Talk:633: Blockbuster Mining - Revision history

208.59.176.206: comment

2026-01-31T02:13:00Z

comment

42.book.addict at 18:30, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T18:30:31Z

173.245.50.94: Is Harriet Margaret?

2015-06-30T07:16:48Z

Is Harriet Margaret?

Weatherlawyer at 00:40, 29 January 2015

2015-01-29T00:40:10Z

Weatherlawyer at 00:39, 29 January 2015

2015-01-29T00:39:59Z

108.162.219.192 at 03:35, 2 January 2014

2014-01-02T03:35:50Z

Davidy22 at 01:57, 2 January 2014

2014-01-02T01:57:42Z

108.162.215.65: "stop I'll talk frame suggestion"

2014-01-01T20:57:44Z

"stop I'll talk frame suggestion"

108.162.226.228: extremely generic action frames

2014-01-01T15:28:08Z

extremely generic action frames

108.162.237.120 at 15:24, 1 January 2014

2014-01-01T15:24:05Z

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :::I will tag this as incomplete. Megan is not that violent and we still have to find a better solution.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 ::::"Woman" is a fine alternative to "Megan", but too generic. "Female spy" might give away the punchline a little early. "Testosterette" looks too much like the name of a toaster pastry flavoured with bacon, gunshot and a hint of Jack Daniel's. [[User:Thokling|Thokling]] ([[User talk:Thokling|talk]]) 18:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 Misuse of "to" in the title text. I'll check this out. --[[User:Quicksilver|Quicksilver]] ([[User talk:Quicksilver|talk]]) 19:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 The movie based on this book already and by the same name deserves mention here somewhere.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.192|108.162.219.192]] 03:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
-:Bitch II Terror Beater?
+:Bitch II Terror Beater? [[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 00:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 Is the person playing Harriet perhaps [[Margaret]], thus making this her first known appearance? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.94|173.245.50.94]] 07:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:16, 30 June 2015
Line 19:		Line 19:

	[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 00:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)		[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 00:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Is the person playing Harriet perhaps [[Margaret]], thus making this her first known appearance? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.94\|173.245.50.94]] 07:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:40, 29 January 2015
Line 17:		Line 17:
	The movie based on this book already and by the same name deserves mention here somewhere.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.192\|108.162.219.192]] 03:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)		The movie based on this book already and by the same name deserves mention here somewhere.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.192\|108.162.219.192]] 03:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
	:Bitch II Terror Beater?		:Bitch II Terror Beater?
		+
		+	[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 00:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:39, 29 January 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:

	The movie based on this book already and by the same name deserves mention here somewhere.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.192\|108.162.219.192]] 03:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)		The movie based on this book already and by the same name deserves mention here somewhere.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.192\|108.162.219.192]] 03:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
		+	:Bitch II Terror Beater?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:35, 2 January 2014
Line 14:		Line 14:
	The one in the "stop I'll talk" frame reminds me of the scene in Mission Impossible III (I think three) where the bad guy gets the info and then shoots the girlfriend anyway, however it could be from any movie. It was my impression that the panels are more of a "spy goes bananas" aspect so this could just be a reference to the stereotypical spy information extraction tactic gone awry.		The one in the "stop I'll talk" frame reminds me of the scene in Mission Impossible III (I think three) where the bad guy gets the info and then shoots the girlfriend anyway, however it could be from any movie. It was my impression that the panels are more of a "spy goes bananas" aspect so this could just be a reference to the stereotypical spy information extraction tactic gone awry.
	[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.65\|108.162.215.65]] 20:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.65\|108.162.215.65]] 20:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	The movie based on this book already and by the same name deserves mention here somewhere.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.192\|108.162.219.192]] 03:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :Randall has targeted grammar nazi's and people afflicted with OCD in the past. Consider yourself a member in a special breed of Internetter! [[User:Thokling|Thokling]] ([[User talk:Thokling|talk]]) 18:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
-The "rectangular object" appears to be be the spiral bound notebook when looked at closely. Or is it just me?
+The "rectangular object" appears to be be the spiral bound notebook when looked at closely. Or is it just me? {{unsigned ip|108.162.237.120}}
 Do we know which particular action scenes of which particular movies are satirized in each frame? I get the feeling they're either extremely generic or from something familiar. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.226.228|108.162.226.228]] 15:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 1 January 2014
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Do we know which particular action scenes of which particular movies are satirized in each frame? I get the feeling they're either extremely generic or from something familiar. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.226.228\|108.162.226.228]] 15:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)		Do we know which particular action scenes of which particular movies are satirized in each frame? I get the feeling they're either extremely generic or from something familiar. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.226.228\|108.162.226.228]] 15:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	The one in the "stop I'll talk" frame reminds me of the scene in Mission Impossible III (I think three) where the bad guy gets the info and then shoots the girlfriend anyway, however it could be from any movie. It was my impression that the panels are more of a "spy goes bananas" aspect so this could just be a reference to the stereotypical spy information extraction tactic gone awry.
		+	[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.65\|108.162.215.65]] 20:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 1 January 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:

	The "rectangular object" appears to be be the spiral bound notebook when looked at closely. Or is it just me?		The "rectangular object" appears to be be the spiral bound notebook when looked at closely. Or is it just me?
		+
		+	Do we know which particular action scenes of which particular movies are satirized in each frame? I get the feeling they're either extremely generic or from something familiar. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.226.228\|108.162.226.228]] 15:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:24, 1 January 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Misuse of "to" in the title text. I'll check this out. --[[User:Quicksilver\|Quicksilver]] ([[User talk:Quicksilver\|talk]]) 19:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)		Misuse of "to" in the title text. I'll check this out. --[[User:Quicksilver\|Quicksilver]] ([[User talk:Quicksilver\|talk]]) 19:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
	:Randall has targeted grammar nazi's and people afflicted with OCD in the past. Consider yourself a member in a special breed of Internetter! [[User:Thokling\|Thokling]] ([[User talk:Thokling\|talk]]) 18:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)		:Randall has targeted grammar nazi's and people afflicted with OCD in the past. Consider yourself a member in a special breed of Internetter! [[User:Thokling\|Thokling]] ([[User talk:Thokling\|talk]]) 18:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	The "rectangular object" appears to be be the spiral bound notebook when looked at closely. Or is it just me?