Fuzzy, or approximate, string matching
|| This explanation may be incomplete or incorrect: Created by a BOT. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.|
If you can address this issue, please edit the page! Thanks.
is a technique used for searching strings (how a computer stores and manipulates writing) for specified values. Normal string matching would only find results that fit the search exactly. Fuzzy string matching instead finds results that are "close enough" by some metric. This is often used in search engines, as typos, misspellings, and inexact searches are commonplace.
If a list of potential nuclear missile targets were stored, and a fuzzy search was looking for "missile silos", the Missal of Silos would most likely be returned as a result--and subsequently, targeted with a nuclear missile. Why an 11th century piece of writing was a potential target for a nuclear strike is unknown. Missile silos are often thought to be the first targeting priority in event of a nuclear strike, in hopes of preventing retaliation from the target.
Cheyenne Mountain is a mountain in Colorado, which houses an underground compound (aptly named the Cheyenne Mountain Complex) designed to withstand a nuclear strike, armed with missiles of their own. Cheyenne, Wyoming, on the other hand, is the capital of Wyoming. The residents of Cheyenne, Wyoming would prefer their home isn't the target of a nuclear attack because of confusion with Cheyenne Mountain.
|| This transcript is incomplete. Please help editing it! Thanks.
MISSAL OF SILOS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Missal of Silos is the oldest known paper document created in the christian west; it is 11th century in date 
The missal is held in the library of the monastery of Santo Domingo de Silos near Burgos, Spain. It is one of a number of liturgical manuscripts (...)
Spain would like to remind everyone not to use fuzzy string matching in their nuclear strike target lists.
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
We need a citation to prove that residents of Cheyenne, Wyoming would rather not be targeted with nuclear weapons?
184.108.40.206 19:06, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- As no residents have already requested otherwise, let's go ahead and nuke them now. SDSpivey (talk) 19:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Seriously, though, a sufficiently patriotic American living in Cheyenne, WY may potentially prefer that the relatively unimportant city of his or her residence be nuked instead of the more militarily important Cheyenne Mountain Complex. 220.127.116.11 20:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Is the citation needed for the military importance or for the crazy patriotic guy? Linker (talk) 20:40, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'm wondering, why would anyone want to target a site that is expressly built to withstand a nuklear strike? That's like fighting a barbarian princess and try to hit her on the bikini armor instead of the midriff Ruffy314 (talk) 00:12, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Enough nuclear weapons will eventually crack it, or at least that's the idea. Also, military command bases are far more important targets than cities: All nuking cities does is kill millions of people and disrupt your enemy's economy and morale, while destroying command bunkers actually reduces your enemy's ability to fight you.
- My understanding is that most military sites are only capable of withstanding near misses from nuclear weapons. This was adequate with early ICBMs because of accuracy problems, modern missiles however are supposed to be accurate enough to destroy hardened facilities. 18.104.22.168 01:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Nuking cities will also REALLY tick off the UN, which is a plus.
"This is how the world ends, not with a bang, but a spellcheck." (Followed by a lot of bangs). These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For (talk) 07:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
I did not laugh at the comic today. However, I startled people around me laughing at the placement of this  in the description. Kudo's to whomever placed it. DanB (talk) 21:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Wouldn't it make more sense to create a seperate page to collect all the "xkcd-Wikipedia effect" cases? I'm kinda surprised there isn't one already. Model Rail isn't even the only time that happened. One other example being https://xkcd.com/1485/. 22.214.171.124 11:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Does the date of the underlying Wiki revision lend a clue as to the lead time Randall takes to create non-topical strips? These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For (talk) 07:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Checking the revision history, the revision mentioned in trivia (currently) did not influence the displayed part when viewed on a mobile, since it did only remove a picture (which I think usually is below the text on mobile). Actually the last change to the text displayed happened on 30th June 2014. So all we know is that the comic was created during the past 5 years. --Lupo (talk) 08:33, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Checking again, I notice, that the text given in the comic does not reflect any revision, since it misses the whole "The quarto missal has 157 original folios [...]" part. Therefore the trivia stated is just wrong. The article never looked like this. --Lupo (talk) 08:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Similar comics
The format of this comic is highly similar to the recent comic 2042: Rolle's Theorem, with a title and From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia header, and the first few paragraphs in the article.
The fact that the reference of this comic to fuzzy string matching matches 1031: s/keyboard/leopard/'s reference to regex (comic 1031 also has a Wikipedia page format)
Can we have kind of a 'Meme format' explanation and Randall's fascination with this format? 126.96.36.199 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
There have been several comics referencing nuclear weapons in one way of another. Have added link to 1655: Doomsday Clock in the description because there is already a collection of comics about this there. But do we need a category, so that kind of explanation could go there? --Kynde (talk) 14:15, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Why has it been cremated by a bob?
Damn it! I see comments raving about the Citation Needed, and there's none! Did some idiot remove it AGAIN? I'm getting sick and tired of the people who have grown tired of the gag. Just because YOU'VE become jaded and don't find it funny anymore doesn't mean there aren't still people who enjoy them! Case in point, just read the comments here. Be considerate of others and embrace the fact that we're all different. If you don't like the gag, move on to the next comic. NiceGuy1 (talk) 04:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)