Talk:3222: Star Formation - Revision history

RG at 02:33, 12 May 2026

2026-05-12T02:33:28Z

82.13.184.33 at 11:51, 23 March 2026

2026-03-23T11:51:25Z

82.132.239.91: Undo revision 408695 by 82.13.184.33 (talk) No need for additional indent, looks like secondary reply to original question, as much as direct follow-up to the first reply to it.

2026-03-23T11:27:02Z

Undo revision 408695 by 82.13.184.33 (talk) No need for additional indent, looks like secondary reply to original question, as much as direct follow-up to the first reply to it.

82.13.184.33 at 09:31, 23 March 2026

2026-03-23T09:31:44Z

82.132.186.49: Sorry, mistook it for an unsigned original with already one (agreeing) signed reply. Found otherwise when looking for the details to "unsigned" the first bit with.

2026-03-22T17:50:15Z

Sorry, mistook it for an unsigned original with already one (agreeing) signed reply. Found otherwise when looking for the details to "unsigned" the first bit with.

82.132.186.49 at 17:39, 22 March 2026

2026-03-22T17:39:55Z

Pere prlpz: I think that this part is wrong: "''Interestingly enough though, the narrator acts as if there is another diety as well as it, actively causing the ionization. This could be true, or it could be that they are just imagining that the clouds have life - Wh

2026-03-22T15:22:47Z

I think that this part is wrong: "''Interestingly enough though, the narrator acts as if there is another diety as well as it, actively causing the ionization. This could be true, or it could be that they are just imagining that the clouds have life - Wh

2001:4C4E:1C06:B100:9DA5:A169:37E5:42A0: [[→{{

2026-03-22T14:36:31Z

[[→{{

81.179.199.253 at 22:39, 21 March 2026

2026-03-21T22:39:57Z

81.179.199.253 at 22:11, 21 March 2026

2026-03-21T22:11:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:33, 12 May 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Is Randall a believer in Stupid Design? [[User:Barmar\|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar\|talk]]) 22:42, 20 March 2026 (UTC)		Is Randall a believer in Stupid Design? [[User:Barmar\|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar\|talk]]) 22:42, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
		+	: Just searched up. I think this is hilarious. The idea that "Nah God DOES exist, but he was kinda just fuckin' winging it the entire time, that's why everything is kinda wonky" is amazing [[User:RG\|RG]] ([[User talk:RG\|talk]]) 02:33, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

	I was actually factually thinking about stellar constitutionality at formative stages last night. Like couple days ago i explained big bubbles theory to a person on Blue Sky. Gives me headswirls to envision ( attempt ) alternate density temporal flow size constants. Cool! [[User:AskShea\|AskShea]] ([[User talk:AskShea\|talk]]) 00:34, 21 March 2026‎ (UTC)		I was actually factually thinking about stellar constitutionality at formative stages last night. Like couple days ago i explained big bubbles theory to a person on Blue Sky. Gives me headswirls to envision ( attempt ) alternate density temporal flow size constants. Cool! [[User:AskShea\|AskShea]] ([[User talk:AskShea\|talk]]) 00:34, 21 March 2026‎ (UTC)

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 This is the best XKCD comic I've seen in a while. The creativity and biblical implications are horrifying. {{unsigned ip|199.241.130.234|20:45, 21 March 2026}}
 I think that this part is wrong: "''Interestingly enough though, the narrator acts as if there is another diety as well as it, actively causing the ionization. This could be true, or it could be that they are just imagining that the clouds have life - Which is another possibility as well.''"
 <br/>Clouds aren't ionized by another deity but by the light of the first stars that are formed. I propose changing that part.--[[User:Pere prlpz|Pere prlpz]] ([[User talk:Pere prlpz|talk]]) 15:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
 :I just removed that. No sign the narrator/prime-manipulator is even ''refering'' to any other intelligent (or dumb but willful) spoiler-manipulator. Things are just going 'wrong', naturally, despite what the on-pagd entity wishes to be happening. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.186.49|82.132.186.49]] 17:39, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 :But it's clearly a variation within Randall's "non-corporeal intelligent entity" broad stroke of character, just like a number of the more physical [[:Category:Aliens]] (or possibly 'futurekind' of more distant Earth ages) are variations on the tentacled-/bug-eyed-monster variety (minor notable  differences, but of a similar style; being of the Kang And Kodoth form, more or less).
 :We only seem to have a clear Category for the two examples of the TTS, which other 'dot entities' like this one (and the AI, etc) probably are not, but it's the handiest reference we have without pointing at ''all'' vaguely similar 'characters' directly. Unless and until we get ourselves a 'dot entity' super-category to cover all such floaty-glowy dots/spheres/etc of clearly greatly advanced ability (if not intelligence). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.5|82.132.238.5]] 17:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
-::I've had a quick blitz through the likely comics, and I've found the following list (not guaranteed to be an exaustive set) of simlar(ish) glowy-floaty-orb-beings, and tried to subcategorise them...
+:I've had a quick blitz through the likely comics, and I've found the following list (not guaranteed to be an exaustive set) of simlar(ish) glowy-floaty-orb-beings, and tried to subcategorise them...
-::*[[1173: Steroids]] - unknown
+:*[[1173: Steroids]] - unknown
-::*[[1450: AI-Box Experiment]] - AI
+:*[[1450: AI-Box Experiment]] - AI
-::*[[1747: Spider Paleontology]] - Time Travelling Sphere
+:*[[1747: Spider Paleontology]] - Time Travelling Sphere
-::*[[1748: Future Archaeology]] - Time Travelling Sphere
+:*[[1748: Future Archaeology]] - Time Travelling Sphere
-::*[[1782: Team Chat]] - Singularity consciousness
+:*[[1782: Team Chat]] - Singularity consciousness
-::*[[2635: Superintelligent AIs]] - AI
+:*[[2635: Superintelligent AIs]] - AI
-::*[[3085: About 20 Pounds]] - Mystical Oracle
+:*[[3085: About 20 Pounds]] - Mystical Oracle
 :...and this one is going to be some sort of mystical creative entity [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 22:39, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
 This is the best XKCD comic I've seen in a while. The creativity and biblical implications are horrifying. {{unsigned ip|199.241.130.234|20:45, 21 March 2026}}
 I think that this part is wrong: "''Interestingly enough though, the narrator acts as if there is another diety as well as it, actively causing the ionization. This could be true, or it could be that they are just imagining that the clouds have life - Which is another possibility as well.''"
 <br/>Clouds aren't ionized by another deity but by the light of the first stars that are formed. I propose changing that part.--[[User:Pere prlpz|Pere prlpz]] ([[User talk:Pere prlpz|talk]]) 15:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
 :I just removed that. No sign the narrator/prime-manipulator is even ''refering'' to any other intelligent (or dumb but willful) spoiler-manipulator. Things are just going 'wrong', naturally, despite what the on-pagd entity wishes to be happening. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.186.49|82.132.186.49]] 17:39, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 :But it's clearly a variation within Randall's "non-corporeal intelligent entity" broad stroke of character, just like a number of the more physical [[:Category:Aliens]] (or possibly 'futurekind' of more distant Earth ages) are variations on the tentacled-/bug-eyed-monster variety (minor notable  differences, but of a similar style; being of the Kang And Kodoth form, more or less).
 :We only seem to have a clear Category for the two examples of the TTS, which other 'dot entities' like this one (and the AI, etc) probably are not, but it's the handiest reference we have without pointing at ''all'' vaguely similar 'characters' directly. Unless and until we get ourselves a 'dot entity' super-category to cover all such floaty-glowy dots/spheres/etc of clearly greatly advanced ability (if not intelligence). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.5|82.132.238.5]] 17:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
-:I've had a quick blitz through the likely comics, and I've found the following list (not guaranteed to be an exaustive set) of simlar(ish) glowy-floaty-orb-beings, and tried to subcategorise them...
+::I've had a quick blitz through the likely comics, and I've found the following list (not guaranteed to be an exaustive set) of simlar(ish) glowy-floaty-orb-beings, and tried to subcategorise them...
-:*[[1173: Steroids]] - unknown
+::*[[1173: Steroids]] - unknown
-:*[[1450: AI-Box Experiment]] - AI
+::*[[1450: AI-Box Experiment]] - AI
-:*[[1747: Spider Paleontology]] - Time Travelling Sphere
+::*[[1747: Spider Paleontology]] - Time Travelling Sphere
-:*[[1748: Future Archaeology]] - Time Travelling Sphere
+::*[[1748: Future Archaeology]] - Time Travelling Sphere
-:*[[1782: Team Chat]] - Singularity consciousness
+::*[[1782: Team Chat]] - Singularity consciousness
-:*[[2635: Superintelligent AIs]] - AI
+::*[[2635: Superintelligent AIs]] - AI
-:*[[3085: About 20 Pounds]] - Mystical Oracle
+::*[[3085: About 20 Pounds]] - Mystical Oracle
 :...and this one is going to be some sort of mystical creative entity [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 22:39, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
 This is the best XKCD comic I've seen in a while. The creativity and biblical implications are horrifying. {{unsigned ip|199.241.130.234|20:45, 21 March 2026}}
 I think that this part is wrong: "''Interestingly enough though, the narrator acts as if there is another diety as well as it, actively causing the ionization. This could be true, or it could be that they are just imagining that the clouds have life - Which is another possibility as well.''"
 <br/>Clouds aren't ionized by another deity but by the light of the first stars that are formed. I propose changing that part.--[[User:Pere prlpz|Pere prlpz]] ([[User talk:Pere prlpz|talk]]) 15:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
 :I just removed that. No sign the narrator/prime-manipulator is even ''refering'' to any other intelligent (or dumb but willful) spoiler-manipulator. Things are just going 'wrong', naturally, despite what the on-pagd entity wishes to be happening. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.186.49|82.132.186.49]] 17:39, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 I think that this part is wrong: "''Interestingly enough though, the narrator acts as if there is another diety as well as it, actively causing the ionization. This could be true, or it could be that they are just imagining that the clouds have life - Which is another possibility as well.''"
-:Clouds aren't ionized by another deity but by the light of the first stars that are formed. I propose changing that part.--[[User:Pere prlpz|Pere prlpz]] ([[User talk:Pere prlpz|talk]]) 15:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
+<br/>Clouds aren't ionized by another deity but by the light of the first stars that are formed. I propose changing that part.--[[User:Pere prlpz|Pere prlpz]] ([[User talk:Pere prlpz|talk]]) 15:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)
 :I just removed that. No sign the narrator/prime-manipulator is even ''refering'' to any other intelligent (or dumb but willful) spoiler-manipulator. Things are just going 'wrong', naturally, despite what the on-pagd entity wishes to be happening. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.186.49|82.132.186.49]] 17:39, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 22 March 2026
Line 33:		Line 33:

	This is the best XKCD comic I've seen in a while. The creativity and biblical implications are horrifying. {{unsigned ip\|199.241.130.234\|20:45, 21 March 2026}}		This is the best XKCD comic I've seen in a while. The creativity and biblical implications are horrifying. {{unsigned ip\|199.241.130.234\|20:45, 21 March 2026}}
		+
		+
		+	I think that this part is wrong: "''Interestingly enough though, the narrator acts as if there is another diety as well as it, actively causing the ionization. This could be true, or it could be that they are just imagining that the clouds have life - Which is another possibility as well.''"
		+
		+	Clouds aren't ionized by another deity but by the light of the first stars that are formed. I propose changing that part.--[[User:Pere prlpz\|Pere prlpz]] ([[User talk:Pere prlpz\|talk]]) 15:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 22 March 2026
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:...and this one is going to be some sort of mystical creative entity [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253\|81.179.199.253]] 22:39, 21 March 2026 (UTC)		:...and this one is going to be some sort of mystical creative entity [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253\|81.179.199.253]] 22:39, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

−	This is the best XKCD comic I've seen in a while. The creativity and biblical implications are horrifying. [[unsigned ip\|199.241.130.234\|20:45, 21 March 2026}}	+	This is the best XKCD comic I've seen in a while. The creativity and biblical implications are horrifying. {{unsigned ip\|199.241.130.234\|20:45, 21 March 2026}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 21 March 2026
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:We only seem to have a clear Category for the two examples of the TTS, which other 'dot entities' like this one (and the AI, etc) probably are not, but it's the handiest reference we have without pointing at ''all'' vaguely similar 'characters' directly. Unless and until we get ourselves a 'dot entity' super-category to cover all such floaty-glowy dots/spheres/etc of clearly greatly advanced ability (if not intelligence). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.5\|82.132.238.5]] 17:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)		:We only seem to have a clear Category for the two examples of the TTS, which other 'dot entities' like this one (and the AI, etc) probably are not, but it's the handiest reference we have without pointing at ''all'' vaguely similar 'characters' directly. Unless and until we get ourselves a 'dot entity' super-category to cover all such floaty-glowy dots/spheres/etc of clearly greatly advanced ability (if not intelligence). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.5\|82.132.238.5]] 17:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

−	This is the best XKCD comic I've seen in a while. The creativity and biblical implications are horrifying.	+	This is the best XKCD comic I've seen in a while. The creativity and biblical implications are horrifying. [[unsigned ip\|199.241.130.234\|20:45, 21 March 2026}}