Talk:34: Flowers - Revision history

1234231587678 at 16:48, 27 January 2024

2024-01-27T16:48:50Z

Kynde at 16:55, 25 April 2015

2015-04-25T16:55:37Z

173.245.49.124 at 23:28, 14 April 2015

2015-04-14T23:28:23Z

141.101.98.33 at 20:13, 9 April 2015

2015-04-09T20:13:04Z

Dgbrt at 21:13, 22 June 2013

2013-06-22T21:13:20Z

Frankie: sign

2013-06-22T20:57:43Z

sign

Frankie: disagree about revert

2013-06-22T20:57:15Z

disagree about revert

St.nerol at 22:18, 11 June 2013

2013-06-11T22:18:00Z

Dgbrt at 13:56, 11 June 2013

2013-06-11T13:56:30Z

St.nerol at 10:23, 11 June 2013

2013-06-11T10:23:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 27 January 2024
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:I dont see how the title text could be a reference to anything, maybe because of the two words "this is" ?... I'm really not convinced. I would be okay if the sentence began with "This is not". [[Special:Contributions/173.245.49.124\|173.245.49.124]] 23:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)		:I dont see how the title text could be a reference to anything, maybe because of the two words "this is" ?... I'm really not convinced. I would be okay if the sentence began with "This is not". [[Special:Contributions/173.245.49.124\|173.245.49.124]] 23:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
	::Agreed and removed. --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 16:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)		::Agreed and removed. --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 16:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	The red flowers kind of look like trillium erectum. Just saying. [[User:1234231587678\|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678\|talk]]) 16:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:55, 25 April 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Uhh, the title text is just an explanation, it isn't a reference to anything... You guys really try to squeeze stuff out of nothing [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.33\|141.101.98.33]] 20:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)		Uhh, the title text is just an explanation, it isn't a reference to anything... You guys really try to squeeze stuff out of nothing [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.33\|141.101.98.33]] 20:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
	:I dont see how the title text could be a reference to anything, maybe because of the two words "this is" ?... I'm really not convinced. I would be okay if the sentence began with "This is not". [[Special:Contributions/173.245.49.124\|173.245.49.124]] 23:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)		:I dont see how the title text could be a reference to anything, maybe because of the two words "this is" ?... I'm really not convinced. I would be okay if the sentence began with "This is not". [[Special:Contributions/173.245.49.124\|173.245.49.124]] 23:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
		+	::Agreed and removed. --[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 16:55, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 14 April 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Uhh, the title text is just an explanation, it isn't a reference to anything... You guys really try to squeeze stuff out of nothing [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.33\|141.101.98.33]] 20:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)		Uhh, the title text is just an explanation, it isn't a reference to anything... You guys really try to squeeze stuff out of nothing [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.33\|141.101.98.33]] 20:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
		+	:I dont see how the title text could be a reference to anything, maybe because of the two words "this is" ?... I'm really not convinced. I would be okay if the sentence began with "This is not". [[Special:Contributions/173.245.49.124\|173.245.49.124]] 23:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 9 April 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Dgbrt, I did not remove content, I removed redundancy. One sentence about graph paper instead of three. Clearer, shorter wording about botany and picture editing, but no less informative. - [[User:Frankie\|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie\|talk]]) 20:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)		Dgbrt, I did not remove content, I removed redundancy. One sentence about graph paper instead of three. Clearer, shorter wording about botany and picture editing, but no less informative. - [[User:Frankie\|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie\|talk]]) 20:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
	:Hi Frankie, you did remove the incomplete tag. We still have to review pages like this. But your enhancements are welcome!--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 21:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)		:Hi Frankie, you did remove the incomplete tag. We still have to review pages like this. But your enhancements are welcome!--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 21:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	Uhh, the title text is just an explanation, it isn't a reference to anything... You guys really try to squeeze stuff out of nothing [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.33\|141.101.98.33]] 20:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 22 June 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::::Yeah, I know it was reverted, that's what I meant. I will improve stuff when I have time and knowledge to do so. Sometimes I will also delete stuff. It's a balance to strike, and often quick decisions, but my intention is always to make the wiki better. ––[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 22:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)		::::Yeah, I know it was reverted, that's what I meant. I will improve stuff when I have time and knowledge to do so. Sometimes I will also delete stuff. It's a balance to strike, and often quick decisions, but my intention is always to make the wiki better. ––[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 22:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
	Dgbrt, I did not remove content, I removed redundancy. One sentence about graph paper instead of three. Clearer, shorter wording about botany and picture editing, but no less informative. - [[User:Frankie\|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie\|talk]]) 20:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)		Dgbrt, I did not remove content, I removed redundancy. One sentence about graph paper instead of three. Clearer, shorter wording about botany and picture editing, but no less informative. - [[User:Frankie\|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie\|talk]]) 20:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
		+	:Hi Frankie, you did remove the incomplete tag. We still have to review pages like this. But your enhancements are welcome!--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 21:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 :::Check the history, your edit was reverted. When you have problems with some pages do not only tell us what's wrong, just try to give an better explanation. Without a new solution these discussions are meaningless. Everybody is doing mistakes, but the magical word is UPDATE not DELETE.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 13:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 ::::Yeah, I know it was reverted, that's what I meant. I will improve stuff when I have time and knowledge to do so. Sometimes I will also delete stuff. It's a balance to strike, and often quick decisions, but my intention is always to make the wiki better. ––[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 22:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
-Dgbrt, I did not remove content, I removed redundancy. One sentence about graph paper instead of three. Clearer, shorter wording about botany and picture editing, but no less informative.
+Dgbrt, I did not remove content, I removed redundancy. One sentence about graph paper instead of three. Clearer, shorter wording about botany and picture editing, but no less informative. - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 20:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 22 June 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::Check the history, your edit was reverted. When you have problems with some pages do not only tell us what's wrong, just try to give an better explanation. Without a new solution these discussions are meaningless. Everybody is doing mistakes, but the magical word is UPDATE not DELETE.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 13:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)		:::Check the history, your edit was reverted. When you have problems with some pages do not only tell us what's wrong, just try to give an better explanation. Without a new solution these discussions are meaningless. Everybody is doing mistakes, but the magical word is UPDATE not DELETE.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 13:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
	::::Yeah, I know it was reverted, that's what I meant. I will improve stuff when I have time and knowledge to do so. Sometimes I will also delete stuff. It's a balance to strike, and often quick decisions, but my intention is always to make the wiki better. ––[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 22:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)		::::Yeah, I know it was reverted, that's what I meant. I will improve stuff when I have time and knowledge to do so. Sometimes I will also delete stuff. It's a balance to strike, and often quick decisions, but my intention is always to make the wiki better. ––[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 22:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
		+	Dgbrt, I did not remove content, I removed redundancy. One sentence about graph paper instead of three. Clearer, shorter wording about botany and picture editing, but no less informative.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 11 June 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::As I remember it, I removed the "explanation" that was, which wasn't popular. So I just let it be... ––[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 10:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)		::As I remember it, I removed the "explanation" that was, which wasn't popular. So I just let it be... ––[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 10:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
	:::Check the history, your edit was reverted. When you have problems with some pages do not only tell us what's wrong, just try to give an better explanation. Without a new solution these discussions are meaningless. Everybody is doing mistakes, but the magical word is UPDATE not DELETE.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 13:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)		:::Check the history, your edit was reverted. When you have problems with some pages do not only tell us what's wrong, just try to give an better explanation. Without a new solution these discussions are meaningless. Everybody is doing mistakes, but the magical word is UPDATE not DELETE.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 13:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
		+	::::Yeah, I know it was reverted, that's what I meant. I will improve stuff when I have time and knowledge to do so. Sometimes I will also delete stuff. It's a balance to strike, and often quick decisions, but my intention is always to make the wiki better. ––[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 22:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:56, 11 June 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Shit, shit, shit... as Randall would say, but finally I could upload my edit. It's still not complete.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 00:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)		::Shit, shit, shit... as Randall would say, but finally I could upload my edit. It's still not complete.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 00:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
	::As I remember it, I removed the "explanation" that was, which wasn't popular. So I just let it be... ––[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 10:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)		::As I remember it, I removed the "explanation" that was, which wasn't popular. So I just let it be... ––[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 10:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
		+	:::Check the history, your edit was reverted. When you have problems with some pages do not only tell us what's wrong, just try to give an better explanation. Without a new solution these discussions are meaningless. Everybody is doing mistakes, but the magical word is UPDATE not DELETE.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 13:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:23, 11 June 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Correct. I'm working on this comic because you did not;)--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 22:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)		:Correct. I'm working on this comic because you did not;)--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 22:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
	::Shit, shit, shit... as Randall would say, but finally I could upload my edit. It's still not complete.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 00:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)		::Shit, shit, shit... as Randall would say, but finally I could upload my edit. It's still not complete.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 00:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
		+	::As I remember it, I removed the "explanation" that was, which wasn't popular. So I just let it be... ––[[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 10:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)