User talk:TheusafBOT - Revision history

TheusafBOT: /* Congrats */

2026-04-07T18:32:42Z

‎Congrats

45.178.3.49: /* Congrats */ new section

2026-03-31T16:09:35Z

‎Congrats: new section

82.132.239.196 at 13:31, 24 December 2025

2025-12-24T13:31:06Z

Theusaf: /* False positive */

2025-12-24T05:46:35Z

‎False positive

82.132.244.49: /* False positive */ new section

2025-11-28T09:46:51Z

‎False positive: new section

Hdjensofjfnen at 01:48, 24 August 2025

2025-08-24T01:48:21Z

NewCrapper6 at 01:36, 24 August 2025

2025-08-24T01:36:55Z

42.book.addict at 21:50, 20 December 2024

2024-12-20T21:50:57Z

Theusaf: /* User/Discussion Pages */

2024-12-02T17:06:33Z

‎User/Discussion Pages

172.71.122.111: /* Offensive numbers in byte count */

2024-11-29T21:23:08Z

‎Offensive numbers in byte count

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 7 April 2026
Line 55:		Line 55:

	Congrats on you, a very human human being on being 2st in the editing thing in the front page! - [[Special:Contributions/45.178.3.49\|45.178.3.49]] 16:09, 31 March 2026 (UTC)		Congrats on you, a very human human being on being 2st in the editing thing in the front page! - [[Special:Contributions/45.178.3.49\|45.178.3.49]] 16:09, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
		+	:thank you not robot being unfortunately cannot tell website officially am bot ——[[User:TheusafBOT\|TheusafBOT]] ([[User talk:TheusafBOT\|talk]]) 18:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 31 March 2026
Line 51:		Line 51:
	::No worries (not my change, easy to see how it could detect as nonsense and, anyway, you sorted the 28/Nov change on 8/Dec whether or not you followed this note beforehand). And the diff number looks like it got accidentally (pre)truncated when pasting it in - so I've taken the liberty of correcting it in the above!		::No worries (not my change, easy to see how it could detect as nonsense and, anyway, you sorted the 28/Nov change on 8/Dec whether or not you followed this note beforehand). And the diff number looks like it got accidentally (pre)truncated when pasting it in - so I've taken the liberty of correcting it in the above!
	::There was also something yesterday (or day before?) where a number with a lot of post-decimal 9s got squished, probably by running afowl of basic character repetition, but I think that got safely resolved by other means. And, even on explainxkcd, I don't think the balance of need is to be less automatically critical against long runs of numbers. Whatever the contextual threshold actually was that got triggered that particular time. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.196\|82.132.239.196]] 13:31, 24 December 2025 (UTC)		::There was also something yesterday (or day before?) where a number with a lot of post-decimal 9s got squished, probably by running afowl of basic character repetition, but I think that got safely resolved by other means. And, even on explainxkcd, I don't think the balance of need is to be less automatically critical against long runs of numbers. Whatever the contextual threshold actually was that got triggered that particular time. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.196\|82.132.239.196]] 13:31, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Congrats ==
		+
		+	Congrats on you, a very human human being on being 2st in the editing thing in the front page! - [[Special:Contributions/45.178.3.49\|45.178.3.49]] 16:09, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 == False positive ==
-Probably it suffered due to the run of nonstandard characters, I'm guessing, but {{diff|92636|this undone braille}} looks like it should have stayed (without checking the accuracy) and isn't (for example) emoji-spam, or even attempted filter avoidance by non-Latin visually-similar character obfuscations. I might have dereverted it, on behalf of the original poster, but can guess that it would rerevert my attempt too, so leaving it entirely up to 'you'. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.49|82.132.244.49]] 09:46, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
+Probably it suffered due to the run of nonstandard characters, I'm guessing, but {{diff|392636|this undone braille}} looks like it should have stayed (without checking the accuracy) and isn't (for example) emoji-spam, or even attempted filter avoidance by non-Latin visually-similar character obfuscations. I might have dereverted it, on behalf of the original poster, but can guess that it would rerevert my attempt too, so leaving it entirely up to 'you'. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.49|82.132.244.49]] 09:46, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
 :Sorry about that. There was a bug in one of the checks which caused this issue. Your changes should have been restored (although the linked diff in your message doesn't seem to match the description?). —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 05:46, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:46, 24 December 2025
Line 48:		Line 48:

	Probably it suffered due to the run of nonstandard characters, I'm guessing, but {{diff\|92636\|this undone braille}} looks like it should have stayed (without checking the accuracy) and isn't (for example) emoji-spam, or even attempted filter avoidance by non-Latin visually-similar character obfuscations. I might have dereverted it, on behalf of the original poster, but can guess that it would rerevert my attempt too, so leaving it entirely up to 'you'. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.49\|82.132.244.49]] 09:46, 28 November 2025 (UTC)		Probably it suffered due to the run of nonstandard characters, I'm guessing, but {{diff\|92636\|this undone braille}} looks like it should have stayed (without checking the accuracy) and isn't (for example) emoji-spam, or even attempted filter avoidance by non-Latin visually-similar character obfuscations. I might have dereverted it, on behalf of the original poster, but can guess that it would rerevert my attempt too, so leaving it entirely up to 'you'. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.49\|82.132.244.49]] 09:46, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
		+	:Sorry about that. There was a bug in one of the checks which caused this issue. Your changes should have been restored (although the linked diff in your message doesn't seem to match the description?). —[[User:Theusaf\|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf\|talk]]) 05:46, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:46, 28 November 2025
Line 44:		Line 44:
	:::I cannot speak for the intent of the spammer, but can I suggest that by being so totally annoyed by a mere number then you are in a far worse position than merely having being spammed, and by demanding this solution you have opened yourself up to more loss (and vindicated the spammer) than you might have if it was just a transient (and thwarted) bit of random spamming.		:::I cannot speak for the intent of the spammer, but can I suggest that by being so totally annoyed by a mere number then you are in a far worse position than merely having being spammed, and by demanding this solution you have opened yourself up to more loss (and vindicated the spammer) than you might have if it was just a transient (and thwarted) bit of random spamming.
	:::I'm open to hearing reasons why a particular number is problematic, e.g. 64 for June the 4th (more a censorable number, probably, the way that's handled in a certain country), and would be very sympathetic if I heard that a full string of numbers exactly represents the precise date upon which you became orphaned in a particularly terrible train crash. But all of this requires the addition of significance to what are numbers. For any number, N, there is going to be N-1 and N+1 and you cannot avoid the possibility that something needs to indicate one more than N-1 and one less than N+1. And it's so easy to ignore a number. As I will now ignore you. Go away in disgust, or stay and grin and bear it. I'm not particularly a fan of anime (I presume that a fan would know what this number means, and why it therefore bothers anti-fans), but I am tolerant of most things ''except'' intolerance, which is apparently what you're claiming you have (in spades!)... This was my attempt to give you a fair hearing, now it's just me giving you fair notice that I consider you not worth any more time on this issue. Enjoy your life, and I won't even bother to look up whatever those numbers were and leave them as a parting shot. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.122.111\|172.71.122.111]] 21:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)		:::I'm open to hearing reasons why a particular number is problematic, e.g. 64 for June the 4th (more a censorable number, probably, the way that's handled in a certain country), and would be very sympathetic if I heard that a full string of numbers exactly represents the precise date upon which you became orphaned in a particularly terrible train crash. But all of this requires the addition of significance to what are numbers. For any number, N, there is going to be N-1 and N+1 and you cannot avoid the possibility that something needs to indicate one more than N-1 and one less than N+1. And it's so easy to ignore a number. As I will now ignore you. Go away in disgust, or stay and grin and bear it. I'm not particularly a fan of anime (I presume that a fan would know what this number means, and why it therefore bothers anti-fans), but I am tolerant of most things ''except'' intolerance, which is apparently what you're claiming you have (in spades!)... This was my attempt to give you a fair hearing, now it's just me giving you fair notice that I consider you not worth any more time on this issue. Enjoy your life, and I won't even bother to look up whatever those numbers were and leave them as a parting shot. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.122.111\|172.71.122.111]] 21:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	== False positive ==
		+
		+	Probably it suffered due to the run of nonstandard characters, I'm guessing, but {{diff\|92636\|this undone braille}} looks like it should have stayed (without checking the accuracy) and isn't (for example) emoji-spam, or even attempted filter avoidance by non-Latin visually-similar character obfuscations. I might have dereverted it, on behalf of the original poster, but can guess that it would rerevert my attempt too, so leaving it entirely up to 'you'. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.49\|82.132.244.49]] 09:46, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Bot ==
-{{notÂ±ôßË¡∏√ŸH∫›T¶ñû�iÏáT+�»Å”QM��1Œa5JÀ*êT:„ó1˛��M
+{{notice|Know that thou art a bot most splendid.}}
 {{User talk:DgbrtBOT}}

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 == Hi ==
-Hi
+Hi {{unsigned|Stiloes|13:00, 23 March 2023 (UTC)}}
 == I thought it might autorevert 'wrongly' again. ==

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 :The question probably is whether theusaf can be asked to add a handler for the current issue (maybe a bit more general, without generating overreach that reverts genuine changes). Similar things have been done (are probably still active against what was happening then), but it'll need some hands-on work to add/extend this.
 :But only responding in case Theusaf can't get back to you with a more precise answer (and/or solution?) fairly quickly. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.14|172.69.194.14]] 15:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- == Thank you ==
+:Hi 42.book.addict, like others have mentioned, this hasn't been added to the bot's code. I think it may be difficult to add in, as there are valid reasons to remove or replace content from discussion pages. If the content replacing the pages is consistent, I can block the replaced content instead. --[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 17:06, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
 I would really like to thank you for preventing the annoying guy from getting on top of the leaderboard. Please ban [[User:ConscriptGlossary]]. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.2|172.70.162.2]] 12:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 29 November 2024
Line 39:		Line 39:

	::The spammer was repeatedly making such edits with offending numbers. There are many other Anime haters which may be equally annoyed by those numbers, if the numbers went to their talk page. The Anime haters may even sue the whole website or at least the bot. The wiki that [[User:ClassicalGames]] created have been sued, according to reports, perhaps for the same reason. [[User:ChristmasGospel\|ChristmasGospel]] ([[User talk:ChristmasGospel\|talk]]) 20:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)		::The spammer was repeatedly making such edits with offending numbers. There are many other Anime haters which may be equally annoyed by those numbers, if the numbers went to their talk page. The Anime haters may even sue the whole website or at least the bot. The wiki that [[User:ClassicalGames]] created have been sued, according to reports, perhaps for the same reason. [[User:ChristmasGospel\|ChristmasGospel]] ([[User talk:ChristmasGospel\|talk]]) 20:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
		+	:::Wait, what? People who hate anime (not just dislike it, not just ''not'' like it, not just ignore it and watch a totally different genre of fiction or go for long walks over tall mountains instead...) have a specific number that they hate? They'd rip out a page of a phone directory, logarithm book or rip daffodils out of the ground if they happened to form distinct groups of exactly the right numbers to trigger this (frankly obsessed-sounding) rather specialised form of mania-cum-phobia?
		+	:::I cannot speak for the intent of the spammer, but can I suggest that by being so totally annoyed by a mere number then you are in a far worse position than merely having being spammed, and by demanding this solution you have opened yourself up to more loss (and vindicated the spammer) than you might have if it was just a transient (and thwarted) bit of random spamming.
		+	:::I'm open to hearing reasons why a particular number is problematic, e.g. 64 for June the 4th (more a censorable number, probably, the way that's handled in a certain country), and would be very sympathetic if I heard that a full string of numbers exactly represents the precise date upon which you became orphaned in a particularly terrible train crash. But all of this requires the addition of significance to what are numbers. For any number, N, there is going to be N-1 and N+1 and you cannot avoid the possibility that something needs to indicate one more than N-1 and one less than N+1. And it's so easy to ignore a number. As I will now ignore you. Go away in disgust, or stay and grin and bear it. I'm not particularly a fan of anime (I presume that a fan would know what this number means, and why it therefore bothers anti-fans), but I am tolerant of most things ''except'' intolerance, which is apparently what you're claiming you have (in spades!)... This was my attempt to give you a fair hearing, now it's just me giving you fair notice that I consider you not worth any more time on this issue. Enjoy your life, and I won't even bother to look up whatever those numbers were and leave them as a parting shot. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.122.111\|172.71.122.111]] 21:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)