Talk:715: Numbers - Revision history

Certified nqh at 08:32, 8 June 2023

2023-06-08T08:32:39Z

Certified nqh at 08:29, 8 June 2023

2023-06-08T08:29:57Z

162.158.158.146 at 18:09, 27 April 2023

2023-04-27T18:09:27Z

The Cat Lady at 10:07, 19 August 2021

2021-08-19T10:07:20Z

Beanie at 11:49, 22 April 2021

2021-04-22T11:49:49Z

162.158.91.209 at 18:59, 19 August 2017

2017-08-19T18:59:34Z

162.158.91.209 at 18:58, 19 August 2017

2017-08-19T18:58:31Z

ArchieT at 07:28, 29 January 2015

2015-01-29T07:28:35Z

Davidy22 at 02:31, 16 November 2014

2014-11-16T02:31:39Z

199.27.128.190: the scale is wrong

2014-11-16T02:06:53Z

the scale is wrong

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :The problem with any claim of a correct number of water glasses is that glass volume isn't standardized. For example, https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/2d9bcf/mom_asked_for_the_largest_glass_of_water_i_can/:
 :The part that is always left out is that <i>you already get that much fluid intake just from normal eating and drinking!</i> The common misconception that you need to <i>separately</i> drink six glasses of water is flat out wrong and potentially even dangerous.
-::You should always drink 68 (shot) glasses of water a day! [[User:Certified_nqh|Me]]<sup>&#91;[[285: Wikipedian Protester|''citation needed'']]&#93;[[Category:Pages using the "citation needed" template]]</sup> 08:29, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
+::You should always drink 150 (german) (shot) glasses of water a day! [[User:Certified_nqh|Me]]<sup>&#91;[[285: Wikipedian Protester|''citation needed'']]&#93;[[Category:Pages using the "citation needed" template]]</sup> 08:29, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:29, 8 June 2023
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:The problem with any claim of a correct number of water glasses is that glass volume isn't standardized. For example, https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/2d9bcf/mom_asked_for_the_largest_glass_of_water_i_can/:		:The problem with any claim of a correct number of water glasses is that glass volume isn't standardized. For example, https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/2d9bcf/mom_asked_for_the_largest_glass_of_water_i_can/:
	:The part that is always left out is that <i>you already get that much fluid intake just from normal eating and drinking!</i> The common misconception that you need to <i>separately</i> drink six glasses of water is flat out wrong and potentially even dangerous.		:The part that is always left out is that <i>you already get that much fluid intake just from normal eating and drinking!</i> The common misconception that you need to <i>separately</i> drink six glasses of water is flat out wrong and potentially even dangerous.
		+	::You should always drink 68 (shot) glasses of water a day! [[User:Certified_nqh\|Me]]<sup>[[[285: Wikipedian Protester\|''citation needed'']]][[Category:Pages using the "citation needed" template]]</sup> 08:29, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 27 April 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Just for the record, for the people that didn't read the explanation; the correct number of glasses that you should have per day (on average) is <u>6</u>. [[User:Beanie\|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie\|talk]]) 11:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC)		Just for the record, for the people that didn't read the explanation; the correct number of glasses that you should have per day (on average) is <u>6</u>. [[User:Beanie\|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie\|talk]]) 11:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
		+	:The problem with any claim of a correct number of water glasses is that glass volume isn't standardized. For example, https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/2d9bcf/mom_asked_for_the_largest_glass_of_water_i_can/:
	:The part that is always left out is that <i>you already get that much fluid intake just from normal eating and drinking!</i> The common misconception that you need to <i>separately</i> drink six glasses of water is flat out wrong and potentially even dangerous.		:The part that is always left out is that <i>you already get that much fluid intake just from normal eating and drinking!</i> The common misconception that you need to <i>separately</i> drink six glasses of water is flat out wrong and potentially even dangerous.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:07, 19 August 2021
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Just for the record, for the people that didn't read the explanation; the correct number of glasses that you should have per day (on average) is <u>6</u>. [[User:Beanie\|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie\|talk]]) 11:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC)		Just for the record, for the people that didn't read the explanation; the correct number of glasses that you should have per day (on average) is <u>6</u>. [[User:Beanie\|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie\|talk]]) 11:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
		+	:The part that is always left out is that <i>you already get that much fluid intake just from normal eating and drinking!</i> The common misconception that you need to <i>separately</i> drink six glasses of water is flat out wrong and potentially even dangerous.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 22 April 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I think it's a funny little coincidence, that the graph for breast size slightly resembles a pair of breasts [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.209\|162.158.91.209]] 18:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)		I think it's a funny little coincidence, that the graph for breast size slightly resembles a pair of breasts [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.209\|162.158.91.209]] 18:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	Just for the record, for the people that didn't read the explanation; the correct number of glasses that you should have per day (on average) is <u>6</u>. [[User:Beanie\|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie\|talk]]) 11:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 19 August 2017
Line 5:		Line 5:
	I'm from Poland and when I was joining Mensa, the test score was in the Cattell scale, in which 148 is required to join. So that may be a reason for 147 ;) [[User:ArchieT\|ArchieT]] ([[User talk:ArchieT\|talk]]) 07:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)		I'm from Poland and when I was joining Mensa, the test score was in the Cattell scale, in which 148 is required to join. So that may be a reason for 147 ;) [[User:ArchieT\|ArchieT]] ([[User talk:ArchieT\|talk]]) 07:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

−	I think it's a funny little coincidence, that the graph for breast size slightly resembles a pair of breasts	+	I think it's a funny little coincidence, that the graph for breast size slightly resembles a pair of breasts [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.209\|162.158.91.209]] 18:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 19 August 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I'm from Poland and when I was joining Mensa, the test score was in the Cattell scale, in which 148 is required to join. So that may be a reason for 147 ;) [[User:ArchieT\|ArchieT]] ([[User talk:ArchieT\|talk]]) 07:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)		I'm from Poland and when I was joining Mensa, the test score was in the Cattell scale, in which 148 is required to join. So that may be a reason for 147 ;) [[User:ArchieT\|ArchieT]] ([[User talk:ArchieT\|talk]]) 07:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	I think it's a funny little coincidence, that the graph for breast size slightly resembles a pair of breasts

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:28, 29 January 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I think it should be noted that many of the graphs use.an exponential scale of measurement, which destroys any credibility the visuals had in a quite posssibly intentional moment of internet satire. {{unsigned ip\|199.27.128.190}}		I think it should be noted that many of the graphs use.an exponential scale of measurement, which destroys any credibility the visuals had in a quite posssibly intentional moment of internet satire. {{unsigned ip\|199.27.128.190}}
		+
		+	I'm from Poland and when I was joining Mensa, the test score was in the Cattell scale, in which 148 is required to join. So that may be a reason for 147 ;) [[User:ArchieT\|ArchieT]] ([[User talk:ArchieT\|talk]]) 07:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:31, 16 November 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	It seems pretty obvious that the spike at "I'm 18 and have never had a boyfriend" is thanks to porn sites. I don't think that has anything to do with "anxiety about reaching adulthood." {{unsigned ip\|‎108.162.216.54}}		It seems pretty obvious that the spike at "I'm 18 and have never had a boyfriend" is thanks to porn sites. I don't think that has anything to do with "anxiety about reaching adulthood." {{unsigned ip\|‎108.162.216.54}}
−	I think it should be noted that many of the graphs use.an exponential scale of measurement, which destroys any credibility the visuals had in a quite posssibly intentional moment of internet satire.	+
		+	I think it should be noted that many of the graphs use.an exponential scale of measurement, which destroys any credibility the visuals had in a quite posssibly intentional moment of internet satire. {{unsigned ip\|199.27.128.190}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 16 November 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	It seems pretty obvious that the spike at "I'm 18 and have never had a boyfriend" is thanks to porn sites. I don't think that has anything to do with "anxiety about reaching adulthood." {{unsigned ip\|‎108.162.216.54}}		It seems pretty obvious that the spike at "I'm 18 and have never had a boyfriend" is thanks to porn sites. I don't think that has anything to do with "anxiety about reaching adulthood." {{unsigned ip\|‎108.162.216.54}}
		+	I think it should be noted that many of the graphs use.an exponential scale of measurement, which destroys any credibility the visuals had in a quite posssibly intentional moment of internet satire.