Talk:754: Dependencies - Revision history

625571b7-aa66-4f98-ac5c-92464cfb4ed8: Someone please confirm this!

2017-03-21T01:00:23Z

Someone please confirm this!

173.245.56.71 at 12:46, 1 July 2016

2016-07-01T12:46:14Z

108.162.216.209: Spelling

2014-12-05T20:38:12Z

Spelling

108.162.216.209 at 20:36, 5 December 2014

2014-12-05T20:36:31Z

108.162.216.209: Unlikely explanation

2014-12-05T20:32:11Z

Unlikely explanation

Troy0 at 07:04, 17 August 2014

2014-08-17T07:04:40Z

108.162.238.215 at 02:23, 18 April 2014

2014-04-18T02:23:38Z

108.162.221.9 at 01:09, 17 April 2014

2014-04-17T01:09:04Z

108.162.221.9 at 01:00, 17 April 2014

2014-04-17T01:00:58Z

141.101.81.216 at 06:36, 24 February 2014

2014-02-24T06:36:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:00, 21 March 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:

	About the third/fourth year things: I don't know how it works at all U.S. schools, but at mine just because a class starts with a 3 or a 4 doesn't mean it HAS to be taken in that year. Because of the way the pre-reqs (for my major, at my school) work, I can take a 2000-level class, then a 3000-level, then a 4000 and some more 3000s... so a "fourth year" class can be taken before a "third year", just in general. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.71\|173.245.56.71]] 12:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)		About the third/fourth year things: I don't know how it works at all U.S. schools, but at mine just because a class starts with a 3 or a 4 doesn't mean it HAS to be taken in that year. Because of the way the pre-reqs (for my major, at my school) work, I can take a 2000-level class, then a 3000-level, then a 4000 and some more 3000s... so a "fourth year" class can be taken before a "third year", just in general. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.71\|173.245.56.71]] 12:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	I was trying to read the next course, and here's what I saw:
		+	"Computer" \| CPSC 433 \| Advanced compiler design \| DHTL 101

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:46, 1 July 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:Alternately, the title text could be a meta joke where course prerequisites are confused with {{w\|system requirements}}. System requirements tell the user what other hardware or software are requied in order for a piece of software to run properly, such as a minimum amount of RAM or a particular operating system. The inclusion of glibc2.5 in the prerequisites might mean that the student needs to have this package loaded rather than be familiar with it. --[[User:Smperron\|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron\|talk]])		:Alternately, the title text could be a meta joke where course prerequisites are confused with {{w\|system requirements}}. System requirements tell the user what other hardware or software are requied in order for a piece of software to run properly, such as a minimum amount of RAM or a particular operating system. The inclusion of glibc2.5 in the prerequisites might mean that the student needs to have this package loaded rather than be familiar with it. --[[User:Smperron\|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron\|talk]])
	:: This does not fit with the context of the joke (which is about dependencies) also clearly all other items in the title text are dependency related, therefore this is very unlikely. However the current description may be incorrect and the glibc2.5 or later comment may just be the author intentionally confusing prerequisite and package management dependencies. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209\|108.162.216.209]] 20:32, 5 December 2014 (UTC)		:: This does not fit with the context of the joke (which is about dependencies) also clearly all other items in the title text are dependency related, therefore this is very unlikely. However the current description may be incorrect and the glibc2.5 or later comment may just be the author intentionally confusing prerequisite and package management dependencies. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209\|108.162.216.209]] 20:32, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	About the third/fourth year things: I don't know how it works at all U.S. schools, but at mine just because a class starts with a 3 or a 4 doesn't mean it HAS to be taken in that year. Because of the way the pre-reqs (for my major, at my school) work, I can take a 2000-level class, then a 3000-level, then a 4000 and some more 3000s... so a "fourth year" class can be taken before a "third year", just in general. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.71\|173.245.56.71]] 12:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Added to the talk as it was removed from the main content:
 :Alternately, the title text could be a meta joke where course prerequisites are confused with {{w|system requirements}}. System requirements tell the user what other hardware or software are requied in order for a piece of software to run properly, such as a minimum amount of RAM or a particular operating system. The inclusion of glibc2.5 in the prerequisites might mean that the student needs to have this package loaded rather than be familiar with it. --[[User:Smperron|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron|talk]])
-:: This does not fit with the context of the joke (which is about dependencies) also clearly all other items in the title text are dependency related, therefore this is very unlikely. How ever the curent discription may be incorect and the glibc2.5 or later comment may just be the author dilibritly confusing prereques and package management dependencies . [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209|108.162.216.209]] 20:32, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
+:: This does not fit with the context of the joke (which is about dependencies) also clearly all other items in the title text are dependency related, therefore this is very unlikely. However the current description may be incorrect and the glibc2.5 or later comment may just be the author intentionally confusing prerequisite and package management dependencies. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209|108.162.216.209]] 20:32, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Added to the talk as it was removed from the main content:
 :Alternately, the title text could be a meta joke where course prerequisites are confused with {{w|system requirements}}. System requirements tell the user what other hardware or software are requied in order for a piece of software to run properly, such as a minimum amount of RAM or a particular operating system. The inclusion of glibc2.5 in the prerequisites might mean that the student needs to have this package loaded rather than be familiar with it. --[[User:Smperron|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron|talk]])
-:: This does not fit with the context of the joke (which is about dependencies) also clearly all other items in the title text are dependency related, therefore this is very unlikely. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209|108.162.216.209]] 20:32, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
+:: This does not fit with the context of the joke (which is about dependencies) also clearly all other items in the title text are dependency related, therefore this is very unlikely. How ever the curent discription may be incorect and the glibc2.5 or later comment may just be the author dilibritly confusing prereques and package management dependencies . [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209|108.162.216.209]] 20:32, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 5 December 2014
Line 8:		Line 8:

	CPSC 432 lists itself as a ''pre''req, not a ''co''req. A coreq can be satisfied by enrolling in the original course and the coreq course at the same time; however, prior completion of the course is required in the case of a prereq. So the dependency problem here cannot be solved by allowing a course to satisfy itself, and as a result, no one will be able to enroll in this course. The joke here is thus that the instructor of a course on dependency resolution created a dependency problem himself. --[[User:Troy0\|Troy0]] ([[User talk:Troy0\|talk]]) 07:04, 17 August 2014 (UTC)		CPSC 432 lists itself as a ''pre''req, not a ''co''req. A coreq can be satisfied by enrolling in the original course and the coreq course at the same time; however, prior completion of the course is required in the case of a prereq. So the dependency problem here cannot be solved by allowing a course to satisfy itself, and as a result, no one will be able to enroll in this course. The joke here is thus that the instructor of a course on dependency resolution created a dependency problem himself. --[[User:Troy0\|Troy0]] ([[User talk:Troy0\|talk]]) 07:04, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	Added to the talk as it was removed from the main content:
		+	:Alternately, the title text could be a meta joke where course prerequisites are confused with {{w\|system requirements}}. System requirements tell the user what other hardware or software are requied in order for a piece of software to run properly, such as a minimum amount of RAM or a particular operating system. The inclusion of glibc2.5 in the prerequisites might mean that the student needs to have this package loaded rather than be familiar with it. --[[User:Smperron\|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron\|talk]])
		+	:: This does not fit with the context of the joke (which is about dependencies) also clearly all other items in the title text are dependency related, therefore this is very unlikely. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.209\|108.162.216.209]] 20:32, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:04, 17 August 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:

	"Yes, Microsoft CRT 9.0 or later is acceptable. But you should probably think about getting MinGW, Cygwin, or just switch to Linux." (groan) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.9\|108.162.221.9]] 01:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)		"Yes, Microsoft CRT 9.0 or later is acceptable. But you should probably think about getting MinGW, Cygwin, or just switch to Linux." (groan) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.9\|108.162.221.9]] 01:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	CPSC 432 lists itself as a ''pre''req, not a ''co''req. A coreq can be satisfied by enrolling in the original course and the coreq course at the same time; however, prior completion of the course is required in the case of a prereq. So the dependency problem here cannot be solved by allowing a course to satisfy itself, and as a result, no one will be able to enroll in this course. The joke here is thus that the instructor of a course on dependency resolution created a dependency problem himself. --[[User:Troy0\|Troy0]] ([[User talk:Troy0\|talk]]) 07:04, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:23, 18 April 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	In response to the programmer at [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]]: yes, it's probably too technical for non-programmers. But then again, so is the comic. It's a programming (or logic) joke. Unfortunately the level of knowledge required to 'get' some of Randall's humour can't always be reduced down to a simplistic lowest common denominator. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.81.216\|141.101.81.216]] 06:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)		In response to the programmer at [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]]: yes, it's probably too technical for non-programmers. But then again, so is the comic. It's a programming (or logic) joke. Unfortunately the level of knowledge required to 'get' some of Randall's humour can't always be reduced down to a simplistic lowest common denominator. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.81.216\|141.101.81.216]] 06:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

−	"Yes, Microsoft CRT 9.0 or later is acceptable. But you should probably think about getting MinGW, Cygwin, or just ~~switching~~ to Linux." (groan) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.9\|108.162.221.9]] 01:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)	+	"Yes, Microsoft CRT 9.0 or later is acceptable. But you should probably think about getting MinGW, Cygwin, or just switch to Linux." (groan) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.9\|108.162.221.9]] 01:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:09, 17 April 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	In response to the programmer at [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]]: yes, it's probably too technical for non-programmers. But then again, so is the comic. It's a programming (or logic) joke. Unfortunately the level of knowledge required to 'get' some of Randall's humour can't always be reduced down to a simplistic lowest common denominator. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.81.216\|141.101.81.216]] 06:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)		In response to the programmer at [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]]: yes, it's probably too technical for non-programmers. But then again, so is the comic. It's a programming (or logic) joke. Unfortunately the level of knowledge required to 'get' some of Randall's humour can't always be reduced down to a simplistic lowest common denominator. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.81.216\|141.101.81.216]] 06:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

−	"Yes, Microsoft CRT 9.0 is ~~also~~ acceptable.~~..but I recommend version 10~~ or ~~later~~." (groan) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.9\|108.162.221.9]] 01:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)	+	"Yes, Microsoft CRT 9.0 or later is acceptable. But you should probably think about getting MinGW, Cygwin, or just switching to Linux." (groan) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.9\|108.162.221.9]] 01:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:00, 17 April 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:

	In response to the programmer at [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]]: yes, it's probably too technical for non-programmers. But then again, so is the comic. It's a programming (or logic) joke. Unfortunately the level of knowledge required to 'get' some of Randall's humour can't always be reduced down to a simplistic lowest common denominator. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.81.216\|141.101.81.216]] 06:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)		In response to the programmer at [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]]: yes, it's probably too technical for non-programmers. But then again, so is the comic. It's a programming (or logic) joke. Unfortunately the level of knowledge required to 'get' some of Randall's humour can't always be reduced down to a simplistic lowest common denominator. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.81.216\|141.101.81.216]] 06:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	"Yes, Microsoft CRT 9.0 is also acceptable...but I recommend version 10 or later." (groan) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.9\|108.162.221.9]] 01:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:36, 24 February 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I'm a programmer so I'm ok with the explanation, but it seems too technical for non programmers. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]] 02:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)		I'm a programmer so I'm ok with the explanation, but it seems too technical for non programmers. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]] 02:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	In response to the programmer at [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196\|108.162.212.196]]: yes, it's probably too technical for non-programmers. But then again, so is the comic. It's a programming (or logic) joke. Unfortunately the level of knowledge required to 'get' some of Randall's humour can't always be reduced down to a simplistic lowest common denominator. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.81.216\|141.101.81.216]] 06:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)