Talk:816: Applied Math - Revision history

108.162.254.56: explaining IP 108.162's comment

2015-06-08T11:45:05Z

explaining IP 108.162's comment

2015-05-07T20:20:07Z

2015-05-07T20:06:59Z

2014-05-12T19:58:58Z

explosion

2013-05-17T10:45:38Z

Created page with "Where IS the indication that she got the address from Black Hat ?~~~~"

New page

Where IS the indication that she got the address from [[Black Hat]] ?[[User:Guru-45|Guru-45]] ([[User talk:Guru-45|talk]]) 10:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 She must have derived it via the principle of explosion. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.90|108.162.221.90]] 19:58, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
+:Which is a reference to xkcd #[[704]]. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.56|108.162.254.56]] 11:45, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 If you look in the top-right corner, you can see what looks like "ZFC," (Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory with the Axiom of Choice), which is a a dozen or so axioms that all of mathematics is built upon. Because of Godel's Incompleteness Theorems, it is impossible to prove that ZFC contains no contradictions (unless it actually does contain contradictions). If Megan proved the inconsistency of logic, she certainly could show as a corrollary the inconsistency of ZFC, and therefore all of mathematics. Even statements like 2+2=4 could be proven false. [[User:String userName &#61; new String();|String userName &#61; new String();]] ([[User talk:String userName &#61; new String();|talk]]) 20:20, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 7 May 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:


−	If you look in the top-right corner, you can see what looks like "ZFC," (Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory with the Axiom of Choice), which is a a dozen or so axioms that all of mathematics is built upon. Because of Godel's Incompleteness Theorems, it is impossible to prove that ZFC contains no contradictions (unless it actually does contain contradictions). If Megan proved the inconsistency of logic, she certainly could show as a corrollary the inconsistency of ZFC, and therefore all of mathematics. Even statements like 2+2=4 could be proven false. [[~~Special~~:~~Contributions/173.245.52.154~~\|~~173.245.52.154~~]] 20:06, 7 May 2015 (UTC)	+	If you look in the top-right corner, you can see what looks like "ZFC," (Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory with the Axiom of Choice), which is a a dozen or so axioms that all of mathematics is built upon. Because of Godel's Incompleteness Theorems, it is impossible to prove that ZFC contains no contradictions (unless it actually does contain contradictions). If Megan proved the inconsistency of logic, she certainly could show as a corrollary the inconsistency of ZFC, and therefore all of mathematics. Even statements like 2+2=4 could be proven false. [[User:String userName = new String();\|String userName = new String();]] ([[User talk:String userName = new String();\|talk]]) 20:20, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:06, 7 May 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	She must have derived it via the principle of explosion. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.90\|108.162.221.90]] 19:58, 12 May 2014 (UTC)		She must have derived it via the principle of explosion. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.90\|108.162.221.90]] 19:58, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	If you look in the top-right corner, you can see what looks like "ZFC," (Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory with the Axiom of Choice), which is a a dozen or so axioms that all of mathematics is built upon. Because of Godel's Incompleteness Theorems, it is impossible to prove that ZFC contains no contradictions (unless it actually does contain contradictions). If Megan proved the inconsistency of logic, she certainly could show as a corrollary the inconsistency of ZFC, and therefore all of mathematics. Even statements like 2+2=4 could be proven false. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.154\|173.245.52.154]] 20:06, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 12 May 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Where IS the indication that she got the address from [[Black Hat]] ?[[User:Guru-45\|Guru-45]] ([[User talk:Guru-45\|talk]]) 10:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)		Where IS the indication that she got the address from [[Black Hat]] ?[[User:Guru-45\|Guru-45]] ([[User talk:Guru-45\|talk]]) 10:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	She must have derived it via the principle of explosion. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.90\|108.162.221.90]] 19:58, 12 May 2014 (UTC)