Talk:66: Abusive Astronomy - Revision history

42.book.addict at 03:39, 18 September 2025

2025-09-18T03:39:50Z

108.162.245.64 at 17:14, 14 February 2017

2017-02-14T17:14:25Z

Davidy22 at 07:07, 24 December 2015

2015-12-24T07:07:29Z

Flewk at 03:33, 24 December 2015

2015-12-24T03:33:15Z

Flewk at 03:33, 24 December 2015

2015-12-24T03:33:02Z

Dgbrt at 20:07, 1 May 2014

2014-05-01T20:07:56Z

108.162.219.59 at 10:29, 1 May 2014

2014-05-01T10:29:35Z

Subwoofer at 22:23, 6 September 2013

2013-09-06T22:23:32Z

98.212.198.105 at 06:36, 6 November 2012

2012-11-06T06:36:49Z

35.13.220.113: Created page with "Actually, I don't quite get it. Since it's one of the early xkcd strips, it is somewhat different from the latter ones. I would suppose he is making fun on how it is impossibl..."

2012-10-25T03:52:22Z

Created page with "Actually, I don't quite get it. Since it's one of the early xkcd strips, it is somewhat different from the latter ones. I would suppose he is making fun on how it is impossibl..."

New page

Actually, I don't quite get it. Since it's one of the early xkcd strips, it is somewhat different from the latter ones. I would suppose he is making fun on how it is impossible to guess what the constellations are, as they just look like a bunch of stars clumped together (definitely not like a belt). [[Special:Contributions/35.13.220.113|35.13.220.113]] 03:52, 25 October 2012 (UTC) NariOX

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Actually, I don't quite get it. Since it's one of the early xkcd strips, it is somewhat different from the latter ones. I would suppose he is making fun on how it is impossible to guess what the constellations are, as they just look like a bunch of stars clumped together (definitely not like a belt). [[Special:Contributions/35.13.220.113|35.13.220.113]] 03:52, 25 October 2012 (UTC) NariOX
-The first one looks like a certain male part, the second looks like a pencil, I can't figure out the last one though...
+The first one looks like a certain male part, the second looks like a pencil, I can't figure out the last one though... {{unsigned ip|98.212.198.105|06:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)}}
 Constellations are NOT "formally known as asterisms." They are defined area of the celestial sphere. Asterisms are star formations that are part of constellations (e.g. Orion's Belt) or can span multiple constellations (e.g. the Summer Triangle and Winter Hexagon.) Constellations are more formally called, um, constellations. [[User:Subwoofer|Subwoofer]] ([[User talk:Subwoofer|talk]]) 22:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Never knew about the confusion with Pleiades, always though it was between the Big Dipper and the Little Dipper. {{unsigned|Flewk}}
-Big Dipper is a Ladle.  For taking drinks, perhaps, from the drinking gourd. Referenced from abolitionist movement times. http://pathways.thinkport.org/secrets/gourd1.cfm ((GlitchedOut))
+Big Dipper is a Ladle.  For taking drinks, perhaps, from the drinking gourd. Referenced from abolitionist movement times. http://pathways.thinkport.org/secrets/gourd1.cfm ((GlitchedOut)) {{unsigned ip|108.162.245.64|17:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:14, 14 February 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Never knew about the confusion with Pleiades, always though it was between the Big Dipper and the Little Dipper. {{unsigned\|Flewk}}		Never knew about the confusion with Pleiades, always though it was between the Big Dipper and the Little Dipper. {{unsigned\|Flewk}}
		+
		+	Big Dipper is a Ladle. For taking drinks, perhaps, from the drinking gourd. Referenced from abolitionist movement times. http://pathways.thinkport.org/secrets/gourd1.cfm ((GlitchedOut))

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:07, 24 December 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I have been stargazing quite a lot in the last year and I can tell that those constellations are rather simple to recognize in the night sky; especially the Orion's belt, only someone completely inept wouldn't be able to find it, in the Northern Hemisphere. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.219.59}}		I have been stargazing quite a lot in the last year and I can tell that those constellations are rather simple to recognize in the night sky; especially the Orion's belt, only someone completely inept wouldn't be able to find it, in the Northern Hemisphere. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.219.59}}

−	Never knew about the confusion with Pleiades, always though it was between the Big Dipper and the Little Dipper.	+	Never knew about the confusion with Pleiades, always though it was between the Big Dipper and the Little Dipper. {{unsigned\|Flewk}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:33, 24 December 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I have been stargazing quite a lot in the last year and I can tell that those constellations are rather simple to recognize in the night sky; especially the Orion's belt, only someone completely inept wouldn't be able to find it, in the Northern Hemisphere. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.219.59}}		I have been stargazing quite a lot in the last year and I can tell that those constellations are rather simple to recognize in the night sky; especially the Orion's belt, only someone completely inept wouldn't be able to find it, in the Northern Hemisphere. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.219.59}}

−	Never knew about the confusion ~~between~~ Pleiades, always though it was between the Big Dipper and the Little Dipper.	+	Never knew about the confusion with Pleiades, always though it was between the Big Dipper and the Little Dipper.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:33, 24 December 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I have been stargazing quite a lot in the last year and I can tell that those constellations are rather simple to recognize in the night sky; especially the Orion's belt, only someone completely inept wouldn't be able to find it, in the Northern Hemisphere. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.219.59}}		I have been stargazing quite a lot in the last year and I can tell that those constellations are rather simple to recognize in the night sky; especially the Orion's belt, only someone completely inept wouldn't be able to find it, in the Northern Hemisphere. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.219.59}}
		+
		+	Never knew about the confusion between Pleiades, always though it was between the Big Dipper and the Little Dipper.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 1 May 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Constellations are NOT "formally known as asterisms." They are defined area of the celestial sphere. Asterisms are star formations that are part of constellations (e.g. Orion's Belt) or can span multiple constellations (e.g. the Summer Triangle and Winter Hexagon.) Constellations are more formally called, um, constellations. [[User:Subwoofer\|Subwoofer]] ([[User talk:Subwoofer\|talk]]) 22:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)		Constellations are NOT "formally known as asterisms." They are defined area of the celestial sphere. Asterisms are star formations that are part of constellations (e.g. Orion's Belt) or can span multiple constellations (e.g. the Summer Triangle and Winter Hexagon.) Constellations are more formally called, um, constellations. [[User:Subwoofer\|Subwoofer]] ([[User talk:Subwoofer\|talk]]) 22:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

−	I have been stargazing quite a lot in the last year and I can tell that those constellations are rather simple to recognize in the night sky; especially the Orion's belt, only someone completely inept wouldn't be able to find it, in the Northern Hemisphere.	+	I have been stargazing quite a lot in the last year and I can tell that those constellations are rather simple to recognize in the night sky; especially the Orion's belt, only someone completely inept wouldn't be able to find it, in the Northern Hemisphere. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.219.59}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:29, 1 May 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Constellations are NOT "formally known as asterisms." They are defined area of the celestial sphere. Asterisms are star formations that are part of constellations (e.g. Orion's Belt) or can span multiple constellations (e.g. the Summer Triangle and Winter Hexagon.) Constellations are more formally called, um, constellations. [[User:Subwoofer\|Subwoofer]] ([[User talk:Subwoofer\|talk]]) 22:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)		Constellations are NOT "formally known as asterisms." They are defined area of the celestial sphere. Asterisms are star formations that are part of constellations (e.g. Orion's Belt) or can span multiple constellations (e.g. the Summer Triangle and Winter Hexagon.) Constellations are more formally called, um, constellations. [[User:Subwoofer\|Subwoofer]] ([[User talk:Subwoofer\|talk]]) 22:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	I have been stargazing quite a lot in the last year and I can tell that those constellations are rather simple to recognize in the night sky; especially the Orion's belt, only someone completely inept wouldn't be able to find it, in the Northern Hemisphere.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 6 September 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The first one looks like a certain male part, the second looks like a pencil, I can't figure out the last one though...		The first one looks like a certain male part, the second looks like a pencil, I can't figure out the last one though...
		+
		+	Constellations are NOT "formally known as asterisms." They are defined area of the celestial sphere. Asterisms are star formations that are part of constellations (e.g. Orion's Belt) or can span multiple constellations (e.g. the Summer Triangle and Winter Hexagon.) Constellations are more formally called, um, constellations. [[User:Subwoofer\|Subwoofer]] ([[User talk:Subwoofer\|talk]]) 22:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:36, 6 November 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Actually, I don't quite get it. Since it's one of the early xkcd strips, it is somewhat different from the latter ones. I would suppose he is making fun on how it is impossible to guess what the constellations are, as they just look like a bunch of stars clumped together (definitely not like a belt). [[Special:Contributions/35.13.220.113\|35.13.220.113]] 03:52, 25 October 2012 (UTC) NariOX		Actually, I don't quite get it. Since it's one of the early xkcd strips, it is somewhat different from the latter ones. I would suppose he is making fun on how it is impossible to guess what the constellations are, as they just look like a bunch of stars clumped together (definitely not like a belt). [[Special:Contributions/35.13.220.113\|35.13.220.113]] 03:52, 25 October 2012 (UTC) NariOX
		+
		+	The first one looks like a certain male part, the second looks like a pencil, I can't figure out the last one though...