Talk:468: Fetishes - Revision history

141.101.69.105 at 16:58, 11 May 2020

2020-05-11T16:58:56Z

162.158.106.252 at 12:44, 26 February 2019

2019-02-26T12:44:40Z

108.162.245.166: added a comment

2019-02-02T01:01:30Z

added a comment

Dgbrt: Please sign your comments.

2018-11-07T20:00:27Z

Please sign your comments.

162.158.38.100 at 01:20, 7 November 2018

2018-11-07T01:20:32Z

Someone Else 37: Explained Russel's Paradox

2014-01-14T04:17:16Z

Explained Russel's Paradox

New page

I should point out that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox] is "The set of all sets that do not contain themselves"- if it does not contain itself, then it must contain itself; but since it now contains itself, it cannot. Although this doesn't seem to have an obvious parallel in the comic, Russell probably should've known better than to create a comprehensive list of anything. --[[User:Someone Else 37|Someone Else 37]] ([[User talk:Someone Else 37|talk]]) 04:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 11 May 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: Wow. You've just solved the Incompleteness Theorem by simply calling Gödel a liar. Why didn't Bertram Russell think of that for his Principia Mathematica? But, have you taken [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule%2034 Rule 34] into account? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.252\|162.158.106.252]] 12:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)		: Wow. You've just solved the Incompleteness Theorem by simply calling Gödel a liar. Why didn't Bertram Russell think of that for his Principia Mathematica? But, have you taken [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule%2034 Rule 34] into account? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.252\|162.158.106.252]] 12:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	By typing "doing anything at any amount": both paradoxes would be solved. "Anything not on your list" would simply be "nothing", and "at any amount" would cover "twice" [[Special:Contributions/141.101.69.105\|141.101.69.105]] 16:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 26 February 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:

	The real solution here is to take into account that Godel is clearly lying. There's no way he's turned on by literally anything not on the list. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.166\|108.162.245.166]] 01:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)		The real solution here is to take into account that Godel is clearly lying. There's no way he's turned on by literally anything not on the list. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.166\|108.162.245.166]] 01:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	: Wow. You've just solved the Incompleteness Theorem by simply calling Gödel a liar. Why didn't Bertram Russell think of that for his Principia Mathematica? But, have you taken [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule%2034 Rule 34] into account? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.252\|162.158.106.252]] 12:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:01, 2 February 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:

	And factoids are false even if they don't contain 7. If they weren't false they would be facts.Factoids are falsehoods that look almost like facts, just as the humanoid Mr. Spock is not human, but almost lookalike one. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.38.100}}		And factoids are false even if they don't contain 7. If they weren't false they would be facts.Factoids are falsehoods that look almost like facts, just as the humanoid Mr. Spock is not human, but almost lookalike one. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.38.100}}
		+
		+	The real solution here is to take into account that Godel is clearly lying. There's no way he's turned on by literally anything not on the list. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.166\|108.162.245.166]] 01:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 7 November 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I should point out that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox] is "The set of all sets that do not contain themselves"- if it does not contain itself, then it must contain itself; but since it now contains itself, it cannot. Although this doesn't seem to have an obvious parallel in the comic, Russell probably should've known better than to create a comprehensive list of anything. --[[User:Someone Else 37\|Someone Else 37]] ([[User talk:Someone Else 37\|talk]]) 04:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)		I should point out that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox] is "The set of all sets that do not contain themselves"- if it does not contain itself, then it must contain itself; but since it now contains itself, it cannot. Although this doesn't seem to have an obvious parallel in the comic, Russell probably should've known better than to create a comprehensive list of anything. --[[User:Someone Else 37\|Someone Else 37]] ([[User talk:Someone Else 37\|talk]]) 04:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

−	And factoids are false even if they don't contain 7. If they weren't false they would be facts.Factoids are falsehoods that look almost like facts, just as the humanoid Mr. Spock is not human, but almost lookalike one.	+	And factoids are false even if they don't contain 7. If they weren't false they would be facts.Factoids are falsehoods that look almost like facts, just as the humanoid Mr. Spock is not human, but almost lookalike one. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.38.100}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 7 November 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I should point out that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox] is "The set of all sets that do not contain themselves"- if it does not contain itself, then it must contain itself; but since it now contains itself, it cannot. Although this doesn't seem to have an obvious parallel in the comic, Russell probably should've known better than to create a comprehensive list of anything. --[[User:Someone Else 37\|Someone Else 37]] ([[User talk:Someone Else 37\|talk]]) 04:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)		I should point out that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_paradox] is "The set of all sets that do not contain themselves"- if it does not contain itself, then it must contain itself; but since it now contains itself, it cannot. Although this doesn't seem to have an obvious parallel in the comic, Russell probably should've known better than to create a comprehensive list of anything. --[[User:Someone Else 37\|Someone Else 37]] ([[User talk:Someone Else 37\|talk]]) 04:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	And factoids are false even if they don't contain 7. If they weren't false they would be facts.Factoids are falsehoods that look almost like facts, just as the humanoid Mr. Spock is not human, but almost lookalike one.