Title text: To detect dark matter, we just need to build a bird feeder that spins two squirrels around the rim in opposite directions at relativistic speeds and collides them together.
|| This explanation may be incomplete or incorrect: Created by a DARK MATTER SQUIRREL ON A SPINNING BIRD FEEDER. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.|
If you can address this issue, please edit the page! Thanks.
are talking about dark matter
, the mysterious invisible mass observed indirectly in the rate at which galaxies rotate. Megan states that dark matter's density in the solar system is 0.3 GeV/cm3
, as claimed, for example, by Bovy and Tremaine (2012) "On the local dark matter density" in The Astrophysical Journal.
Cueball does not understand what that means, so to clarify, Megan explains that it equates to one squirrel's mass of dark matter in the volume of the Earth. In the final two panels, Cueball humorously misinterprets this as implying dark matter is actually one or more squirrels, and thereby provides the mass necessary for squirrels to spin on bird feeders designed to deter them
, enraging Megan.
The gigaelectronvolt (GeV) is a unit of energy that can be converted to a mass using Einstein's formula E = mc2. It is typically used for subatomic particles, such as weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), one of several contending possibilities for the still-open question of the composition of dark matter, and one which Megan's uniform density figure implies constitutes most of it. For example, the mass of a proton is 0.938 GeV/c2. However, it is common to omit the c2 denominator, representing masses as GeV or MeV. A mass represented as 0.3 GeV is equal to 5.35 × 10−25 grams . Megan's figures imply that a squirrel has a mass of 580 g  (about 1.3 lb), a typical weight for several species of common squirrels.
The title text imagines using a spinning bird feeder like a particle accelerator, colliding squirrels at relativistic speeds as if they were atomic nuclei, to detect new and exciting particles like the Higgs boson. (Note, however, that accelerating even one squirrel to relativistic velocities would destroy the feeder along with any nearby birds, not to mention the squirrels.)
Squirrels are a recurring topic on xkcd, but are not a serious alternative to WIMPs as a scientific explanation for the composition of dark matter. Since the September 2015 detection by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) and subsequent confirmation by the Virgo interferometer of gravitational waves from unexpectedly many merging black holes substantially more massive than those produced by stellar collapse, primordial black holes (PBHs) have become a popular alternative explanation to WIMPs (or squirrels), attracting proponents at NASA, and other cosmologists for several reasons. But PBHs remain controversial, because if they constituted more than a very small portion of dark matter, alternative explanations would be almost entirely excluded.
Other alternative hypotheses for the observations suggesting dark matter, such as theories involving the gravitational force varying over different distances, often upset cosmologists as much as Megan is shown to be, because they violate the cosmological principle among other issues. Part of this frustration may be due to the fact that even after many decades of careful, tremendously expensive, and often stunningly beautiful experiments, none of the many explanations for dark matter or the observations suggesting it have as yet any support from direct empirical observations.
- [Megan walks with Cueball. She is holding a hand out while telling Cueball something.]
- Megan: Dark matter density in the solar system is around 0.3 GeV/cm3
- Cueball: Is... that a lot?
- [As they continue to walk and talk she spreads her arms out.]
- Megan: In terms of mass, it means the Earth contains one squirrel worth of dark matter at any given time.
- Cueball: Wow.
- [In a frame-less panel Cueball stops while Megan walks past him. Megan is face-palming herself while looking down.]
- Cueball: Is there any way to find out which squirrel it is?
- Megan: No, it's not literally-
- [Cueball holds his hand with one finger up in front of Megan, while she has turned towards him and is holding both arms up, possible with balled fist, as she shouts back at him, shown both with large fat letters and with small lines emanating above her head.]
- Cueball: Oh, that explains why they weigh enough to set off those spinning bird feeders!
- Megan: Dark matter isn't squirrels!
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
If dark matter were squirrels, they wouldn't set off the bird feeders because dark matter can't interact with feeders at all! Especially since it's not to the squirrels' advantage to set them off. Unless, of course, the dark matter squirrels do exist and steal from our feeders freely, but we can't notice because dark matter is unobservable at this scale. In fact, it's entirely plausible that some squirrels evolved to be dark matter for this specific advantage, so I wouldn't rule that out. 220.127.116.11 12:12, 7 August
- Well if they can't interact with the feeders, they won't be able to steal the food either.18.104.22.168 13:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Not with that attitude. 22.214.171.124 14:10, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
I have never seen a spinning bird - can they turn peanuts into gold?
- Yes, but the gold would be radioactive. The much more impressive reaction is to turn gold into peanuts, other than by paying a farmer for peanuts using the gold. Nutster (talk) 14:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- Would I be allowed to pay a merchant for peanuts using the gold? --Lupo (talk) 14:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
I had to google what a spinning bird feeder is. I had never seen one of these before (I live in Germany). Maybe a link to one of these funny videos should be added. Frank 126.96.36.199 19:59, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- ✓ Done 188.8.131.52 01:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- You don't have bird feeders in Germany? I know birds exist all around the world, I would think people like to feed them all around the world... Or maybe you're missing squirrels that jump on them and make them spin? NiceGuy1 (talk) 04:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, clicked the link, never heard of that feature before, LOL! I understood just that when they jump on a hanging bird feeder they tend to make it spin, LOL! NiceGuy1 (talk) 04:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Anyone else who read PBH as PHB, the pointy haired boss from Dilbert? --Lupo (talk) 07:06, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- I always think "peanut butter and ham," from PBJ+BLT I guess. 184.108.40.206 07:20, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- I read it as "Pause Buffered Hitstun". Probably not Douglas Hofstadter (talk) 05:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
In the explanation, I think I missed a step of logic. Are Windows, Icons, Mice and Pointers made up of Dark Matter? It might explain a few lockups in Windows I've been having lately.Seebert (talk) 11:47, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
How can Megan use the dark matter density across the whole solar system to calculate the density within the Earth? If dark matter interacts with gravity, shouldn't the distribution of dark matter within the Solar system be similar to the distribution of normal matter (i.e. much higher density near massive objects like the Earth)? 220.127.116.11 17:40, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
- It interacts with gravity, but in doing so it falls into and through ordinary matter and then just keeps going -- gravity isn't strong enough to slow it down enough to make it bunch up around normal matter. Only galaxies have discernible halos clumped. Most dark matter particles that fall into our solar system would just fall out the other side at the same speed, tossing them into the gravity of another star before they slow down enough to come back, in most cases. The linked density paper talks about the extent of that effect as the basis of their calculations. 18.104.22.168 01:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
For comparison, it would be nice to have the average density of "regular" matter of the earth, the sun, interplanetary space, interstellar space, etc. --22.214.171.124 18:59, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
- It's a little less than one fifth overall. However, you can't really have a local density of normal matter because it's clumped into stars and planets. Even at our scale, what's underneath is almost certainly far more dense than what's above you. 126.96.36.199 01:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)