Talk:424: Security Holes - Revision history

172.71.183.72 at 12:00, 25 March 2024

2024-03-25T12:00:49Z

172.71.183.71 at 12:00, 25 March 2024

2024-03-25T12:00:29Z

AzureArmageddon at 15:40, 1 October 2023

2023-10-01T15:40:37Z

108.162.250.87 at 09:39, 30 November 2020

2020-11-30T09:39:58Z

Flewk at 16:43, 28 December 2015

2015-12-28T16:43:09Z

Codefreak5 at 21:38, 15 July 2014

2014-07-15T21:38:12Z

Codefreak5 at 21:37, 15 July 2014

2014-07-15T21:37:05Z

Codefreak5 at 21:36, 15 July 2014

2014-07-15T21:36:51Z

Davidy22 at 15:39, 10 April 2014

2014-04-10T15:39:12Z

108.162.216.45 at 11:31, 10 April 2014

2014-04-10T11:31:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 25 March 2024
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Crippling Crypto (the first article mentioned as offering more detail on the Debian-OpenSSL vulnerability) analogises the resulting problem by partly reproducing [[221: Random Number]]. Should this be mentioned in this article or in 221, or both, or not mentioned in either? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.87\|108.162.250.87]] 09:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)		Crippling Crypto (the first article mentioned as offering more detail on the Debian-OpenSSL vulnerability) analogises the resulting problem by partly reproducing [[221: Random Number]]. Should this be mentioned in this article or in 221, or both, or not mentioned in either? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.87\|108.162.250.87]] 09:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

−	This has aged interestingly, given that about half of those security problems are legitimate weaknesses of current LLM AI models. Not the same as operating systems, of course, but you'd be terrified by how much people already trust them to be secure.	+	This has aged interestingly, given that about half of those security problems are legitimate weaknesses of current LLM AI models. Not the same as operating systems, of course, but you'd be terrified by how much people already trust them to be secure.[[Special:Contributions/172.71.183.72\|172.71.183.72]] 12:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 25 March 2024
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Crippling Crypto (the first article mentioned as offering more detail on the Debian-OpenSSL vulnerability) analogises the resulting problem by partly reproducing [[221: Random Number]]. Should this be mentioned in this article or in 221, or both, or not mentioned in either? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.87\|108.162.250.87]] 09:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)		Crippling Crypto (the first article mentioned as offering more detail on the Debian-OpenSSL vulnerability) analogises the resulting problem by partly reproducing [[221: Random Number]]. Should this be mentioned in this article or in 221, or both, or not mentioned in either? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.87\|108.162.250.87]] 09:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	This has aged interestingly, given that about half of those security problems are legitimate weaknesses of current LLM AI models. Not the same as operating systems, of course, but you'd be terrified by how much people already trust them to be secure.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 I think the Xandros/EEE PC vulnerability "gives access if asked in a stern voice" is a reference to comic [[413: New Pet]], where Cueball and Megan made a pet out of a EEE PC on wheels inside a hamster ball. Pets sometimes need to be talked to sternly if they're unwilling to obey commands; in this case, a EEE PC needs to be talked to sternly in order to give the commander root access. [[User:Codefreak5|Codefreak5]] ([[User talk:Codefreak5|talk]]) 21:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 The Gentoo explanation does not make sense. Gentoos succumbing to flattery should mean the users use flattery on the Gentoo, not the other way around. --[[User:Flewk|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk|talk]]) 16:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 Crippling Crypto (the first article mentioned as offering more detail on the Debian-OpenSSL vulnerability) analogises the resulting problem by partly reproducing [[221: Random Number]]. Should this be mentioned in this article or in 221, or both, or not mentioned in either? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.87|108.162.250.87]] 09:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 30 November 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:

	The Gentoo explanation does not make sense. Gentoos succumbing to flattery should mean the users use flattery on the Gentoo, not the other way around. --[[User:Flewk\|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk\|talk]]) 16:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)		The Gentoo explanation does not make sense. Gentoos succumbing to flattery should mean the users use flattery on the Gentoo, not the other way around. --[[User:Flewk\|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk\|talk]]) 16:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Crippling Crypto (the first article mentioned as offering more detail on the Debian-OpenSSL vulnerability) analogises the resulting problem by partly reproducing [[221: Random Number]]. Should this be mentioned in this article or in 221, or both, or not mentioned in either? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.87\|108.162.250.87]] 09:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 28 December 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I think the Xandros/EEE PC vulnerability "gives access if asked in a stern voice" is a reference to comic [[413: New Pet]], where Cueball and Megan made a pet out of a EEE PC on wheels inside a hamster ball. Pets sometimes need to be talked to sternly if they're unwilling to obey commands; in this case, a EEE PC needs to be talked to sternly in order to give the commander root access. [[User:Codefreak5\|Codefreak5]] ([[User talk:Codefreak5\|talk]]) 21:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)		I think the Xandros/EEE PC vulnerability "gives access if asked in a stern voice" is a reference to comic [[413: New Pet]], where Cueball and Megan made a pet out of a EEE PC on wheels inside a hamster ball. Pets sometimes need to be talked to sternly if they're unwilling to obey commands; in this case, a EEE PC needs to be talked to sternly in order to give the commander root access. [[User:Codefreak5\|Codefreak5]] ([[User talk:Codefreak5\|talk]]) 21:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	The Gentoo explanation does not make sense. Gentoos succumbing to flattery should mean the users use flattery on the Gentoo, not the other way around. --[[User:Flewk\|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk\|talk]]) 16:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 15 July 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Perhaps he's also implying aliens use OLPC? {{unsigned ip\|108.162.216.45}}		Perhaps he's also implying aliens use OLPC? {{unsigned ip\|108.162.216.45}}

−	I think the Xandros/EEE PC vulnerability "gives access if asked in a stern voice" is a reference to comic [[413: New Pet]], where Cueball and Megan made a pet out of a EEE PC on wheels inside a hamster ball. Pets sometimes need to be talked to sternly if they're unwilling to obey commands; in this case, a EEE PC needs to be talked to sternly in order to give the commander root access.[[User:Codefreak5\|Codefreak5]] ([[User talk:Codefreak5\|talk]]) 21:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)	+	I think the Xandros/EEE PC vulnerability "gives access if asked in a stern voice" is a reference to comic [[413: New Pet]], where Cueball and Megan made a pet out of a EEE PC on wheels inside a hamster ball. Pets sometimes need to be talked to sternly if they're unwilling to obey commands; in this case, a EEE PC needs to be talked to sternly in order to give the commander root access. [[User:Codefreak5\|Codefreak5]] ([[User talk:Codefreak5\|talk]]) 21:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 15 July 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Perhaps he's also implying aliens use OLPC? {{unsigned ip\|108.162.216.45}}		Perhaps he's also implying aliens use OLPC? {{unsigned ip\|108.162.216.45}}

−	I think the ~~Xandrox~~/EEE PC vulnerability "gives access if asked in a stern voice" is a reference to comic [[413: New Pet]], where Cueball and Megan made a pet out of a EEE PC on wheels inside a hamster ball. Pets sometimes need to be talked to sternly if they're unwilling to obey commands; in this case, a EEE PC needs to be talked to sternly in order to give the commander root access.[[User:Codefreak5\|Codefreak5]] ([[User talk:Codefreak5\|talk]]) 21:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)	+	I think the Xandros/EEE PC vulnerability "gives access if asked in a stern voice" is a reference to comic [[413: New Pet]], where Cueball and Megan made a pet out of a EEE PC on wheels inside a hamster ball. Pets sometimes need to be talked to sternly if they're unwilling to obey commands; in this case, a EEE PC needs to be talked to sternly in order to give the commander root access.[[User:Codefreak5\|Codefreak5]] ([[User talk:Codefreak5\|talk]]) 21:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 15 July 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Perhaps he's also implying aliens use OLPC? {{unsigned ip\|108.162.216.45}}		Perhaps he's also implying aliens use OLPC? {{unsigned ip\|108.162.216.45}}
		+
		+	I think the Xandrox/EEE PC vulnerability "gives access if asked in a stern voice" is a reference to comic [[413: New Pet]], where Cueball and Megan made a pet out of a EEE PC on wheels inside a hamster ball. Pets sometimes need to be talked to sternly if they're unwilling to obey commands; in this case, a EEE PC needs to be talked to sternly in order to give the commander root access.[[User:Codefreak5\|Codefreak5]] ([[User talk:Codefreak5\|talk]]) 21:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 10 April 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Could the Slackware one imply that harder nerds/geeks are more fond of this specific Linux distro? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]] 01:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)		Could the Slackware one imply that harder nerds/geeks are more fond of this specific Linux distro? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]] 01:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
−	Perhaps he's also implying aliens use OLPC?	+
		+	Perhaps he's also implying aliens use OLPC? {{unsigned ip\|108.162.216.45}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:31, 10 April 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Could the Slackware one imply that harder nerds/geeks are more fond of this specific Linux distro? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]] 01:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)		Could the Slackware one imply that harder nerds/geeks are more fond of this specific Linux distro? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]] 01:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
		+	Perhaps he's also implying aliens use OLPC?