Talk:793: Physicists - Revision history

42.book.addict at 19:07, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T19:07:23Z

2022-09-13T05:18:46Z

2020-01-16T19:19:31Z

Cool comment

2017-05-03T00:40:14Z

Needs more explanation

2017-05-02T21:28:27Z

2017-05-02T04:28:27Z

2016-11-10T22:04:10Z

2015-01-26T15:54:47Z

2013-12-30T04:59:35Z

2013-08-02T07:25:15Z

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ::Nobody seriously reads scientific papers all the way through. Most of it is just about conditions used as controls, et cetera. Most people just get by on the abstract and the conclusion whilst seriously interested people get through to the introduction from the abstract before skipping to the conclusion.
 ::: I read the above statement in Raj's voice because of the original comment. Not sure why Raj.
-:::: Probably because of the "whilst"
+:::: Probably because of the "whilst" [[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 15:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 The transcript claims the blackboard contains equations and diagrams. But there is no equation on the blackboard.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ::Nobody seriously reads scientific papers all the way through. Most of it is just about conditions used as controls, et cetera. Most people just get by on the abstract and the conclusion whilst seriously interested people get through to the introduction from the abstract before skipping to the conclusion.
 ::: I read the above statement in Raj's voice because of the original comment. Not sure why Raj.
 [[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 15:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 16 January 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:

	How does the title text take the dismissive attitude to an extreme? What does the thesis statement mean? I would add an incomplete tag, but this comic is so old I don't think I should. If this page doesn't get more thoroughly explained soon, I might add one. [[User:625571b7-aa66-4f98-ac5c-92464cfb4ed8\|625571b7-aa66-4f98-ac5c-92464cfb4ed8]] ([[User talk:625571b7-aa66-4f98-ac5c-92464cfb4ed8\|talk]]) 00:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)		How does the title text take the dismissive attitude to an extreme? What does the thesis statement mean? I would add an incomplete tag, but this comic is so old I don't think I should. If this page doesn't get more thoroughly explained soon, I might add one. [[User:625571b7-aa66-4f98-ac5c-92464cfb4ed8\|625571b7-aa66-4f98-ac5c-92464cfb4ed8]] ([[User talk:625571b7-aa66-4f98-ac5c-92464cfb4ed8\|talk]]) 00:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
		+	:So, uh, it's been two and a half years. Yeah... [[Special:Contributions/172.69.34.20\|172.69.34.20]] 19:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 : Oh great, now I can't help but read the title text in his voice. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.62|162.158.2.62]] 22:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 : Lol accurate  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 04:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
-::Nobody seriously reads scientific papers all the way through. Most of it is just about conditions used as controls, etcetera. Most people just get by on the abstract and the conclusion whilst seriously interested people get through to the introduction from the abstract before skipping to the conclusion.
+::Nobody seriously reads scientific papers all the way through. Most of it is just about conditions used as controls, et cetera. Most people just get by on the abstract and the conclusion whilst seriously interested people get through to the introduction from the abstract before skipping to the conclusion.
 ::: I read the above statement in Raj's voice because of the original comment. Not sure why Raj.
 [[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 15:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
-The tanscript claims the blackboard contains equations and diagrams. But there is no equation on the blackboard.
+The transcript claims the blackboard contains equations and diagrams. But there is no equation on the blackboard.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 2 May 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:

	[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 15:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)		[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 15:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	The tanscript claims the blackboard contains equations and diagrams. But there is no equation on the blackboard.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 26 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	And thus, the character of Sheldon Cooper was born...{{unsigned\|108.28.72.186}}		And thus, the character of Sheldon Cooper was born...{{unsigned\|108.28.72.186}}
	: Lol accurate [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223\|108.162.219.223]] 04:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC)		: Lol accurate [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223\|108.162.219.223]] 04:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
		+	::Nobody seriously reads scientific papers all the way through. Most of it is just about conditions used as controls, etcetera. Most people just get by on the abstract and the conclusion whilst seriously interested people get through to the introduction from the abstract before skipping to the conclusion.
		+
		+	[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 15:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 30 December 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	And thus, the character of Sheldon Cooper was born...{{unsigned\|108.28.72.186}}		And thus, the character of Sheldon Cooper was born...{{unsigned\|108.28.72.186}}
		+	: Lol accurate [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223\|108.162.219.223]] 04:59, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:25, 2 August 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	And thus, the character of Sheldon Cooper was born...	+	And thus, the character of Sheldon Cooper was born...{{unsigned\|108.28.72.186}}