Talk:57: Wait For Me - Revision history

141.101.98.33 at 09:17, 4 April 2015

2015-04-04T09:17:20Z

Richmond tudor at 03:55, 13 March 2015

2015-03-13T03:55:25Z

Davidy22 at 16:45, 25 October 2014

2014-10-25T16:45:17Z

108.162.229.110 at 15:19, 25 October 2014

2014-10-25T15:19:57Z

Dgbrt at 21:38, 8 November 2013

2013-11-08T21:38:27Z

Dgbrt at 14:24, 8 November 2013

2013-11-08T14:24:30Z

Madbadger2742 at 13:33, 8 November 2013

2013-11-08T13:33:37Z

Madbadger2742 at 13:33, 8 November 2013

2013-11-08T13:33:03Z

141.101.99.214 at 11:15, 8 November 2013

2013-11-08T11:15:47Z

141.101.99.214 at 10:57, 8 November 2013

2013-11-08T10:57:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 4 April 2015
Line 28:		Line 28:

	It is interesting to note that since the comic gradually reveals how much time has elapsed (or has been imagined/joked to have elapsed), it gives the impression of time accelerating as you read the comic. So if you read it quasi-statically, it seems that Cueball has merely been gone for long enough to have a son about Megan's age, but if you read dynamically, it seems that Cueball is getting older as he speaks, and will age and die before the conversation is over. [[User:Richmond tudor\|Richmond tudor]] ([[User talk:Richmond tudor\|talk]]) 03:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)		It is interesting to note that since the comic gradually reveals how much time has elapsed (or has been imagined/joked to have elapsed), it gives the impression of time accelerating as you read the comic. So if you read it quasi-statically, it seems that Cueball has merely been gone for long enough to have a son about Megan's age, but if you read dynamically, it seems that Cueball is getting older as he speaks, and will age and die before the conversation is over. [[User:Richmond tudor\|Richmond tudor]] ([[User talk:Richmond tudor\|talk]]) 03:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Why is it 'stereotypically female' to announce approximately how long task will take? In the UK, at least, men do this as well. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.33\|141.101.98.33]] 09:17, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:55, 13 March 2015
Line 26:		Line 26:

	He may be also referring to Star trek episode 'The Inner Light' {{unsigned ip\|108.162.229.110}}		He may be also referring to Star trek episode 'The Inner Light' {{unsigned ip\|108.162.229.110}}
		+
		+	It is interesting to note that since the comic gradually reveals how much time has elapsed (or has been imagined/joked to have elapsed), it gives the impression of time accelerating as you read the comic. So if you read it quasi-statically, it seems that Cueball has merely been gone for long enough to have a son about Megan's age, but if you read dynamically, it seems that Cueball is getting older as he speaks, and will age and die before the conversation is over. [[User:Richmond tudor\|Richmond tudor]] ([[User talk:Richmond tudor\|talk]]) 03:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Who is "Scott"? He is mentioned here a couple of times so, we do need a category for him at this wiki.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
-:We already have [[Scott|a page for him]]. I've adjusted the two pages that refer to him in the title text to wikilink his name like the third already did. [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:MMarkhurd|talk]]) 01:37, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
+:We already have [[Scott|a page for him]]. I've adjusted the two pages that refer to him in the title text to wikilink his name like the third already did. [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 01:37, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 The 90 seconds could refer to time to read the comic for some people?[[Special:Contributions/87.242.215.146|87.242.215.146]] 14:13, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 A woman announces: '''One minute...'''—that's the joke!--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
-He may be also referring to Star trek episode 'The Inner Light'
+He may be also referring to Star trek episode 'The Inner Light' {{unsigned ip|108.162.229.110}}

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Who is "Scott"? He is mentioned here a couple of times so, we do need a category for him at this wiki.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
-:We already have [[Scott|a page for him]]. I've adjusted the two pages that refer to him in the title text to wikilink his name like the third already did. [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 01:37, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
+:We already have [[Scott|a page for him]]. I've adjusted the two pages that refer to him in the title text to wikilink his name like the third already did. [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:MMarkhurd|talk]]) 01:37, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 The 90 seconds could refer to time to read the comic for some people?[[Special:Contributions/87.242.215.146|87.242.215.146]] 14:13, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 A woman announces: '''One minute...'''—that's the joke!--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 8 November 2013
Line 22:		Line 22:
	It seems to me more like a sketch based on the premise of the Bill Nighy film About Time where the males of the family can travel backwards in time, sometimes changing the future as a result [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.214\|141.101.99.214]] 10:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Pab		It seems to me more like a sketch based on the premise of the Bill Nighy film About Time where the males of the family can travel backwards in time, sometimes changing the future as a result [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.214\|141.101.99.214]] 10:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Pab
	:How could Randall have referenced a 2013 movie in 2006? -- Oh. I see what you did there. {{unsigned\|Madbadger2742}}		:How could Randall have referenced a 2013 movie in 2006? -- Oh. I see what you did there. {{unsigned\|Madbadger2742}}
		+
		+	A woman announces: '''One minute...'''—that's the joke!--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 21:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:24, 8 November 2013
Line 21:		Line 21:

	It seems to me more like a sketch based on the premise of the Bill Nighy film About Time where the males of the family can travel backwards in time, sometimes changing the future as a result [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.214\|141.101.99.214]] 10:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Pab		It seems to me more like a sketch based on the premise of the Bill Nighy film About Time where the males of the family can travel backwards in time, sometimes changing the future as a result [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.214\|141.101.99.214]] 10:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Pab
−	:How could Randall have referenced a 2013 movie in 2006? -- Oh. I see what you did there.	+	:How could Randall have referenced a 2013 movie in 2006? -- Oh. I see what you did there. {{unsigned\|Madbadger2742}}

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 I feel pretty strongly that Cueball's hesitation is more because he is embarrassed, than because he is joking. bringing cueball's son into the situation would then pull relativity into the matter. [[User:GallantChaos|GallantChaos]] ([[User talk:GallantChaos|talk]]) 17:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
-:How could Randall have referenced a 2013 movie in 2006?  -- Oh. I see what you did there.
 It seems to me more like a sketch based on the premise of the Bill Nighy film About Time where the males of the family can travel backwards in time, sometimes changing the future as a result [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.214|141.101.99.214]] 10:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Pab

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 8 November 2013
Line 20:		Line 20:
	I feel pretty strongly that Cueball's hesitation is more because he is embarrassed, than because he is joking. bringing cueball's son into the situation would then pull relativity into the matter. [[User:GallantChaos\|GallantChaos]] ([[User talk:GallantChaos\|talk]]) 17:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)		I feel pretty strongly that Cueball's hesitation is more because he is embarrassed, than because he is joking. bringing cueball's son into the situation would then pull relativity into the matter. [[User:GallantChaos\|GallantChaos]] ([[User talk:GallantChaos\|talk]]) 17:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

−	It seems to me more like a sketch based on the premise of the Bill ~~Nighty~~ film About Time where the males of the family can travel backwards in time, sometimes changing the future as a result [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.214\|141.101.99.214]] 10:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Pab	+	It seems to me more like a sketch based on the premise of the Bill Nighy film About Time where the males of the family can travel backwards in time, sometimes changing the future as a result [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.214\|141.101.99.214]] 10:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Pab

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 8 November 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:

	I feel pretty strongly that Cueball's hesitation is more because he is embarrassed, than because he is joking. bringing cueball's son into the situation would then pull relativity into the matter. [[User:GallantChaos\|GallantChaos]] ([[User talk:GallantChaos\|talk]]) 17:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)		I feel pretty strongly that Cueball's hesitation is more because he is embarrassed, than because he is joking. bringing cueball's son into the situation would then pull relativity into the matter. [[User:GallantChaos\|GallantChaos]] ([[User talk:GallantChaos\|talk]]) 17:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	It seems to me more like a sketch based on the premise of the Bill Nighty film About Time where the males of the family can travel backwards in time, sometimes changing the future as a result [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.214\|141.101.99.214]] 10:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Pab