Talk:770: All the Girls - Revision history

While False at 22:30, 8 December 2022

2022-12-08T22:30:40Z

SilverTheTerribleMathematician at 22:24, 8 December 2022

2022-12-08T22:24:57Z

162.158.75.232 at 12:37, 10 August 2019

2019-08-10T12:37:50Z

Greyson at 14:44, 28 June 2013

2013-06-28T14:44:58Z

31.110.88.49: Glaring typo. Others will certainly remain. (Oh, and I generally assume I'm gonna use Strict; and warnings;)

2013-05-04T04:36:17Z

Glaring typo. Others will certainly remain. (Oh, and I generally assume I'm gonna use Strict; and warnings;)

31.110.88.49 at 04:34, 4 May 2013

2013-05-04T04:34:09Z

Hkmaly: Created page with "The reasons why this algorithm wouldn't work so well in producing stable marriages are * the people preferences may change (especially if they know someone better) * people ma..."

2013-04-17T10:02:27Z

Created page with "The reasons why this algorithm wouldn't work so well in producing stable marriages are * the people preferences may change (especially if they know someone better) * people ma..."

New page

The reasons why this algorithm wouldn't work so well in producing stable marriages are
* the people preferences may change (especially if they know someone better)
* people may prefer not having marriage at all (when rejected by some of their choices)
Still, it's not like there is better algorithm. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 10:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 8 December 2022
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I'm not sure the explanation needs profanity such as "shitty". Sure, XKCD can often be very vulgar and profane, but I think that if the comic doesn't involve such a topic, it doesn't require that. I am still having second thoughts about editing, though (as "shitty" is actually a perfect way to describe something that is terrible). [[User:SilverTheTerribleMathematician\|SilverTheTerribleMathematician]] ([[User talk:SilverTheTerribleMathematician\|talk]]) 22:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)		I'm not sure the explanation needs profanity such as "shitty". Sure, XKCD can often be very vulgar and profane, but I think that if the comic doesn't involve such a topic, it doesn't require that. I am still having second thoughts about editing, though (as "shitty" is actually a perfect way to describe something that is terrible). [[User:SilverTheTerribleMathematician\|SilverTheTerribleMathematician]] ([[User talk:SilverTheTerribleMathematician\|talk]]) 22:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
		+	:You’re right. I made an attempt to use less attention-seeking adjectives. I don’t know. —[[User:While False\|While False]] ([[User:While False/explain xkcd museum\|'''museum''']] \| [[User talk:While False\|talk]] \| [[special:Contributions/While_False\|contributions]] \| [[special:Log/While_False\|logs]] \| [[Special:UserRights/While_False\|rights]] \| [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:While_False&printable=yes printable version] \| [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:While_False&action=info page information] \| [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:WhatLinksHere/User:While_False what links there] \| [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Special:RecentChangesLinked&days=30&from=&target=User%3AWhile_False related changes] \| [https://www.google.com Google search] \| current time: {{CURRENTTIME}}) 22:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 8 December 2022
Line 12:		Line 12:

	You know, when I read the comic, I thought he meant the "girls" who were related to him (e.g. is mother, his grandma(s), his niece(s),etc.)		You know, when I read the comic, I thought he meant the "girls" who were related to him (e.g. is mother, his grandma(s), his niece(s),etc.)
		+
		+	I'm not sure the explanation needs profanity such as "shitty". Sure, XKCD can often be very vulgar and profane, but I think that if the comic doesn't involve such a topic, it doesn't require that. I am still having second thoughts about editing, though (as "shitty" is actually a perfect way to describe something that is terrible). [[User:SilverTheTerribleMathematician\|SilverTheTerribleMathematician]] ([[User talk:SilverTheTerribleMathematician\|talk]]) 22:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:37, 10 August 2019
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:Megan: '...but what about all those girls who do not love you?'		:Megan: '...but what about all those girls who do not love you?'
	:Rob: 'Frankly, my dear, I couldn't care less. They do not love me. Why bother violating their wishes for my own?' [[User:Greyson\|Greyson]] ([[User talk:Greyson\|talk]]) 14:44, 28 June 2013 (UTC)		:Rob: 'Frankly, my dear, I couldn't care less. They do not love me. Why bother violating their wishes for my own?' [[User:Greyson\|Greyson]] ([[User talk:Greyson\|talk]]) 14:44, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	You know, when I read the comic, I thought he meant the "girls" who were related to him (e.g. is mother, his grandma(s), his niece(s),etc.)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 28 June 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:

	sub BetterThanNothing { my (@everyone,@m,@f,@o,@r,@Ps) = @_; while (my $person = shift @everyone) { push(@m, $person)&&next if _isMale($person); push(@f, $person)&&next if _isFemale($person); push @o, $person } my $priority =(@m>=@f)?[\@f,\@m]:[\@m,\@f]; while (@{$priority[0]}) { push @Ps, [splice(@{$priority[0]},rnd(@{$priority[0]}),1), splice(@{$priority[1]},rnd(@{$priority[1]}),1)] } } @r = (@m,@f,@o); while (@r>1) { push @Ps, [splice(@r,rnd(@r),1), splice(@r,rnd(@r),1)] } } @r && push @Ps, [(shift @r) x 2]; return @Ps } # Totally untested Perl for when you /really/ don't care too much... ;) [[Special:Contributions/31.110.88.49\|31.110.88.49]] 04:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)		sub BetterThanNothing { my (@everyone,@m,@f,@o,@r,@Ps) = @_; while (my $person = shift @everyone) { push(@m, $person)&&next if _isMale($person); push(@f, $person)&&next if _isFemale($person); push @o, $person } my $priority =(@m>=@f)?[\@f,\@m]:[\@m,\@f]; while (@{$priority[0]}) { push @Ps, [splice(@{$priority[0]},rnd(@{$priority[0]}),1), splice(@{$priority[1]},rnd(@{$priority[1]}),1)] } } @r = (@m,@f,@o); while (@r>1) { push @Ps, [splice(@r,rnd(@r),1), splice(@r,rnd(@r),1)] } } @r && push @Ps, [(shift @r) x 2]; return @Ps } # Totally untested Perl for when you /really/ don't care too much... ;) [[Special:Contributions/31.110.88.49\|31.110.88.49]] 04:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	When I read 'I love you out of all the girls who love me back,' I thought that he meant...
		+	:Rob: 'I courted a lot of females because I was looking for the best life partner, since marriage is a serious thing. You are the perfect future life partner.'
		+	:Megan: '...but what about all those girls who do not love you?'
		+	:Rob: 'Frankly, my dear, I couldn't care less. They do not love me. Why bother violating their wishes for my own?' [[User:Greyson\|Greyson]] ([[User talk:Greyson\|talk]]) 14:44, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:36, 4 May 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Still, it's not like there is better algorithm. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)		Still, it's not like there is better algorithm. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

−	sub BetterThanNothing ( my (@everyone,@m,@f,@o,@r,@Ps) = @_; while (my $person = shift @everyone) { push(@m, $person)&&next if _isMale($person); push(@f, $person)&&next if _isFemale($person); push @o, $person } my $priority =(@m>=@f)?[\@f,\@m]:[\@m,\@f]; while (@{$priority[0]}) { push @Ps, [splice(@{$priority[0]},rnd(@{$priority[0]}),1), splice(@{$priority[1]},rnd(@{$priority[1]}),1)] } } @r = (@m,@f,@o); while (@r>1) { push @Ps, [splice(@r,rnd(@r),1), splice(@r,rnd(@r),1)] } } @r && push @Ps, [(shift @r) x 2]; return @Ps } # Totally untested Perl for when you /really/ don't care too much... ;) [[Special:Contributions/31.110.88.49\|31.110.88.49]] 04:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)	+	sub BetterThanNothing { my (@everyone,@m,@f,@o,@r,@Ps) = @_; while (my $person = shift @everyone) { push(@m, $person)&&next if _isMale($person); push(@f, $person)&&next if _isFemale($person); push @o, $person } my $priority =(@m>=@f)?[\@f,\@m]:[\@m,\@f]; while (@{$priority[0]}) { push @Ps, [splice(@{$priority[0]},rnd(@{$priority[0]}),1), splice(@{$priority[1]},rnd(@{$priority[1]}),1)] } } @r = (@m,@f,@o); while (@r>1) { push @Ps, [splice(@r,rnd(@r),1), splice(@r,rnd(@r),1)] } } @r && push @Ps, [(shift @r) x 2]; return @Ps } # Totally untested Perl for when you /really/ don't care too much... ;) [[Special:Contributions/31.110.88.49\|31.110.88.49]] 04:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:34, 4 May 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* people may prefer not having marriage at all (when rejected by some of their choices)		* people may prefer not having marriage at all (when rejected by some of their choices)
	Still, it's not like there is better algorithm. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)		Still, it's not like there is better algorithm. -- [[User:Hkmaly\|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly\|talk]]) 10:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	sub BetterThanNothing ( my (@everyone,@m,@f,@o,@r,@Ps) = @_; while (my $person = shift @everyone) { push(@m, $person)&&next if _isMale($person); push(@f, $person)&&next if _isFemale($person); push @o, $person } my $priority =(@m>=@f)?[\@f,\@m]:[\@m,\@f]; while (@{$priority[0]}) { push @Ps, [splice(@{$priority[0]},rnd(@{$priority[0]}),1), splice(@{$priority[1]},rnd(@{$priority[1]}),1)] } } @r = (@m,@f,@o); while (@r>1) { push @Ps, [splice(@r,rnd(@r),1), splice(@r,rnd(@r),1)] } } @r && push @Ps, [(shift @r) x 2]; return @Ps } # Totally untested Perl for when you /really/ don't care too much... ;) [[Special:Contributions/31.110.88.49\|31.110.88.49]] 04:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)