line 240:		Line 240:

	Cueball says 'people are working so hard to make it complicated when it's one of the few things in this world that isn't'. Given the length and fractiousness of this comments section, I think they may have a point. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.43.138\|172.69.43.138]] 15:32, 6 November 2023 (UTC)		Cueball says 'people are working so hard to make it complicated when it's one of the few things in this world that isn't'. Given the length and fractiousness of this comments section, I think they may have a point. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.43.138\|172.69.43.138]] 15:32, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
		+
		+	Excess deaths are up, cancers are up, dementia is up, strokes are up. There must be a simple explanation for this all... if only there were one.
		+	Oh well. Guess science can't explain everything after all. I used to get mad at fanatics, but now I just feel sad, because the denial is rock solid.
		+	[[User:Scienceizkool\|Scienceizkool]] ([[User talk:Scienceizkool\|talk]]) 03:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 6 November 2023
Line 238:		Line 238:
	----		----
	[[Special:Contributions/172.71.98.227\|172.71.98.227]] 05:32, 19 August 2023 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/172.71.98.227\|172.71.98.227]] 05:32, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
		+
		+	Cueball says 'people are working so hard to make it complicated when it's one of the few things in this world that isn't'. Given the length and fractiousness of this comments section, I think they may have a point. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.43.138\|172.69.43.138]] 15:32, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 I added a bunch of info, including a disclaimer to take this with a grain of salt. I normally don't comment on Randall's political comics, as I disagree with nearly all of them, but this one irritates me more than most and borders dangerously close to misinformation. Randall is a physicist. I don't know his familiarity with the virology world, but I would presume not much.
 I'm a biologist by degree ''and'' career. Emphasis on microbiology. I'm not vaccinated for Covid-19. I ''never'' will be. I am vaccinated for everything else. I don't trust the vaccine for a number of reasons, not just because there are a statistically significant number of cases of severe harm and death. [[User:Darkwolf0218|Darkwolf0218]] ([[User talk:Darkwolf0218|talk]]) 07:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 :What is your personal definition of "statistically significant number of cases of severe harm and death"? is it greater, by any chance, than the risk of death by NOT taking a vaccine? [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|talk]]) 02:09, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->
 Did he forget to write a punchline?
 [[Special:Contributions/172.70.131.58|172.70.131.58]] 05:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)