Talk:867: Herpetology - Revision history

42.book.addict at 21:13, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T21:13:50Z

42.book.addict at 21:13, 5 November 2024

2024-11-05T21:13:36Z

162.158.78.196 at 00:37, 7 March 2018

2018-03-07T00:37:14Z

Davidy22: Reverted edits by 108.162.219.160 (talk) to last revision by Weatherlawyer

2015-02-21T16:45:29Z

Reverted edits by 108.162.219.160 (talk) to last revision by Weatherlawyer

108.162.219.160 at 14:32, 21 February 2015

2015-02-21T14:32:25Z

Weatherlawyer at 10:53, 24 January 2015

2015-01-24T10:53:47Z

Weatherlawyer at 10:41, 24 January 2015

2015-01-24T10:41:12Z

Weatherlawyer: Created page with ":At their own conference, they retaliate with a chart that purports to demonstrate that douchebags and ornithologists are more closely related to each other than either are to..."

2015-01-24T10:40:28Z

Created page with ":At their own conference, they retaliate with a chart that purports to demonstrate that douchebags and ornithologists are more closely related to each other than either are to..."

New page

:At their own conference, they retaliate with a chart that purports to demonstrate that douchebags and ornithologists are more closely related to each other than either are to "nice people", and they can therefore be grouped into an encompassing "asshole" classification.

Since the intent of the earlier presentation was presumably to rile herpetologists rather than achieve any particular scientific goal, this response seems appropriate.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 5 November 2024
Line 8:		Line 8:
	(Unless you want to join the dinosaurs in a game of how high can you jump from a tree (with enough rope.))[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 10:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)		(Unless you want to join the dinosaurs in a game of how high can you jump from a tree (with enough rope.))[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 10:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

−		+	The funny part is that Ponytail's clade diagram isn't right, either. Reptiles are not a sister clade to birds; they don't form a clade at all. Crocodilians are more closely related to birds than they are to, say, turtles, or snakes & lizards. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.196\|162.158.78.196]] 00:37, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
−	The funny part is that Ponytail's clade diagram isn't right, either. Reptiles are not a sister clade to birds; they don't form a clade at all. Crocodilians are more closely related to birds than they are to, say, turtles, or snakes & lizards.
−
−	[[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.196\|162.158.78.196]] 00:37, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Such a response is more likely to place you into the hands of someone who is planning to set you up. When you are attacked the first, reaction is to close-up. Next you check for damage and alert damage control if you have damage to report. Next you post watches and keep on the alert.
 Once you have information on the source of the attack, the likely intent and how well it was accomplished you draw up a guarded response. You are still not going to be sure that an attack from you will be successful.
 If it is going to be successful an attack will be the last thing you need to do.
 If it isn't going to be successful an attack is the last thing you ought to do.
-(Unless you want to join the dinosaurs in a game of how high can you jump from a tree (with enough rope.))
+(Unless you want to join the dinosaurs in a game of how high can you jump from a tree (with enough rope.))[[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 10:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:37, 7 March 2018
Line 11:		Line 11:

	[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 10:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)		[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 10:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	The funny part is that Ponytail's clade diagram isn't right, either. Reptiles are not a sister clade to birds; they don't form a clade at all. Crocodilians are more closely related to birds than they are to, say, turtles, or snakes & lizards.
		+
		+	[[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.196\|162.158.78.196]] 00:37, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 21 February 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	If it isn't going to be successful an attack is the last thing you ought to do.		If it isn't going to be successful an attack is the last thing you ought to do.
	(Unless you want to join the dinosaurs in a game of how high can you jump from a tree (with enough rope.))		(Unless you want to join the dinosaurs in a game of how high can you jump from a tree (with enough rope.))
		+
		+	[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 10:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 21 February 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	If it isn't going to be successful an attack is the last thing you ought to do.		If it isn't going to be successful an attack is the last thing you ought to do.
	(Unless you want to join the dinosaurs in a game of how high can you jump from a tree (with enough rope.))		(Unless you want to join the dinosaurs in a game of how high can you jump from a tree (with enough rope.))
−
−	~~[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 10:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:53, 24 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:

−	At their own conference, they retaliate with a chart that purports to demonstrate that douchebags and ornithologists are more closely related to each other than either are to "nice people", and they can therefore be grouped into an encompassing "asshole" classification.	+	At their own conference, they retaliate with a chart that purports to demonstrate that douchebags and ornithologists are more closely related to each other than either are to "nice people", and they can therefore be grouped into an encompassing "asshole" classification. Since the intent of the earlier presentation was presumably to rile herpetologists rather than achieve any particular scientific goal, this response seems appropriate.
−	Since the intent of the earlier presentation was presumably to rile herpetologists rather than achieve any particular scientific goal, this response seems appropriate.	+
		+	Such a response is more likely to place you into the hands of someone who is planning to set you up. When you are attacked the first, reaction is to close-up. Next you check for damage and alert damage control if you have damage to report. Next you post watches and keep on the alert.
		+
		+	Once you have information on the source of the attack, the likely intent and how well it was accomplished you draw up a guarded response. You are still not going to be sure that an attack from you will be successful.
		+
		+	If it is going to be successful an attack will be the last thing you need to do.
		+	If it isn't going to be successful an attack is the last thing you ought to do.
		+	(Unless you want to join the dinosaurs in a game of how high can you jump from a tree (with enough rope.))
		+
		+	[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 10:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 24 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	:At their own conference, they retaliate with a chart that purports to demonstrate that douchebags and ornithologists are more closely related to each other than either are to "nice people", and they can therefore be grouped into an encompassing "asshole" classification.

		+	At their own conference, they retaliate with a chart that purports to demonstrate that douchebags and ornithologists are more closely related to each other than either are to "nice people", and they can therefore be grouped into an encompassing "asshole" classification.
	Since the intent of the earlier presentation was presumably to rile herpetologists rather than achieve any particular scientific goal, this response seems appropriate.		Since the intent of the earlier presentation was presumably to rile herpetologists rather than achieve any particular scientific goal, this response seems appropriate.