Talk:652: More Accurate - Revision history

Nafedalbi at 19:07, 3 May 2022

2022-05-03T19:07:20Z

International Space Station at 18:22, 22 April 2016

2016-04-22T18:22:35Z

Flewk at 13:19, 8 January 2016

2016-01-08T13:19:59Z

108.162.250.162 at 06:26, 10 August 2015

2015-08-10T06:26:50Z

108.162.229.44 at 18:38, 21 March 2014

2014-03-21T18:38:56Z

108.162.212.196 at 23:37, 6 January 2014

2014-01-06T23:37:55Z

Quicksilver at 18:58, 20 August 2013

2013-08-20T18:58:21Z

Dawfedora at 16:38, 11 July 2013

2013-07-11T16:38:33Z

Hkmaly: Created page with "MOST? You mean some aren't? Our current level of artifical intelligence research is not really far and I doubt anyone would be trying to advance it inside armed machines. -- ..."

2013-02-25T09:03:35Z

Created page with "MOST? You mean some aren't? Our current level of artifical intelligence research is not really far and I doubt anyone would be trying to advance it inside armed machines. -- ..."

New page

MOST? You mean some aren't?

Our current level of artifical intelligence research is not really far and I doubt anyone would be trying to advance it inside armed machines. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:07, 3 May 2022
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I think Randall hit too closely to home on this one. Uncomfortably close. I will never understand humanity's morbid fetishization of war, destruction, and death. [[User:International Space Station\|International Space Station]] ([[User talk:International Space Station\|talk]]) 18:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)		I think Randall hit too closely to home on this one. Uncomfortably close. I will never understand humanity's morbid fetishization of war, destruction, and death. [[User:International Space Station\|International Space Station]] ([[User talk:International Space Station\|talk]]) 18:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	Like our sex drive, it's not a part of us that can be erased. Just hope our tendencies for compassion and organization are stronger. [[User:Nafedalbi\|Nafedalbi]] ([[User talk:Nafedalbi\|talk]]) 19:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 22 April 2016
Line 14:		Line 14:

	And the joke is on everyone when the "drone" turns out to be Soundwave. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162\|108.162.250.162]] 06:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)		And the joke is on everyone when the "drone" turns out to be Soundwave. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162\|108.162.250.162]] 06:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	I think Randall hit too closely to home on this one. Uncomfortably close. I will never understand humanity's morbid fetishization of war, destruction, and death. [[User:International Space Station\|International Space Station]] ([[User talk:International Space Station\|talk]]) 18:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 : As far as I knew, we already have autonomous drones, but there's a law that requires that a human must pull the trigger. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196|108.162.212.196]] 23:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 At ''every'' moment of life we leave the present to enter the future...--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.44|108.162.229.44]] 18:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 And the joke is on everyone when the "drone" turns out to be Soundwave. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162|108.162.250.162]] 06:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:26, 10 August 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:

	At ''every'' moment of life we leave the present to enter the future...--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.44\|108.162.229.44]] 18:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)		At ''every'' moment of life we leave the present to enter the future...--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.44\|108.162.229.44]] 18:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	And the joke is on everyone when the "drone" turns out to be Soundwave. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162\|108.162.250.162]] 06:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:38, 21 March 2014
Line 8:		Line 8:

	: As far as I knew, we already have autonomous drones, but there's a law that requires that a human must pull the trigger. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]] 23:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)		: As far as I knew, we already have autonomous drones, but there's a law that requires that a human must pull the trigger. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]] 23:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	At ''every'' moment of life we leave the present to enter the future...--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.44\|108.162.229.44]] 18:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:37, 6 January 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:

	The current level of our artificial intelligence research is high enough for Google to be testing {{w\|google driverless car\|driverless cars}} on the streets of the Bay Area. Given that, I'm sure the military is at least testing autonomous drones. [[User:Dawfedora\|Dawfedora]] ([[User talk:Dawfedora\|talk]]) 16:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)		The current level of our artificial intelligence research is high enough for Google to be testing {{w\|google driverless car\|driverless cars}} on the streets of the Bay Area. Given that, I'm sure the military is at least testing autonomous drones. [[User:Dawfedora\|Dawfedora]] ([[User talk:Dawfedora\|talk]]) 16:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	: As far as I knew, we already have autonomous drones, but there's a law that requires that a human must pull the trigger. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]] 23:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 20 August 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Our current level of artifical intelligence research is not really far and I doubt anyone would be trying to advance it inside armed machines. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 09:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)		Our current level of artifical intelligence research is not really far and I doubt anyone would be trying to advance it inside armed machines. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 09:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	: Do you just not notice the high volume of news literature on the current state of drones? The Atlantic wrote a long feature about it recently. --[[User:Quicksilver\|Quicksilver]] ([[User talk:Quicksilver\|talk]]) 18:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

	The current level of our artificial intelligence research is high enough for Google to be testing {{w\|google driverless car\|driverless cars}} on the streets of the Bay Area. Given that, I'm sure the military is at least testing autonomous drones. [[User:Dawfedora\|Dawfedora]] ([[User talk:Dawfedora\|talk]]) 16:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)		The current level of our artificial intelligence research is high enough for Google to be testing {{w\|google driverless car\|driverless cars}} on the streets of the Bay Area. Given that, I'm sure the military is at least testing autonomous drones. [[User:Dawfedora\|Dawfedora]] ([[User talk:Dawfedora\|talk]]) 16:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:38, 11 July 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Our current level of artifical intelligence research is not really far and I doubt anyone would be trying to advance it inside armed machines. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 09:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)		Our current level of artifical intelligence research is not really far and I doubt anyone would be trying to advance it inside armed machines. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 09:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	The current level of our artificial intelligence research is high enough for Google to be testing {{w\|google driverless car\|driverless cars}} on the streets of the Bay Area. Given that, I'm sure the military is at least testing autonomous drones. [[User:Dawfedora\|Dawfedora]] ([[User talk:Dawfedora\|talk]]) 16:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)