Talk:564: Crossbows - Revision history

162.158.62.120 at 15:08, 6 March 2022

2022-03-06T15:08:00Z

162.158.233.5 at 05:41, 18 January 2022

2022-01-18T05:41:55Z

162.158.79.219 at 03:01, 4 October 2020

2020-10-04T03:01:00Z

SlashMe: moved comment to bottom

2019-02-22T07:34:30Z

moved comment to bottom

Netherin5 at 17:01, 14 February 2019

2019-02-14T17:01:51Z

Netherin5: Formatting

2019-02-14T17:01:27Z

Formatting

162.158.79.47 at 16:02, 14 February 2019

2019-02-14T16:02:44Z

Papayaman1000 at 08:08, 20 November 2016

2016-11-20T08:08:35Z

Davidy22: Don't do that.

2016-11-13T06:19:53Z

Don't do that.

Leong: What it should say ..

2016-11-13T06:01:58Z

What it should say ..

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 6 March 2022
Line 66:		Line 66:

	Yeah I also read it as raptors or some other attacking creature, due to the double meaning in "I hate being the slowest guy in the lab." As the joke goes, you don't need to run faster than the raptor, you just need to run faster than the slowest guy. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.233.5\|162.158.233.5]] 05:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)		Yeah I also read it as raptors or some other attacking creature, due to the double meaning in "I hate being the slowest guy in the lab." As the joke goes, you don't need to run faster than the raptor, you just need to run faster than the slowest guy. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.233.5\|162.158.233.5]] 05:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	This is my first time coming to this explanation page. I burst out chuckling on reading the first line. You wiki editors are a riot. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.120\|162.158.62.120]] 15:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:41, 18 January 2022
Line 64:		Line 64:

	What does explanation 2 have anything to do with being slow with the math? IMO it's obviously going for explanation 1, but some sort of variant where instead of causing black holes somehow it releases zombies or whatnot.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.219\|162.158.79.219]] 03:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)		What does explanation 2 have anything to do with being slow with the math? IMO it's obviously going for explanation 1, but some sort of variant where instead of causing black holes somehow it releases zombies or whatnot.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.219\|162.158.79.219]] 03:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	Yeah I also read it as raptors or some other attacking creature, due to the double meaning in "I hate being the slowest guy in the lab." As the joke goes, you don't need to run faster than the raptor, you just need to run faster than the slowest guy. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.233.5\|162.158.233.5]] 05:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 4 October 2020
Line 62:		Line 62:
	I thought they were just going to shoot the Cueball without the crossbow or they would kill the slowest guy in the lab.		I thought they were just going to shoot the Cueball without the crossbow or they would kill the slowest guy in the lab.
	:Please sign your posts with 4 ~’s, and put your comments at the bottom.[[User:Netherin5\|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5\|talk]]) 17:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)		:Please sign your posts with 4 ~’s, and put your comments at the bottom.[[User:Netherin5\|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5\|talk]]) 17:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	What does explanation 2 have anything to do with being slow with the math? IMO it's obviously going for explanation 1, but some sort of variant where instead of causing black holes somehow it releases zombies or whatnot.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.219\|162.158.79.219]] 03:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Is there ''any'' evidence for involvement of velicoraptors in this comic?[[User:Guru-45|Guru-45]] ([[User talk:Guru-45|talk]]) 17:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 :I did add the incomplete tag. Physicists are unsure on gravity? I also can't see any hints for Velociraptors at the comic. The explain does need a major review. When I have enough time I will give a try.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 17:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
@@ Line 61: / Line 59: @@
 I... I undid Leong's edits. This article went from trainwreck, to run-down shack, to abandoned cottage, to a nice little bungalow, to a rather fine suburban townhouse. Then M. Leong threw a train at it. I was, suffice to say, rather shocked at how appalling the explanation was. The fact that there were major edits (totaling nearly 1,500 characters added and God knows how many actually changed) several ''years'' after the comic's release was a red flag. [[User:Papayaman1000|Papayaman1000]] ([[User talk:Papayaman1000|talk]]) 08:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I thought they were just going to shoot the Cueball without the crossbow or they would kill the slowest guy in the lab.
-:Please sign your posts with 4 ~’s, and put your comments at the bottom.
+:Please sign your posts with 4 ~’s, and put your comments at the bottom.[[User:Netherin5|Netherin5]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 17:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 Is there ''any'' evidence for involvement of velicoraptors in this comic?[[User:Guru-45|Guru-45]] ([[User talk:Guru-45|talk]]) 17:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 :I did add the incomplete tag. Physicists are unsure on gravity? I also can't see any hints for Velociraptors at the comic. The explain does need a major review. When I have enough time I will give a try.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 17:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 14 February 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	I thought they were just going to shoot the Cueball without the crossbow or they would kill the slowest guy in the lab.
		+
	Is there ''any'' evidence for involvement of velicoraptors in this comic?[[User:Guru-45\|Guru-45]] ([[User talk:Guru-45\|talk]]) 17:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)		Is there ''any'' evidence for involvement of velicoraptors in this comic?[[User:Guru-45\|Guru-45]] ([[User talk:Guru-45\|talk]]) 17:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
	:I did add the incomplete tag. Physicists are unsure on gravity? I also can't see any hints for Velociraptors at the comic. The explain does need a major review. When I have enough time I will give a try.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 17:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)		:I did add the incomplete tag. Physicists are unsure on gravity? I also can't see any hints for Velociraptors at the comic. The explain does need a major review. When I have enough time I will give a try.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 17:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:08, 20 November 2016
Line 57:		Line 57:

	Before the full text of this explanation was entered, there were alternatives, which may be read just in case they somehow gained similar merit. {{unsigned\|Leong}}		Before the full text of this explanation was entered, there were alternatives, which may be read just in case they somehow gained similar merit. {{unsigned\|Leong}}
		+
		+	I... I undid Leong's edits. This article went from trainwreck, to run-down shack, to abandoned cottage, to a nice little bungalow, to a rather fine suburban townhouse. Then M. Leong threw a train at it. I was, suffice to say, rather shocked at how appalling the explanation was. The fact that there were major edits (totaling nearly 1,500 characters added and God knows how many actually changed) several ''years'' after the comic's release was a red flag. [[User:Papayaman1000\|Papayaman1000]] ([[User talk:Papayaman1000\|talk]]) 08:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 The joke is that when you treat what HE SAID as the utter truth, you have to form conclusions like this...
+[[Special:Contributions/172.68.118.11|172.68.118.11]] 05:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
-Add the following to the actual page...
+:Add the following to the actual page...
 but Randy's panel was released in the week  that Higgs' prediction was going to fail...
@@ Line 56: / Line 56: @@
-Before the full text of this explanation was entered, there were alternatives, which may be read just in case they somehow gained similar merit.
+Before the full text of this explanation was entered, there were alternatives, which may be read just in case they somehow gained similar merit. {{unsigned|Leong}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 13 November 2016
Line 43:		Line 43:
	7. Therefore they have no doubt that their solution (to being the one creditted with the observation of Higgs particle or effect.) .. the crossbow.. is a perfectly logical solution. Because HE said .		7. Therefore they have no doubt that their solution (to being the one creditted with the observation of Higgs particle or effect.) .. the crossbow.. is a perfectly logical solution. Because HE said .

−	The joke is that when you treat what HE SAID as the utter truth, you have to form conclusions like this... [[Special:Contributions/172.68.118.11\|172.68.118.11]] 05:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)	+	The joke is that when you treat what HE SAID as the utter truth, you have to form conclusions like this...
		+
		+	Add the following to the actual page...
		+	but Randy's panel was released in the week that Higgs' prediction was going to fail...
		+
		+	If Peter Higgs can say that the aims will be met within a year, he must have done two things. 1. Analyzed the complexity, and hence the exact number of steps, of the problem to meet the aims. and 2. That the people meeting the aims will carry out those steps at some specific rate, at least... Meaning definitely never slower.
		+
		+
		+	Further, what does it mean for the other guy to say "Maybe he is slow with the math". Speed of thought , and the assumption that people think at the same rates, is part of the logic puzzle that starts "Three perfect logicians who think at the same rate are given a puzzle".... The two with crossbows have deduced that they are the perfect logicians who think at the same rate. Because they have accepted what Peter Higgs said about tuesday to be true, and to refer to them. Their lab is going to have detected the Higgs thingy by Tuesday.
		+
		+	What does it mean that both of the other two lab people have crossbows ? They both think the same, they both have them at the same time... they are the perfect logicians who think at the same rate.. the mouse other text "I hate being the slowest person in the lab".. really points at the idea that these two have deduced that since they both thought of crossbows, it must be the one logical solution ... (whereas real humans deduce that murdering other top scientists just to claim the Nobel prize is completely wrong... ) Its proof that there is a problem when you raise "what Peter Higgs predicted" to be "Must be absolutely true since Peter Higgs said it"....
		+
		+
		+	Before the full text of this explanation was entered, there were alternatives, which may be read just in case they somehow gained similar merit.
		+
		+	[[Special:Contributions/172.68.118.11\|172.68.118.11]] 05:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)