Talk:Danish - Revision history

FaviFake: /* Danish/Eve should be a main character */

2025-04-13T17:18:25Z

‎Danish/Eve should be a main character

Xnerkcd: /* Danish/Eve should be a main character */

2025-04-13T12:00:35Z

‎Danish/Eve should be a main character

I'mASquare: /* Danish/Eve should be a main character */

2023-11-15T20:55:51Z

‎Danish/Eve should be a main character

I'mASquare: /* Danish/Eve should be a main character */ new section

2023-11-15T20:53:51Z

‎Danish/Eve should be a main character: new section

162.158.79.65: /* Danish should be Eve */

2018-10-08T20:55:57Z

‎Danish should be Eve

162.158.79.65: /* Danish should be Eve */

2018-10-08T20:55:26Z

‎Danish should be Eve

162.158.102.137: /* Danish should be Eve */ new section

2016-03-12T13:43:37Z

‎Danish should be Eve: new section

17jiangz1 at 02:05, 5 May 2015

2015-05-05T02:05:47Z

141.101.98.188: Created page with "Random comment, possibly, but regarding the current "Personality-wise, she is to Black Hat as Megan is to Cueball." Surely better as "Personality-wise, she is to Megan as Blac..."

2015-02-23T17:15:30Z

Created page with "Random comment, possibly, but regarding the current "Personality-wise, she is to Black Hat as Megan is to Cueball." Surely better as "Personality-wise, she is to Megan as Blac..."

New page

Random comment, possibly, but regarding the current "Personality-wise, she is to Black Hat as Megan is to Cueball."
Surely better as "Personality-wise, she is to Megan as Black Hat is to Cueball"? Or remove the "Personality-wise" bit to allow the implied "female counterpart" to shine out instead of implying each pairing ''differs'' in personality, whilst shares with the counterpart... Which they don't in the current order. IYSWIM... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188|141.101.98.188]] 17:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:18, 13 April 2025
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Her number of appearances has been growing, and I believe should be high enough to qualify, given it is (On the last update, which it is unclear how old it is) now at 27, and is a consistent character.		Her number of appearances has been growing, and I believe should be high enough to qualify, given it is (On the last update, which it is unclear how old it is) now at 27, and is a consistent character.
	:I feel the same about this --[[User:Xnerkcd\|<b><i>xnerkcd</b></i>]] ([[User talk:Xnerkcd\|talk]]) 12:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)		:I feel the same about this --[[User:Xnerkcd\|<b><i>xnerkcd</b></i>]] ([[User talk:Xnerkcd\|talk]]) 12:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
		+	:She has much fewer appearances than Blondie, Hairbun, Jill. Once she has more than any of these, we can consider doing this. --[[User:FaviFake\|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake\|talk]]) 17:18, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 13 April 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Her number of appearances has been growing, and I believe should be high enough to qualify, given it is (On the last update, which it is unclear how old it is) now at 27, and is a consistent character.		Her number of appearances has been growing, and I believe should be high enough to qualify, given it is (On the last update, which it is unclear how old it is) now at 27, and is a consistent character.
		+	:I feel the same about this --[[User:Xnerkcd\|<b><i>xnerkcd</b></i>]] ([[User talk:Xnerkcd\|talk]]) 12:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 15 November 2023
Line 11:		Line 11:
	== Danish/Eve should be a main character ==		== Danish/Eve should be a main character ==

−	Her number of appearances has been growing, and I believe should be high enough to qualify.	+	Her number of appearances has been growing, and I believe should be high enough to qualify, given it is (On the last update, which it is unclear how old it is) now at 27, and is a consistent character.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 15 November 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Hmm- This does seem like the logical thing to do, but Danish and Eve (I'm discussing them as separate entities here) appeared rather far apart, and taking into account that Eve was introduced solely for that comic, and Danish appeared in a series of comics, clearly linked. I think naming Danish Eve is a somewhat large assumption, so a simple note of Eve's existence should be enough.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.65\|162.158.79.65]] 20:55, 8 October 2018 (UTC)		Hmm- This does seem like the logical thing to do, but Danish and Eve (I'm discussing them as separate entities here) appeared rather far apart, and taking into account that Eve was introduced solely for that comic, and Danish appeared in a series of comics, clearly linked. I think naming Danish Eve is a somewhat large assumption, so a simple note of Eve's existence should be enough.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.65\|162.158.79.65]] 20:55, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Danish/Eve should be a main character ==
		+
		+	Her number of appearances has been growing, and I believe should be high enough to qualify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 8 October 2018
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Similar-looking character appears in [[177]], where she is called Eve, and Eve has a propensity to destruction too. I think we should call her Eve, and change her name in the whole wiki. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.102.137\|162.158.102.137]] 13:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)		Similar-looking character appears in [[177]], where she is called Eve, and Eve has a propensity to destruction too. I think we should call her Eve, and change her name in the whole wiki. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.102.137\|162.158.102.137]] 13:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

−	Hmm- This does seem like the logical thing to do, but Danish and Eve (I'm discussing them as separate entities here) ~~Appeared~~ rather far apart, and taking into account that Eve was introduced solely for that comic, and Danish appeared in a series of comics, clearly linked. I think naming Danish Eve is a somewhat large assumption, so a simple note of Eve's existence should be enough.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.65\|162.158.79.65]] 20:55, 8 October 2018 (UTC)	+	Hmm- This does seem like the logical thing to do, but Danish and Eve (I'm discussing them as separate entities here) appeared rather far apart, and taking into account that Eve was introduced solely for that comic, and Danish appeared in a series of comics, clearly linked. I think naming Danish Eve is a somewhat large assumption, so a simple note of Eve's existence should be enough.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.65\|162.158.79.65]] 20:55, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 8 October 2018
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Similar-looking character appears in [[177]], where she is called Eve, and Eve has a propensity to destruction too. I think we should call her Eve, and change her name in the whole wiki. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.102.137\|162.158.102.137]] 13:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)		Similar-looking character appears in [[177]], where she is called Eve, and Eve has a propensity to destruction too. I think we should call her Eve, and change her name in the whole wiki. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.102.137\|162.158.102.137]] 13:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	Hmm- This does seem like the logical thing to do, but Danish and Eve (I'm discussing them as separate entities here) Appeared rather far apart, and taking into account that Eve was introduced solely for that comic, and Danish appeared in a series of comics, clearly linked. I think naming Danish Eve is a somewhat large assumption, so a simple note of Eve's existence should be enough.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.65\|162.158.79.65]] 20:55, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 12 March 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Surely better as "Personality-wise, she is to Megan as Black Hat is to Cueball"? Or remove the "Personality-wise" bit to allow the implied "female counterpart" to shine out instead of implying each pairing ''differs'' in personality, whilst shares with the counterpart... Which they don't in the current order. IYSWIM... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188\|141.101.98.188]] 17:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)		Surely better as "Personality-wise, she is to Megan as Black Hat is to Cueball"? Or remove the "Personality-wise" bit to allow the implied "female counterpart" to shine out instead of implying each pairing ''differs'' in personality, whilst shares with the counterpart... Which they don't in the current order. IYSWIM... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188\|141.101.98.188]] 17:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
	I don't think that 15 appearances warrants her to be a Major female character. --{{User:17jiangz1/signature\|02:05, 05 May 2015}}		I don't think that 15 appearances warrants her to be a Major female character. --{{User:17jiangz1/signature\|02:05, 05 May 2015}}
		+
		+	== Danish should be Eve ==
		+
		+	Similar-looking character appears in [[177]], where she is called Eve, and Eve has a propensity to destruction too. I think we should call her Eve, and change her name in the whole wiki. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.102.137\|162.158.102.137]] 13:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 5 May 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Random comment, possibly, but regarding the current "Personality-wise, she is to Black Hat as Megan is to Cueball."		Random comment, possibly, but regarding the current "Personality-wise, she is to Black Hat as Megan is to Cueball."
	Surely better as "Personality-wise, she is to Megan as Black Hat is to Cueball"? Or remove the "Personality-wise" bit to allow the implied "female counterpart" to shine out instead of implying each pairing ''differs'' in personality, whilst shares with the counterpart... Which they don't in the current order. IYSWIM... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188\|141.101.98.188]] 17:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)		Surely better as "Personality-wise, she is to Megan as Black Hat is to Cueball"? Or remove the "Personality-wise" bit to allow the implied "female counterpart" to shine out instead of implying each pairing ''differs'' in personality, whilst shares with the counterpart... Which they don't in the current order. IYSWIM... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.188\|141.101.98.188]] 17:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
		+	I don't think that 15 appearances warrants her to be a Major female character. --{{User:17jiangz1/signature\|02:05, 05 May 2015}}