Talk:689: FIRST Design - Revision history

Bb777 at 15:33, 26 April 2025

2025-04-26T15:33:37Z

172.70.211.146 at 16:49, 31 August 2022

2022-08-31T16:49:12Z

162.158.74.203 at 21:00, 6 June 2020

2020-06-06T21:00:13Z

172.68.255.8 at 00:38, 23 July 2019

2019-07-23T00:38:29Z

172.68.255.8 at 00:37, 23 July 2019

2019-07-23T00:37:53Z

162.158.155.236: fitting considering randall's obsession with aging

2019-07-16T09:27:39Z

fitting considering randall's obsession with aging

108.162.215.199: Talking about how much this comic is against the rules.

2016-10-11T17:26:06Z

Talking about how much this comic is against the rules.

Davidy22 at 18:03, 16 January 2016

2016-01-16T18:03:19Z

108.162.236.43 at 16:24, 16 January 2016

2016-01-16T16:24:11Z

Benjaminikuta: appreciate

2015-08-18T11:52:38Z

appreciate

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 26 April 2025
Line 15:		Line 15:
	huh, nine years on and i read this. i understand we nerds don't do sport, and you americans don't do soccer. just a heads up, then. you say "soccer balls into their team's goals" which really isn't how soccer works, and would lose you the match. it goes against common usage, at least in the uk. is that a joke? a playful and wilful misunderstanding of the double meaning of "goal" as both "objective" and "opponents' scoring area"? it may be my goal/objective to score, but i will do so in my opponents' goal/net. too late now, though, and the high schooler who wrote this text has now left university. oh well. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.236\|162.158.155.236]] 09:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)		huh, nine years on and i read this. i understand we nerds don't do sport, and you americans don't do soccer. just a heads up, then. you say "soccer balls into their team's goals" which really isn't how soccer works, and would lose you the match. it goes against common usage, at least in the uk. is that a joke? a playful and wilful misunderstanding of the double meaning of "goal" as both "objective" and "opponents' scoring area"? it may be my goal/objective to score, but i will do so in my opponents' goal/net. too late now, though, and the high schooler who wrote this text has now left university. oh well. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.236\|162.158.155.236]] 09:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
	:They're not playing soccer - it's a robotics competition. There are balls placed on the field, and your team is scored by how many balls you manage to get into your goal - essentially the robot that can retrieve the most balls is the winner. So this article is exactly correct.--[[Special:Contributions/172.68.255.8\|172.68.255.8]] 00:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)		:They're not playing soccer - it's a robotics competition. There are balls placed on the field, and your team is scored by how many balls you manage to get into your goal - essentially the robot that can retrieve the most balls is the winner. So this article is exactly correct.--[[Special:Contributions/172.68.255.8\|172.68.255.8]] 00:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	must be team #254. --[[User:Bb777\|me, hi]] ([[User talk:Bb777\|talk]]) 15:33, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:49, 31 August 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:

	You would lose ranking points if the opposing alliance doesn't score anything. Also you will have destroyed your alliance partnr's robot. I'd try it with VEX first... {{unsigned ip\|108.162.236.43}}		You would lose ranking points if the opposing alliance doesn't score anything. Also you will have destroyed your alliance partnr's robot. I'd try it with VEX first... {{unsigned ip\|108.162.236.43}}
		+	:you could always score a token goal for your opponent?

	Should we mention the fact of how much against the rules this is? I mean they are breaking at least three rules off the top of my head. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.199\|108.162.215.199]] 17:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC)		Should we mention the fact of how much against the rules this is? I mean they are breaking at least three rules off the top of my head. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.199\|108.162.215.199]] 17:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 6 June 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:I read this. I appreciate your contribution. [[User:Benjaminikuta\|Benjaminikuta]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta\|talk]]) 11:52, 18 August 2015 (UTC)		:I read this. I appreciate your contribution. [[User:Benjaminikuta\|Benjaminikuta]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta\|talk]]) 11:52, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	:I had nothing to do with the original point, but your comment made me happy and I wanted to share that. Thank you.--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.203\|162.158.74.203]] 21:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

	It wouldn't work in Dallas--the Dallas Memorial Arena is too high, and doesn't have a proper sprinkler system. It's just too old. -R, another former US FIRST member (#3392). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.8\|108.162.221.8]] 02:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)		It wouldn't work in Dallas--the Dallas Memorial Arena is too high, and doesn't have a proper sprinkler system. It's just too old. -R, another former US FIRST member (#3392). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.8\|108.162.221.8]] 02:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:38, 23 July 2019
Line 11:		Line 11:

	huh, nine years on and i read this. i understand we nerds don't do sport, and you americans don't do soccer. just a heads up, then. you say "soccer balls into their team's goals" which really isn't how soccer works, and would lose you the match. it goes against common usage, at least in the uk. is that a joke? a playful and wilful misunderstanding of the double meaning of "goal" as both "objective" and "opponents' scoring area"? it may be my goal/objective to score, but i will do so in my opponents' goal/net. too late now, though, and the high schooler who wrote this text has now left university. oh well. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.236\|162.158.155.236]] 09:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)		huh, nine years on and i read this. i understand we nerds don't do sport, and you americans don't do soccer. just a heads up, then. you say "soccer balls into their team's goals" which really isn't how soccer works, and would lose you the match. it goes against common usage, at least in the uk. is that a joke? a playful and wilful misunderstanding of the double meaning of "goal" as both "objective" and "opponents' scoring area"? it may be my goal/objective to score, but i will do so in my opponents' goal/net. too late now, though, and the high schooler who wrote this text has now left university. oh well. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.236\|162.158.155.236]] 09:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
−	:They're not playing soccer - it's a robotics competition. There are balls placed on the field, and your team is scored by how many balls you manage to get into your goal - essentially the robot that can retrieve the most balls is the winner. So this article is exactly correct.	+	:They're not playing soccer - it's a robotics competition. There are balls placed on the field, and your team is scored by how many balls you manage to get into your goal - essentially the robot that can retrieve the most balls is the winner. So this article is exactly correct.--[[Special:Contributions/172.68.255.8\|172.68.255.8]] 00:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:37, 23 July 2019
Line 11:		Line 11:

	huh, nine years on and i read this. i understand we nerds don't do sport, and you americans don't do soccer. just a heads up, then. you say "soccer balls into their team's goals" which really isn't how soccer works, and would lose you the match. it goes against common usage, at least in the uk. is that a joke? a playful and wilful misunderstanding of the double meaning of "goal" as both "objective" and "opponents' scoring area"? it may be my goal/objective to score, but i will do so in my opponents' goal/net. too late now, though, and the high schooler who wrote this text has now left university. oh well. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.236\|162.158.155.236]] 09:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)		huh, nine years on and i read this. i understand we nerds don't do sport, and you americans don't do soccer. just a heads up, then. you say "soccer balls into their team's goals" which really isn't how soccer works, and would lose you the match. it goes against common usage, at least in the uk. is that a joke? a playful and wilful misunderstanding of the double meaning of "goal" as both "objective" and "opponents' scoring area"? it may be my goal/objective to score, but i will do so in my opponents' goal/net. too late now, though, and the high schooler who wrote this text has now left university. oh well. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.236\|162.158.155.236]] 09:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
		+	:They're not playing soccer - it's a robotics competition. There are balls placed on the field, and your team is scored by how many balls you manage to get into your goal - essentially the robot that can retrieve the most balls is the winner. So this article is exactly correct.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:27, 16 July 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Should we mention the fact of how much against the rules this is? I mean they are breaking at least three rules off the top of my head. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.199\|108.162.215.199]] 17:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC)		Should we mention the fact of how much against the rules this is? I mean they are breaking at least three rules off the top of my head. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.199\|108.162.215.199]] 17:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	huh, nine years on and i read this. i understand we nerds don't do sport, and you americans don't do soccer. just a heads up, then. you say "soccer balls into their team's goals" which really isn't how soccer works, and would lose you the match. it goes against common usage, at least in the uk. is that a joke? a playful and wilful misunderstanding of the double meaning of "goal" as both "objective" and "opponents' scoring area"? it may be my goal/objective to score, but i will do so in my opponents' goal/net. too late now, though, and the high schooler who wrote this text has now left university. oh well. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.236\|162.158.155.236]] 09:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 11 October 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:

	You would lose ranking points if the opposing alliance doesn't score anything. Also you will have destroyed your alliance partnr's robot. I'd try it with VEX first... {{unsigned ip\|108.162.236.43}}		You would lose ranking points if the opposing alliance doesn't score anything. Also you will have destroyed your alliance partnr's robot. I'd try it with VEX first... {{unsigned ip\|108.162.236.43}}
		+
		+	Should we mention the fact of how much against the rules this is? I mean they are breaking at least three rules off the top of my head. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.199\|108.162.215.199]] 17:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Should I mention there is an Umbrella Corporation? [[Special:Contributions/71.166.47.84|71.166.47.84]] 15:00, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 :As a former student in FRC, the little plow thingy in the front is also a thing. but nobody is going to read this so whatever. 21:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)~ {{unsigned ip|173.245.54.254}}
@@ Line 8: / Line 6: @@
 It wouldn't work in Dallas--the Dallas Memorial Arena is too high, and doesn't have a proper sprinkler system. It's just too old. -R, another former US FIRST member (#3392). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.8|108.162.221.8]] 02:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
-You would lose ranking points if the opposing alliance doesn't score anything. Also you will have destroyed your alliance partnr's robot. I'd try it with VEX first...
+You would lose ranking points if the opposing alliance doesn't score anything. Also you will have destroyed your alliance partnr's robot. I'd try it with VEX first... {{unsigned ip|108.162.236.43}}