Talk:918: Google+ - Revision history

Aaron Liu: sign

2023-10-07T13:47:36Z

sign

The Cat Lady at 13:15, 22 August 2021

2021-08-22T13:15:59Z

Beanie: ok this is harsh but NO ONE ASKEDDD

2021-05-04T11:20:52Z

ok this is harsh but NO ONE ASKEDDD

Beanie at 11:19, 4 May 2021

2021-05-04T11:19:14Z

A female faust: "who's not going to be on facebook?"

2016-06-13T03:37:27Z

"who's not going to be on facebook?"

Cflare at 16:16, 19 August 2014

2014-08-19T16:16:23Z

108.162.219.223 at 06:49, 21 January 2014

2014-01-21T06:49:46Z

Davidy22: Created page with "I really don't mind Facebook. It's not like they look at my data specifically, they're just using my data in an aggregate to better target adverts at me, and I don't have any ..."

2013-04-17T01:23:34Z

Created page with "I really don't mind Facebook. It's not like they look at my data specifically, they're just using my data in an aggregate to better target adverts at me, and I don't have any ..."

New page

I really don't mind Facebook. It's not like they look at my data specifically, they're just using my data in an aggregate to better target adverts at me, and I don't have any issue with receiving ads that I actually care about. '''[[User:Davidy22|{{Color|#707|David}}y²²]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 01:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 -----I just wanted to note that I am not now, nor have I ever been, on Facebook. Although i have of course viewed pages, I do not have one myself, and only use the site when absolutely unavoidable. Nor do i use Google+ (although the more they support anonymity the more likely it is i will at least entertain the notion).  For the most part I agree with Cflare, but take exception to 'who's not going to use Facebook' and the assumptions behind it: in fact it was the desire to provide details about this disagreement, to leave a comment here, that prompted me to register with this wiki (ironic though that may seem). Something about Facebook always feels overwhelmingly destructive to the human spirit, at least to me: as if just getting used to ignoring what you will be needing to ignore to make the service usable would have an irreversible deleterious effect on creativity.-------[[User:A female faust|A female faust]] ([[User talk:A female faust|talk]]) 03:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 :Absolutely no one asked what sites you use (not does anyone care). [[User:Beanie|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie|talk]]) 11:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
-::This is a comments section. Who the hell do you think you are denigrating other peoples' comments?
+::This is a comments section. Who the hell do you think you are denigrating other peoples' comments? {{unsigned|The Cat Lady|13:15, 22 August 2021‎}}
 o7 google+ [[User:Beanie|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie|talk]]) 11:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 -----I just wanted to note that I am not now, nor have I ever been, on Facebook. Although i have of course viewed pages, I do not have one myself, and only use the site when absolutely unavoidable. Nor do i use Google+ (although the more they support anonymity the more likely it is i will at least entertain the notion).  For the most part I agree with Cflare, but take exception to 'who's not going to use Facebook' and the assumptions behind it: in fact it was the desire to provide details about this disagreement, to leave a comment here, that prompted me to register with this wiki (ironic though that may seem). Something about Facebook always feels overwhelmingly destructive to the human spirit, at least to me: as if just getting used to ignoring what you will be needing to ignore to make the service usable would have an irreversible deleterious effect on creativity.-------[[User:A female faust|A female faust]] ([[User talk:A female faust|talk]]) 03:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 :Absolutely no one asked what sites you use (not does anyone care). [[User:Beanie|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie|talk]]) 11:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 o7 google+ [[User:Beanie|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie|talk]]) 11:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ::99.99999% of facebook's problems are PR. They take the "you're holding it wrong" approach, and this is what creates a spiral. Sorry, if you're online, it's public. If facebook simply said that it had to do this for the features to work, allowed people the ability to disable any feature, and geared features so that they aren't co-dependent (or if they are dependent, the setting cascades) then they'd be fine. The, it's our way or the highway approach is effective because, who's not going to use facebook, but it's derogatory and creates demagoguery and unnecessary panic. This is bad for the public, and for no reason at all. [[User:Cflare|Cflare]] ([[User talk:Cflare|talk]]) 16:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 -----I just wanted to note that I am not now, nor have I ever been, on Facebook. Although i have of course viewed pages, I do not have one myself, and only use the site when absolutely unavoidable. Nor do i use Google+ (although the more they support anonymity the more likely it is i will at least entertain the notion).  For the most part I agree with Cflare, but take exception to 'who's not going to use Facebook' and the assumptions behind it: in fact it was the desire to provide details about this disagreement, to leave a comment here, that prompted me to register with this wiki (ironic though that may seem). Something about Facebook always feels overwhelmingly destructive to the human spirit, at least to me: as if just getting used to ignoring what you will be needing to ignore to make the service usable would have an irreversible deleterious effect on creativity.-------[[User:A female faust|A female faust]] ([[User talk:A female faust|talk]]) 03:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 o7 google+ [[User:Beanie|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie|talk]]) 11:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 4 May 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::99.99999% of facebook's problems are PR. They take the "you're holding it wrong" approach, and this is what creates a spiral. Sorry, if you're online, it's public. If facebook simply said that it had to do this for the features to work, allowed people the ability to disable any feature, and geared features so that they aren't co-dependent (or if they are dependent, the setting cascades) then they'd be fine. The, it's our way or the highway approach is effective because, who's not going to use facebook, but it's derogatory and creates demagoguery and unnecessary panic. This is bad for the public, and for no reason at all. [[User:Cflare\|Cflare]] ([[User talk:Cflare\|talk]]) 16:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)		::99.99999% of facebook's problems are PR. They take the "you're holding it wrong" approach, and this is what creates a spiral. Sorry, if you're online, it's public. If facebook simply said that it had to do this for the features to work, allowed people the ability to disable any feature, and geared features so that they aren't co-dependent (or if they are dependent, the setting cascades) then they'd be fine. The, it's our way or the highway approach is effective because, who's not going to use facebook, but it's derogatory and creates demagoguery and unnecessary panic. This is bad for the public, and for no reason at all. [[User:Cflare\|Cflare]] ([[User talk:Cflare\|talk]]) 16:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
	-----I just wanted to note that I am not now, nor have I ever been, on Facebook. Although i have of course viewed pages, I do not have one myself, and only use the site when absolutely unavoidable. Nor do i use Google+ (although the more they support anonymity the more likely it is i will at least entertain the notion). For the most part I agree with Cflare, but take exception to 'who's not going to use Facebook' and the assumptions behind it: in fact it was the desire to provide details about this disagreement, to leave a comment here, that prompted me to register with this wiki (ironic though that may seem). Something about Facebook always feels overwhelmingly destructive to the human spirit, at least to me: as if just getting used to ignoring what you will be needing to ignore to make the service usable would have an irreversible deleterious effect on creativity.-------[[User:A female faust\|A female faust]] ([[User talk:A female faust\|talk]]) 03:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)		-----I just wanted to note that I am not now, nor have I ever been, on Facebook. Although i have of course viewed pages, I do not have one myself, and only use the site when absolutely unavoidable. Nor do i use Google+ (although the more they support anonymity the more likely it is i will at least entertain the notion). For the most part I agree with Cflare, but take exception to 'who's not going to use Facebook' and the assumptions behind it: in fact it was the desire to provide details about this disagreement, to leave a comment here, that prompted me to register with this wiki (ironic though that may seem). Something about Facebook always feels overwhelmingly destructive to the human spirit, at least to me: as if just getting used to ignoring what you will be needing to ignore to make the service usable would have an irreversible deleterious effect on creativity.-------[[User:A female faust\|A female faust]] ([[User talk:A female faust\|talk]]) 03:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	o7 google+ [[User:Beanie\|Beanie]] ([[User talk:Beanie\|talk]]) 11:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:37, 13 June 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Is that you, Mark?? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223\|108.162.219.223]] 06:49, 21 January 2014 (UTC)		:Is that you, Mark?? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223\|108.162.219.223]] 06:49, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
	::99.99999% of facebook's problems are PR. They take the "you're holding it wrong" approach, and this is what creates a spiral. Sorry, if you're online, it's public. If facebook simply said that it had to do this for the features to work, allowed people the ability to disable any feature, and geared features so that they aren't co-dependent (or if they are dependent, the setting cascades) then they'd be fine. The, it's our way or the highway approach is effective because, who's not going to use facebook, but it's derogatory and creates demagoguery and unnecessary panic. This is bad for the public, and for no reason at all. [[User:Cflare\|Cflare]] ([[User talk:Cflare\|talk]]) 16:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)		::99.99999% of facebook's problems are PR. They take the "you're holding it wrong" approach, and this is what creates a spiral. Sorry, if you're online, it's public. If facebook simply said that it had to do this for the features to work, allowed people the ability to disable any feature, and geared features so that they aren't co-dependent (or if they are dependent, the setting cascades) then they'd be fine. The, it's our way or the highway approach is effective because, who's not going to use facebook, but it's derogatory and creates demagoguery and unnecessary panic. This is bad for the public, and for no reason at all. [[User:Cflare\|Cflare]] ([[User talk:Cflare\|talk]]) 16:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
		+	-----I just wanted to note that I am not now, nor have I ever been, on Facebook. Although i have of course viewed pages, I do not have one myself, and only use the site when absolutely unavoidable. Nor do i use Google+ (although the more they support anonymity the more likely it is i will at least entertain the notion). For the most part I agree with Cflare, but take exception to 'who's not going to use Facebook' and the assumptions behind it: in fact it was the desire to provide details about this disagreement, to leave a comment here, that prompted me to register with this wiki (ironic though that may seem). Something about Facebook always feels overwhelmingly destructive to the human spirit, at least to me: as if just getting used to ignoring what you will be needing to ignore to make the service usable would have an irreversible deleterious effect on creativity.-------[[User:A female faust\|A female faust]] ([[User talk:A female faust\|talk]]) 03:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:16, 19 August 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I really don't mind Facebook. It's not like they look at my data specifically, they're just using my data in an aggregate to better target adverts at me, and I don't have any issue with receiving ads that I actually care about. '''[[User:Davidy22\|<u>{{Color\|#707\|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22\|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 01:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)		I really don't mind Facebook. It's not like they look at my data specifically, they're just using my data in an aggregate to better target adverts at me, and I don't have any issue with receiving ads that I actually care about. '''[[User:Davidy22\|<u>{{Color\|#707\|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22\|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 01:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
	:Is that you, Mark?? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223\|108.162.219.223]] 06:49, 21 January 2014 (UTC)		:Is that you, Mark?? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223\|108.162.219.223]] 06:49, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
		+	::99.99999% of facebook's problems are PR. They take the "you're holding it wrong" approach, and this is what creates a spiral. Sorry, if you're online, it's public. If facebook simply said that it had to do this for the features to work, allowed people the ability to disable any feature, and geared features so that they aren't co-dependent (or if they are dependent, the setting cascades) then they'd be fine. The, it's our way or the highway approach is effective because, who's not going to use facebook, but it's derogatory and creates demagoguery and unnecessary panic. This is bad for the public, and for no reason at all. [[User:Cflare\|Cflare]] ([[User talk:Cflare\|talk]]) 16:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:49, 21 January 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I really don't mind Facebook. It's not like they look at my data specifically, they're just using my data in an aggregate to better target adverts at me, and I don't have any issue with receiving ads that I actually care about. '''[[User:Davidy22\|<u>{{Color\|#707\|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22\|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 01:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)		I really don't mind Facebook. It's not like they look at my data specifically, they're just using my data in an aggregate to better target adverts at me, and I don't have any issue with receiving ads that I actually care about. '''[[User:Davidy22\|<u>{{Color\|#707\|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22\|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 01:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
		+	:Is that you, Mark?? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223\|108.162.219.223]] 06:49, 21 January 2014 (UTC)