Talk:403: Convincing Pickup Line - Revision history

172.71.242.185 at 18:12, 4 January 2024

2024-01-04T18:12:38Z

141.101.76.6 at 11:11, 4 January 2024

2024-01-04T11:11:33Z

172.71.250.88 at 23:07, 20 March 2023

2023-03-20T23:07:24Z

172.71.250.89 at 23:06, 20 March 2023

2023-03-20T23:06:07Z

Netherin5: Stephen Hawking has the same bacon erdos as Natalie Portman

2019-03-13T17:39:31Z

Stephen Hawking has the same bacon erdos as Natalie Portman

Zachweix at 16:57, 5 November 2018

2018-11-05T16:57:53Z

Gijobarts at 03:36, 2 March 2016

2016-03-02T03:36:14Z

Hogtree Octovish: Created page with "I'm more intrigued by the {{w|Erdős–Bacon number}}, where {{w|Natalie Portman}} and {{w|Carl Sagan}} both have a six (5+1 and 4+2 respectively). ~~~~"

2013-02-16T06:47:22Z

Created page with "I'm more intrigued by the {{w|Erdős–Bacon number}}, where {{w|Natalie Portman}} and {{w|Carl Sagan}} both have a six (5+1 and 4+2 respectively). ~~~~"

New page

I'm more intrigued by the {{w|Erdős–Bacon number}}, where {{w|Natalie Portman}} and {{w|Carl Sagan}} both have a six (5+1 and 4+2 respectively). [[User:Hogtree Octovish|Hogtree Octovish]] ([[User talk:Hogtree Octovish|talk]]) 06:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 4 January 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:

	One could argue that graphs that represent "(consensually) sleeping with each other" are always symmetric, making this a rather tautological pick-up line. 23:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)		One could argue that graphs that represent "(consensually) sleeping with each other" are always symmetric, making this a rather tautological pick-up line. 23:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
−	:Not every undirected graph is symmetric. 11:10, 4 January 2024 (UTC)	+	:Not every undirected graph is symmetric. {{unsigned ip\|141.101.76.6\|11:11, 4 January 2024}}
		+	::Is it not? For every path (single- or multi-edge) from node A to node B, there will be an identical (reversed) one from B to A. It seems to me that this would introduce full symmetry regardless of configuration. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.242.185\|172.71.242.185]] 18:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:11, 4 January 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:

	One could argue that graphs that represent "(consensually) sleeping with each other" are always symmetric, making this a rather tautological pick-up line. 23:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)		One could argue that graphs that represent "(consensually) sleeping with each other" are always symmetric, making this a rather tautological pick-up line. 23:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
		+	:Not every undirected graph is symmetric. 11:10, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:07, 20 March 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	There's some irony here that they both think that they are terrible matches with each other, but both like the logic of making the graph symmetrical, indicating that they probably would be a good match [[User:Zachweix\|Zachweix]] ([[User talk:Zachweix\|talk]]) 16:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)		There's some irony here that they both think that they are terrible matches with each other, but both like the logic of making the graph symmetrical, indicating that they probably would be a good match [[User:Zachweix\|Zachweix]] ([[User talk:Zachweix\|talk]]) 16:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

−	One could argue that graphs that represent "(consensually) sleeping with each other" are always symmetric, making this a rather tautological pick-up line.	+	One could argue that graphs that represent "(consensually) sleeping with each other" are always symmetric, making this a rather tautological pick-up line. 23:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 20 March 2023
Line 4:		Line 4:

	There's some irony here that they both think that they are terrible matches with each other, but both like the logic of making the graph symmetrical, indicating that they probably would be a good match [[User:Zachweix\|Zachweix]] ([[User talk:Zachweix\|talk]]) 16:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)		There's some irony here that they both think that they are terrible matches with each other, but both like the logic of making the graph symmetrical, indicating that they probably would be a good match [[User:Zachweix\|Zachweix]] ([[User talk:Zachweix\|talk]]) 16:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
		+
		+	One could argue that graphs that represent "(consensually) sleeping with each other" are always symmetric, making this a rather tautological pick-up line.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I'm more intrigued by the {{w|Erdős–Bacon number}}, where {{w|Natalie Portman}} and {{w|Carl Sagan}} both have a six (5+1 and 4+2 respectively). [[User:Hogtree Octovish|Hogtree Octovish]] ([[User talk:Hogtree Octovish|talk]]) 06:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 :Wikipedia and erdosbaconsabbath.com say that Natalie Portman's EB is 7, not six. (Bacon 2, not 1.) Still awesome. [[User:gijobarts|gijobarts]] ([[User Talk:gijobarts|talk]]) 03:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 There's some irony here that they both think that they are terrible matches with each other, but both like the logic of making the graph symmetrical, indicating that they probably would be a good match [[User:Zachweix|Zachweix]] ([[User talk:Zachweix|talk]]) 16:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 5 November 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'm more intrigued by the {{w\|Erdős–Bacon number}}, where {{w\|Natalie Portman}} and {{w\|Carl Sagan}} both have a six (5+1 and 4+2 respectively). [[User:Hogtree Octovish\|Hogtree Octovish]] ([[User talk:Hogtree Octovish\|talk]]) 06:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC)		I'm more intrigued by the {{w\|Erdős–Bacon number}}, where {{w\|Natalie Portman}} and {{w\|Carl Sagan}} both have a six (5+1 and 4+2 respectively). [[User:Hogtree Octovish\|Hogtree Octovish]] ([[User talk:Hogtree Octovish\|talk]]) 06:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
	:Wikipedia and erdosbaconsabbath.com say that Natalie Portman's EB is 7, not six. (Bacon 2, not 1.) Still awesome. [[User:gijobarts\|gijobarts]] ([[User Talk:gijobarts\|talk]]) 03:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)		:Wikipedia and erdosbaconsabbath.com say that Natalie Portman's EB is 7, not six. (Bacon 2, not 1.) Still awesome. [[User:gijobarts\|gijobarts]] ([[User Talk:gijobarts\|talk]]) 03:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	There's some irony here that they both think that they are terrible matches with each other, but both like the logic of making the graph symmetrical, indicating that they probably would be a good match [[User:Zachweix\|Zachweix]] ([[User talk:Zachweix\|talk]]) 16:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:36, 2 March 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'm more intrigued by the {{w\|Erdős–Bacon number}}, where {{w\|Natalie Portman}} and {{w\|Carl Sagan}} both have a six (5+1 and 4+2 respectively). [[User:Hogtree Octovish\|Hogtree Octovish]] ([[User talk:Hogtree Octovish\|talk]]) 06:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC)		I'm more intrigued by the {{w\|Erdős–Bacon number}}, where {{w\|Natalie Portman}} and {{w\|Carl Sagan}} both have a six (5+1 and 4+2 respectively). [[User:Hogtree Octovish\|Hogtree Octovish]] ([[User talk:Hogtree Octovish\|talk]]) 06:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
		+	:Wikipedia and erdosbaconsabbath.com say that Natalie Portman's EB is 7, not six. (Bacon 2, not 1.) Still awesome. [[User:gijobarts\|gijobarts]] ([[User Talk:gijobarts\|talk]]) 03:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)