Talk:346: Diet Coke+Mentos - Revision history

42.book.addict at 19:31, 10 October 2024

2024-10-10T19:31:33Z

172.69.70.107 at 15:57, 5 September 2019

2019-09-05T15:57:19Z

Davidy22 at 01:44, 27 December 2015

2015-12-27T01:44:02Z

Flewk at 20:40, 26 December 2015

2015-12-26T20:40:40Z

Flewk at 20:40, 26 December 2015

2015-12-26T20:40:20Z

108.162.216.89 at 18:00, 8 February 2014

2014-02-08T18:00:31Z

108.162.216.45 at 22:49, 18 December 2013

2013-12-18T22:49:35Z

178.98.31.27: Created page with "The title-text reads badly, for me, but indicates that the (traditional) trick as depicted ''is'' cool, to the author, along with the non-Newtonian Liquid demonstration. (Alt..."

2013-06-19T03:46:14Z

Created page with "The title-text reads badly, for me, but indicates that the (traditional) trick as depicted ''is'' cool, to the author, along with the non-Newtonian Liquid demonstration. (Alt..."

New page

The title-text reads badly, for me, but indicates that the (traditional) trick as depicted ''is'' cool, to the author, along with the non-Newtonian Liquid demonstration. (Although that latter may ''also'' have been done to death by virtually every science-for-kids-or-fun TV show that go in for that kind of thing...) [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27|178.98.31.27]] 03:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 10 October 2024
Line 8:		Line 8:

	This is just 1337: Part 6. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.107\|172.69.70.107]] 15:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)		This is just 1337: Part 6. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.107\|172.69.70.107]] 15:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	Is the dad in the comic Hairy? If so, should the explanation and transcript be changed? [[User:42.book.addict\|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict\|talk]]) 19:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:57, 5 September 2019
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: I am pretty sure that is a satirical blog post. The reviewer is talking about his terrible relationship with his dad half the time and trying to claim that it is xkcd's fault. I am sure there are real reviews that criticize xkcd, but this is just a joke blog.{{unsigned\|Flewk}}		: I am pretty sure that is a satirical blog post. The reviewer is talking about his terrible relationship with his dad half the time and trying to claim that it is xkcd's fault. I am sure there are real reviews that criticize xkcd, but this is just a joke blog.{{unsigned\|Flewk}}
		+
		+	This is just 1337: Part 6. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.107\|172.69.70.107]] 15:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 27 December 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	I think it should be noted that this comic can probably be read as an anwer the criticism of xkcd found here: http://webcomicssobad.blogspot.com/2007/11/xkcd.html [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.89\|108.162.216.89]] 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)		I think it should be noted that this comic can probably be read as an anwer the criticism of xkcd found here: http://webcomicssobad.blogspot.com/2007/11/xkcd.html [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.89\|108.162.216.89]] 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

−	: I am pretty sure that is a satirical blog post. The reviewer is talking about his terrible relationship with his dad half the time and trying to claim that it is xkcd's fault. I am sure there are real reviews that criticize xkcd, but this is just a joke blog.	+	: I am pretty sure that is a satirical blog post. The reviewer is talking about his terrible relationship with his dad half the time and trying to claim that it is xkcd's fault. I am sure there are real reviews that criticize xkcd, but this is just a joke blog.{{unsigned\|Flewk}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:40, 26 December 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:
	I think it should be noted that this comic can probably be read as an anwer the criticism of xkcd found here: http://webcomicssobad.blogspot.com/2007/11/xkcd.html [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.89\|108.162.216.89]] 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)		I think it should be noted that this comic can probably be read as an anwer the criticism of xkcd found here: http://webcomicssobad.blogspot.com/2007/11/xkcd.html [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.89\|108.162.216.89]] 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

−	: I am pretty sure that is a satirical blog post. The reviewer is talking about his terrible relationship with his dad half the time and trying to claim that it is xkcd's fault. I am sure there are real reviews that criticize, but this is just a joke blog.	+	: I am pretty sure that is a satirical blog post. The reviewer is talking about his terrible relationship with his dad half the time and trying to claim that it is xkcd's fault. I am sure there are real reviews that criticize xkcd, but this is just a joke blog.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:40, 26 December 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I think it should be noted that this comic can probably be read as an anwer the criticism of xkcd found here: http://webcomicssobad.blogspot.com/2007/11/xkcd.html [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.89\|108.162.216.89]] 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)		I think it should be noted that this comic can probably be read as an anwer the criticism of xkcd found here: http://webcomicssobad.blogspot.com/2007/11/xkcd.html [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.89\|108.162.216.89]] 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	: I am pretty sure that is a satirical blog post. The reviewer is talking about his terrible relationship with his dad half the time and trying to claim that it is xkcd's fault. I am sure there are real reviews that criticize, but this is just a joke blog.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 8 February 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I don't think the "Ta-daa" pose meant that Cueball was expecting his friend's dad to appear out of nowhere instead of the Diet Coke + Mentos eruption. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.45\|108.162.216.45]] 22:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)		I don't think the "Ta-daa" pose meant that Cueball was expecting his friend's dad to appear out of nowhere instead of the Diet Coke + Mentos eruption. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.45\|108.162.216.45]] 22:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	I think it should be noted that this comic can probably be read as an anwer the criticism of xkcd found here: http://webcomicssobad.blogspot.com/2007/11/xkcd.html [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.89\|108.162.216.89]] 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 18 December 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The title-text reads badly, for me, but indicates that the (traditional) trick as depicted ''is'' cool, to the author, along with the non-Newtonian Liquid demonstration. (Although that latter may ''also'' have been done to death by virtually every science-for-kids-or-fun TV show that go in for that kind of thing...) [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27\|178.98.31.27]] 03:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)		The title-text reads badly, for me, but indicates that the (traditional) trick as depicted ''is'' cool, to the author, along with the non-Newtonian Liquid demonstration. (Although that latter may ''also'' have been done to death by virtually every science-for-kids-or-fun TV show that go in for that kind of thing...) [[Special:Contributions/178.98.31.27\|178.98.31.27]] 03:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	I don't think the "Ta-daa" pose meant that Cueball was expecting his friend's dad to appear out of nowhere instead of the Diet Coke + Mentos eruption. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.45\|108.162.216.45]] 22:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)