Talk:439: Thinking Ahead - Revision history

172.70.160.248 at 16:43, 20 August 2024

2024-08-20T16:43:05Z

162.158.33.237 at 14:16, 20 August 2024

2024-08-20T14:16:48Z

172.69.214.5 at 13:50, 20 August 2024

2024-08-20T13:50:11Z

172.70.162.185 at 16:39, 27 May 2024

2024-05-27T16:39:34Z

172.70.90.43 at 16:56, 30 December 2021

2021-12-30T16:56:34Z

162.158.91.164: Summer winter spring and FALLing in love!

2021-12-30T15:03:35Z

Summer winter spring and FALLing in love!

Donny2112 at 02:08, 3 July 2016

2016-07-03T02:08:58Z

Donny2112 at 02:08, 3 July 2016

2016-07-03T02:08:19Z

Flewk at 17:47, 28 December 2015

2015-12-28T17:47:56Z

Kynde at 05:40, 12 June 2014

2014-06-12T05:40:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 20 August 2024
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:Don't forget "-ise" instead of "-ize" (yes, "-ize"s are considered variations in UK English, but... they frankly look odd to me and the way I was taught to spell such words, so I'll personally "-ise" the words wherever this is an option), that we say numbers like "two hundred ''and'' twenty four", I would ask you to "write ''to'' me" ("write me a letter" would be ok, but to "write me" would imply I want you to actually author my existence in some way... e.g. I think you've done a bad job at telling people my story, and I want you to "write me better" in the next draft) and there's the whole controversy of "alumin''i''um" (which really does make more sense, regardless of the origins of both variations) and I'd still use "sulphur". And I really can't get over "short scale" billions, etc, which always seems rather wasteful of word-numbers (although you'd have to be a 'short' trillionaire to be able to claim you are a 'long' billionaire, so probably the current 'short' billionaires are happy to have a more reachable label).		:Don't forget "-ise" instead of "-ize" (yes, "-ize"s are considered variations in UK English, but... they frankly look odd to me and the way I was taught to spell such words, so I'll personally "-ise" the words wherever this is an option), that we say numbers like "two hundred ''and'' twenty four", I would ask you to "write ''to'' me" ("write me a letter" would be ok, but to "write me" would imply I want you to actually author my existence in some way... e.g. I think you've done a bad job at telling people my story, and I want you to "write me better" in the next draft) and there's the whole controversy of "alumin''i''um" (which really does make more sense, regardless of the origins of both variations) and I'd still use "sulphur". And I really can't get over "short scale" billions, etc, which always seems rather wasteful of word-numbers (although you'd have to be a 'short' trillionaire to be able to claim you are a 'long' billionaire, so probably the current 'short' billionaires are happy to have a more reachable label).
	:With regard to "colour/neighbour", dialect and accent does vary a lot across here (and spelling/inflection is already weird with the "col-" sounding "cul-" and the tetragraph "-eigh-" being a typical angloglyphic weird way to depict the sound), but I would read the "-or" ending pretty much as "or", rather than the "-our" which tends more (but not entirely) towards the french "-eur". [[Special:Contributions/162.158.33.237\|162.158.33.237]] 14:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)		:With regard to "colour/neighbour", dialect and accent does vary a lot across here (and spelling/inflection is already weird with the "col-" sounding "cul-" and the tetragraph "-eigh-" being a typical angloglyphic weird way to depict the sound), but I would read the "-or" ending pretty much as "or", rather than the "-our" which tends more (but not entirely) towards the french "-eur". [[Special:Contributions/162.158.33.237\|162.158.33.237]] 14:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
		+	::Loads of word differences, {{wiktionary\|meter#Alternative forms\|some of which}} are {{wiktionary\|practice#Usage notes\|more significant than others}} in their alternations. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.248\|172.70.160.248]] 16:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 20 August 2024
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Its not just the extra "of" that makes you guys British strange to Americans, its also the fact you guys spell color with a extra u and neighbor also with a extra u and center you guys spell with the e and r switched and u guys say z as zed.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.214.5\|172.69.214.5]] 13:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)		Its not just the extra "of" that makes you guys British strange to Americans, its also the fact you guys spell color with a extra u and neighbor also with a extra u and center you guys spell with the e and r switched and u guys say z as zed.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.214.5\|172.69.214.5]] 13:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
		+	:Don't forget "-ise" instead of "-ize" (yes, "-ize"s are considered variations in UK English, but... they frankly look odd to me and the way I was taught to spell such words, so I'll personally "-ise" the words wherever this is an option), that we say numbers like "two hundred ''and'' twenty four", I would ask you to "write ''to'' me" ("write me a letter" would be ok, but to "write me" would imply I want you to actually author my existence in some way... e.g. I think you've done a bad job at telling people my story, and I want you to "write me better" in the next draft) and there's the whole controversy of "alumin''i''um" (which really does make more sense, regardless of the origins of both variations) and I'd still use "sulphur". And I really can't get over "short scale" billions, etc, which always seems rather wasteful of word-numbers (although you'd have to be a 'short' trillionaire to be able to claim you are a 'long' billionaire, so probably the current 'short' billionaires are happy to have a more reachable label).
		+	:With regard to "colour/neighbour", dialect and accent does vary a lot across here (and spelling/inflection is already weird with the "col-" sounding "cul-" and the tetragraph "-eigh-" being a typical angloglyphic weird way to depict the sound), but I would read the "-or" ending pretty much as "or", rather than the "-our" which tends more (but not entirely) towards the french "-eur". [[Special:Contributions/162.158.33.237\|162.158.33.237]] 14:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 20 August 2024
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::So, no, I won't mock you. I'm sure your grasp of any given English dialect is far better than my understanding of whatever your native language is. (German? If it is, mein Deutsche ist nicht sehr gut. If not, I'm probably even worse.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.43\|172.70.90.43]] 16:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)		::So, no, I won't mock you. I'm sure your grasp of any given English dialect is far better than my understanding of whatever your native language is. (German? If it is, mein Deutsche ist nicht sehr gut. If not, I'm probably even worse.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.43\|172.70.90.43]] 16:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
	I notice the difference between US and British English here. In England, we would say 'jump out of the window', not 'jump out the window'. Just thought it was interesting. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.185\|172.70.162.185]] 16:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)		I notice the difference between US and British English here. In England, we would say 'jump out of the window', not 'jump out the window'. Just thought it was interesting. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.185\|172.70.162.185]] 16:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	Its not just the extra "of" that makes you guys British strange to Americans, its also the fact you guys spell color with a extra u and neighbor also with a extra u and center you guys spell with the e and r switched and u guys say z as zed.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.214.5\|172.69.214.5]] 13:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, 27 May 2024
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::As a native ''British'' speaker of English, it's one of the many words/phrases that I've had to gradually learn. (The ubiquitousness of Hollywood movies and US import TV shows quickly get one used to much of the strangenesses, but even after forty-odd years I'm occasionally surprised by something.) "Separated by a common language" indeed (see [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/table#Verb table as a verb], items 4 and 5, for polar-opposite uses of such a simple word), and [https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SeparatedByACommonLanguage if you want to dive down a rabbithole] there are plenty of places that go into examples.		::As a native ''British'' speaker of English, it's one of the many words/phrases that I've had to gradually learn. (The ubiquitousness of Hollywood movies and US import TV shows quickly get one used to much of the strangenesses, but even after forty-odd years I'm occasionally surprised by something.) "Separated by a common language" indeed (see [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/table#Verb table as a verb], items 4 and 5, for polar-opposite uses of such a simple word), and [https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SeparatedByACommonLanguage if you want to dive down a rabbithole] there are plenty of places that go into examples.
	::So, no, I won't mock you. I'm sure your grasp of any given English dialect is far better than my understanding of whatever your native language is. (German? If it is, mein Deutsche ist nicht sehr gut. If not, I'm probably even worse.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.43\|172.70.90.43]] 16:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)		::So, no, I won't mock you. I'm sure your grasp of any given English dialect is far better than my understanding of whatever your native language is. (German? If it is, mein Deutsche ist nicht sehr gut. If not, I'm probably even worse.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.43\|172.70.90.43]] 16:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
		+	I notice the difference between US and British English here. In England, we would say 'jump out of the window', not 'jump out the window'. Just thought it was interesting. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.185\|172.70.162.185]] 16:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 30 December 2021
Line 5:		Line 5:
	On to the actual problem mentioned in the article (i.e. Thinking Ahead), it's a common issue with intelligent guys who spend a lot of time thinking to start imagining all the ways a relationship could go wrong before it even starts. ([http://www.sosuave.com/romance/david/art61.htm "Why Very Intelligent Men Fail With Women, Reason #4: They psych themselves out"]) [[User:Donny2112\|Donny2112]] ([[User talk:Donny2112\|talk]]) 02:08, 3 July 2016 (UTC)		On to the actual problem mentioned in the article (i.e. Thinking Ahead), it's a common issue with intelligent guys who spend a lot of time thinking to start imagining all the ways a relationship could go wrong before it even starts. ([http://www.sosuave.com/romance/david/art61.htm "Why Very Intelligent Men Fail With Women, Reason #4: They psych themselves out"]) [[User:Donny2112\|Donny2112]] ([[User talk:Donny2112\|talk]]) 02:08, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
	:sorry, non-native speaker here. Free to mock me, but I had a hard time understanding “I’m moving in the fall”. I thought it was some obscure idiom about rushing things and falling in love. Then I got that it probably just means “Next autumn I will move to another town”… right ? Thanks in advance --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.164\|162.158.91.164]] 15:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)		:sorry, non-native speaker here. Free to mock me, but I had a hard time understanding “I’m moving in the fall”. I thought it was some obscure idiom about rushing things and falling in love. Then I got that it probably just means “Next autumn I will move to another town”… right ? Thanks in advance --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.164\|162.158.91.164]] 15:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
		+	::As a native ''British'' speaker of English, it's one of the many words/phrases that I've had to gradually learn. (The ubiquitousness of Hollywood movies and US import TV shows quickly get one used to much of the strangenesses, but even after forty-odd years I'm occasionally surprised by something.) "Separated by a common language" indeed (see [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/table#Verb table as a verb], items 4 and 5, for polar-opposite uses of such a simple word), and [https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SeparatedByACommonLanguage if you want to dive down a rabbithole] there are plenty of places that go into examples.
		+	::So, no, I won't mock you. I'm sure your grasp of any given English dialect is far better than my understanding of whatever your native language is. (German? If it is, mein Deutsche ist nicht sehr gut. If not, I'm probably even worse.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.43\|172.70.90.43]] 16:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 30 December 2021
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:::I believe it might be xkcd volume 0? --[[User:Flewk\|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk\|talk]]) 17:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)		:::I believe it might be xkcd volume 0? --[[User:Flewk\|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk\|talk]]) 17:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
	On to the actual problem mentioned in the article (i.e. Thinking Ahead), it's a common issue with intelligent guys who spend a lot of time thinking to start imagining all the ways a relationship could go wrong before it even starts. ([http://www.sosuave.com/romance/david/art61.htm "Why Very Intelligent Men Fail With Women, Reason #4: They psych themselves out"]) [[User:Donny2112\|Donny2112]] ([[User talk:Donny2112\|talk]]) 02:08, 3 July 2016 (UTC)		On to the actual problem mentioned in the article (i.e. Thinking Ahead), it's a common issue with intelligent guys who spend a lot of time thinking to start imagining all the ways a relationship could go wrong before it even starts. ([http://www.sosuave.com/romance/david/art61.htm "Why Very Intelligent Men Fail With Women, Reason #4: They psych themselves out"]) [[User:Donny2112\|Donny2112]] ([[User talk:Donny2112\|talk]]) 02:08, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
		+	:sorry, non-native speaker here. Free to mock me, but I had a hard time understanding “I’m moving in the fall”. I thought it was some obscure idiom about rushing things and falling in love. Then I got that it probably just means “Next autumn I will move to another town”… right ? Thanks in advance --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.164\|162.158.91.164]] 15:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[http://www.example.com link title]I don't think the girl pictured is Megan, it seems to me that it's another girl and he is conflicted about talking to her because of unresolved feelings with Megan, which may come back to bite him if he doesn't explore them fully before becoming committed to another. Due to the beginning of the description it seems like this is just a silly mistake.{{unsigned ip|50.198.145.13}}
+I don't think the girl pictured is Megan, it seems to me that it's another girl and he is conflicted about talking to her because of unresolved feelings with Megan, which may come back to bite him if he doesn't explore them fully before becoming committed to another. Due to the beginning of the description it seems like this is just a silly mistake.{{unsigned ip|50.198.145.13}}
 :It's fixed, and look at the trivia.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 ::Where is this original transcript that I have seen people mention several times?[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 05:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 :::I believe it might be xkcd volume 0? --[[User:Flewk|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk|talk]]) 17:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 On to the actual problem mentioned in the article (i.e. Thinking Ahead), it's a common issue with intelligent guys who spend a lot of time thinking to start imagining all the ways a relationship could go wrong before it even starts. ([http://www.sosuave.com/romance/david/art61.htm "Why Very Intelligent Men Fail With Women, Reason #4: They psych themselves out"]) [[User:Donny2112|Donny2112]] ([[User talk:Donny2112|talk]]) 02:08, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:47, 28 December 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:It's fixed, and look at the trivia.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 21:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)		:It's fixed, and look at the trivia.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 21:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
	::Where is this original transcript that I have seen people mention several times?[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 05:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)		::Where is this original transcript that I have seen people mention several times?[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 05:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
		+	:::I believe it might be xkcd volume 0? --[[User:Flewk\|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk\|talk]]) 17:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:40, 12 June 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think the girl pictured is Megan, it seems to me that it's another girl and he is conflicted about talking to her because of unresolved feelings with Megan, which may come back to bite him if he doesn't explore them fully before becoming committed to another. Due to the beginning of the description it seems like this is just a silly mistake.{{unsigned ip\|50.198.145.13}}		I don't think the girl pictured is Megan, it seems to me that it's another girl and he is conflicted about talking to her because of unresolved feelings with Megan, which may come back to bite him if he doesn't explore them fully before becoming committed to another. Due to the beginning of the description it seems like this is just a silly mistake.{{unsigned ip\|50.198.145.13}}
	:It's fixed, and look at the trivia.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 21:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)		:It's fixed, and look at the trivia.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 21:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
		+	::Where is this original transcript that I have seen people mention several times?[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 05:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)