Difference between revisions of "1018: Good Cop, Dadaist Cop"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Explanation)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
| titletext = NOW INVENT AN IMPOSSIBLE-TO-TRANSLATE LANGUAGE AND USE IT TO TELL US WHERE THE MONEY IS.
 
| titletext = NOW INVENT AN IMPOSSIBLE-TO-TRANSLATE LANGUAGE AND USE IT TO TELL US WHERE THE MONEY IS.
 
}}
 
}}
{{incomplete|Language and still a bad explain.}}
 
  
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
 +
{{incomplete|Language and still a bad explain.}}
 
The title of this comic is is a play on the police interrogation strategy "{{w|Good cop/bad cop}}". Typically you have a "bad cop" who is rude and verbally abusive to the suspect, and a "good cop" who acts calm and polite; the idea is that the suspect, scared of the bad cop, will trust the good cop and co-operate once the bad cop leaves.
 
The title of this comic is is a play on the police interrogation strategy "{{w|Good cop/bad cop}}". Typically you have a "bad cop" who is rude and verbally abusive to the suspect, and a "good cop" who acts calm and polite; the idea is that the suspect, scared of the bad cop, will trust the good cop and co-operate once the bad cop leaves.
  

Revision as of 02:22, 15 August 2014

Good Cop, Dadaist Cop
NOW INVENT AN IMPOSSIBLE-TO-TRANSLATE LANGUAGE AND USE IT TO TELL US WHERE THE MONEY IS.
Title text: NOW INVENT AN IMPOSSIBLE-TO-TRANSLATE LANGUAGE AND USE IT TO TELL US WHERE THE MONEY IS.

Explanation

Ambox notice.png This explanation may be incomplete or incorrect: Language and still a bad explain.
If you can address this issue, please edit the page! Thanks.

The title of this comic is is a play on the police interrogation strategy "Good cop/bad cop". Typically you have a "bad cop" who is rude and verbally abusive to the suspect, and a "good cop" who acts calm and polite; the idea is that the suspect, scared of the bad cop, will trust the good cop and co-operate once the bad cop leaves.

Dadaism is an artistic movement that embraces the free flow of unreasoned thought. It has very little place in criminal interrogation.

The comic starts with the "good cop", Cueball, and the "dadaist cop", Ponytail, working out their plan to interrogate the suspect, Hairy. After Cuball makes a few statements, intended to build trust with Hairy, and leaves to get coffee, Ponytail enters the interrogation and starts asking Hairy absurd questions. Hairy very quickly agitated, questioning what is wrong with Ponytail.

Luckily for the investigation, our "dadaist cop" is making a rather effective "bad cop".

The title text builds on the joke as by asking a suspect to give the whereabouts of the money in a form that could be considered dadaist art. Since dadaist art is without reason, there would be no way of decoding where the money is from the confession.

Irrationality

  • See this? It's Mark Zuckerberg's Mortgage. So why is it written in CHURCH LATIN?
  • “WHY ARE MY BONES SO SMALL?”, “What's wrong with ART?”
    • These are non sequiturs and therefore have no place in an investigation.
  • The title text: NOW INVENT AN IMPOSSIBLE-TO-TRANSLATE LANGUAGE AND USE IT TO TELL US WHERE THE MONEY IS.
    • The location of the money cannot be conveyed to Ponytail if the information were expressed in a newly-invented language that cannot be translated, and there would be useless to an investigation.

Transcript

[Two cops look through a window into an interrogation chamber holding a handcuffed suspect.]
Good Cop: All right, let's try good cop, dadaist cop
[Good Cop is seated in front of the suspect.]
Good Cop: Look, you're a good guy. We can work this out. Hey, lemme get us some coffee.
[CHANGE PLACES.]
[Dadaist Cop holds up a document of indeterminate contents and threatens the suspect with it.]
Dadaist Cop: See this? It's Mark Zuckerberg's Mortgage. So why is it written in CHURCH LATIN?
[Dadaist cop physically rattles the suspect.]
Dadaist Cop: WHY ARE MY BONES SO SMALL?
Suspect: What's WRONG with you!?
Dadaist Cop: What's wrong with ART?
comment.png add a comment! ⋅ comment.png add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!

Discussion

A comment from the blog that is quite on and off (you'll get the joke) the topic:

I took a class in college, in French, and we studied (insofar as one can) dadaism, surrealism, and existentialism.
One day, the girl next to me raised her hand and started out, “This is off the subject, but..”… Professor La Charité interrupted immediately, with, “It’s *never* off the subject. Continue.”
We all felt we learned something that day. Giraffe. - E

Hope that explains some things. lcarsos (talk) 17:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Explanation

I think the above explanation is lacking. What's bones got to do with it? How about the language stuff? AND A Mexican bandit robbed a bank. The sheriff and his bilingual deputy captured him, and the sheriff, who couldn't speak Spanish, asked him where he'd hidden the money. "No se nada," said the bandit. The sheriff put a gun to the bandit's head and said to his deputy: "Tell him, if he doesn't tell us where the money is, I'll blow his brains out." Upon receiving the translation, the bandit became very animated. "Ya me acuerdo! Tienen que caminar tres cuadradas hasta ese gran arbol. Debajo del arbol, alli esta el dinero." The sheriff leaned forward. "Yeah? Well..?" The deputy replied: "He says he wants to die like a man." 122.61.61.161 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

It's Dadaism. It means unrelated random stuff. AND nice story =) 108.162.212.206 19:26, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

What's incomplete about this? 0100011101100001011011010110010101011010011011110110111001100101 (talk page) 05:37, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

If you twisted my arm, I'd have to guess that my phone is ringing off the salmon. That's all I can remember at this indication, though. -- Brettpeirce (talk) 11:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
This is why we can't have giraffes. 172.68.10.83 09:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Has Mark Zuckerberg ever HAD a mortgage?108.162.219.164, 27 Dec 1014


Well interesting fact about ponytail then, her bones are small! --Dalonacueball (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 13:35 3/24/2015

The implication, in the explanation text, that wealthy individuals, such as Zukerberg, wouldn't take a mortgage is flawed. Wealthy individuals usually do take out mortgages because they have the ability to generate a higher rate of return from the freed capital than the cost of the interest on the mortgage. Mountain Hikes (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Would the gibberish produced in response to the title text actually count as a valid confession? Even assuming the suspect was trying to do what was asked, which I don’t think is a legally valid assumption, they could be saying “I don’t know; I didn’t take it!”. --162.158.255.142 18:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)