Talk:767: Temper - Revision history

《プロキシ》 at 13:46, 18 May 2026

2026-05-18T13:46:04Z

74.214.172.51 at 13:44, 18 May 2026

2026-05-18T13:44:30Z

2.98.65.8 at 19:15, 24 October 2025

2025-10-24T19:15:34Z

《プロキシ》 at 18:07, 24 October 2025

2025-10-24T18:07:21Z

《プロキシ》 at 18:06, 24 October 2025

2025-10-24T18:06:49Z

42.book.addict at 18:42, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T18:42:44Z

162.158.78.196 at 23:37, 5 April 2018

2018-04-05T23:37:16Z

162.158.154.229 at 12:38, 3 April 2017

2017-04-03T12:38:24Z

Davidy22 at 13:33, 27 January 2015

2015-01-27T13:33:02Z

Weatherlawyer: Created page with "A blade with no temper is a letter opener or a butter knife. One that keeps its temper perfectly is good enough for the best swords."

2015-01-26T21:28:35Z

Created page with "A blade with no temper is a letter opener or a butter knife. One that keeps its temper perfectly is good enough for the best swords."

New page

A blade with no temper is a letter opener or a butter knife. One that keeps its temper perfectly is good enough for the best swords.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:46, 18 May 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:

	It wasn’t my own invention, sorry..I found it on the Internet when using Google Fu of my own to try to further explain the comic past this page. (“Fred Rogers controversy”) [[Special:Contributions/74.214.172.51\|74.214.172.51]] 13:44, 18 May 2026 (UTC)		It wasn’t my own invention, sorry..I found it on the Internet when using Google Fu of my own to try to further explain the comic past this page. (“Fred Rogers controversy”) [[Special:Contributions/74.214.172.51\|74.214.172.51]] 13:44, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
		+
		+	Update: Forgot to log in. This is me, sorry. 《プロキシ》(XKCD中毒者) 13:46, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:44, 18 May 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:I see absolutely no credible (or even incredible) hint out there that echoes that idea. She survived him, and lived until 2021, plenty of time to have outed herself if she'd have wanted to. Meanwhile Fred Rogers identified himself as being platonically bisexual ''and'' seemingly happily married to Sara Joanne Rogers (neé Byrd), so it would seem even more unlikely to have persuaded her to have denied this, even to preserve his legacy. I call shenanigans on this suggestion, or you're thinking of two entirely different people entirely, or just an existing conspiracy theory that hasn't even been considered popular enough to spread.		:I see absolutely no credible (or even incredible) hint out there that echoes that idea. She survived him, and lived until 2021, plenty of time to have outed herself if she'd have wanted to. Meanwhile Fred Rogers identified himself as being platonically bisexual ''and'' seemingly happily married to Sara Joanne Rogers (neé Byrd), so it would seem even more unlikely to have persuaded her to have denied this, even to preserve his legacy. I call shenanigans on this suggestion, or you're thinking of two entirely different people entirely, or just an existing conspiracy theory that hasn't even been considered popular enough to spread.
	:But maybe I'm wrong, and my Google Fu has failed me (or been got at by the Mister Rogers Protection Agency!)... Please do add (however wrong it is) a link to what you mean, if it wasn't entirely your own invention. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8\|2.98.65.8]] 19:15, 24 October 2025 (UTC)		:But maybe I'm wrong, and my Google Fu has failed me (or been got at by the Mister Rogers Protection Agency!)... Please do add (however wrong it is) a link to what you mean, if it wasn't entirely your own invention. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8\|2.98.65.8]] 19:15, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
		+
		+	It wasn’t my own invention, sorry..I found it on the Internet when using Google Fu of my own to try to further explain the comic past this page. (“Fred Rogers controversy”) [[Special:Contributions/74.214.172.51\|74.214.172.51]] 13:44, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:15, 24 October 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:

	What about the controversy in which he told his wife to stay in the closet and not come out as gay?《プロキシ》(XKCD中毒者) 18:07, 24 October 2025 (UTC)		What about the controversy in which he told his wife to stay in the closet and not come out as gay?《プロキシ》(XKCD中毒者) 18:07, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
		+	:I see absolutely no credible (or even incredible) hint out there that echoes that idea. She survived him, and lived until 2021, plenty of time to have outed herself if she'd have wanted to. Meanwhile Fred Rogers identified himself as being platonically bisexual ''and'' seemingly happily married to Sara Joanne Rogers (neé Byrd), so it would seem even more unlikely to have persuaded her to have denied this, even to preserve his legacy. I call shenanigans on this suggestion, or you're thinking of two entirely different people entirely, or just an existing conspiracy theory that hasn't even been considered popular enough to spread.
		+	:But maybe I'm wrong, and my Google Fu has failed me (or been got at by the Mister Rogers Protection Agency!)... Please do add (however wrong it is) a link to what you mean, if it wasn't entirely your own invention. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8\|2.98.65.8]] 19:15, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 24 October 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:
	One time, someone stole Fred Rodger's car but gave it back and sincerely apologized once he realized whose car he stole. Or so I've been told. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.78.196\|23:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)}}		One time, someone stole Fred Rodger's car but gave it back and sincerely apologized once he realized whose car he stole. Or so I've been told. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.78.196\|23:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)}}

−	What about the controversy in which he told his wife to stay in the closet and not come out as gay?	+	What about the controversy in which he told his wife to stay in the closet and not come out as gay?《プロキシ》(XKCD中毒者) 18:07, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 24 October 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:

	One time, someone stole Fred Rodger's car but gave it back and sincerely apologized once he realized whose car he stole. Or so I've been told. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.78.196\|23:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)}}		One time, someone stole Fred Rodger's car but gave it back and sincerely apologized once he realized whose car he stole. Or so I've been told. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.78.196\|23:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)}}
		+
		+	What about the controversy in which he told his wife to stay in the closet and not come out as gay?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 5 November 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I think he is also referenced in what if 146, stop Jupiter. Should it be added? {{[[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.229\|162.158.154.229]] 12:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)}}		I think he is also referenced in what if 146, stop Jupiter. Should it be added? {{[[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.229\|162.158.154.229]] 12:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)}}

−		+	One time, someone stole Fred Rodger's car but gave it back and sincerely apologized once he realized whose car he stole. Or so I've been told. {{unsigned ip\|162.158.78.196\|23:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)}}
−	One time, someone stole Fred Rodger's car but gave it back and sincerely apologized once he realized whose car he stole. Or so I've been told.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:37, 5 April 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I think he is also referenced in what if 146, stop Jupiter. Should it be added? {{[[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.229\|162.158.154.229]] 12:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)}}		I think he is also referenced in what if 146, stop Jupiter. Should it be added? {{[[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.229\|162.158.154.229]] 12:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)}}
		+
		+
		+	One time, someone stole Fred Rodger's car but gave it back and sincerely apologized once he realized whose car he stole. Or so I've been told.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:38, 3 April 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A blade with no temper is a letter opener or a butter knife. One that keeps its temper perfectly is good enough for the best swords. {{unsigned\|Weatherlawyer}}		A blade with no temper is a letter opener or a butter knife. One that keeps its temper perfectly is good enough for the best swords. {{unsigned\|Weatherlawyer}}
		+
		+	I think he is also referenced in what if 146, stop Jupiter. Should it be added? {{[[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.229\|162.158.154.229]] 12:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:33, 27 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	A blade with no temper is a letter opener or a butter knife. One that keeps its temper perfectly is good enough for the best swords.	+	A blade with no temper is a letter opener or a butter knife. One that keeps its temper perfectly is good enough for the best swords. {{unsigned\|Weatherlawyer}}