Difference between revisions of "1833: Code Quality 3"
(add category) |
(Added transcript) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
{{incomplete|Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}} | {{incomplete|Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}} | ||
+ | This comic is a direct continuation of [[1513: Code Quality]] and [[1695: Code Quality 2]] in the [[:Category:Code Quality|Code Quality]] series | ||
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
− | + | [Ponytail sitting in front of a computer screen typing. Cueball speaks only off-panel, but since this is a direct continuation of comic 1513 and 1695: Code Quality and Code Quality 2 where Cueball is shown, there can be no doubt it is him.] | |
+ | Ponytail: Your code looks like song lyrics written using only the stuff that comes after the question mark in a URL. | ||
+ | Cueball (off-panel): Sorry. | ||
+ | [Zoom in on Ponytail.] | ||
+ | Ponytail: It's like a JSON table of model numbers for flashlights with "tactical" in their names | ||
+ | [Zoom back out again] | ||
+ | Ponytail: Like you read Turing's 1936 paper on computing and a page of JavaScript example code and guessed at everything in between. | ||
+ | [Zoom in again on Ponytail's face] | ||
+ | Ponytail: It's like a leet-speak translation of a manifesto by a survivalist cult leader who's for some reason obsessed with memory allocation. | ||
+ | Cueball (off-panel): I can get someone else to review my code | ||
+ | Ponytail: Not more than once, I bet. | ||
{{comic discussion}} | {{comic discussion}} | ||
[[Category:Code Quality]] | [[Category:Code Quality]] |
Revision as of 12:42, 5 May 2017
Code Quality 3 |
Title text: It's like a half-solved cryptogram where the solution is a piece of FORTH code written by someone who doesn't know FORTH. |
Explanation
This explanation may be incomplete or incorrect: Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon. If you can address this issue, please edit the page! Thanks. |
This comic is a direct continuation of 1513: Code Quality and 1695: Code Quality 2 in the Code Quality series
Transcript
[Ponytail sitting in front of a computer screen typing. Cueball speaks only off-panel, but since this is a direct continuation of comic 1513 and 1695: Code Quality and Code Quality 2 where Cueball is shown, there can be no doubt it is him.] Ponytail: Your code looks like song lyrics written using only the stuff that comes after the question mark in a URL. Cueball (off-panel): Sorry. [Zoom in on Ponytail.] Ponytail: It's like a JSON table of model numbers for flashlights with "tactical" in their names [Zoom back out again] Ponytail: Like you read Turing's 1936 paper on computing and a page of JavaScript example code and guessed at everything in between. [Zoom in again on Ponytail's face] Ponytail: It's like a leet-speak translation of a manifesto by a survivalist cult leader who's for some reason obsessed with memory allocation. Cueball (off-panel): I can get someone else to review my code Ponytail: Not more than once, I bet.
Discussion
I think the FORTH in the title text also references the CIA statue, which is a cryptogram with 3 parts solved and the fourth part remains unsolved. Possibly also the date May fourth, which was a popular topic on reddit because of Star Wars (and because this comic was posted just after May 4). 173.245.50.102 18:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
No. Unlike the computer on which the Forth language was developed, comics allow words with more than 5 letters to be used, so if it was a reference to these it would have been spelled 'Fourth'. The programming language would also have been spelled that way if Chuck Moore had had a decent computer (but maybe then he wouldn't have invented the language). He reckoned it was a fourth-generation language, superseding third-gen languages like C or Pascal. We all have blind spots about the potential of our pet projects. Or kids. 162.158.38.28 13:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I know Elonka (the CIA Kryptos expert), and I think she'd disagree. 172.68.54.58 15:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Please describe JSON table. Apparently it's some type of programming language that is so popular that Google can't find a definition among all the examples.--162.158.62.21 17:11, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Could the reference to "tactical" flashlights be a dig at the current practice of taking a standard flashlight and adding things like crenelated bezels, high-powered LEDs, multiple flashing modes, heavy casings etc.? "Tactical" has turned into a nearly meaningless advertising buzzword, as a current search on Amazon ("tactical flashlight") turns up over 20,000 listings.These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Does the timing of Halley's comet meteor shower apply to the last panel? Amber (talk) 18:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
As I review this series of comics, I really wonder if the text is intended to be set to music, and if so what pop song it scans against. Any takers? JohnHawkinson (talk) 06:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
I believe this comic strip is a reference to the Deadpool movie, in which the main character, Wade, is given a battery of insults by his best friend. If you look at the behind the scenes footage, you will see that the person giving the insults actually has a much longer barrage of insults before Deadpool ultimately states his impatience, and that the list of insults was actually quite enough as-is. Watch it and you will see the similarities.172.68.146.14 10:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)