Talk:815: Mu - Revision history

172.68.65.60 at 23:23, 18 August 2020

2020-08-18T23:23:14Z

162.158.165.214 at 15:34, 3 November 2017

2017-11-03T15:34:22Z

Davidy22 at 01:57, 4 October 2016

2016-10-04T01:57:49Z

Blacksilver at 13:13, 3 October 2016

2016-10-03T13:13:18Z

Blacksilver at 13:12, 3 October 2016

2016-10-03T13:12:50Z

108.162.245.181 at 06:21, 10 February 2016

2016-02-10T06:21:09Z

Dgbrt at 22:49, 9 December 2013

2013-12-09T22:49:31Z

Dgbrt at 20:41, 25 November 2013

2013-11-25T20:41:32Z

Alfons: inverse morse potential

2013-11-25T14:56:09Z

inverse morse potential

Alfons: reference to electron spin?

2013-11-20T09:50:30Z

reference to electron spin?

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 "Coefficient of ___ Force"?
 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.181|108.162.245.181]]
 We should do a formal double-blind trial.
 --[[User:Blacksilver|Blacksilver]] ([[User talk:Blacksilver|talk]]) 13:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 3 November 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:Now I know, where I know this graph from: It is an inversed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_potential Morse potential]. Does anybody know, whether it might have something to do with the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franck%E2%80%93Condon_principle Franck-Condon principle]? --[[User:Alfons\|Alfons]] ([[User talk:Alfons\|talk]]) 14:56, 25 November 2013 (UTC)		:Now I know, where I know this graph from: It is an inversed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_potential Morse potential]. Does anybody know, whether it might have something to do with the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franck%E2%80%93Condon_principle Franck-Condon principle]? --[[User:Alfons\|Alfons]] ([[User talk:Alfons\|talk]]) 14:56, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	::First time commenting, apologies if I'm doing it wrong. Anyway, the graph is also shaped much like the [http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/NucEne/imgnuk/bcurv.gif binding energy] for elements (minus the negative part). Coincidence maybe?

	;Title of the comic		;Title of the comic

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I don't understand the max.  Do chair-sitters decrease in productivity as mu increases because they are trying in vain to spin difficult chairs?  In the limiting case of a rigid chair, do chair-sitters vainly attempt to rotate their chairs anyways? {{unsigned ip|75.145.95.201}}
@@ Line 37: / Line 34: @@
 "Coefficient of ___ Force"?
 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.181|108.162.245.181]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 We should do a formal double-blind trial.
---[[User:Blacksilver|Blacksilver]] ([[User talk:Blacksilver|talk]]) 13:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
+--[[User:Blacksilver|Blacksilver]] ([[User talk:Blacksilver|talk]]) 13:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 I don't understand the max.  Do chair-sitters decrease in productivity as mu increases because they are trying in vain to spin difficult chairs?  In the limiting case of a rigid chair, do chair-sitters vainly attempt to rotate their chairs anyways? {{unsigned ip|75.145.95.201}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 3 October 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	We should do a formal double-blind trial.
		+	--[[User:Blacksilver\|Blacksilver]] ([[User talk:Blacksilver\|talk]]) 13:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
		+
	I don't understand the max. Do chair-sitters decrease in productivity as mu increases because they are trying in vain to spin difficult chairs? In the limiting case of a rigid chair, do chair-sitters vainly attempt to rotate their chairs anyways? {{unsigned ip\|75.145.95.201}}		I don't understand the max. Do chair-sitters decrease in productivity as mu increases because they are trying in vain to spin difficult chairs? In the limiting case of a rigid chair, do chair-sitters vainly attempt to rotate their chairs anyways? {{unsigned ip\|75.145.95.201}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:21, 10 February 2016
Line 30:		Line 30:
	;{{w\|Classical mechanics}}		;{{w\|Classical mechanics}}
	Ohh, this is a very ''classical mechanics'' comic. I must have been blind. Shame on me. Look at this angular momentum wheel: {{w\|Reaction wheel}}. One wheel moves its momentum to an other wheel (the spacecraft in this case). This is just simple classical physics, which also not easy to understand without knowing the basics of classical mechanics. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 22:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)		Ohh, this is a very ''classical mechanics'' comic. I must have been blind. Shame on me. Look at this angular momentum wheel: {{w\|Reaction wheel}}. One wheel moves its momentum to an other wheel (the spacecraft in this case). This is just simple classical physics, which also not easy to understand without knowing the basics of classical mechanics. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 22:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	What is the full form of "CoKF" (in the title text)?
		+	"Coefficient of ___ Force"?
		+	[[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.181\|108.162.245.181]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 9 December 2013
Line 27:		Line 27:
	;Quantum mechanics		;Quantum mechanics
	As Alfons did mention above, the graph is related to quantum mechanics. But the spin of an electron is not correct, but maybe a hint. It belongs more to this: {{w\|Probability amplitude}} or {{w\|Quantum tunnelling}} (the latter because of the negative values on the left.) Further investigations are needed.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:41, 25 November 2013 (UTC)		As Alfons did mention above, the graph is related to quantum mechanics. But the spin of an electron is not correct, but maybe a hint. It belongs more to this: {{w\|Probability amplitude}} or {{w\|Quantum tunnelling}} (the latter because of the negative values on the left.) Further investigations are needed.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:41, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	;{{w\|Classical mechanics}}
		+	Ohh, this is a very ''classical mechanics'' comic. I must have been blind. Shame on me. Look at this angular momentum wheel: {{w\|Reaction wheel}}. One wheel moves its momentum to an other wheel (the spacecraft in this case). This is just simple classical physics, which also not easy to understand without knowing the basics of classical mechanics. --[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 22:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 25 November 2013
Line 24:		Line 24:
	:Mu is not μ, which just means micro (one per Million). I can't see the link.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 17:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)		:Mu is not μ, which just means micro (one per Million). I can't see the link.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 17:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
	::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(letter) Mu, or μ], is a Greek letter. It is often used as an abbreviation for the prefix [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro- micro-], but can also be used as a variable for the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction#Coefficient_of_friction coefficient of friction]. [[Special:Contributions/24.41.66.114\|24.41.66.114]] 23:04, 12 September 2013 (UTC)		::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(letter) Mu, or μ], is a Greek letter. It is often used as an abbreviation for the prefix [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro- micro-], but can also be used as a variable for the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction#Coefficient_of_friction coefficient of friction]. [[Special:Contributions/24.41.66.114\|24.41.66.114]] 23:04, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	;Quantum mechanics
		+	As Alfons did mention above, the graph is related to quantum mechanics. But the spin of an electron is not correct, but maybe a hint. It belongs more to this: {{w\|Probability amplitude}} or {{w\|Quantum tunnelling}} (the latter because of the negative values on the left.) Further investigations are needed.--[[User:Dgbrt\|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt\|talk]]) 20:41, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 25 November 2013
Line 18:		Line 18:
	I cannot shake the feeling that this comic makes a reference to the spin of electrons. However, not being a physicist, I cannot quite place the implications. Also, the graph looks quite familiar to me. --[[User:Alfons\|Alfons]] ([[User talk:Alfons\|talk]]) 09:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)		I cannot shake the feeling that this comic makes a reference to the spin of electrons. However, not being a physicist, I cannot quite place the implications. Also, the graph looks quite familiar to me. --[[User:Alfons\|Alfons]] ([[User talk:Alfons\|talk]]) 09:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

		+	:Now I know, where I know this graph from: It is an inversed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_potential Morse potential]. Does anybody know, whether it might have something to do with the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franck%E2%80%93Condon_principle Franck-Condon principle]? --[[User:Alfons\|Alfons]] ([[User talk:Alfons\|talk]]) 14:56, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

	;Title of the comic		;Title of the comic

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 20 November 2013
Line 14:		Line 14:

	::Rick, I hope you don't mind, I've come through and indented your comment the way I think you intended. If this is incorrect, feel free to correct it. [[User:Lcarsos\|lcarsos]]<span title="I'm an admin. I can help.">_a</span> ([[User talk:Lcarsos\|talk]]) 22:33, 14 April 2013 (UTC)		::Rick, I hope you don't mind, I've come through and indented your comment the way I think you intended. If this is incorrect, feel free to correct it. [[User:Lcarsos\|lcarsos]]<span title="I'm an admin. I can help.">_a</span> ([[User talk:Lcarsos\|talk]]) 22:33, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	;Reference to electrons
		+	I cannot shake the feeling that this comic makes a reference to the spin of electrons. However, not being a physicist, I cannot quite place the implications. Also, the graph looks quite familiar to me. --[[User:Alfons\|Alfons]] ([[User talk:Alfons\|talk]]) 09:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)