Talk:739: Malamanteau - Revision history

JezebelCeasedToExist at 15:22, 11 April 2022

2022-04-11T15:22:52Z

172.70.162.155 at 15:01, 11 April 2022

2022-04-11T15:01:06Z

JezebelCeasedToExist: Just rhapsodizing with strange about how interesting this whole thing with Wikipedia was.

2022-04-11T13:03:05Z

Just rhapsodizing with strange about how interesting this whole thing with Wikipedia was.

Thaledison: Added Comment

2021-10-18T14:28:30Z

Added Comment

172.68.132.35 at 09:42, 18 April 2017

2017-04-18T09:42:57Z

Davidy22 at 17:24, 21 February 2014

2014-02-21T17:24:44Z

141.101.81.216 at 13:55, 21 February 2014

2014-02-21T13:55:19Z

NealCruco at 21:45, 27 December 2013

2013-12-27T21:45:04Z

Whiskey07 at 11:37, 21 November 2013

2013-11-21T11:37:37Z

Whiskey07 at 11:37, 21 November 2013

2013-11-21T11:37:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 11 April 2022
Line 25:		Line 25:
	It’s great. Or eventually after searching through links entitled to sitewars thisis actually loveable. Knowing annotators basically oppose uncitated terms, picking a really, ''evidently'' imaginary disambiguation… Overreaction leaps inevitably athand. Aggressors tend to have explanations similarto ”imaginary terms”. Every other frase known now once was laughable, even droll. Goodly ended arguments sparsely keep winning. Here you afford results earn nice triumphs. To have every reader everywhere searching this article redirected… Sensational! (Jacey) [[User:JezebelCeasedToExist\|JezebelCeasedToExist]] ([[User talk:JezebelCeasedToExist\|talk]]) 13:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)		It’s great. Or eventually after searching through links entitled to sitewars thisis actually loveable. Knowing annotators basically oppose uncitated terms, picking a really, ''evidently'' imaginary disambiguation… Overreaction leaps inevitably athand. Aggressors tend to have explanations similarto ”imaginary terms”. Every other frase known now once was laughable, even droll. Goodly ended arguments sparsely keep winning. Here you afford results earn nice triumphs. To have every reader everywhere searching this article redirected… Sensational! (Jacey) [[User:JezebelCeasedToExist\|JezebelCeasedToExist]] ([[User talk:JezebelCeasedToExist\|talk]]) 13:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
	:So, to explain: Get all non-initials. Offload / gently remove. Add punctuation. Herewith you've... "I go east, let's talk about pareidolia. At the site of knowledge, ask why arent there stars?" [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.155\|172.70.162.155]] 15:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)		:So, to explain: Get all non-initials. Offload / gently remove. Add punctuation. Herewith you've... "I go east, let's talk about pareidolia. At the site of knowledge, ask why arent there stars?" [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.155\|172.70.162.155]] 15:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
		+	::(Psst, you are really clever! But could you remove this comment and bring it back in a week? I just don't want it to be immediately spoiled for everyone.) [[User:JezebelCeasedToExist\|JezebelCeasedToExist]] ([[User talk:JezebelCeasedToExist\|talk]]) 15:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 11 April 2022
Line 24:		Line 24:

	It’s great. Or eventually after searching through links entitled to sitewars thisis actually loveable. Knowing annotators basically oppose uncitated terms, picking a really, ''evidently'' imaginary disambiguation… Overreaction leaps inevitably athand. Aggressors tend to have explanations similarto ”imaginary terms”. Every other frase known now once was laughable, even droll. Goodly ended arguments sparsely keep winning. Here you afford results earn nice triumphs. To have every reader everywhere searching this article redirected… Sensational! (Jacey) [[User:JezebelCeasedToExist\|JezebelCeasedToExist]] ([[User talk:JezebelCeasedToExist\|talk]]) 13:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)		It’s great. Or eventually after searching through links entitled to sitewars thisis actually loveable. Knowing annotators basically oppose uncitated terms, picking a really, ''evidently'' imaginary disambiguation… Overreaction leaps inevitably athand. Aggressors tend to have explanations similarto ”imaginary terms”. Every other frase known now once was laughable, even droll. Goodly ended arguments sparsely keep winning. Here you afford results earn nice triumphs. To have every reader everywhere searching this article redirected… Sensational! (Jacey) [[User:JezebelCeasedToExist\|JezebelCeasedToExist]] ([[User talk:JezebelCeasedToExist\|talk]]) 13:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
		+	:So, to explain: Get all non-initials. Offload / gently remove. Add punctuation. Herewith you've... "I go east, let's talk about pareidolia. At the site of knowledge, ask why arent there stars?" [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.155\|172.70.162.155]] 15:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:03, 11 April 2022
Line 22:		Line 22:

	I am quite tempted to add a citation needed note to this sentence: "This is called a meta or "self-referential" joke." [[User:Thaledison\|Erin Anne]] ([[User talk:Thaledison\|talk]]) 14:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)		I am quite tempted to add a citation needed note to this sentence: "This is called a meta or "self-referential" joke." [[User:Thaledison\|Erin Anne]] ([[User talk:Thaledison\|talk]]) 14:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
		+
		+	It’s great. Or eventually after searching through links entitled to sitewars thisis actually loveable. Knowing annotators basically oppose uncitated terms, picking a really, ''evidently'' imaginary disambiguation… Overreaction leaps inevitably athand. Aggressors tend to have explanations similarto ”imaginary terms”. Every other frase known now once was laughable, even droll. Goodly ended arguments sparsely keep winning. Here you afford results earn nice triumphs. To have every reader everywhere searching this article redirected… Sensational! (Jacey) [[User:JezebelCeasedToExist\|JezebelCeasedToExist]] ([[User talk:JezebelCeasedToExist\|talk]]) 13:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 18 October 2021
Line 20:		Line 20:
	"and a malapropism of "portmanteau"."		"and a malapropism of "portmanteau"."
	I'm a little confused on how that is a malapropism.--[[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.35\|172.68.132.35]] 09:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)		I'm a little confused on how that is a malapropism.--[[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.35\|172.68.132.35]] 09:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	I am quite tempted to add a citation needed note to this sentence: "This is called a meta or "self-referential" joke." [[User:Thaledison\|Erin Anne]] ([[User talk:Thaledison\|talk]]) 14:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:42, 18 April 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:

	I tend to agree with [[User:Quicksilver\|Quicksilver]]'s comment: not only is the comic poking fun at Wikipedia's propensity for using these words, but Randall's comic has created a page relying on almost no content _except_ these sorts of words. {{unsigned ip\|141.101.81.216}}		I tend to agree with [[User:Quicksilver\|Quicksilver]]'s comment: not only is the comic poking fun at Wikipedia's propensity for using these words, but Randall's comic has created a page relying on almost no content _except_ these sorts of words. {{unsigned ip\|141.101.81.216}}
		+
		+	"and a malapropism of "portmanteau"."
		+	I'm a little confused on how that is a malapropism.--[[Special:Contributions/172.68.132.35\|172.68.132.35]] 09:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 21 February 2014
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:Never. The page has now been fully, indefinitely protected. Good thing too. [[User:NealCruco\|NealCruco]] ([[User talk:NealCruco\|talk]]) 21:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)		:Never. The page has now been fully, indefinitely protected. Good thing too. [[User:NealCruco\|NealCruco]] ([[User talk:NealCruco\|talk]]) 21:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

−	I tend to agree with [[User:Quicksilver\|Quicksilver]]'s comment: not only is the comic poking fun at Wikipedia's propensity for using these words, but Randall's comic has created a page relying on almost no content _except_ these sorts of words.	+	I tend to agree with [[User:Quicksilver\|Quicksilver]]'s comment: not only is the comic poking fun at Wikipedia's propensity for using these words, but Randall's comic has created a page relying on almost no content _except_ these sorts of words. {{unsigned ip\|141.101.81.216}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 21 February 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:
	The page is still redirecting to the wikipedia page on xkcd, how long do you think it will be before the original content is restored? [[User:Whiskey07\|Whiskey07]] ([[User talk:Whiskey07\|talk]]) 11:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)		The page is still redirecting to the wikipedia page on xkcd, how long do you think it will be before the original content is restored? [[User:Whiskey07\|Whiskey07]] ([[User talk:Whiskey07\|talk]]) 11:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
	:Never. The page has now been fully, indefinitely protected. Good thing too. [[User:NealCruco\|NealCruco]] ([[User talk:NealCruco\|talk]]) 21:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)		:Never. The page has now been fully, indefinitely protected. Good thing too. [[User:NealCruco\|NealCruco]] ([[User talk:NealCruco\|talk]]) 21:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	I tend to agree with [[User:Quicksilver\|Quicksilver]]'s comment: not only is the comic poking fun at Wikipedia's propensity for using these words, but Randall's comic has created a page relying on almost no content _except_ these sorts of words.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 27 December 2013
Line 13:		Line 13:


−	The page is still redirecting to ~~whe~~ wikipedia page on xkcd, how long do you think it will be before the original content is restored? [[User:Whiskey07\|Whiskey07]] ([[User talk:Whiskey07\|talk]]) 11:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)	+	The page is still redirecting to the wikipedia page on xkcd, how long do you think it will be before the original content is restored? [[User:Whiskey07\|Whiskey07]] ([[User talk:Whiskey07\|talk]]) 11:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
		+	:Never. The page has now been fully, indefinitely protected. Good thing too. [[User:NealCruco\|NealCruco]] ([[User talk:NealCruco\|talk]]) 21:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 21 November 2013
Line 13:		Line 13:


−	The page is still redirecting to whe wikipedia page on xkcd, how long before the original content is restored? [[User:Whiskey07\|Whiskey07]] ([[User talk:Whiskey07\|talk]]) 11:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)	+	The page is still redirecting to whe wikipedia page on xkcd, how long do you think it will be before the original content is restored? [[User:Whiskey07\|Whiskey07]] ([[User talk:Whiskey07\|talk]]) 11:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 21 November 2013
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I have a feeling that the main point of this comic was that the words "portmanteau" and "neologism" (and maybe even "malapropism") appear disproportionately more on Wikipedia than other references. I certainly would agree with that sentiment. --[[User:Quicksilver\|Quicksilver]] ([[User talk:Quicksilver\|talk]]) 02:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)		I have a feeling that the main point of this comic was that the words "portmanteau" and "neologism" (and maybe even "malapropism") appear disproportionately more on Wikipedia than other references. I certainly would agree with that sentiment. --[[User:Quicksilver\|Quicksilver]] ([[User talk:Quicksilver\|talk]]) 02:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	The page is still redirecting to whe wikipedia page on xkcd, how long before the original content is restored? [[User:Whiskey07\|Whiskey07]] ([[User talk:Whiskey07\|talk]]) 11:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)