Talk:441: Babies - Revision history

Beanie at 10:44, 25 March 2021

2021-03-25T10:44:10Z

Davidy22 at 17:21, 8 October 2016

2016-10-08T17:21:15Z

162.158.85.159 at 11:52, 8 October 2016

2016-10-08T11:52:58Z

108.162.250.162 at 00:59, 25 June 2015

2015-06-25T00:59:24Z

Caeleste Alarum: Created page with "The explanation says that "disassembling a child will be impractical and possibly lethal for the child". I don't think that disassembling a child could be "possibly lethal". U..."

2015-05-18T13:31:49Z

Created page with "The explanation says that "disassembling a child will be impractical and possibly lethal for the child". I don't think that disassembling a child could be "possibly lethal". U..."

New page

The explanation says that "disassembling a child will be impractical and possibly lethal for the child". I don't think that disassembling a child could be "possibly lethal". Unless your definition of "disassembling a child" is something like plucking strands of hair off them, if you took a child apart, they would die. I'm changing the explanation. (Also, sorry, I'm kinda new here, but I hope I'm doing the signature thing correctly.) [[User:Caeleste Alarum|Caeleste Alarum]] ([[User talk:Caeleste Alarum|talk]])

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 25 March 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	"I don't think that disassembling a child could be "possibly lethal"." => We do organ transplants in people daily. And reattach severed appendages. It is well within the abilities of medical science to disassemble a person to an extreme degree and reassemble them with a high probability of a full recovery. Wether Cueball and Megan will be doing the disassembly themselves is somewhat vague - they can hire someone. The ethics of this action have been deliberately ignored here, so don't whine about how "barbaric" the procedure would be. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.85.159}}		"I don't think that disassembling a child could be "possibly lethal"." => We do organ transplants in people daily. And reattach severed appendages. It is well within the abilities of medical science to disassemble a person to an extreme degree and reassemble them with a high probability of a full recovery. Wether Cueball and Megan will be doing the disassembly themselves is somewhat vague - they can hire someone. The ethics of this action have been deliberately ignored here, so don't whine about how "barbaric" the procedure would be. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.85.159}}
		+	:Replacing someone's organs is very different to completely taking someone apart. [[User:Beanie\|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie\|talk]]) 10:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:21, 8 October 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I am honestly surprised no one put a [Citation needed] tag after "It will kill the child". -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162\|108.162.250.162]] 00:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)		:I am honestly surprised no one put a [Citation needed] tag after "It will kill the child". -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162\|108.162.250.162]] 00:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

−	"I don't think that disassembling a child could be "possibly lethal"." => We do organ transplants in people daily. And reattach severed appendages. It is well within the abilities of medical science to disassemble a person to an extreme degree and reassemble them with a high probability of a full recovery. Wether Cueball and Megan will be doing the disassembly themselves is somewhat vague - they can hire someone. The ethics of this action have been deliberately ignored here, so don't whine about how "barbaric" the procedure would be.	+	"I don't think that disassembling a child could be "possibly lethal"." => We do organ transplants in people daily. And reattach severed appendages. It is well within the abilities of medical science to disassemble a person to an extreme degree and reassemble them with a high probability of a full recovery. Wether Cueball and Megan will be doing the disassembly themselves is somewhat vague - they can hire someone. The ethics of this action have been deliberately ignored here, so don't whine about how "barbaric" the procedure would be. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.85.159}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 8 October 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The explanation says that "disassembling a child will be impractical and possibly lethal for the child". I don't think that disassembling a child could be "possibly lethal". Unless your definition of "disassembling a child" is something like plucking strands of hair off them, if you took a child apart, they would die. I'm changing the explanation. (Also, sorry, I'm kinda new here, but I hope I'm doing the signature thing correctly.) [[User:Caeleste Alarum\|Caeleste Alarum]] ([[User talk:Caeleste Alarum\|talk]])		The explanation says that "disassembling a child will be impractical and possibly lethal for the child". I don't think that disassembling a child could be "possibly lethal". Unless your definition of "disassembling a child" is something like plucking strands of hair off them, if you took a child apart, they would die. I'm changing the explanation. (Also, sorry, I'm kinda new here, but I hope I'm doing the signature thing correctly.) [[User:Caeleste Alarum\|Caeleste Alarum]] ([[User talk:Caeleste Alarum\|talk]])
	:I am honestly surprised no one put a [Citation needed] tag after "It will kill the child". -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162\|108.162.250.162]] 00:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)		:I am honestly surprised no one put a [Citation needed] tag after "It will kill the child". -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162\|108.162.250.162]] 00:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	"I don't think that disassembling a child could be "possibly lethal"." => We do organ transplants in people daily. And reattach severed appendages. It is well within the abilities of medical science to disassemble a person to an extreme degree and reassemble them with a high probability of a full recovery. Wether Cueball and Megan will be doing the disassembly themselves is somewhat vague - they can hire someone. The ethics of this action have been deliberately ignored here, so don't whine about how "barbaric" the procedure would be.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:59, 25 June 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The explanation says that "disassembling a child will be impractical and possibly lethal for the child". I don't think that disassembling a child could be "possibly lethal". Unless your definition of "disassembling a child" is something like plucking strands of hair off them, if you took a child apart, they would die. I'm changing the explanation. (Also, sorry, I'm kinda new here, but I hope I'm doing the signature thing correctly.) [[User:Caeleste Alarum\|Caeleste Alarum]] ([[User talk:Caeleste Alarum\|talk]])		The explanation says that "disassembling a child will be impractical and possibly lethal for the child". I don't think that disassembling a child could be "possibly lethal". Unless your definition of "disassembling a child" is something like plucking strands of hair off them, if you took a child apart, they would die. I'm changing the explanation. (Also, sorry, I'm kinda new here, but I hope I'm doing the signature thing correctly.) [[User:Caeleste Alarum\|Caeleste Alarum]] ([[User talk:Caeleste Alarum\|talk]])
		+	:I am honestly surprised no one put a [Citation needed] tag after "It will kill the child". -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162\|108.162.250.162]] 00:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)