Talk:878: Model Rail - Revision history

FaviFake at 17:56, 11 February 2025

2025-02-11T17:56:30Z

172.70.162.77 at 06:14, 27 May 2022

2022-05-27T06:14:16Z

172.70.134.47 at 15:56, 4 October 2021

2021-10-04T15:56:22Z

103.22.200.144 at 01:55, 19 January 2019

2019-01-19T01:55:09Z

103.22.200.144: Brouwer Fixed-Point

2019-01-19T01:54:28Z

Brouwer Fixed-Point

162.158.238.113: not the only Fight Club reference in xkcd

2017-12-09T20:53:06Z

not the only Fight Club reference in xkcd

108.162.212.59 at 06:04, 10 June 2017

2017-06-10T06:04:17Z

Thomson's Gazelle at 11:50, 6 March 2017

2017-03-06T11:50:53Z

Thomson's Gazelle at 11:49, 6 March 2017

2017-03-06T11:49:38Z

Johanna-Hypatia: running it backwards one step

2016-09-26T21:15:09Z

running it backwards one step

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 The "this discussion" link doesn't lead to the discussion in question. Please fix? Anonymous 17:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 :I can't see this. But a former add here is fixed, maybe this helps.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 23:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
-::The {{Tl|w}} does interpret the link target as the page name. So when linking to "Page?bar=foo" will not interpret the bar parameter. Additionally because there was a = in one parameter it treated everything before as the parameter name and everything after it as the parameter value. If the first problem wouldn't be a problem at least the first parameter would need to be defined as 1=…. I reverted that part to the old working version. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.109|108.162.254.109]] 13:49, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
+::The {{tl|w}} does interpret the link target as the page name. So when linking to "Page?bar=foo" will not interpret the bar parameter. Additionally because there was a = in one parameter it treated everything before as the parameter name and everything after it as the parameter value. If the first problem wouldn't be a problem at least the first parameter would need to be defined as 1=…. I reverted that part to the old working version. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.109|108.162.254.109]] 13:49, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
 There is a [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Merge_Cueball_.26_Rob|community portal discussion]] of what to call Cueball and what to do in case with more than one Cueball. I have added this comic to the Category:Multiple Cueballs. Since the one who knows the rule to me seems like the best candidate for a Cueball here, I have changed the transcript to make him Cueball. He has the interesting comments of this comic, so maybe it is OK to let him be listed as Cueball? On the other hand someone has previously done the opposite, proving that it is not possible to say that Cueball is any particular guy. But it is just easier to explain the transcript (and the comic) when calling one of them Cueball rather than guy 1 and 2 (left of right etc.)--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:11, 29 July 2015 (UTC)--

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:14, 27 May 2022
Line 29:		Line 29:

	Why not just put a little note in the scale model of his basement to refer to the zoomed in version of the model? [[user:Claire Kholin]]		Why not just put a little note in the scale model of his basement to refer to the zoomed in version of the model? [[user:Claire Kholin]]
		+
		+	Cueball's problems with nesting would be solved if he made the replica of the town ''at a specific moment of time'' - making a replica of the town before he made the replica would avoid nesting entirely since that moment of time would not include the replica itself.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:56, 4 October 2021
Line 27:		Line 27:

	This idea can be used to prove Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem in 2 dimensions. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brouwer_fixed-point_theorem#Illustrations --[[Special:Contributions/103.22.200.144\|Cosmia Nebula]] 01:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)		This idea can be used to prove Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem in 2 dimensions. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brouwer_fixed-point_theorem#Illustrations --[[Special:Contributions/103.22.200.144\|Cosmia Nebula]] 01:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	Why not just put a little note in the scale model of his basement to refer to the zoomed in version of the model? [[user:Claire Kholin]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 19 January 2019
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Fight Club has also been referred to (at least) in [[922: Fight Club]]. I think this should be mentioned, but I'm not sure how to work that into the current text. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.238.113\|162.158.238.113]] 20:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)		Fight Club has also been referred to (at least) in [[922: Fight Club]]. I think this should be mentioned, but I'm not sure how to work that into the current text. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.238.113\|162.158.238.113]] 20:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

−	This idea can be used to prove Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem in 2 dimensions. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brouwer_fixed-point_theorem#Illustrations --[[Special:Contributions/103.22.200.144\|~~103.22.200.144~~]] 01:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)	+	This idea can be used to prove Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem in 2 dimensions. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brouwer_fixed-point_theorem#Illustrations --[[Special:Contributions/103.22.200.144\|Cosmia Nebula]] 01:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 19 January 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Fight Club has also been referred to (at least) in [[922: Fight Club]]. I think this should be mentioned, but I'm not sure how to work that into the current text. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.238.113\|162.158.238.113]] 20:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)		Fight Club has also been referred to (at least) in [[922: Fight Club]]. I think this should be mentioned, but I'm not sure how to work that into the current text. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.238.113\|162.158.238.113]] 20:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	This idea can be used to prove Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem in 2 dimensions. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brouwer_fixed-point_theorem#Illustrations --[[Special:Contributions/103.22.200.144\|103.22.200.144]] 01:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 9 December 2017
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Is this really a sensible interpretation of the "philistines" comment? It seems to hinge on more obscure, original use of the word, and slightly far-fetched. In particular, considering Munroe's other [[922\|comments]] on that movie, I had assumed they were considered philistines simply for cluttering the rulebook with needless pop-culture references, as per the more common definition given on the {{w\|Philistinism\|wikipedia page}} of "[A person with a] lack of and an indifference to cultural and æsthetic values".[[User:Thomson's Gazelle\|Thomson's Gazelle]] ([[User talk:Thomson's Gazelle\|talk]]) 11:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)		Is this really a sensible interpretation of the "philistines" comment? It seems to hinge on more obscure, original use of the word, and slightly far-fetched. In particular, considering Munroe's other [[922\|comments]] on that movie, I had assumed they were considered philistines simply for cluttering the rulebook with needless pop-culture references, as per the more common definition given on the {{w\|Philistinism\|wikipedia page}} of "[A person with a] lack of and an indifference to cultural and æsthetic values".[[User:Thomson's Gazelle\|Thomson's Gazelle]] ([[User talk:Thomson's Gazelle\|talk]]) 11:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	Fight Club has also been referred to (at least) in [[922: Fight Club]]. I think this should be mentioned, but I'm not sure how to work that into the current text. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.238.113\|162.158.238.113]] 20:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:04, 10 June 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:In Germany this scale is called "H-Null" (H for halb=half; Null=zero). So H0 is definitly correct there while HO is completly illogical. The HO can be used in english only because it is common to use O instead of saying zero, while this is uncommon in most other languages. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.101\|141.101.104.101]] 09:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)		:In Germany this scale is called "H-Null" (H for halb=half; Null=zero). So H0 is definitly correct there while HO is completly illogical. The HO can be used in english only because it is common to use O instead of saying zero, while this is uncommon in most other languages. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.101\|141.101.104.101]] 09:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
		+	::How is half of zero logical but half of O isn't? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.59\|108.162.212.59]] 06:04, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

	The "this discussion" link doesn't lead to the discussion in question. Please fix? Anonymous 17:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)		The "this discussion" link doesn't lead to the discussion in question. Please fix? Anonymous 17:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 6 March 2017
Line 21:		Line 21:
	The original width of the section of real world being modeled (18m * 87) works out to 1 mile. [[User:Johanna-Hypatia\|Johanna-Hypatia]] ([[User talk:Johanna-Hypatia\|talk]]) 21:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)		The original width of the section of real world being modeled (18m * 87) works out to 1 mile. [[User:Johanna-Hypatia\|Johanna-Hypatia]] ([[User talk:Johanna-Hypatia\|talk]]) 21:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

−	Is this really a sensible interpretation of the "philistines" comment? It seems to hinge on more obscure, original use of the word, and slightly far-fetched. In particular, considering Munroe's other [[922\|comments]] on that movie, I had assumed they were considered philistines simply for cluttering the rulebook with needless pop-culture references, as per the more common definition given on the {{w\|Philistinism\|wikipedia page}} of "[A person with a] lack of and an indifference to cultural and æsthetic values".[[User:Thomson's Gazelle\|Thomson's Gazelle]] ([[User talk:Thomson's Gazelle\|talk]]) 11:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)	+	Is this really a sensible interpretation of the "philistines" comment? It seems to hinge on more obscure, original use of the word, and slightly far-fetched. In particular, considering Munroe's other [[922\|comments]] on that movie, I had assumed they were considered philistines simply for cluttering the rulebook with needless pop-culture references, as per the more common definition given on the {{w\|Philistinism\|wikipedia page}} of "[A person with a] lack of and an indifference to cultural and æsthetic values".[[User:Thomson's Gazelle\|Thomson's Gazelle]] ([[User talk:Thomson's Gazelle\|talk]]) 11:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 6 March 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:

	The original width of the section of real world being modeled (18m * 87) works out to 1 mile. [[User:Johanna-Hypatia\|Johanna-Hypatia]] ([[User talk:Johanna-Hypatia\|talk]]) 21:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)		The original width of the section of real world being modeled (18m * 87) works out to 1 mile. [[User:Johanna-Hypatia\|Johanna-Hypatia]] ([[User talk:Johanna-Hypatia\|talk]]) 21:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	Is this really a sensible interpretation of the "philistines" comment? It seems to hinge on more obscure, original use of the word, and slightly far-fetched. In particular, considering Munroe's other [[922\|comments]] on that movie, I had assumed they were considered philistines simply for cluttering the rulebook with needless pop-culture references, as per the more common definition given on the {{w\|Philistinism\|wikipedia page}} of "[A person with a] lack of and an indifference to cultural and æsthetic values".[[User:Thomson's Gazelle\|Thomson's Gazelle]] ([[User talk:Thomson's Gazelle\|talk]]) 11:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 26 September 2016
Line 18:		Line 18:

	There is a [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Merge_Cueball_.26_Rob\|community portal discussion]] of what to call Cueball and what to do in case with more than one Cueball. I have added this comic to the Category:Multiple Cueballs. Since the one who knows the rule to me seems like the best candidate for a Cueball here, I have changed the transcript to make him Cueball. He has the interesting comments of this comic, so maybe it is OK to let him be listed as Cueball? On the other hand someone has previously done the opposite, proving that it is not possible to say that Cueball is any particular guy. But it is just easier to explain the transcript (and the comic) when calling one of them Cueball rather than guy 1 and 2 (left of right etc.)--[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 14:11, 29 July 2015 (UTC)--		There is a [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Merge_Cueball_.26_Rob\|community portal discussion]] of what to call Cueball and what to do in case with more than one Cueball. I have added this comic to the Category:Multiple Cueballs. Since the one who knows the rule to me seems like the best candidate for a Cueball here, I have changed the transcript to make him Cueball. He has the interesting comments of this comic, so maybe it is OK to let him be listed as Cueball? On the other hand someone has previously done the opposite, proving that it is not possible to say that Cueball is any particular guy. But it is just easier to explain the transcript (and the comic) when calling one of them Cueball rather than guy 1 and 2 (left of right etc.)--[[User:Kynde\|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde\|talk]]) 14:11, 29 July 2015 (UTC)--
		+
		+	The original width of the section of real world being modeled (18m * 87) works out to 1 mile. [[User:Johanna-Hypatia\|Johanna-Hypatia]] ([[User talk:Johanna-Hypatia\|talk]]) 21:15, 26 September 2016 (UTC)