Talk:415: Restraining Order - Revision history

Beanie at 12:18, 24 March 2021

2021-03-24T12:18:39Z

172.69.42.44 at 03:09, 2 October 2020

2020-10-02T03:09:24Z

162.158.154.35 at 00:55, 27 September 2020

2020-09-27T00:55:40Z

162.158.89.49: describe a theoritcal situation where one could have both a min and mix distance on someone.

2020-04-01T23:08:57Z

describe a theoritcal situation where one could have both a min and mix distance on someone.

162.158.79.17 at 23:19, 8 February 2020

2020-02-08T23:19:21Z

Netherin5 at 15:58, 3 April 2019

2019-04-03T15:58:34Z

172.68.54.4 at 16:20, 26 April 2017

2017-04-26T16:20:21Z

Dontknow at 00:28, 8 March 2017

2017-03-08T00:28:29Z

Prongs95 at 15:10, 22 February 2016

2016-02-22T15:10:12Z

Flewk at 12:08, 28 December 2015

2015-12-28T12:08:08Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Looks like something [[Danish]] would do, not Ponytail.Classhole 00:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 :Therein lies the problem with presuming "Ponytail" is a singular, consistent character, which she isn't, and never has been. It's kind of ridiculous to say something is out of character for Ponytails, Megans, or Cueballs (and probably White Hat), since they're rarely the same person.[[User:Pennpenn|Pennpenn]] ([[User talk:Pennpenn|talk]]) 02:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 Is "iconic" meant to be "ironic"? It is also not ironic, unless if the restraining order forces Cueball to be within 1 yard of Ponytail at all times which defeats the general purpose of a restraining order. [[User:Flewk|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk|talk]]) 12:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:09, 2 October 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:

	On the surface of a sphere, all distances are modulo the circumference of the sphere, so a minimum distance ''d'' is equivalent to a maximum distance ''circumference - d''. If ''d'' was large enough, it would imply a maximum distance even accounting for irregularities of the earth's surface, or one of the persons going on the ISS. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.35\|162.158.154.35]] 00:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)		On the surface of a sphere, all distances are modulo the circumference of the sphere, so a minimum distance ''d'' is equivalent to a maximum distance ''circumference - d''. If ''d'' was large enough, it would imply a maximum distance even accounting for irregularities of the earth's surface, or one of the persons going on the ISS. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.35\|162.158.154.35]] 00:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	This one is kind of like [[390]]. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.42.44\|172.69.42.44]] 03:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:55, 27 September 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I feel as if one could theoretically enforce a maximum distance. For example, if you had a restraining order (minimum distance) on your target and they were imprisoned and released on bail, they could not the leave the state, giving us our maximum distance. From there, especially in a tiny state like Rhode Island, you could slowly corner them in. Especially if this were to occur on a pennisula, they would be trapped, helpless to move except at your whim.		I feel as if one could theoretically enforce a maximum distance. For example, if you had a restraining order (minimum distance) on your target and they were imprisoned and released on bail, they could not the leave the state, giving us our maximum distance. From there, especially in a tiny state like Rhode Island, you could slowly corner them in. Especially if this were to occur on a pennisula, they would be trapped, helpless to move except at your whim.
		+
		+	On the surface of a sphere, all distances are modulo the circumference of the sphere, so a minimum distance ''d'' is equivalent to a maximum distance ''circumference - d''. If ''d'' was large enough, it would imply a maximum distance even accounting for irregularities of the earth's surface, or one of the persons going on the ISS. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.35\|162.158.154.35]] 00:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 1 April 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:

	The Steven Wright line comes to mind about seeing a girl and wondering if there were an opposite to a restraining order.		The Steven Wright line comes to mind about seeing a girl and wondering if there were an opposite to a restraining order.
		+
		+	I feel as if one could theoretically enforce a maximum distance. For example, if you had a restraining order (minimum distance) on your target and they were imprisoned and released on bail, they could not the leave the state, giving us our maximum distance. From there, especially in a tiny state like Rhode Island, you could slowly corner them in. Especially if this were to occur on a pennisula, they would be trapped, helpless to move except at your whim.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 8 February 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:
	It's not that bad if Cueball is massive enough. But stuff gets really weird if Cueball's de Broglie wavelength is on the order of 100 yards... --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.4\|172.68.54.4]] 16:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)		It's not that bad if Cueball is massive enough. But stuff gets really weird if Cueball's de Broglie wavelength is on the order of 100 yards... --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.4\|172.68.54.4]] 16:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
	:I need another explain page for the comments. [[User:Netherin5\|“That Guy from the Netherlands”]] ([[User talk:Netherin5\|talk]]) 15:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)		:I need another explain page for the comments. [[User:Netherin5\|“That Guy from the Netherlands”]] ([[User talk:Netherin5\|talk]]) 15:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	The Steven Wright line comes to mind about seeing a girl and wondering if there were an opposite to a restraining order.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:58, 3 April 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:

	It's not that bad if Cueball is massive enough. But stuff gets really weird if Cueball's de Broglie wavelength is on the order of 100 yards... --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.4\|172.68.54.4]] 16:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)		It's not that bad if Cueball is massive enough. But stuff gets really weird if Cueball's de Broglie wavelength is on the order of 100 yards... --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.4\|172.68.54.4]] 16:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
		+	:I need another explain page for the comments. [[User:Netherin5\|“That Guy from the Netherlands”]] ([[User talk:Netherin5\|talk]]) 15:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 26 April 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:

	This is certainly not possible, just think of how much trouble it would cause.[[User:Dontknow\|Dontknow]] ([[User talk:Dontknow\|talk]]) 00:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)		This is certainly not possible, just think of how much trouble it would cause.[[User:Dontknow\|Dontknow]] ([[User talk:Dontknow\|talk]]) 00:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	It's not that bad if Cueball is massive enough. But stuff gets really weird if Cueball's de Broglie wavelength is on the order of 100 yards... --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.4\|172.68.54.4]] 16:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 8 March 2017
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Is this even legally possible? [[User:Prongs95\|Prongs95]] ([[User talk:Prongs95\|talk]]) 15:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)		Is this even legally possible? [[User:Prongs95\|Prongs95]] ([[User talk:Prongs95\|talk]]) 15:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	This is certainly not possible, just think of how much trouble it would cause.[[User:Dontknow\|Dontknow]] ([[User talk:Dontknow\|talk]]) 00:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:10, 22 February 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Is "iconic" meant to be "ironic"? It is also not ironic, unless if the restraining order forces Cueball to be within 1 yard of Ponytail at all times which defeats the general purpose of a restraining order. [[User:Flewk\|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk\|talk]]) 12:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)		Is "iconic" meant to be "ironic"? It is also not ironic, unless if the restraining order forces Cueball to be within 1 yard of Ponytail at all times which defeats the general purpose of a restraining order. [[User:Flewk\|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk\|talk]]) 12:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Is this even legally possible? [[User:Prongs95\|Prongs95]] ([[User talk:Prongs95\|talk]]) 15:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 28 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Looks like something [[Danish]] would do, not Ponytail.Classhole 00:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)		Looks like something [[Danish]] would do, not Ponytail.Classhole 00:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
	:Therein lies the problem with presuming "Ponytail" is a singular, consistent character, which she isn't, and never has been. It's kind of ridiculous to say something is out of character for Ponytails, Megans, or Cueballs (and probably White Hat), since they're rarely the same person.[[User:Pennpenn\|Pennpenn]] ([[User talk:Pennpenn\|talk]]) 02:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)		:Therein lies the problem with presuming "Ponytail" is a singular, consistent character, which she isn't, and never has been. It's kind of ridiculous to say something is out of character for Ponytails, Megans, or Cueballs (and probably White Hat), since they're rarely the same person.[[User:Pennpenn\|Pennpenn]] ([[User talk:Pennpenn\|talk]]) 02:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	Is "iconic" meant to be "ironic"? It is also not ironic, unless if the restraining order forces Cueball to be within 1 yard of Ponytail at all times which defeats the general purpose of a restraining order. [[User:Flewk\|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk\|talk]]) 12:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)