Talk:786: Exoplanets - Revision history

Lackadaisical at 19:43, 29 September 2021

2021-09-29T19:43:48Z

Nitpicking: bickering

2021-09-07T01:03:32Z

bickering

Lackadaisical at 19:12, 6 September 2021

2021-09-06T19:12:51Z

Nitpicking: Can't not answer a question!

2021-09-05T01:19:57Z

Can't not answer a question!

172.69.42.44 at 03:00, 11 February 2021

2021-02-11T03:00:48Z

172.69.42.44 at 03:00, 11 February 2021

2021-02-11T03:00:18Z

Promethean at 01:30, 14 February 2018

2018-02-14T01:30:28Z

173.245.54.11 at 04:53, 11 May 2014

2014-05-11T04:53:43Z

Markhurd: Add unsigned, including times; mention this was 2 years earlier

2013-04-13T11:07:42Z

Add unsigned, including times; mention this was 2 years earlier

Davidy22 at 09:47, 21 February 2013

2013-02-21T09:47:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, 29 September 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::We don't have the infrastructure yet to build things in space, the US is working on it but these things take time, and planning--[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical\|talk]]) 19:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)		::We don't have the infrastructure yet to build things in space, the US is working on it but these things take time, and planning--[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical\|talk]]) 19:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
	:::We don't exactly have the infrastructure to build things on the moon, either, you know. It would still be easier in space. [[User:Nitpicking\|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking\|talk]]) 01:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)		:::We don't exactly have the infrastructure to build things on the moon, either, you know. It would still be easier in space. [[User:Nitpicking\|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking\|talk]]) 01:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
		+	:::Not exactly, it costs money to send materials into space, materials we have to launch from the earth's gravity well, if we could instead use resources on the moon we can then use those resources to build things on the moon and launch them into space from the moon's gravity for less than we could launch those same materials from Earth. Eventually we can transport asteroids to orbit earth for raw materials in orbital factories and we won't have to worry about launching any of those --[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical\|talk]]) 19:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 7 September 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::Not to have a conversation with three-year pauses, but why not assemble the ship in orbit? That way you don't have to use up large amounts of propellant to land ships in the moon's gravity well, then boost the completed vessel away again. [[User:Nitpicking\|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking\|talk]]) 01:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)		::Not to have a conversation with three-year pauses, but why not assemble the ship in orbit? That way you don't have to use up large amounts of propellant to land ships in the moon's gravity well, then boost the completed vessel away again. [[User:Nitpicking\|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking\|talk]]) 01:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
	::We don't have the infrastructure yet to build things in space, the US is working on it but these things take time, and planning--[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical\|talk]]) 19:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)		::We don't have the infrastructure yet to build things in space, the US is working on it but these things take time, and planning--[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical\|talk]]) 19:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
		+	:::We don't exactly have the infrastructure to build things on the moon, either, you know. It would still be easier in space. [[User:Nitpicking\|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking\|talk]]) 01:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:12, 6 September 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:Look at you, predicting the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program Artemis Program]... [[Special:Contributions/172.69.42.44\|172.69.42.44]] 03:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)		:Look at you, predicting the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program Artemis Program]... [[Special:Contributions/172.69.42.44\|172.69.42.44]] 03:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
	::Not to have a conversation with three-year pauses, but why not assemble the ship in orbit? That way you don't have to use up large amounts of propellant to land ships in the moon's gravity well, then boost the completed vessel away again. [[User:Nitpicking\|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking\|talk]]) 01:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)		::Not to have a conversation with three-year pauses, but why not assemble the ship in orbit? That way you don't have to use up large amounts of propellant to land ships in the moon's gravity well, then boost the completed vessel away again. [[User:Nitpicking\|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking\|talk]]) 01:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
		+	::We don't have the infrastructure yet to build things in space, the US is working on it but these things take time, and planning--[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] ([[User talk:Lackadaisical\|talk]]) 19:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:19, 5 September 2021
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Before restarting Orion, why not start with a more modest goal: a facility to ''assemble'' spacecraft on the moon from parts made on Earth? Even without the mining, it'll mean we can launch a craft from Earth in several smaller rockets instead of one big one. [[User:Promethean\|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean\|talk]]) 01:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)		Before restarting Orion, why not start with a more modest goal: a facility to ''assemble'' spacecraft on the moon from parts made on Earth? Even without the mining, it'll mean we can launch a craft from Earth in several smaller rockets instead of one big one. [[User:Promethean\|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean\|talk]]) 01:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
	:Look at you, predicting the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program Artemis Program]... [[Special:Contributions/172.69.42.44\|172.69.42.44]] 03:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)		:Look at you, predicting the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program Artemis Program]... [[Special:Contributions/172.69.42.44\|172.69.42.44]] 03:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
		+	::Not to have a conversation with three-year pauses, but why not assemble the ship in orbit? That way you don't have to use up large amounts of propellant to land ships in the moon's gravity well, then boost the completed vessel away again. [[User:Nitpicking\|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking\|talk]]) 01:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:00, 11 February 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Before restarting Orion, why not start with a more modest goal: a facility to ''assemble'' spacecraft on the moon from parts made on Earth? Even without the mining, it'll mean we can launch a craft from Earth in several smaller rockets instead of one big one. [[User:Promethean\|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean\|talk]]) 01:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)		Before restarting Orion, why not start with a more modest goal: a facility to ''assemble'' spacecraft on the moon from parts made on Earth? Even without the mining, it'll mean we can launch a craft from Earth in several smaller rockets instead of one big one. [[User:Promethean\|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean\|talk]]) 01:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
−	:Look at you, predicting the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program Artemis Program]...	+	:Look at you, predicting the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program Artemis Program]... [[Special:Contributions/172.69.42.44\|172.69.42.44]] 03:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 14 February 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Footfall by Larry Niven is the best example of city-ships in line with Project Orion. Basically the bigger they are the better. Big metal plate with a city on top and nuclear bombs exploding underneath. And the project started in the 50s. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)]--[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.11\|173.245.54.11]] 04:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)		Footfall by Larry Niven is the best example of city-ships in line with Project Orion. Basically the bigger they are the better. Big metal plate with a city on top and nuclear bombs exploding underneath. And the project started in the 50s. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)]--[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.11\|173.245.54.11]] 04:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	Before restarting Orion, why not start with a more modest goal: a facility to ''assemble'' spacecraft on the moon from parts made on Earth? Even without the mining, it'll mean we can launch a craft from Earth in several smaller rockets instead of one big one. [[User:Promethean\|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean\|talk]]) 01:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:53, 11 May 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Also note that this comic is no. 786, which is the amount of known exoplanets. {{unsigned\|‎152.93.147.10\|09:17, 21 February 2013‎ (UTC)}}		Also note that this comic is no. 786, which is the amount of known exoplanets. {{unsigned\|‎152.93.147.10\|09:17, 21 February 2013‎ (UTC)}}
	:But this was released 2 years earlier than [[1071: Exoplanets\|that count]]; still it's interesting factiod... [[User:Markhurd\|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd\|talk]]) 11:07, 13 April 2013 (UTC)		:But this was released 2 years earlier than [[1071: Exoplanets\|that count]]; still it's interesting factiod... [[User:Markhurd\|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd\|talk]]) 11:07, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	Footfall by Larry Niven is the best example of city-ships in line with Project Orion. Basically the bigger they are the better. Big metal plate with a city on top and nuclear bombs exploding underneath. And the project started in the 50s. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)]--[[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.11\|173.245.54.11]] 04:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 13 April 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	There is no indication that SG:A is the city-ship being referenced. Atlantis does not fly by Orion-drive and is in no way the first Sci-fi reference to City ships. They go back at least as far as "Cities in Flight" by James Blish and possibly further, although I've found no evidence of this.	+	There is no indication that SG:A is the city-ship being referenced. Atlantis does not fly by Orion-drive and is in no way the first Sci-fi reference to City ships. They go back at least as far as "Cities in Flight" by James Blish and possibly further, although I've found no evidence of this. {{unsigned\|99.111.149.90\|12:04, 19 January 2013‎ (UTC)}}

−	Also note that this comic is no. 786, which is the amount of known exoplanets. {{unsigned\|‎152.93.147.10}}	+	Also note that this comic is no. 786, which is the amount of known exoplanets. {{unsigned\|‎152.93.147.10\|09:17, 21 February 2013‎ (UTC)}}
		+	:But this was released 2 years earlier than [[1071: Exoplanets\|that count]]; still it's interesting factiod... [[User:Markhurd\|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd\|talk]]) 11:07, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:47, 21 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	There is no indication that SG:A is the city-ship being referenced. Atlantis does not fly by Orion-drive and is in no way the first Sci-fi reference to City ships. They go back at least as far as "Cities in Flight" by James Blish and possibly further, although I've found no evidence of this.		There is no indication that SG:A is the city-ship being referenced. Atlantis does not fly by Orion-drive and is in no way the first Sci-fi reference to City ships. They go back at least as far as "Cities in Flight" by James Blish and possibly further, although I've found no evidence of this.

−		+	Also note that this comic is no. 786, which is the amount of known exoplanets. {{unsigned\|‎152.93.147.10}}
−	Also note that this comic is no. 786, which is the amount of known exoplanets.